Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • going nowhere then. well if you've not been simply doing it to look the big cheese to your mates, you need to address why you are doing it. if its to impress your mates then simply stop being an idiot eh? , learn from it and go live your life . dx
    • Yes only with dwf. The first letter I received was explaining that I have not responded to the first letter they sent which I did not receive at all  then the second letter came, they said again saying we have not heard from you we are extending this another 14 days but at that point a couple of days before I called them on the phone saying I have received this and supposedly i owe money for stolen goods and that I need to see the breakdown which they then emailed to me dwf said this was what we were trying to send to you at first and I told them we have not received your first letter only one asking for demand of payment. On my second call to them I asked can you list the things that I have supposedly stole to which they replied “we normally have this on file but I can’t seem to find this on your file”   
    • oh well, at least your eign of terror is over now. so no contact directly since from/to sainsbury's. everything since has only been with DWF?
    • Replying to above  this was on the day that two store detectives approached me and my friend and took us into the back room and spoke to us when they explained they have been watching
    • as my learned friend above...and.. sadly because just like DCA's and initially yourself in this case, you believed they have some magical powers ...they DON'T. 85% of people blindly pay DCA's cause they know no better and think they are BAILIFFS. only the RETAILER can ever do court and none have done this on a silly member of joe public that did something stupid since the infamous 2012 Oxford case on retail loss. BAILIFFS can only ever be involved after you've been to court and lost a CCJ, fat chance re above... and anyway, no BAILIFF has any right of forced entry anyway on consumer debts even with a judgement so......... stop panicking and thinking everything that doesn't apply.. forget about them but p'haps a confidential GP visit might be a very good move... what slightly concerns me more here is:  who are 'them' that told you they'd reviewed a week of CCTV and come up with several shoplifting instances over that time amounting to the above? have you directly contacted or had contact from Sainsbury's? and know they HAVE done this? or is this DWF willy waving and they tricked you into  admitting several previous successful thefts... this is not the norm...  dx      
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

dwp capital limit Benefits stopped and how to appeal


melhunter
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4360 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

Probably wont get anywhere but I must try.

 

I am a single mother of one boy from marriage. Partener has no contact n pays nothing. Son is in receipt of middle level dla.

 

Anyway I am expecting my second child in july. Partner and i split at xmas due to stresses of current situation and him not being able to handle my 13yr old.

 

BasicallyI was getting housing benefit and Income support etc. I am adopted and my birth mother gave a lump sum to pay for my son to have correct assesments and tuition etc back in 2007. She then decided to send me a cheque to cover fees monthly until this april when we would use the lump sum again. We have tried special schools etc and use lump for this.

 

Now im not overly savvy with money and simply put it in a savings account seperate from my own as it wasnt my money to spend. Although clearly it was in my name. I still dont know if I should put it in a trust fund or something or how these things work.

 

DWP interviewed me last Sept under caution.Terrified. Explained everything as best I could and was told to wait on desision. Well doesnt take a genius to suss they will say im not entitled.

 

I cancelled all benefits as my partner who works full time asked me to move in with him and as my benefits had also been frozen i could not pay rent. I didnt want debts to get worse.

 

DWP eventually wrote in Jan saying i owe thousands and i mean thousands!!!! Income support council tax housing benefit over 4 plus years! Due to the money my mother has supplied but if i could show evidence of it being used for the ppurpose of his needs etc.

 

I did this but as you can imagin all to no avail. However I have written appealing saying again what the money was for and provided all receipts to show it has been used for the purposes it was ment. If I could spend it as I chose i wouldnt now be living in a room at my mothers with no income full stop and possible court and god forbid jail hanging over me!!

 

They are asking for more than i was even given due to the length of time i was given the money and even if it were a case of making repayments Ive nothing coming in apart frm my sons child benefit and dla I cant get job as im due and even temps wont take me on and once the baby is born wouldnt be able to get help with childcare as dwp say im not entitled. Im in a visious circle.

 

Does anyone know how i can best fight tis desision or if i should put money in a trust or such like.

 

The legl adviser i spoke with was not much help and happy to ask a fee and assume we put a guilty plea in never even suggested fighting the desision. But i guess this is the goverment we are dealing with and when they say your stuffed yor stuffed even if you shdnt be.

 

Terriffied my son and unborn will lose me or god know what.

My mom who who gave money wrote explaining it was only for the purpose of my sons education but nothing seems to matter to them.

Edited by honeybee13
Putting in some paragraphs for ease of reading.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bumping up, as you haven't had a response yet.

