Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Benefit Sanctioned


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3641 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I don't think your sanction is reasonable, no. And I fully understand your frustration, I'm just asking you to find a different way to vent it.

 

JCP staff deal with the frustrating system every day, and are routinely insulted by claimants. If they come here and are insulted further when they're off the clock, they might get fed up and leave. This would be a serious loss to the CAG benefit forum.

 

As I said before please don't take it personal its not meant to be and I appologise if I have offended anyone but this really does hurt me along with the thousands of other people from disabled to able bodied people who have had their benefit unfairly sanctioned. I dare say if I was to ring head office and try to speak to the individual responsible they would be a faceless person in the background who I couldn't get to speak to which adds to the frustration. According to the Guardian newspaper a whistleblower said they had been set targets to initialy sannction one person a week but that wasn't enough so they made it 3. He also said they had a catchphrase constantly hammered in to them which is "Save the public purse" feel good about stopping someones money you have just saved your own pocket". Obviously I don't know the accuracy of this but there is no smoke without fire as they say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

As I said before please don't take it personal its not meant to be and I appologise if I have offended anyone but this really does hurt me along with the thousands of other people from disabled to able bodied people who have had their benefit unfairly sanctioned. I dare say if I was to ring head office and try to speak to the individual responsible they would be a faceless person in the background who I couldn't get to speak to which adds to the frustration. According to the Guardian newspaper a whistleblower said they had been set targets to initialy sannction one person a week but that wasn't enough so they made it 3. He also said they had a catchphrase constantly hammered in to them which is "Save the public purse" feel good about stopping someones money you have just saved your own pocket". Obviously I don't know the accuracy of this but there is no smoke without fire as they say.

 

No problem, we just need to keep a civil tone here.

 

You are correct in that if you called the office where the DM works, you likely wouldn't be allowed to speak to him or her. As to the targets, well, I didn't work on JSA at all, so I can't speak about that from personal experience. Put it this way, the whistleblowers claims seem plausible to me, but I don't know if they're accurate or if this is simply a garbled account of something less sinister.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem, we just need to keep a civil tone here.

 

You are correct in that if you called the office where the DM works, you likely wouldn't be allowed to speak to him or her. As to the targets, well, I didn't work on JSA at all, so I can't speak about that from personal experience. Put it this way, the whistleblowers claims seem plausible to me, but I don't know if they're accurate or if this is simply a garbled account of something less sinister.

 

Whatever goes on in the depths of the office out of sight of people like myself is anyones guess, but the end result is lots of people are having their benefits sanctioned unfairly and the numbers are supposedly on the increase.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I work for the customer service side of JCP and as already posted on here I post voluntarily.

At you New Claim Interview you would have been asked if you hold a validdriving license and if you are a car owner so it will be on the LMS system.

Your travel time is 90minutes by your normal method of transport not purely by public transport.

If at the time the vacancy was suitable and "matched" your job goals and retsrictions of days and hours etc then you would have been expected to apply for the vacancy as you wouldhave agrred to appky for the vacancy.

You have given your reasons and they have been submitted to the DMA, if you have any additionsl information to give you can request a reconsideration of the original decision and if you don't it will go straight to appeal.

The reason you can't speak to the person who actually makes the decision is because they have to make the decision purely based on the facts in black and white in front of them, they do not speak to the JCP staff about the decision either to ensure that they are not swayed away from the Decision Makers Guidance.

There is no set period of sanction if it is your first offence or 20th. the sanctions are set for periods between 2 and 26 weeks and the 1 week sanction is for the first falied to attend an appointment or sigining on the correct day and/or time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly how can they justify a 3 month sanction for not applying for one job? Seems very excesive to me I just can't see how this level of punishment fits the crime. How could I be expected to travel 90 mins either way to job which may be minimum wage not in my case but could have been. I couldn't possibly afford to pay for fuel to do that, but none of this matters because once the advisor presses that print button ime expected to apply for that vacancy and they know it or we run the risk of sanctioned benefit. We have no control over this they just behave as though they are God controling our lives inflicting worry and stress upon us. I have been told several times today how helpfull JCP staff are well in my latest experience they have been anything but helpfull and caused me nothing more than grief and worry. Sorry but just don't get it how sanctioning my benefit for 3 months helps me or anyone else in the slightest way, I really can't see what explanation anyone can give me will convince me and dare say lots of other people in the same situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you watch over the next few days, things like this if they are a change in policy tend to filter in here - so if there is a sudden increase in the number of complaints on sanctions, you know its a policy change - and if not, then you were just unlucky.

