Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You need a back up plan. If you believe that redundancy is very likely, start looking at other employment options.  Don't leave it until you have been made redundant before looking for new employment. I regularly speak to people who have been made redundant and about mental health. Those who have a positive plan, get into employment quickly following redundancy and manage to maintain their finances. Those who don't have a plan, decide to accept redundancy and a period of unemployment. They end up in a downward spiral, with redundancy money spent, debts accumulated, mental health decline and difficulty finding new employment.  
    • Interested observer here as I'm in a similar situation. People become conditioned into seeking and maintaining a perfect credit score/file, but if your situation is that you're unlikely to obtain further credit for the foreseeable future anyway due to your other outstanding debts, then tanking your credit file now won't make a difference other than you've took back control of your finances.
    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cap1 & CCA return


tamadus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4972 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest Battleaxe

I have to agree, this thread contains pertinent information to our claims regarding banks charges. Without the CCA we cannot back our claims and prove the breaches which banks repeatedly ignore. Perhaps one of the MODS could create the relevant stickies, to help Newbies with their questions. I don't mind helping Newbies with their questions, as I was one once, maybe the MODS help more with this function also.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

can I add my twopence worth and I think its been said before, a sticky for the main points would be fantastic! maybe a template letter, I have used the PPI letter and amended it for other charges but was worried I had also weakened it in some way by 'fiddling' with it!?

 

this is a wealth of info but it is large :):):)

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pam i know you are busy, and i dont like asking direct questions, but

 

can you just have a look at my thoughts in this post

 

is there ANY mileage in anything ive written

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-780736.html

 

Dave

 

OOH Dave,

thats interesting!!!

 

I've just checked my micrfiche signature form, the torn of bottom part of the application from that MBNA sent me in response to my CCA 1974 S78 request and...yes, it does show my signature and date 25/07/2001. However MBNA's stamped signature goes right through the DPA important information but the date is 08/08/2001.

 

I don't suppose it makes much difference in my case as the doc. that I was sent does not show any credit limit/amount of credit, it also lacks many of the prescribed terms.

 

Anyhow, I have reported MBNA to TS and they have forwarded my complaint regarding MBNA being in Default and thus have committed an Offence to Chester TS for investigation.

 

It would appear that TS are reluctant to use their enforcement powers, but I find it interesting that anyone complaining to their local TS about MBNA, will in turn have their complaints forwarded to Chester.

 

AC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

AC,

 

I would love to be a fly on the wall when TS has it's monthly meeting with MBNA to discuss these matters. Looks like the meetings aren't very productive. I know this is subjective, but if TS are reporting the complaints MBNA, why hasn't MBNA taken heed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe because there is no dis-incentive for their actions.

Its like being at school.

You mess about in the playground, and a prefect comes along and tells you 'You shouldn't be doing that'.

Once the prefects back is turned , you stick two fingers up, say 'what do they know' and carry on.

 

the regulatory bodies are not geared up or prepared for a consumer revolt, nor are the courts. What is happening now is that the consumer has gained more teeth in a shorter space of time, than 100 years of authoritarian dictatorship and monopolisation of regulation (phew-did I say that?)

Maybe we should take the regulatory body(ies) to court/task for non compliance of their fiduciary duties?

Now that would be interesting. (expensive but interesting!)

If my advice has helped, please click on my scales. Thank you!

MBNA - CRA file to be cleared then finished!

__________________________________________

Abbey Personal - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court

__________________________________________

Capital One - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court

__________________________________________

GMAC - Sent DCA SAR 9th March 07 - confirmed not legally assigned.

Waiting for GMAC to provide breakdown of charges and CCA under s79

__________________________________________

Alliance & Leicester - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a document fee is included in the total amount payable but interest as been charged on the fee. Could the fee be construed as credit?,

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a document fee is included in the total amount payable but interest as been charged on the fee. Could the fee be construed as credit?,

 

If the fee is provided in the total credit amount, then yes IMO!

If my advice has helped, please click on my scales. Thank you!

MBNA - CRA file to be cleared then finished!

__________________________________________

Abbey Personal - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court

__________________________________________

Capital One - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court

__________________________________________

GMAC - Sent DCA SAR 9th March 07 - confirmed not legally assigned.

