Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yup, well so far they have lied to me about responding to a CCA,  are threatening me with a default notice that they don't have, produced a knocked up version of my NOA, sent me 29 pages of spew for an agreement. No wonder they pay 5 p in the pound for that crap.
    • Paragraph 2. I think there should be further down and also you should make the point that the payment to was made unilaterally and without the imposition of any conditions. Paragraph 3 – this is unnecessary because you are not claiming as an entitled third-party. This worries me because it makes me feel that you haven't fully read around because this is a paragraph which you would include where you were suing EVRi as a beneficial third party because you had actually made your contract with Packlink or some other broker. I think you need to revisit and do some more reading. I'm afraid I have a sense that you have simply copied this from somebody else's witness statement without understanding that it wasn't necessary. Please can you post the amended draft. Other than the suggestions above, it looks okay – but let's see it again for a further appraisal. In terms of the evidence, parties bundle, I think it might be an idea to start off with the correspondence with EVRi and then go onto the other evidence. You will have to amend the index page accordingly. You could shorten this bit. Take 19 is pretty well blank and you may as well miss it out also, there seems to be some repetition of emails and the email chain. I think will be worth going through and getting rid of duplicates if you can. 49 pages is a bit long and it would be a good idea to try and reduce the number. I have a feeling that 50 pages as the County Court limit anyway. The judge will be happier with you if the bundle is smaller. Maybe you could reduce the size of some of the images or messages et cetera. You have got several messages which straddle onto a second page so that things like sign off information and standard confidentiality information become orphans. A bit of manipulation and they could be joined to their parents I think. Page 31 as an example. So is page 19. You may only be up to shorten the whole thing by 56 pages – but I think it would be a good idea. 56 pages is, after all, 10%. If you can do more then so much the better
    • Investment by Dutch brewing giant will create 1,000 new jobs and reopen dozens of closed pubsView the full article
    • Qantas agrees to pay millions to settle lawsuit accusing it of selling tickets to cancelled flights.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA compared to Incapacity Benefit / Income Support


Foebane72
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3590 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am 40 this month and am currently on £220 Housing Benefit per month and £202.70 Income Support (Incapacity Benefit) per fortnight, and I have been concerned about the "horror stories" concerning the ATOS reassessments based on their medical examinations. I personally take medication, like Sulpiride for anxiety and paranoia, and Omeprazole for a hiatal hernia caused by my abdominal obesity, ie. I look like a pregnant man, my belly is so big. My knees are also quite stiff, and I don't like resting on them to look in cupboards and so forth.

 

So when I get a letter from ATOS/DWP saying I have to come in for a medical, I just go ahead and answer truthfully, right?

 

If I'm deemed fit for work, I will have to attend interviews and so on, but for a while will only end up with something like £71 per week during the "assessment phase", but eventually end up on the "work-related activity group" at £99.15, right? That sounds not much less at all than the benefit I'm on now, which is a good thing. And I've been thinking about reentering employment for a long time now, as voluntary work just isn't cutting it and I want more money, frankly. The job market is dismal, but I'm strangely confident, for some reason.

 

I would class myself as only slightly disabled, but is it the fear of reduced benefits or having to travel to interviews that are petrifying the genuinely needy disabled people out there, leading to the poverty and suicides we've heard about when they're deemed fit for work? Or am I missing something?

 

Also, does the Universal Credit mean that Housing Benefit and ESA will be all combined into one lump sum per month?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

... is it the fear of reduced benefits or having to travel to interviews that are petrifying the genuinely needy disabled people out there, leading to the poverty and suicides we've heard about when they're deemed fit for work? Or am I missing something? ...