 

It was pretty much the same in the CAB, when there was a sudden influx of clients with something new - then you knew what was behind it.

 

If its a policy change, it tends to make appeals less successful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you watch over the next few days, things like this if they are a change in policy tend to filter in here - so if there is a sudden increase in the number of complaints on sanctions, you know its a policy change - and if not, then you were just unlucky.

 

It was pretty much the same in the CAB, when there was a sudden influx of clients with something new - then you knew what was behind it.

 

If its a policy change, it tends to make appeals less successful.

 

Ok thanks I will keep an eye on things,I have been doing some reading on Google and there is a lot in the Guardian newspaper about this and they say there are increasing numbers of people across the country going through this. If you just type into Google about sanctioned benefits there is lots of stuff there about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The benefit of an appeal would be that it will be looked at by an independent tribunal, one that is not part of the DWP. Tribunals can often be more, well, lenient than DWP DMs. Also, before it goes to the tribunal it will be looked at by another DM to see if the decision can be changed in your favour without the need to escalate any further.

 

Thanks Antone, I just hope common sense prevails here don't get me wrong I will take my punishment same as the next bloke if its fair and justified but I just can't come to terms with this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it John Domokos who covered it (or something like that)? If so he tends to cover his articles in twitter too, so when he has something published you will get the link if you follow him.

 

His main interest seems to be video journalism, which is a shame as the present punitive benefit climate could do with more egalitarian articles rather than the current tory crap spewed by the red tops.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it John Domokos who covered it (or something like that)? If so he tends to cover his articles in twitter too, so when he has something published you will get the link if you follow him.

 

His main interest seems to be video journalism, which is a shame as the present punitive benefit climate could do with more egalitarian articles rather than the current tory crap spewed by the red tops.

 

Yes he is the man who it says to contact and it is his article

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly how can they justify a 3 month sanction for not applying for one job? Seems very excesive to me I just can't see how this level of punishment fits the crime. How could I be expected to travel 90 mins either way to job which may be minimum wage not in my case but could have been. I couldn't possibly afford to pay for fuel to do that, but none of this matters because once the advisor presses that print button ime expected to apply for that vacancy and they know it or we run the risk of sanctioned benefit. We have no control over this they just behave as though they are God controling our lives inflicting worry and stress upon us. I have been told several times today how helpfull JCP staff are well in my latest experience they have been anything but helpfull and caused me nothing more than grief and worry. Sorry but just don't get it how sanctioning my benefit for 3 months helps me or anyone else in the slightest way, I really can't see what explanation anyone can give me will convince me and dare say lots of other people in the same situation.

 

Its not good that you have a sanction and you will suffer for three months. But I have recently started a job, have now gone to 37 hours, minimum wage and take two buses to get there and back, time it takes ninety five minutes each way. I am hoping to move soon to be nearer my job if I can get a house swap. Its not easy but I do it and I am no spring chicken

I was on benefits for many years as a carer, and was neither work shy or idle. I now pay tax but I dont hold a grudge to paying it, for many years I had to depend on benefits myself. I was promised a jobgrant by my advisor at the jobcentre when I started work didnt get but am over it now.

I was grateful for help and advice I got on here.

There are hardly any jobs out there, I am lucky I can claim WTC as I have children. Its not easy on benefits but its not easy working either, rent council tax now I have to pay in full. Good luck with your appeal but if you lose you will have to get over it, whats the point in making yourself ill as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The job centre people just sit in their chairs like robots I guess controled by the Fat Controlers who don't really care what people have to do to find work as long as we are of their books and back out there earning to pay taxes to pay for the work shy who have no intention of working a day in the their livesQUOTE]

 

Everybody has to pay taxes out of their earnings including the JobCentre staff, who Knows how the goverment spend these taxes? but believe me I never think I am working to pay any bodies benefits, because that could be me one day and I say thank goodness there is a benefit system in place because who know what live can throw at you......

