Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well I sent them the letter of claim, the only responses so far was a few emails reopening the claims on the parcels where they asked for information such as proof of value (which I get) but other things like photos of the parcels, which I haven't got as I never took photos of them. It's been well over the 14 days since I sent the letter now anyway, so what do you think I should do now?
    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism in these circumstances  to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know. Just a tip - if you are offered a fixed penalty be sure to submit your driving licence details as instructed. I've seen lots of instances where a driver has not done this. There will be no reminder and no second chance; your £100 will be refunded and the police will prosecute you through the courts.
    • Looks similar to you original email to their Complaints team. I dont rate copypasta for a CEO complaint. Rewrite it with emotion involved as to how badly this is affecting you and make them feel embarrassed for their actions... 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Universal credits


Tiger Lily
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4327 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Gosh, I wish I understood what it alll means! In-work conditionality? Additional earnings required? I just want to know if I'm going to be better (ha!) or worse off...think I need to wait to see how this shakes out...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gosh, I wish I understood what it alll means! In-work conditionality? Additional earnings required? I just want to know if I'm going to be better (ha!) or worse off...think I need to wait to see how this shakes out...

 

Universal Credit will also, for the first time, introduce “in work” conditionality for those who earn below an earnings threshold. The threshold will be set at the equivalent of working full time at the national minimum wage (i.e. £212.80), although it will be lower for claimants with caring commitments. This in-work conditionality is intended to help to strengthen the incentive to increase hours and earnings for those on low incomes.

 

So basically if you have a part time low paid job under £212 in earnings you will receive a lower rate of benefit and be subject to the same regime as somebody who does no work. Until basically you stop being lazy and do.

 

I'd take every calculator etc with a large pinch of salt. What's on the table is a basic frame work all the nastiness and madness of IDS which will be the actual meat regulations on the bones has yet to be filled in. Either by a shame consultation or sneaked in on the back of something else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Universal Credit will also, for the first time, introduce “in work” conditionality for those who earn below an earnings threshold. The threshold will be set at the equivalent of working full time at the national minimum wage (i.e. £212.80), although it will be lower for claimants with caring commitments. This in-work conditionality is intended to help to strengthen the incentive to increase hours and earnings for those on low incomes.

 

So basically if you have a part time low paid job under £212 in earnings you will receive a lower rate of benefit and be subject to the same regime as somebody who does no work. Until basically you stop being lazy and do.

 

 

Mmm. Wonder how that will affect self-employed on less than minimum wage? I have a horrible creeping feeling that my safety net is about to be pulled from under my feet, and I'm going to have to work the 150 hours+ p/w that the calculator stated I need to work to get the money. (If I'm understanding it correctly.)

 

I know there's no official guidelines yet, but this may just spell the end of my dreams.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aren't tax credits cracking down on those who are self employed and don't earn minimum wage? I'm sure I've read on here about people having problems.

 

As mentioned earlier, I would be worse off under UC than on JSA. Is there transitional protection for people like me?

 

And there's no extra earnings disregard for disabled people; but it goes up for non-disabled people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aren't tax credits cracking down on those who are self employed and don't earn minimum wage? I'm sure I've read on here about people having problems.

 

As mentioned earlier, I would be worse off under UC than on JSA. Is there transitional protection for people like me?

 

And there's no extra earnings disregard for disabled people; but it goes up for non-disabled people.

 

Yes, I was one of them!:sad: Had a WTC compliance examination earlier this year, they didn't do anything except send my stuff back with a "thanks, case is closed" - I believe I was one of the lucky ones who got contacted just before that particular cost-cutting scheme ended.

 

I don't think there's any way I can get my average hourly earnings above minimum wage between now and April next year, so I am going to have to think about how I can survive while chasing my ambition. Might mean having to cut back on family time and caring for my mentally ill ex-husband though so I can take a job while being SE on the side (legally, of course)...

 

I "look forward" (ha!) to learning more about self-employed & UTC as more info comes available.

 

Thanks all :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it will cut out some fraud,

 

the amount of self employed taxi drivers working 20 hours a week and declare £20 a week earnings is beyond a joke, however i do feel for the genuine people who are struggling, who will be hit by this i think it is unfair. if your not earning this money then your claim should not be based on this amount.

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites

One problem I have with the earnings thing, WTC and SE is that whilst you may be working, you may not be providing your service. Therefore, not earning money. (advertising, accounts, etc)

 

Is that taken into account?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is the SDM who does the decision and they are taken into account, but I would think the taxi drviers earn a lot more, then we have the people who earn £20 dead, printed wage slips to boot, and the child minders who declare under the disregard, how dear is childmindiing these days , they sure must have a lot of overheads. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

... but I would think the taxi drviers earn a lot more ...

 

A lot of people think that as well. However, for a lot of taxi drivers the reality is different - at least in my part of the country. Its a damned hard way not to earn a living. If you work for a firm the shift is usually 11 hours five or six times a week. They don't like to admit they earn crap money so most drivers, when asked, will tell you the turnover of their best ever week plus a little extra for exageration purposes. But that's turnover. Take out your subs, fuel, insurance, twice yearly vehicle inspection, new set of tyres each year, daily car wash etc etc etc and you're not left with a lot. And the taxman has a guide to what he assumes your turnover is. If you fall out of those parimeters you'll have some explaining to do ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

This might be of use to others.