Waiting for GMAC to provide breakdown of charges and CCA under s79

__________________________________________

Alliance & Leicester - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the fee is provided in the total credit amount, then yes IMO!

 

A term in the agreement states: the document fee will be debited to your account on the day the credit is first drawn and interest as been aplied on the fee and is included in the interest as stated above.

 

I think the creditor is guilty of mischief by charging the account with interest on the fee. This IMO is credit, threfore the amount of credit as been incorectly stated.

 

I have a copy of the original agreement given to me at the time but the creditor has a copy with a line through the document fee making the fee void. The creditor is forwarding the agreement through a CCA request. Interesting.

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we should take the regulatory body(ies) to court/task for non compliance of their fiduciary duties?

Now that would be interesting. (expensive but interesting!)

 

7-day LBA for £30 billion to the OFT for negligence. Roughly £4bn for each year it has had the ability to retaliate against the use and enforcement of unfair terms in consumer contracts. I dare you. :p

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

LMAO - meagain....

 

Is there a template for that? :o

 

P

If my advice has helped, please click on my scales. Thank you!

MBNA - CRA file to be cleared then finished!

__________________________________________

Abbey Personal - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court

__________________________________________

Capital One - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court

__________________________________________

GMAC - Sent DCA SAR 9th March 07 - confirmed not legally assigned.

Waiting for GMAC to provide breakdown of charges and CCA under s79

__________________________________________

Alliance & Leicester - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zubo and meagain - I'm up for it if you are!

 

....Perseus throws down the Gauntlet, uncertain of what the hell he's letting himself in for...

If my advice has helped, please click on my scales. Thank you!

MBNA - CRA file to be cleared then finished!

__________________________________________

Abbey Personal - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court

__________________________________________

Capital One - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court

__________________________________________

GMAC - Sent DCA SAR 9th March 07 - confirmed not legally assigned.

Waiting for GMAC to provide breakdown of charges and CCA under s79

__________________________________________

Alliance & Leicester - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's do it!

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

7-day LBA for £30 billion to the OFT for negligence. Roughly £4bn for each year it has had the ability to retaliate against the use and enforcement of unfair terms in consumer contracts. I dare you. :p

 

I REALLY WISH...somebody would do that!!

Maybe, WE can.

Count me in.

 

AC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to ask what could be a stupid question.....

I have 2 loans with EGG and 1 credit card....

My experian report lists 3 loans instead of the 1....

If I do a CCA request does it cover all Agreements held by egg for all loans and the credit card??

Or do I need to do one for each??

Problem is as un1boy knows already....Egg have listed the one loan 3 times, all with different terms, monthly repayment amounts and different loan amounts!

2 of these are listed as settled.....one of the settled ones is the correct information.....for the actual loan I took out!

So if they cannot supply the CCA for the ones they made up??

Does that mean they are unenforcable????

i thought I would ask as Tamadus and Un1boy seem to be full of good info....lol

Cheers....

Russ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to ask what could be a stupid question.....

I have 2 loans with EGG and 1 credit card....

My experian report lists 3 loans instead of the 1....

If I do a CCA request does it cover all Agreements held by egg for all loans and the credit card??

Or do I need to do one for each??

Problem is as un1boy knows already....Egg have listed the one loan 3 times, all with different terms, monthly repayment amounts and different loan amounts!

2 of these are listed as settled.....one of the settled ones is the correct information.....for the actual loan I took out!

So if they cannot supply the CCA for the ones they made up??

Does that mean they are unenforcable????

i thought I would ask as Tamadus and Un1boy seem to be full of good info....lol

Cheers....

Russ

 

Russ

 

Under these circumstances I would 'help' EGG.

At £1 each +£1 recorded - send them a CCA for each spelling out the account numbers....

 

then they really cannot muddy your waters

 

Z

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would.....but three of the listings on experians documents have no reference numbers, etc...

only 2 loans and 1 credit card are known to me....

The 3 remaining that EGG listed are made up by Egg....

So I do not know how to ask for copies of the CCA's, if neither of us have any loan agreement numbers, etc.....

They list the loan I actually signed up for as settled on the same day I took it out.....lol

Rather than list as defaulted they just listed my repayments as a new loan!