 

Yes, you're missing the entire crux of the matter. The people who appear worst hit by this system are those who are genuinely extremely ill or disabled and are medically unfit for work. Due to the built-in bias of the ATOSH system they invariably get informed that they are fit for work despite supporting evidence to the contrary. Believing they have no alternative other than to present themselves at the Jobcentre, they do so only to be told they are clearly unfit for work and unsuitable for JSA. Faced with the prospect of no finacial support, no food and the loss of whatever place they call home, is it surprising some commit suicide in a despair brought about by an ill-thought out system of so-called benefit improvements?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify for you, Foebane, I don't think anyone would have misconstrued your post as disrespectful! You posted an honest appraisal and I made one minor correction for you. Many people get to the right solution with ESA. Quite a few don't. And unfortunately it's a complete disaster for a few others. I'd like to think it's mainly down to a new benefit system bedding in. But it's been in place now for four years ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Foebane72:

 

Fraid you were missing the iniquity of a work capability assessment that's simply not fit for purpose.

Forget incap days, they're long gone. It may help for you to know what to expect when you're assessed for employment and support allowance.

 

Letter from Jobcentreplus to explain that the ConDems want to support you into work. :?:

 

Phone call from Jobcentreplus, you don't have to answer if you don't want to, which explains the reassessment process.

 

An ESA50 questionaire to complete. It's been described as the most unfit for purpose form Work n Pensions has ever produced.

 

A face-to-face assessment, nowt vaguely medical about it, with an Atosser who'll ask whether you can reheat a pizza and which soap opera you'll watch while eating it. His/her ESA85 report, unless it's decided that you meet a support group descriptor or qualify through exceptional/special circumstances for the support component of employment and support allowance, will be a load of computer generated claptrap saying;

 

Fit for work;

 

Either, sign a jobseeker's agreement, whether or not you're well enough to comply with it. Get £70ish a week jobseeker's allowance, until you get sanctioned for non compliance.

 

Or, if you believe you satisfy the criteria for either the work related activity component or support component of employment and support allowance, appeal the decision at tribunal. Dammed hard work and very stressful. Get £70ish a week while parked on employment and support allowance assessment rate for months on end.

 

Fit for work related activity;

 

Work related activity component means £100ish a week. A bit more for some previous incap claimants with transitional protection. Work focused interviews. Some advisors ask what you're doing to find work, but for the moment you can't be mandated to apply for or accept employment.

 

The computer generated claptrap is produced by an Atosser who knows everything there's to know about the effects of your condition, even if s/he's never heard of it. Far more than your psychiatrist or gastroenterologist whose's reports are unlikely to get read.

 

Fore warned is fore armed, Margaret.

 

:Edit:

 

Like :RaeUK: I didn't see anything to get upset about in your original post. The complexities of employment and support allowance would defeat Einstein!!!

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its an unfit for purpose 'test' seemingly aimed at removing as many people from 'higher' benefits, whilst in the meantime enriching a foreign company who is being portrayed by certain government figures as blameless.

 

Sorry if that sounded a bit harsh but is much much easier on the ears than what i first thought.

 

Dame Anne Begg's view:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Zonker.

 

I'm in Fairwater, Cardiff - any idea when I should be expecting the ATOS letter? I'm surprised it's taken this long for them to get to me.

 

In any case, I'll probably only get a few points at most and be declared "fit for work", like all the others.

 

EDIT: So if I pass the medical, I won't get ESA in either form AT ALL?

Edited by Foebane72
Link to post
Share on other sites

:Foebane72:

 

Although the legislation refers to a medical examination it's nowt of the sort. The Atossers call it a medical assessment but there's still nowt medical about it.

 

Anyways, should the assessor recommend that you're fit for work, you'll be invited to claim jobseekers allowance. The only employment and support allowance available to you will be the assessment rate (evidenced by Med3 (unfit) notes from your doctor) if you decide to appeal a disallowance of your claim.

 

Regards, Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you appeal, providing you send in (un)fit notes and keep the assessment rate going, then HB and CTB will continue. Always worth giving them a ring at the appropriate time as the DWP are very quick to close the case once a failed WCA is registered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Foebane72:

 

An appeal against disallowance of a Work n Pensions benefit is made to a (social entitlement) tribunal.

 

The administrative system is due to change next year, but for the moment;

 

Disallowance.

 

Send GL24 or letter to Jobcentreplus to appeal the disallowance.

Jobcentreplus reconsider their decision, but hardly ever change it.

 

GL24 or letter, together with Jobcentreplus's evidence for not revising their decision, is forwarded to the Tribunals Service which is part of the Ministry of Justice. Claimant is sent a copy of Jobcentreplus's evidence at the same time.