 

And do I think people take advanatage of it, then my answer is, thats not my problem is it ;)

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said before please don't take it personal its not meant to be and I appologise if I have offended anyone but this really does hurt me along with the thousands of other people from disabled to able bodied people who have had their benefit unfairly sanctioned. I dare say if I was to ring head office and try to speak to the individual responsible they would be a faceless person in the background who I couldn't get to speak to which adds to the frustration. According to the Guardian newspaper a whistleblower said they had been set targets to initialy sannction one person a week but that wasn't enough so they made it 3. He also said they had a catchphrase constantly hammered in to them which is "Save the public purse" feel good about stopping someones money you have just saved your own pocket". Obviously I don't know the accuracy of this but there is no smoke without fire as they say.

whilst this is not an attack on you personally..you have to realise now you are unemployed that even if you are bending over backwards to get yourself back in work, you have now joined the rank of the so-called workshy..who doesnt deserve benefit because they are not trying to find a job...we give them jobs to go for..and they dont even bother applying!! there probably is a minority who are maybe happy to live this way..but for the vast majority of unemployed i dont believe it for a minute..there is a lack of jobs simple as...you are just unfortunately now caught in the crossfire.the whole system is wrong...and where is the carrot? there is isnt one (unless you count the pittance you should get every week)..just simply a big stick to beat you down with......

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know this is a bit tongue in cheek but with all the stress and worry could the poster get a fit note from doctor saying depressed and claim ESA for a period..or would that be like using the system?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The job centre people just sit in their chairs like robots I guess controled by the Fat Controlers who don't really care what people have to do to find work as long as we are of their books and back out there earning to pay taxes to pay for the work shy who have no intention of working a day in the their livesQUOTE]

 

Everybody has to pay taxes out of their earnings including the JobCentre staff, who Knows how the goverment spend these taxes? but believe me I never think I am working to pay any bodies benefits, because that could be me one day and I say thank goodness there is a benefit system in place because who know what live can throw at you......

 

And do I think people take advanatage of it, then my answer is, thats not my problem is it ;)

 

Ime also glad there is a benefit system in place but for people who use it correctly and don't abuse it!! I do feel we are tarred with the same brush as the hardcore in this country who refuse to work and get round the system,I didn't apply for just one job the only unsuitable job given me and what happens a 3 month sanction so I do feel like ime treated like them if they looked at what I actualy do to find work they may think differently. Sorry but I don't agree with you saying if people take advantage of the system its not your problem its everyones problem because if those people are not stopped from abusing the system the benefit system that one day you may rely on might not exist or won't be the system that is supposed to help us as it will be ruined by the selfish minority. I've paid into the system all my working life and this is the second time I've been unfortunate enough to have to rely on it so I think out of 33 years paying I think ime entitled to some help now and don't take kindly to having my help sanctioned when all said and done it is mine that's why we pay NI isn't it!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know this is a bit tongue in cheek but with all the stress and worry could the poster get a fit note from doctor saying depressed and claim ESA for a period..or would that be like using the system?

 

Quite possibly but I won't use the system falsley its against my principles, much rather be out working doing a job I enjoy. And yes they have caused me a lot of unnesesary stress and worry, so many things in our lives are inflicted upon us by people who have never had to experience themselves!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

the trouble that hardcore is truly a very small minority...but people have been brainwashed into believing that it isn't.....ever since this govt came into power its all we have heard....benefit cheat...lazy...workshy...and i could go on.....its surprising how many people they know anecdotely who have been abusing the system for years...yet did nothing about it...didnt pick up a phone..or write a letter....etc etc...and as to them misusing the system...you can believe the propoganda if you like..but you really need to look at it from a different perspective...and many of us including myself have paid NI for over 30 years..and believed govt spin that we were entitled...well this bloody shower has now changed the rules to suit themselves....so if you were one of the ones 'who believed' you gotta a bloody shock....i truly feel sorry for you..but dont believe for one minute that its a luxurious life on benefts cos it aint..its a daily bloody struggle to survive

Link to post
Share on other sites

I work at the Jobcentre as a processer and pay many families whose benefits and DLA etc are well in of excess of 70k a year. So could this be concluded they are taking advantage of the benefit system who knows , I say its not my problem because it isnt. The goverment makes the rules for benefit not me. I dont know these people, what illness they have their children etc, I am in no position to judge, my job is to pay the correct benefit and amount due.