 

I'm sorry I can't help, but the benefits bods on here are really good - they should be able to offer you advice.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you have any legal documents to state that the money was for your son and was paid to you to use for his needs then the capital will be treated as belonging to you. In hindsight it would have been better for you or your mother to open a trust fund for your son. Also the money that your mother paid to you (which was used to pay his fees) would be treated as an income again it would be different if you had legal documents to conform what the payments were to be used for.

Without the legal documents I'm afraid the decision will stand as you have already requested a reconsideration and appeal.

The problem that you could encounter if you now transfer this capital into a trust fund for your child is that the benefits decision makers could decide that you have deliberately deprived yourself of the capital and transferred it into your sons name in order to be able to claim benefits in your own right. If that decision is/was made then you would still technically be treated as having that capital until a calculation that they calculate in the office shows when you would technically be back under the capital rules which would allow you to receive benefits again in your own right. This calculation is complicated and I haven't had to do that for many years so could not even begin to give you an idea of how long it could be before you could reclaim and receive IS in your own right sorry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I claimed benefits there was a question on the form "does anyone else pay anything for your child eg education etc" and I declared that a children's charity was paying for my dd's school fees (specialist disability school) and they paid direct and I never received or saw the money. This was looked into fully and it was accepted in the end but I know that all income even if you don't receive it needs to be declared. As your child's school fees unless paid directly by the child's father (which would be child maintenance which would be ok) is income of yours unfortunately. Ideally your mother should have paid the school fees directly and kept the money herself and then you should have declared what was happening and then maybe you would have been ok. Though maybe I was ok as it was a children's charity paying rather than a relative, I have no idea why that was ok at the time. Either way, I declared it at the time. I'm sory you are going through this, it sounds a nightmare.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Unless you have any legal documents to state that the money was for your son and was paid to you to use for his needs then the capital will be treated as belonging to you. In hindsight it would have been better for you or your mother to open a trust fund for your son. Also the money that your mother paid to you (which was used to pay his fees) would be treated as an income again it would be different if you had legal documents to conform what the payments were to be used for.

Without the legal documents I'm afraid the decision will stand as you have already requested a reconsideration and appeal.

The problem that you could encounter if you now transfer this capital into a trust fund for your child is that the benefits decision makers could decide that you have deliberately deprived yourself of the capital and transferred it into your sons name in order to be able to claim benefits in your own right. If that decision is/was made then you would still technically be treated as having that capital until a calculation that they calculate in the office shows when you would technically be back under the capital rules which would allow you to receive benefits again in your own right. This calculation is complicated and I haven't had to do that for many years so could not even begin to give you an idea of how long it could be before you could reclaim and receive IS in your own right sorry.

 

Thanks for advise. Im not looking to claim any benefits anain.

What legal document should I have gotten?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I claimed benefits there was a question on the form "does anyone else pay anything for your child eg education etc" and I declared that a children's charity was paying for my dd's school fees (specialist disability school) and they paid direct and I never received or saw the money. This was looked into fully and it was accepted in the end but I know that all income even if you don't receive it needs to be declared. As your child's school fees unless paid directly by the child's father (which would be child maintenance which would be ok) is income of yours unfortunately. Ideally your mother should have paid the school fees directly and kept the money herself and then you should have declared what was happening and then maybe you would have been ok. Though maybe I was ok as it was a children's charity paying rather than a relative, I have no idea why that was ok at the time. Either way, I declared it at the time. I'm sory you are going through this, it sounds a nightmare.

 

Thanks. Perhaps formd have changed. Still I didnt have it when i initially claimed but i understand wht you mean. Just update forms asking if there were any changes in my circumstances. As far as i was concerned no. Sigh. Now the council tax are asking to be repaid dispite it all being appealed. Seems a tad sily to proceed when appeal hasnt been dealt with but what do i dolong term no income no home no belongings for baliffs to reclaim. I dont want to be jailed ive children to think of and it just costd the tax payer even more eek.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You won't go to prison.

 

Thank you

I am not great at math but all benefits over 4yrs is around 70,000!!! Ive nothing to have seized by baliffs and no means to pay if after appeal they still rule against me and council tax say baliffs will be instructed dispite ongoing appeal. Something here doent seem right. Baliffs dont bother me as I have nothing to take however the distress it may cause my mother does.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have contacted my local MP over this also but hes away temporaly. What i dont get is how council tax think they can send in baliffs when its still under appeal. Ok in my situation theres nothing to take so stuff em but if i did n it was sold them appeal ruled in my favour i would have lost my stuff. Seems mad n out of order i suppose baliffs hold it till appeals decided. But its so frustrating typical when its linked to goverment. They (not baliffs) just storm on regardless

I have my moments where i just say stuff it all Im not going to let some stupid system stress my unborn child and family making us ill because the precious goverment scheme cant see when its being silly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not great at math but all benefits over 4yrs is around 70,000!!!

