Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

inflated Solicitors Fees? - they have issued a claim form - help!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4083 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,Yesterday I received a letter from a firm of solicitors that had acted on my behalf earlier this year. The letter states that I have a balance outstanding of £5855.22 and that if I did not pay this amount by return they will be taking me to court.

 

Ok a little bit of background to this is required I think. At the begining of the year I started procedings against my partner to stop her from removing our child from the country and to get full custody.

 

The firm of Solicitors assured me at the time that they could do this and that the total cost would not exceed £3000.00. They also told me that these matters can take up to 15 months to resolve.

 

Whilst waiting for them to get an arrangement for me to see my child, as they had got an order to stop my child from being removed from the country, I went to court on my own to seek the courts help in stopping the harrasement I was getting from my partner and to ask them to help me to see my daughter. The courts gave me both orders and asked me to attend court earlier than had orginally been arranged. At this point I returned to the solicitors and asked them to represent me, they said they would, but it might cost a little bit more. No mention of how much more was made at the time.

 

Cut a long story short my partner and I managed to get ourselves reconciled, after informing the Solicitors of this they told me that I would now have to close the case myself and then sent me a list of charges that amounted to £6165.00. A meeting was arranged where I was asked if I could pay a lump sum payment to which I said no I could not.

 

I was then told that they were not prepared to take my intial offer of £100 per month. I explained to them that I had not been informed that the £800 I had paid out in order to get the case started was not part of the initial agreed charge for their services.

 

They told me that they would be passing the matter on to another memeber of there team who would get in touch with me soon. The whole case lasted a little under a month from start to finish but it has taken them 4 months to come back with there final demand.I can not afford to pay them even the £100 per month at the moment and have since got in touch with PAYPLAN to help me sort out a DMP.My issue is that

 

I do not think there charges are fair and the paperwork concerning the charges did not appear until two weeks after the second hearing, so I had no idea of what I would end up being charged.Can anyone please advise me on how to get this looked at and to get a figure that is closer to a fair charge for the work done? Once I have a sensible figure to work with I can then set up the DMP correctly.Thanks in advance Phil

Edited by andydd
Added paragraphs

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi andydd, Yes the latest paperwork gives a detailed breakdown listing their charges of £5855.22 and yes the orginal paperwork stated £3000.00 but did not have a detailed breakdown!

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All, Can someone please advise on what I can do to sort this situation out? Thanks in advance Phil

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would of thought it's contractual..When I had stuff ferom solicitor, costs were explained in lengthy sheet and then they said they'd inform you along the way if it was increased.

 

Perhaps you could scan up all the paperwork with addresses removed so we can see what it says.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,I will post them up over the weekend as I'm at work at the moment, thanks for looking into this for me its very much appreciated.Phil

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rebel11,

 

I have written to the solicitors to ask them for there complaints procedure as I believe that I should do this first.

 

During my last meeting with them they asked me to take out a loan or borrow money from my family before they were prepared to give an indication on how much they would settle for.

 

I'm not sure if this is normal practice when charges are disputed,

 

I had told them at our first meeting that I would have to pay them on a monthly basis, so I was a bit surprised.

 

Thanks for the links, seems that in most of the Family Matters examples the Legal Ombudsman leaves the complaints 'unresolved'..

 

. I will post up the letters I recieved from the solicitors over the weekend, but I'm getting the feeling that I'm stuck with whatever they want to charge...

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

follow this guide to ensure you blank out pers info

 

the method you have used is not working

 

 

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

.

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc barcodes etc using paint program

but leave all figures and dates.

.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

.

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you saying too

 

that these people are offering a 'discount'

to the bill?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX,Thanks for the guidance, I will use your method to re-post later on. Yes, they indicated that were prepared to give a discount if I was prepared to give them a lump sum. Is that not normal? Phil

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

normal for a debt that does not 99% of the time need ever paying!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

in this case i'm unsure

 

something 'smells'

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

During my last meeting with them they asked me to take out a loan or borrow money from my family before they were prepared to give an indication on how much they would settle for.

 

in this case i'm unsure

 

something 'smells'

 

dx

 

:rockon:

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is very strange, I cant see a solicitor asking how much you can borrow etc before saying how much he would settle for, normally the bill is itemised and thats it, there may be a little leeway in some cases where the sol is prepared to lower his fees, but this just dosnt sound right to me.Dont offer anything at the moment and wait and see if anyone here thinks his breakdown of costs needs looking at again

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi All, Thanks for your responses! Sorry for the delay in getting back to this post, I have so many things going on at the moment. I've made an official complaint to the solicitors and I'm awaiting there decision, I will update with there response if I get one...lol

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi All,

 

After making complaint and seeking to arrange a sencible rate of payments,

all of which they have in one way or another ignored,

 

the Solicitors have decided to take me to court and have started proccedings against me!

 

I could do with some advice on how to respond to their claim, please?

 

In a nut shell I don't believe I owe them anywhere near the amounts they are claiming and would like to try to get the courts to see this!

 

I have attached a copy of the claim form!

 

I have all the letters sent to me, so if you require further info just let me know

(My printer has just stopped scanning, so would have to do any further scans during the week from work)

and I'll try and scan them up to the thread.

 

Thanks in advance BP

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok phil

 

i've move the thread to the legal forum & slightly re-titled it

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you think the charges are unfair? Why do you think you do not owe the full amount?

 

What, exactly, was the £3000 quote for? This is absolutely key, if there is an email or letter setting this out please reproduce the exact words used. It may be possible to defend part of the claim on the basis that work coming within the scope of the initial quote should be kept to £3000 depending on how the quote is worded.

 

Do you have an engagement letter setting out the rates?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

[ATTACH=CONFIG]41876[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]41875[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]41874[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]41873[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]41872[/ATTACH]

 

Hi Steampowered, In answer to your questions, I think that the charges do not reflect the work done and I was never given a full breakdown of the fees until the case was almost concluded! I believe that I do not owe the full amount as they failed to inform me of what I was being charged for and after making my official complaint they agreed that they had not followed correct procedure!

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

[ATTACH=CONFIG]41880[/ATTACH]

 

One more file to add to the above first letter. BP

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

[ATTACH=CONFIG]41882[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]41881[/ATTACH]

 

Hi Steampowered, there are another 2 letters to post up regarding their fees, this is the second letter. BP

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

[ATTACH=CONFIG]41887[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]41886[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]41885[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]41884[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]41883[/ATTACH]

 

Hi Steampowered, I'm only allowed to attach 5 files at a time and unfortunately, I was only able to do them one at a time so here is the the third letter (first five files), this one actually gives a breakdown. BP

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

[ATTACH=CONFIG]41891[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]41890[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]41889[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]41888[/ATTACH]

 

Hi Steampowered,

 

The last few files to the above third letter...Thanks in advance...BP

Many of life’s failures are experienced by people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up. - Thomas Edison

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...