 

An appellant who appeals the findings of a work capability assessment can apply for assessment rate employment and support allowance pending the appeal hearing if their doctor supplies Med3 (unfit notes).

 

Regards, Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the difference between an appeal and a tribunal?

 

And is it true that the benefits could be stopped outright during either?

 

Hello there.

 

Another way of looking at the appeal part, as I understand it, is that you're asking the DWP to reconsider their decision not to allow ESA. If their decision maker [DM] decides to uphold that decision, and most of the time they seem to, then you go to the independent tribunal.

 

Does that help at all?

 

I'm not up to speed on the benefit being stopped part, but the guys will know.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ESA at assessment rate = 71.00 per week

JSA = 71.00 per week

 

What's the difference? Is it that with ESA you don't have to sign on every fortnight?

 

ESA = sickness benefit = unfit for work.

JSA = unemployment benefit = fit for work.

 

No matter how they try to muddy the waters, that remains the basic description.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the fact is, that even with the problems I mentioned in my opening post, I AM "fit for work".

 

I haven't received the ATOS letter yet, but I'm expecting it before the end of this year, and I'm getting myself prepared to go back into full-time employment if I have to, however scarce the jobs market.

 

I will see if I can go on a Shaw Trust "back to work" programme when ATOS happens, and I hope to remain employed beyond the initial period. I was in this situation back in 2004, but the company didn't keep me on - I'm hoping things will be different this time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ESA at assessment rate = 71.00 per week

JSA = 71.00 per week

 

What's the difference? Is it that with ESA you don't have to sign on every fortnight?

 

Not quite. Going back to the beginning, first you receive a detailed form to fill in and return. Once that's done you may be called for an assessment which is not medical but allegedly a 'capability' assessment. During this time (and it can take weeks from returning the form to being given an 'assessment' date)

you'll continue to receive your normal IB benefit.

 

After attending your assessment , you'll get a letter to say you've failed or passed. the assessment. At which point if you've failed you will lose your IB benefit. For HB to continue you just need to let the council know you still require it from an income point of view.

 

Next it's your decision whether to appeal the assessment decision or go and calim JSA. If you do decide to appeal then you ask to be reinstated on ESA assessment rate ,at the same time as you contact DWP to say you want to appeal with a doctor's sick note. YOu will then be paid what's called an ESA assessment rate of £71. Once this has started it will continue until the date of your appeal Tribunal, as long as you keep submitting continuous doctors sick notes. It can take many months of being on this rate till a Tribunal date is set up.

 

If you win at the Tribunal you will be repaid any difference between the ESA assessment rate and what you should have got, .backdated to the date you originally failed the assessment.

 

If you lose your appeal at the Tribunal at that point you lose the ESA assessment rate of £71 and be told to claim JSA or whatever.

 

Hopefully that all makes sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ESA at assessment rate = 71.00 per week

JSA = 71.00 per week

 

What's the difference? Is it that with ESA you don't have to sign on every fortnight?

 

but you may have to attend interviews still?

 

also getting sick notes may be more or less hassle depending how sympathetic GP is, I was getting sick notes only lasting 2 weeks whilst others manage to get 3 month sick notes.

 

I now have no GP at all for 6 weeks, my head GP got kicked out, so my arrangement going to his other surgery is now stopped and I now have had to register at another GP. The first GP wanted photo id, I asked how am I supposed to get that, the second accepted me but with a 6 weeks wait before I can use them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my first post, and thank you all for making this site so informative and friendly.

 

I have searched quite a bit, but cannot seem to find an answer, so thought someone here might know... is it possible to claim income support to top up the assessment rate of £71, if it is deemed to be less than you need to live on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my first post, and thank you all for making this site so informative and friendly.

 

I have searched quite a bit, but cannot seem to find an answer, so thought someone here might know... is it possible to claim income support to top up the assessment rate of £71, if it is deemed to be less than you need to live on?

 

Sorry to say that £71 is the amount that the Govt have deemed the minimum needed....no idea how they have come to that conclusion though.:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...