 

http://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/Current+Affairs/Welfare+State

 

It's a news feed site (that link has the Current Affairs >>> Welfare filter applied) that grabs stuff from all over the web.

 

As well as the usual round up of benefit cheats it picks up stuff you never knew existed or would have thought about. It's not perfect but it's not bad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest amianne
I think it will cut out some fraud,

 

the amount of self employed taxi drivers working 20 hours a week and declare £20 a week earnings is beyond a joke, however i do feel for the genuine people who are struggling, who will be hit by this i think it is unfair. if your not earning this money then your claim should not be based on this amount.

 

I know one businessman that receives ESA and is in the Support Group, yet declares to HMRC that his weekly income is below £5 a week, yet claims that he works in excess of 30 hours a week!

 

He does pay his wife a nice wage out of the business. All legal as they say - HMRC/DWP all know about it and been doing this for the past two years. Currently receives over £200 a week just in ESA/WTC's alone. On top of that come his disability benefit of about £130 a week for MRC and HRM of DLA (he has been judged that he cannot walk and needs constant daily care.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know one businessman that receives ESA and is in the Support Group, yet declares to HMRC that his weekly income is below £5 a week, yet claims that he works in excess of 30 hours a week!

 

He does pay his wife a nice wage out of the business. All legal as they say - HMRC/DWP all know about it and been doing this for the past two years. Currently receives over £200 a week just in ESA/WTC's alone. On top of that come his disability benefit of about £130 a week for MRC and HRM of DLA (he has been judged that he cannot walk and needs constant daily care.

 

This post has me completely befuddled :lol:

How is this man claiming ESA AND WTC? Surely the 30 hours work would cancel out the ESA? Surely the WTC would cancel out the ESA? If you're on ESA, you're too ill to work (or at least, you're too ill to work full time), so how is he working AND getting ESA?

 

And don't even get me started on his declared income...he must have a fantastic accountant, is all I can say!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This sounds like It is going to be almost impossible to work as self employed under UC. I'm simply staggered at how complicated they're going to make things..

 

This is all set to be brought to an end by Universal Credit, which will introduce a staggering amount of complexity into the system and stifle the chances of both the self-employed and the entrepreneurial alike.

 

According to the recently published draft regulations: “claimants who declare that they have income from self-employment, or who are self-employed with no income, will be invited to a “Gateway” interview.”

 

This appears to be some form of Stalinist Dragon’s Den, whereby people will be forced to prove to the DWP that their business, or their trade is: “done with the intention of increasing the income received to the level we could expect the claimant to make if working full time”

 

Claimants will be expected to provide reams of evidence at these interviews which will no doubt be carried out by people with so much entrepreneurial know-how that they’ve ended up working in the Jobcentre.

 

Should the claimant pass this government test, then they will be granted a year’s start up period, during which they will be largely left alone. After that they will be subject to the ‘Minimum Income Floor’. This means that self-employed people will be expected to earn a certain amount a week, or lose eligibility for benefits or self-employed status. The Government are not telling us exactly what that Minimum Income Floor will be in the consultation for documents, however it has previously been suggested that people will be expected to earn at least the minimum wage for any self-employed activity.

 

Under the new proposals self-employed people will be expected to work at least 18 hours a week. It is unclear whether those in self-employment working at this level will be expected to abandon self-employment to take up full time work, or workfare, should the DWP deem it appropriate. Those working part time are now to be forced to continually look for full time work, attend interviews at the drop of a hat and hand in their notice immediately should they be offered even a temporary full time job.

 

 

 

Another aspect of the new regime will punish people who invest in tools, stock or other business expenses in order to increase earnings. Self employed people will now be required to report all income and business expenditure on a monthly basis as opposed to annually as under the present system. Expenses will not be carried over to the next month. This will mean if someone spends a couple of grand on stock this will only be reflected in their earnings for that month. The new system will make it impossible for self-employed people to invest on any significant level to improve their earnings.

 

It will not just be businesses that have large outlays, such as small shops or tradespeople, that will be affected by the monthly reporting. A freelance journalist who spends a month writing a piece in anticipation of it being sold will be penalised for not earning minimum wage during that period. Self employed people will be punished for injecting both time and cash in their business. The harder you work, the less you get.

 

People who fail to impress the Government with their self-employment plans will still be permitted to earn money from self-employment, and will face the same monthly requirement to report any earnings. They will also however be given a Claimant Commitment, meaning they will not be treated as self-employed. This will mean that there will be a requirement to attend Mandatory Work Activity or attend pointless courses and workshops with Welfare to Work companies like fraud ridden A4e any time the DWP sees fit.

