Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can be sure that pardoning himself, stopping the other prosecutions and vengeance will be his first priorities if he wins. i dont think he will win, but no surety on that
    • The other cases aren't going to happen before November though, are they? Reporters are saying he can't pardon himself for a state conviction. He would have to lean on the governor of New York state, as I understand it.
    • I am requesting your assistance to how I should go about a serious breach of my privacy that occurred during my stay at one of IHG’s hotel on Ma 2023. Having previously had items taken from my hotel room elsewhere I take the added precaution of using a security camera app on my device whenever I stay in a hotel room. The recordings are date and time stamped and it cannot be adjusted by the end user.   On this particular occasion I discovered evidence from my personal security camera recordings of a spy camera had been placed underneath my door, and can be seen moving along the base of the door for approximately 15 seconds.   The spy camera is in fact marketed as an inspection device of drains primarily but is known to be used in observing spaces difficult to enter. It is a usb endoscopic camera that has a length flexible cable that is semi rigid and can negotiate any obstruction by bending. The operator can be up to 3-4 metres away.   Infuriated as I had previously stayed with them in 2022 for 3 months at £260 per night that they would seek to question my honesty and invade my privacy. I immediately called reception and asked why they would do such a thing and if they had any concerns they were welcome to inspect my room and go through my personal belongings and ask me anything they wanted to. I was sleeping for the best part of my stay and was alone throughout.   I sent the recordings to the receptionist within the hour of finding them and I asked to speak to the manager of the hotel who I was told wasn’t present. I tried to have face to face meetings with him but he instead wrote to me denying the recordings were made at their hotel stating that they didn’t observe anyone in the corridor at the time of the recordings and that they don’t have a metal bar at the interface of the tile and carpet which corresponds to the overlying door. I rejected that statement on the grounds the video doesn’t show a bar but a reflection of light on the tile and you wouldn’t see a person outside my door because the cable is black and runs along the floor. If you don’t look for this you won’t see it. The matter was passed up to the area manager and he also denied the allegation. This is where the matter ends as far as IHG are concerned. Leading a busy work and family life I let the matter go but I found myself back at the same hotel a year later. I booked for  2 nights and was given a room facing the lobby door that led to the lifts. Unfortunately, from the hours of 3am I was woken up by the noise of the door opening and closing but also noticed shadows of a person standing in front of my door. At first I took no notice and put this down to a guest waiting for someone but the person or persons returned several times, standing outside my door for up to several minutes. I called the hotel reception and asked if there was an issue  on my floor and they said they would come up to check. They never said they would check the CCTV and as the incidents continued to happen up to 8am I called them 6 times. Given my past experience I didn’t think they took security as serious a# her establishments and made them observe the Cctv and let me know. The explanation I was given was that they could see residents there but they were heading down to breakfast. The time that I had noticed these feet by door was from 3am and breakfast started at 6.30am. It also didn’t explain why they would stand by my door for anything longer than 10seconds and if they were waiting for someone how likely is it that this scenario is played out 6 times when there was only 12 rooms per floor. Later that morning when I went down for breakfast the manager said he would move me to a room at the end of the corridor and asked me what my plans were for the day, essentially when would I be in the hotel. I stated that for the day I was out. He then said that all his staff were uncomfortable about me being a guest and said that I was not welcome there anymore. I had paid for the two nights but when it came to the end of the day I didn’t feel that I would be able to rest at the hotel given the hostility so I returned the next day to collect my remaining belongings, namely items of clothing, an iPhone charging cable and plug, and toiletries. Checkout was at 2pm and I was at the hotel at 3pm. All my belongings were gone and they couldn’t locate the items.  I plan to report the incident of the spy camera to the police, as well as the theft, and write to the hotel emphasising that this breach of privacy is unacceptable and the hotel's failure to properly investigate and address the issue is deeply concerning. The fact that I requested security checks to ensure my safety in the early hours was reasonable, yet their response to ban from the premises was excessive and even possibly discriminatory as I had revealed to them that I had been a victim of a hate crime given my sexuality. . I am seeking compensation for the infringement of my privacy, the lack of proper investigation, and the being humiliated and made to feel like an undesirable. I will request a full refund of my two-night stay totaling £390. Additionally, I will request compensation for the cost of my previous stay when the infringement occurred, which was £220. I am also considering damages for the infringement of my privacy but at a loss as to what this would equate to. I will close the letter giving them a 14 day timeframe to respond.    Is there anything you feel i need to consider here? Many thanks   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ARGOS - REFUSED TO REFUND LAP TOP RETURNED ONe DAY AFTER PURCHASE


charles34c
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3472 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi There,

I Purchased a mini HP laptop from Argos.

On taking the laptop home I was extremely disappointed its performance of the laptop. It seemed sluggish and slow to perform various tasks compared with other computers I have owned.

