Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Randall & Vickers - council tax refund


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4064 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I hope someone can help, and please forgive me if I'm in the wrong place.

 

My 96 year old Mum in Law is being pestered with letters from Randall & Vickers who say she can get a council tax refund back to 1993 (and they want 30%). They claim she is in a higher band (B) than some of her neighbours (A).

 

1) is this legit?

2) can we apply for her so she does not loose 30%, or is it better to go with R&V?

 

Thanks in advance for any advice.

Rocky

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only way this can be done is via the Valuation Office by appealing the Band she is in. This can be done by yourselves for £0 but any backdating - if any will only probably go back 1 year only. Beware as doing this could also go the other way as well. Tell the shysters to Foxtrot Oscar.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks PT.

Mum in Law is always being targeted by some type of "offer", they seem to pick on the old and vulnerable.

This one was cleverly done, the letter was addressed to the property and Mum in Law was convinced it was addressed to her personally until I pointed it out. The header mimics a solicitor style and looks very official, with "Important information about your council tax" in red ink as a heading. It is signed by a "council tax co-ordinator".

Easy to be taken in.

Rocky

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

you can apply on her behalf and any reduction to her liability would be applied from 1993 or when she became liable if she moved in after 1993

 

is your mother in receipt of council tax benefit? if so any reduction would be applied to council tax benefit first.

 

for example

 

if charge for band B is £1400 per annum and your mother is receiving ctb of £800 per annum, she would pay £600 per annum

 

if rebanded, the charge for band A is £1200 per annum, your mother's ctb would reduce to £600 per annum, she would still pay £600 per annum - no refund payable

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will only go back 6 years if you have been overpaying. You can check with the Valuation office free of charge. This firm is a fraud that the valuation office is very aware of. The firm will do nothing for you except write a letter to the valuation office, it wont even be a legally written letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sorry for hijacking the thread we also have a letter from this company where would we find out if we are in the wrong council tax band? Was going to start my own thread bt after reading this one don't think I will bother Many thanks GH

:) HFO fan club member :) HFO V GLORYHUNTER ( WON ) :)

0 - 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sorry for hijacking the thread we also have a letter from this company where would we find out if we are in the wrong council tax band? Was going to start my own thread bt after reading this one don't think I will bother Many thanks GH

 

You can check you council tax band and those of your neighbours on the valuation office website http://www.voa.gov.uk/

It will be based on sale prices at or around 1st April 1991 England and 1st April 2003 for Wales

for England:

Band A = sale price of below £40,000

Band B = between £40,001 and £52,000

Band C = between £52,001 and £68,000

Band D = between £68,001 and £88,000

Band E = between £88,001 and £120,000

Band F = between £120,001 and £160,000

Band G = between £160,001 and £320,000

Band H = over £320,000

 

it is totally different for wales.

You will need to look at a site like http://www.nethouseprices.com/ and look at the sold prices for around april 1991 for a property similar to your own. It should be around the same size, number of bedrooms etc. I would try to gain more than one example of sales in your area.

To have the valuation office look at your band for you free of charge all you need to do is contact the valuation office by phone/email/letter http://www.voa.gov.uk/corporate/contact/index.html

you will need to provide the your name and address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 months later...

Sorry if I'm going off at a slight tangent but this same company have contacted me to say I shouldn't have paid Stamp Duty as I'm in an area which is entiled to 'Disadvantaged Area Relief for Stamp Duty Land Tax.'

As with the above situation, they want 30% for claiming this for me. Is there a way of finding out about this relief on my own as I do know my area is classed as disadvantaged?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...