 

 

Even so, it doesn't necessarily mean that prison is the first or only option, by any means at all. Loads of different factors are taken into account when sentencing (if it gets that far!), and factors in your favour include 1) a 'non-greedy' motive (i.e. you used this money to pay for a special school! Had you bought a Ferrari, things would be much different) and 2) your household circumstances (you are, evidently, the mother of a disabled child).

 

Neither of those factors are 'get out of jail free' cards by any means at all, but they will go a long way, if you found yourself convicted of an offence.

 

RE: Baillifs, etc...are you in a position to repay anything at all? You'd never be expected to repay overpayments of this size in one go. Nevertheless, the authorities may try to throw their weight around with scary letters and such. Making even 'token' payments can also go a long way. However, I understand it's still under appeal. The CAB may be able to help with the financial/debt collection side of things, nevertheless.

 

Just remember, too, that your (in)ability to pay has nothing to do with court sentencing (again, if it gets that far!!).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I am going through similar although no where near the same figures. From previouscourt appearances and DWP appeals I know that you can win some leniency providing youremain polite and do EVERYTHING you can to prove yourself. Although you may nothave any legal contract explaining the use of the money you do have allthe receipts. Given that your son is also in receipt of DLA (which is to pay forthe things you are claiming your mum paid for) you will also have to prove thathis DLA is not enough to cover the day to day essentials (extra clothing,washing, travel, damages, specialised equipment etc.) as well as the school fees. If youare missing any receipt then you must phone then write to that school/companyand request a copy of the receipt for the given date - don't forget to look atyour bank/credit card statements to see where large sums of money get paid toofor your son too.

I used The Law Centre for my last appeal and am using themfor my current appeal on behalf of my wife and another potential appeal after weget a response back from a request for DWP to look at the decision they havejust made over my wife’s capital. Something I think DWP has done to my wife is to have doubled and trippled the amounts my wife acctually has. I.e. my wife recieved £3,000 Student loan/grant into her current account and on the same day transfers it to her saving account they then see it as £6,000 savings as there was definately £3,000 in each account at some point in time, albiet different point of time. This is a where you needed to have asked for a written statement of the reasons of their decision within 30 days of the original letter so you got the information they used. You should still receive this as part of the appeal process. Even if you had about £16,000 savings it will help if you double check the DWP calculations because if they tell the court you had £32,000 savings you don't stand much chance of being listened too. The way you have worded your posts though indicate you me that you had much more money then just the school fees per term as you said "lump sum" that the pays for the school if it was just enough each year to cover it then you might be ok(ish) but it sounds to me like you had enough to cover him for many years? Are you able to tell us the sort of sum that you had at the peak in your savings?

Regarding the council tax bailiff company then (if they are like ours) youwould only have to mention their name to your local CAB and they will tell youto ignore them. Phone the council direct and explain that you are a.) Appealing,2.) Skint, 3.) Preggers, 4.) Caring for a disabled child, 5.) Single mum 6.) Withouta paid job 7.) Homeless.

In the past I have spoken to the council and explained that I want to pay myarrears but I wanted to pay the council direct and not the bailiffs (Bristow& Sutor in my case) purely on the grounds that the bailiffs were putting oncharges that I couldn't see a reason for and solely from that one phone call Ihad the bailiff charges removed and paid the council in small instalments withnever hearing from the bailiffs again. You should speak to CAB regarding thecouncil tax as well - they would be able to help in regards to putting the 7points I mentioned above to them and also ask for the same information to beput to whoever housing benefit was paid to.

Although the comment about moving your money into your son's account mightbe seen as deliberately reducing your capitol I should think that you could getadvice about paying it back to the same account it came from, fromyour mum. If this is possible then you could talk about the other suggestion ofa trust fund in your child's name but again I would seek advice on how this mayaffect you.

Are you saying that you current situation right now is that you are stillsingle, at your mums home and not receiving any benefits other than your son'sDLA? Do you receive Child Tax Credits or Child Benefit? And do you mind measking why you are not on income support anymore (i.e. are you not allowed toclaim because of alleged fraud or do you still have over £16,000 capitol?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...