I do not believe the laptop to be defective it was just not fit for purpose. Not being a technical expert I had no idea a mini laptop offered such poor performance. (I know the spec is in their catalogue however it is still hard to equate this to actual performance.)

The Laptop was returned to the above store the next day after purchase on Thursday 26th of April. It was boxed and immaculate.

I spoke to a girl that had on the badge “Stock Manager” at the store.

· Without really establishing all the facts she more or less immediately told me I must contact HP directly and gave me a little pamphlet.

· I felt in this instance her advice was not really appropriate as the issue was more about the disappointing performance rather than any defect.

I politely stated I was more dissatisfied with the product and would like a full refund.

· Her response this time with a little more agitation again was to take the laptop home and contact HP. She went on to repeat this quote a third time which was delivered in slow motion. As I suffer from throat cancer and speak with an artificial device, judging by her patronising tone, I can only imagine my visual appearance led to her believing I was mentally challenged also.

· She was politely told there was no need to repeat this again and I understood.

· At this point I politely asked if I could speak to the Store Manager and she stated she was the most senior member of staff available. I was not even offered a suitable time I could discuss the matter with the Store Manager.

I was told no refund could be made due to laptops being exempt from being refunded as part of an exemption from their 30 day guarantee.

I then asked her to explain the items exemption from the 30 day guarantee in relation to a customers rights under the Sale of Goods Act 1979. (ss35 acceptance)

· In my opinion she was unable to do this with any clarity and certainly did not provide me with any legible explanation why a refund could not be made. In fact she appeared agitated and flustered by now.

I can honestly say that I was not aware and do not recall this items exemption from their 30 day guarantee being explained to me at point of sale. It was 17.55 when I bought the item, the store was about to close, and last couple of customers were being served quickly. It is not beyond the realms of possibility this could of been overlooked as I tried to convey to the Stock Manager. However her reply to this was frankly bizarre.

To quote the Stock Manager:

· “We will check the security camera and will be able to confirm you were told the item was exempt from the guarantee”

I had to tell her she was speaking nonsense in a light hearted way. Pointing out the obvious that your security cameras are unlikely to record conservations. She again stated they could do this as if it were a definitive statement to evaporate my opinon.

Sensing I was getting knowhere I then left the store.

Anyway is view of my dreadful experience I would welcome any suggestions where I stand and what actions I can take.

Thanks and best regards,

Charles34c

Edited by charles34c
Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless there is a breach of contract (I.e its faulty, not as described etc) than Laptops are not returnable to Argos. ss35 of the SOGA only applies when there is such a breach and not if you are disappointed with the goods, remember the fit for purpose qualify is to be fit for the purpose it is described as and not fit for your purpose unless that is clearly mentioned before a contract is made.

 

I can only apologise for any poor service you have received (Though I do not post as an employee of HRG on this forum), and my apologies for any bluntness I may convey. On CAG I write up the facts and the statutes to either help you or make sense of companies actions.

 

There is no law for the return of non-faulty items, such return policies are dictiated by the retailer, who can set their own terms of conditions. These are in addition and do not affect your statutory rights. Laptops wherever advertised have 30 day exemptions, this is also clear on the receipt and should be stated at the till however even if this isn't, this wouldn't qualify you for a refund.

 

To clarify some aspects they won't be able to check security cameras, you can't see if something like this was said, they may speak to the member of staff. With regards to not speaking with the Store Manager, my response would have been similar unfortunately, the management team (Store / Stock / Customer Service) are all allowed to make these judgements with that decision in store ending with them.

 

The companies response for laptops is now to ask the staff to hand over the leaflets and contact HP directly, not the best CS, but for faults it can actually help not if its not fast enough for you.

 

If you feel you have been unfairly treated I would recommend passing this on to Customer Services, you can also appeal to them for a refund / exchange within the store, however in the terms of the law they don't have to provide one if it has been correctly advertised and there is no breach of contract.

Edited by blitz

Ex-Retail Manager who is happy to offer helpful advise in many consumer problems based on my retail experience. Any advise I do offer is my opinion and how I understand the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Rob,

 

Thanks for your reply.

 

It is hard to guage using a display model as they dont tend to be connected to the net or have a facility to test load of any significant software.

 

I am certain the Laptop is not defective and it is just a case of the netbooks performce being very poor when compared to full size laptops.

 

My main gripe is the lack of customer service and how I feel I was treated.

 

Thanks anyway.

 

Scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blitz,

 

I agree with much of what you say however from a customer service perspective surely any company would promote the policy of allowing the customer to speak to the Manager should it be necessary. It is quite hard to take someone serious when they have just told you they will use the shops CCTV to confirm a particular conversation which took place. This is the basis of any sequence of chain: 1. Make complaint at shop floor level 2. If not happy escalate to Manger. 3. Still not happy make formal complaint to central customer service 4. Escalate further as necessary.

