Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated possession, possession orders, bailiffs  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4454 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear All

 

I really need your help right now. I live in a building which consists of a shop on the ground floor and three properties on the above three floors.

 

On Wednesday of this week, all of us in this building were given a letter by the owner of the building and (at the time) current landlord explaining that as of that day, the lease for the building was now in the control of the shop owner on the ground floor.

 

The following day I came home to find a hand written letter from the new landlord as per the attachment below.

 

I am not in any debt with my landlord of any kind. Today he has visited telling me I have 28 days and if I got within that time, he will give two weeks discount on my rent.

 

I was on an Assured Shorthold Tenancy with the previous landlord (and the overall owner of the building) which has since lapsed into a monthly rolling periodic tenancy. The new landlord is claiming I have no contract with him and therefore he is only required to give me 28 days notice to leave. Is this right?

 

All of us in the building are being subjected to the same version of events and we are all pretty frightened right now.

 

Carl.

 

PS: If you are unable to read the letter, the text is as follows:

 

Dear Mr. Carl

 

My name is X X. I'm the new owner of the building. And I need my flat 3 for my stuff. You can have one months notice. In mean time you can pay your rent on Lyods TSB account number x Sort code X. Please inform me when you can move out.

 

Many thanks.

Letter.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have an AST, now SPT and your neighbours' the same, your new LL has not got a hope with current approach, until he issues a valid s21. Will take him at least 4-6 months to get a Court repo order.

Did you pay previous LL any deposit at start of T?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Yes I did pay a deposit way, way back.

 

I've been told tonight that the only person that an issue the Section 21 notice is the person I have a contract with, in this case, the original owner of the building as I do not have any contract whatsoever with the new Landlord.

 

Carl.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Carl, your contract is with new owner/LL as per his letter informing you he is new owner and which account to pay your rent. He inherited your orig AST in purchasing the property and is now resp for your deposit from old LL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your AST agreement on a periodic tenancy will still apply regardless (it gets inherited essentially and isn't optional for the new ll) and the new LL can issue a s.21 (2 months notice + court order before eviction not before). That note certainly doesn't apply and its up to you how to play it (i.e tell him later in the month or when he asks etc to maximise the time you have in the property). During that time it might be worth confirming that the past and new landlord that the deposit has been transferred to the new landlord to avoid problems with that at the end (Again new landlord responsible for paying the deposit back).

Ex-Retail Manager who is happy to offer helpful advise in many consumer problems based on my retail experience. Any advise I do offer is my opinion and how I understand the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey this is a complicated business isn't it? But hey, regardless of who should be giving the notice, I am correct in saying it should be a section 21 notice giving at least two months to leave from the next rent due date?

 

This guy has told me, if I go within the next 28 days, he'll give me two weeks rent free. Yeah right!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Irrespective whether the new landlord owns the whole property or is leasing property the new Landlord still has to properly serve a S21 giving at least two months.

 

It is correct that the new landlord has inherited the agreements and all rights and responsibilites you have with the old landlords agreements.

 

Therefore anything you had in your agreements with the old landlord still stands with the new landlord.

 

Is it just you that has been aske to leave or the other properties as well?

 

Also write to the new landlord requesting confirmation of which Tenancy Deposit Scheme your Deposit is held in.

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

It sounds like this new landlord wants all of yous out then and yes it does stink but you play him at his own game and dont let him away with anything.

 

From now please keep everything in writing send recorded delivery if you can. If landlord tries to speak to yous just inform them that you wish it in writing and will not discuss it verbally.

 

Remember to try and get the other tenants onside as the more voices the better so to speak.

 

* Now I would check with your local Council that your new landlord is registered as a private landlord with them. (You may need to check whether you local Council actually do this as some councils dont but please check this out).

* As it does seem like he is wanting all tenants out I would advise looking for alternative accomodation also during this period so yous are not left out in the cold as and when the new landlord gets the court order I would be cautious.

* Do write to the new landlord and ask for written confirmation as to which Tenancy deposit Scheme your Deposit is in.

* Remember your new landlord is responsible for all repairs as per your agreement.

 

Didi yous all have a move in inventory done to condition of property?

 

Finally keep everything in writing a paper trail in the best.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stu, I wouldn't alert new LL to deposit resps. When he finally serves s21 and he reaches Court hearing, s21 should be thrown out, if served before all deposit requirements met.

I woild have Council private res housing officer tel no on speed dial from now on. (Protection from illegal eviction/harrassment)

 

If new LL wants all Ts out and has already offered minimal financial inducement (carrot & stick approach), it puts all Ts in a strong negotiating position when he realises he has no stick other than legal repo & eviction, which could take several months.

All Ts should meet and consider what their 'price' is sep & together. Agree to record/share ind approaches. Agree mutual min compensation. Time limited as LL will eventually get repo via valid s21.

Check local planning applications for submissions to develop the site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can one of you advise me what should have happened regarding deposits?

 

To recap then, all I have had in terms of correspondence about this whole thing (indeed all any of us have had) are the two letters below.

 

KFLETTER1.JPG

 

IKLETTER1.JPG

KFLETTER.jpg

Edited by weymouthuk
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...