My bloody head hurts again.....lol

helllpppppp....lol

russ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to ask what could be a stupid question.....

I have 2 loans with EGG and 1 credit card....

My experian report lists 3 loans instead of the 1....

If I do a CCA request does it cover all Agreements held by egg for all loans and the credit card??

Or do I need to do one for each??

Problem is as un1boy knows already....Egg have listed the one loan 3 times, all with different terms, monthly repayment amounts and different loan amounts!

2 of these are listed as settled.....one of the settled ones is the correct information.....for the actual loan I took out!

So if they cannot supply the CCA for the ones they made up??

Does that mean they are unenforcable????

i thought I would ask as Tamadus and Un1boy seem to be full of good info....lol

Cheers....

Russ

 

Hi Russ,

 

Now that is very interesting!

I have a cc with Humpty Dumpty (in dispute)

However, upon making an audit of my CRA credit files I found four entries, but one was shown as settled. Therefore, it looks as though I have had four Egg credit cards?

I considered long ago that my Egg information as shown on the CRA files was ambiguous, thus could give the wrong impression.

 

Make a Request under S77 & S78 of The Consumer Credit Act 1974, you only need to make one request, but remember to enclose a £1 postal order.

 

This matter hasd been troubling me for some time now, because undoubtedly egg will provide you with a copy of the true signed executed agreement but...and this is the crux of the matter, there is an issue here re: S85 CCA 1974 and Copies of Cancellation notices copies of Docs 1983, regulatation 7.

 

Most likeley I am barking up the wrong tree but I do smell a very rotten egg!!

 

AC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers angrycat,

I did a CCA request on 13th March 2007...

As yet No reply from EGG.....

But Moorcroft supplied a copy, with no assignment proof....

So I am now ignoring them.....

As they have no hold over me.....only EGG if they actually supply the agreement....lol

Moorcroft have only supplied the agreement for the original loan....

If EGG have told Experian and Equifax that it is settled, as they have done!

I guess they have No agreement for the new loans they listed with the CRA's.....

So I could argue that the genuine loan was settled.......lol

And dispute the one's they cannot prove exist....??

Or they will have to admit supplying CRA's with false information????

russ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick question everyone.

 

Now, I know that an overdraft doesn't come under the sec 77/78 requests, but, if a lender takes you to court over an od balance and they have no paperwork to prove you even opened the account, can they actually take action against you? Or, would they have to provide paperwork in court?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick question everyone.

 

Now, I know that an overdraft doesn't come under the sec 77/78 requests, but, if a lender takes you to court over an od balance and they have no paperwork to prove you even opened the account, can they actually take action against you? Or, would they have to provide paperwork in court?

 

 

They don't need to provide paperwork to the court that an account as been opened just a POC stating the balance owed. It is up to you then, to admit or dispute the balance.

 

Paul

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

They don't need to provide paperwork to the court that an account as been opened just a POC stating the balance owed. It is up to you then, to admit or dispute the balance.

 

Paul

 

To take this one step further: say this was a JOINT account with an OD, one joint account holder declares bankrupt, the other one not. The non bankrupt one is taken to court by the bank and disputes the amount and forces a full proof trial

Would the bank have to provide the original paperwork from when the account became joint to show joint liability, i.e. that the non bankrupt person signed for a joint liability on this account ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is probably off topic but......am battling with Mint (my thread is Mint Triton Green & Co vs Me and this and a longer version is on it too), who are digging their heels in. In reply to my CCA, they sent me a copy of my application form (no credit limit, no APR, no account number, a stamp of a MINT 'authorised signature' etc.) and then a 2 page unsigned, undated agreement (with my name, address, account number, credit limit - tho it was only sent in response to the CCA, not when I rec'd the CC), which I am challenging. Letters are flying back and forth and here is an excerpt from their most recent response:

 

'under 7(1) (b) of the Consumer Credit (Cancellations Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983. Particularly 3(2) which permits the copy agreement not to show signatures or personal details that may have appeared on the application part of the document. There is no statutory requirement under the Act for us ever to give a copy to the customer with a signature on it'.

 

Is there any precedent in refuting this? If MINT is correct, my argument dissolves....or must they produce a signed copy if it goes to court? thanks in advance.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4972 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...