 

Regarding her lying about the fact the CCTV could be used, that actually is bordering on dishonesty, if someone of such character was willing to make such a statement to try and get rid of a customer, then what else could they fabricate?

 

In this case there was no fault so trying to bully someone to contact HP is just pointless.

 

Yes it does say 30 day exemption or words to that affect on till receipt, however to make things crystal clear, why does it simply say 'NO EXCHANGE OR REFUND ON THIS ITEM IN STORE' because that is pretty much the case. Even if there was a fault you have to mess around with 3rd Parties.

 

As you say individual retailers do set their own policy and clearly Argos is amongst the least customer focused in this area.

 

I can understand why Argoes need to protect their own interest and would not want someone using a laptop for 29 days and returning it expecting a refund, however somone taking one back 14 hours later with all packaging intact, well there should be some discretion used.

 

I had already passed my complaint onto customer service as well as the CEO regarding my treatment on a personnel level.

 

Thanks again for taking the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is the HP mini 110-411, by significant I really meant little more than watching youtube videos and general office useage.

 

The Stock Manager refused to test the laptop in anyway and repeatedly told me to contact HP. I guess peformance will always come down to opinion based on your perspective and expectation.

 

I have written to the Store Manager also, I actually sent letter to him, CS, & CEO, in the hope somone will at least do something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For atoms, N270, N280, N450, N455, N470, and N475 are all generally slow - the N550, N570, N2600, and N2800 are faster, and the longer numbered ones have better graphics support. There is another slow one, but I cannot remember its number though it might be N435 which was aimed at very low power use.

 

Some N270s came with Ion graphics which made then very usable.

 

Most can have the 1GB stick swapped for a 2GB replacement although sometimes major dismantling is required. Although other times its like swapping a mobile sim almost (albeit bigger/longer). Make sure you get the correct memory type, as it varied even in the same model families.

 

To get an idea how all processors compare look at the link below. Although some processors such as the E300/E350/E450 come with a rather useful graphics processor for a small machine that actually overcompensates for the sluggish processor.

 

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php

Link to post
Share on other sites

Argos could not re-sell this as new, so if they accepted it back they wild take a hefty hit on profits. Whenever buying something expensive it is defiantly worth googling the product and comparing it to others, or popping on to a forum and asking. Netbooks generally focus more on low power consumption, so they are underpowered as a computer. This is so the battery life is better. As a customer you are faced with a trade off with all laptops and mobile phones for that matter. You can get fast and powerful or a longer lasting battery. This was a bad choice, not a broken netbook.

 

You have no legal right to return an item because you changed your mind, so it is always at the shops discretion. Sweet talking them a little may get you your own way, but remember you are asking Argos to throw over £100 into the bin (as essentially they can no longer sell the item as new.)

 

You could sell it on Ebay and take a hit yourself, then research what you want from a computer and get some opinions. Not ideal but still an option.

 

As bang! says, you can commonly upgrade the memory easily, visit http://www.crucial.com/uk/systemscanner/ with the netbook and it will find the compatable memory upgrade for your netbook. I'm not saying this will cure 100% of the problems, but I find all computers running Windows 7 (even Windows 7 Basic) sluggish if they have under 2gig in them so if you are gonna stick with the netbook it is probably worth a try, and it can be quite cheap to upgrade the memory aswell.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are prepared to forego Windows, there are versions of Linux that will run far faster than windows on all machines, and can make not great netbooks a pleasure to use.

 

Also - malware and viruses are almost non existent for Linux based operating systems.

 

http://www.ubuntu.com/ubuntu

 

Visit that site and it will let you install Ubuntu on a memory pen, and then run your netbook from the pen to see if you like the operating system without wiping windows.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

When ever buying anything your unsure of buy it online so your covered under the DSR.

 

I hate all monitor manufacturers with their dead pixel policies,Recently purchased a new 27" monitor online rather than the shop which is local

enough for me to collect, Also never paid the extra £20 for a pixel check.

 

Monitor came and looked real nice, seemed perfect once up and running and then the dreaded dead pixels came to light, in total 5 pixels off in various

places, If I had bought in store I would have to lived with it but since I ordered online I could return under the DSR.

The shop were almost perfect in the return, the web site is incorrect for DSR returns but they accepted it no problem and my card was issued a refund there and then.

 

While the DSR is not there for customers to try items they purchase I find it certainly helps when making high value items like monitors that could have pixel problems

which are not covered under any warranty unless there is a certain amount of dead/stuck pixels.

 

Not sure on Argos returns for online orders but would think the exemption wouldn't apply due to been unable to actually test the item before hand.

 

George

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
If you return it as faulty you will be offered an alternative, tell them if you have no faith in that brand and if any others you may be offered do not have the same specs as you wanted in the first place, you should get a refund.

 

I'm not sure this is correct, what with it now being 30 months since the purchase ..........

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3472 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...