 

This will destroy people’s ability to take on small amounts of work on a casual basis. Should someone be offered a few days work on a self-employed basis they will not be in a position to guarantee they can turn up. They could be sent to work in a charity shop with no pay that week instead. Far from the stated aim of making all work pay, short periods of self-employed work will be a commitment that claimants can no longer make under the new regime. The DWP will decide how you spend your time and if you fail to comply you could face sanctions for up to three years.

 

The rest here...

 

http://johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/2012/06/23/universal-credit-self-employment-and-the-minimum-wage/

Edited by sadone
Link to post
Share on other sites

I know one businessman that receives ESA and is in the Support Group, yet declares to HMRC that his weekly income is below £5 a week, yet claims that he works in excess of 30 hours a week!

 

He does pay his wife a nice wage out of the business. All legal as they say - HMRC/DWP all know about it and been doing this for the past two years. Currently receives over £200 a week just in ESA/WTC's alone. On top of that come his disability benefit of about £130 a week for MRC and HRM of DLA (he has been judged that he cannot walk and needs constant daily care.

 

I'm trying to work out why this sounds familiar. Sure I've read this post on here before...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying to work out why this sounds familiar. Sure I've read this post on here before...

 

I wasn't going to say anything but the above rings a bell with me too. The talk of her fathers experience with the DWP on another thread also sounded very familiar.

 

I'm sure I've read a case written by another poster some time back that was uncannily similar .

 

Thought I'd bring this over as It's important imo..

 

This sounds like It is going to be almost impossible to work as self employed under UC. I'm simply staggered at how complicated they're going to make things..

 

This is all set to be brought to an end by Universal Credit, which will introduce a staggering amount of complexity into the system and stifle the chances of both the self-employed and the entrepreneurial alike.

 

According to the recently published draft regulations: “claimants who declare that they have income from self-employment, or who are self-employed with no income, will be invited to a “Gateway” interview.”

 

This appears to be some form of Stalinist Dragon’s Den, whereby people will be forced to prove to the DWP that their business, or their trade is: “done with the intention of increasing the income received to the level we could expect the claimant to make if working full time”

 

Claimants will be expected to provide reams of evidence at these interviews which will no doubt be carried out by people with so much entrepreneurial know-how that they’ve ended up working in the Jobcentre.

 

Should the claimant pass this government test, then they will be granted a year’s start up period, during which they will be largely left alone. After that they will be subject to the ‘Minimum Income Floor’. This means that self-employed people will be expected to earn a certain amount a week, or lose eligibility for benefits or self-employed status. The Government are not telling us exactly what that Minimum Income Floor will be in the consultation for documents, however it has previously been suggested that people will be expected to earn at least the minimum wage for any self-employed activity.

 

Under the new proposals self-employed people will be expected to work at least 18 hours a week. It is unclear whether those in self-employment working at this level will be expected to abandon self-employment to take up full time work, or workfare, should the DWP deem it appropriate. Those working part time are now to be forced to continually look for full time work, attend interviews at the drop of a hat and hand in their notice immediately should they be offered even a temporary full time job.

 

 

 

Another aspect of the new regime will punish people who invest in tools, stock or other business expenses in order to increase earnings. Self employed people will now be required to report all income and business expenditure on a monthly basis as opposed to annually as under the present system. Expenses will not be carried over to the next month. This will mean if someone spends a couple of grand on stock this will only be reflected in their earnings for that month. The new system will make it impossible for self-employed people to invest on any significant level to improve their earnings.

 

It will not just be businesses that have large outlays, such as small shops or tradespeople, that will be affected by the monthly reporting. A freelance journalist who spends a month writing a piece in anticipation of it being sold will be penalised for not earning minimum wage during that period. Self employed people will be punished for injecting both time and cash in their business. The harder you work, the less you get.

 

People who fail to impress the Government with their self-employment plans will still be permitted to earn money from self-employment, and will face the same monthly requirement to report any earnings. They will also however be given a Claimant Commitment, meaning they will not be treated as self-employed. This will mean that there will be a requirement to attend Mandatory Work Activity or attend pointless courses and workshops with Welfare to Work companies like fraud ridden A4e any time the DWP sees fit.

 

This will destroy people’s ability to take on small amounts of work on a casual basis. Should someone be offered a few days work on a self-employed basis they will not be in a position to guarantee they can turn up. They could be sent to work in a charity shop with no pay that week instead. Far from the stated aim of making all work pay, short periods of self-employed work will be a commitment that claimants can no longer make under the new regime. The DWP will decide how you spend your time and if you fail to comply you could face sanctions for up to three years.

 

The rest here...

 

http://johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/2012/06/23/universal-credit-self-employment-and-the-minimum-wage/

Link to post
Share on other sites

You and me both. :( I was hoping to try and return to limited amounts of work and this will just destroy that.

 

My meager income would be spread all over the place. and so a regimented system of expecting something weekly just won't work for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it me or is it getting very difficult to do anything that won't p off the Govt, reduce income, result in some type of punishment etc?....What type of Country do they think we live in where we can all work for exactly the amount of money, for exactly the right amount of time, not doing or buying or selling too much or too little of whatever they have decided and, of course, never getting ill.......

 

Freedom....I think maybe prisoners will have more of that than a lot of us!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...