Do I stop and think about the amounts. yes of course, but we dont set the rates and applicable amounts the goverment does and

We dont make the rules we just have to adminster them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I work at the Jobcentre as a processer and pay many families whose benefits and DLA etc are well in of excess of 70k a year. So could this be concluded they are taking advantage of the benefit system who knows , I say its not my problem because it isnt. The goverment makes the rules for benefit not me. I dont know these people, what illness they have their children etc, I am in no position to judge, my job is to pay the correct benefit and amount due.

Do I stop and think about the amounts. yes of course, but we dont set the rates and applicable amounts the goverment does and

We dont make the rules we just have to adminster them.

 

This is not rocket science, I know there are people out there who are genuinly in need of help but all you have to do is open your eyes when you walk around and you will more than likely see the people I am talking about its very clear to see who they are!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

the trouble that hardcore is truly a very small minority...but people have been brainwashed into believing that it isn't.....ever since this govt came into power its all we have heard....benefit cheat...lazy...workshy...and i could go on.....its surprising how many people they know anecdotely who have been abusing the system for years...yet did nothing about it...didnt pick up a phone..or write a letter....etc etc...and as to them misusing the system...you can believe the propoganda if you like..but you really need to look at it from a different perspective...and many of us including myself have paid NI for over 30 years..and believed govt spin that we were entitled...well this bloody shower has now changed the rules to suit themselves....so if you were one of the ones 'who believed' you gotta a bloody shock....i truly feel sorry for you..but dont believe for one minute that its a luxurious life on benefts cos it aint..its a daily bloody struggle to survive

 

I am living on benefits now and I don't believe for one minute its a luxurious life!! But like a lot of things in life you adjust to what you have and its a real test financialy to get the most out of what's given.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is not rocket science, I know there are people out there who are genuinly in need of help but all you have to do is open your eyes when you walk around and you will more than likely see the people I am talking about its very clear to see who they are!!

 

 

Describe one to me then, so I know what to look out for :)

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites

I too work in a JCP office as a customer service officer I have to agree with MIKEY here, we are employed to administer the rules, guidance and rates of benefits as set by Government and Parliament.

 

I do various jobs in the office so I encounter those people who attend to sign on each fortnight and I see those who are experiencing difficulties because of the Incapacity Benefit to ESA transition and I also spend a lot of time discussing via the AJCS appointment system when people have been sanctioned for various reasons and discussing reconsiderations and appeals etc.

I can honestly say that when you are sat at the desk it is not always that easy to tell if that person is genuine or pulling a fast one. Some people seem to know how to work the system though so they never end up with the referral to DMA anyway. All I know is the amount of abuse I receive is oncreasing and some of it physical too but when I can actually help someone and they remember to say "thank you" it makes it worthwhile.

The next round of abuse I am anticipating is the benefit cap :o

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree Flumps, I dont have the time or the inclination to judge anybody, I just do my job

but this is going to be contreversial,

I agree with the benefit cap :)

My opinion is the single and vunerable are sometimes overlooked, I think cut backs are not needed here for sure, the benefit pot just needs spreading out more fairly.

And the rule that takes the biscuit, a single person no fixed abode, so needs all the money they can get, they are not entitled to the disability premium because they dont have an address. WHY?

They are out on the street, and so must need all the money they can get.

But rules are rules.....

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites

And the rule that takes the biscuit, a single person no fixed abode, so needs all the money they can get, they are not entitled to the disability premium because they dont have an address. WHY?

 

What an odd rule.

 

Flumps - what's AJCS?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...