Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So, why do DVLA (via that leaflet) say 1) that S.88 MAY allow a driver to be treated as if they have a valid licence (after an application that discloses a medical condition) AND   2) before DVLA have reached their licensing decision ? (Since S.88 ceases to apply once they have reached a decision to grant or refuse a licence)
    • Thanks for that, Bazza. It sheds some more light on things but I’m still by no means sure of the OP’s father’s likelihood of successfully defending the charge. This in particular from the guidance stands out me: He does not meet all the s88 criteria. S88 is clear and unambiguous: It makes no provision for either the driver or a medical professional to make a judgement on his fitness to drive under s88. S92(4) and the June 2013 guidance you mention defines in what circumstances the SoS must issue a licence. It does no modify s88 in any way. However, delving further I have noticed that the DVLA provides a service where the driver can enter a relevant medical condition to obtain the correct documentation to apply for a licence: https://www.gov.uk/health-conditions-and-driving/find-condition-online I haven’t followed this through because I don’ have the answers that the OP’s father would give to the questions they will ask and in any case it requires the input of personal information and I don’t want to cause complications with my driving licence. It is possible, however, that the end result (apart from providing the necessary forms) is a “Yes/No” answer to whether the driver can continue to drive (courtesy of s88). With that in mind, I should think at  the very least the OP’s father should have completed that process but there is no mention that he has. The Sleep Apnoea Trust gives some useful guidance on driving and SA: https://sleep-apnoea-trust.org/driving-and-sleep-apnoea/detailed-guidance-to-uk-drivers-with-sleep-apnoea/ I know nothing about SA at all and found It interesting to learn that there are various “grades” of the condition. But the significant thing which struck me is that it is only the least trivial version that does not require a driver to report his condition to the DVLA. But more significant than that is that the SA Trust makes no mention of continuing to drive once the condition has been reported. The danger here is that the court will simply deconstruct s88 and reach the same conclusion that I have. I accept, having looked at the DVLA guidance, that there may be (as far as they are concerned) scope for s88 to apply contrary to the conditions stated in the legislation. Firstly, we don’ know whether there is and secondly we don’t know whether the OP’s father would qualify to take advantage of it. Of course he could argue that he need no have reported his condition. The SA trust certainly emphasises that the condition should not be reported until a formal detailed diagnosis is obtained. But the fact is he did report it. As soon as he does that, as far as I can see,  s88 is no longer available to him. Certainly as it stands I maintain my opinion that he was not allowed to continue driving under s88. The only way I would change this is to see the end result of the DVLA exercise I mentioned above. If that said he could continue driving he would have a defence to the charge. Without it I am not confident.  
    • Americans are already keen on UK-made coins, and the Mint said it has seen a 118 per cent increase in sales to the US since 2022.View the full article
    • Right, my friend has just called me. He has indeed had to cancel bookings in the past from his end. There is a specific number for Booking.com that he calls.   After that Booking.com jump into action and contact you re refund and/or alternative accommodation. I suppose it's all logical - the party cancelling the booking has to inform Booking.com. So the gite owner needs to contact Booking.com on the cancellation number.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Suing landlord, what next after LBA?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3966 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Then after the LBA (which she will 100% ignore) what is the next step?

 

LBA's need to be sent recorded delivery, once she is out of time to rectify, 7, 10, or 14 days, whatever you feel is appropriate then you need to back this up with a small claim against her, it costs about £35 and is very simple to do, any fees you have to pay to do this are added to the total amount you are claiming from her.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Your LBA should be sent by mail - no need for recorded delivery - just get a free certificate of posting.

 

After that you can commence a claim online at www.moneyclaim.gov.uk or by paper, using court form N1.

 

Once you have submitted your claim (with the fee of £25 for a £160 online claim - £35 if you use N1) it will be sent to che defendant. The defendant will have 14 days to respond to it. The court will send you a form with when it was sent, and when they must respond by. If they don't, you can fill in the form and apply for a judgement by default.

 

If the defendant does respond with a defence, they are also likely to submit a countercaim (for the builders, damage etc). Details of this will be sent to ou with an allocation questionaire, which you have to fill in and send back with your defence to the counterclaim if applicable. If there is a counterclaim, you must respond to every single point raised - even if you just say 'I deny this' otherwise it will be taken that you accept that point.

 

You will have to pay a hearing fee of £25 if it goes to a hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

As I should imagine is the case with all letting agents, they send me a letter barely 3 months into a 6 months tenancy asking if I will be wanting to renew for the next 6 months so as they can say if they don't hear from me soon the TWO months notice I am legally owed will begin as from 2 months before the end of the tenancy. I HAVE to let them know what I'm doing well in advance and sign the paper.

 

So if I've signed saying yes I'll be continuing on, surely I can still change my mind and give them notice no later than one month before the tenancy ends?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where in the UK are you (different laws north and south of the wall) - and if you can find your tenancy agreement what type of agreement does it state you have?

 

If you tell us this it makes things a lot simpler to answer in more detail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

T cannot give 1 month Notice to terminate T during Fixed term. T can vacate on last day of fixed term, without any Notice, (not courteous) or give at least 1 month Stat Notice once a stat periodic T has arisen, subject to stat dates.

Whilst you have indicated a wish to remain out of courtesy, LA/LL cannot require you to sign an extension/newAST without your consent, if no consent, then a SPT will be created automatically at end of fixed term. If you leave without due Notice or on last day of fixed term, then expect LL to make you liable for nec Court fees, as he now has a reasonable expectation of your continued occupation beyond the fixed term.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmcall me dumb but I didn't really understand much of that. The term is fixed 6 months. I have signed to say I WILL renew in 2 months time. Can I bail out of that then or not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically LA are asking if you intend staying beyond the fixed term, otherwise they will issue a s21 to expire at end of fixed term, meaning poss repo order eviction within 1-3 months later.

I suspect your AST requires T to similarly provide 2 months Notice to Quit during fixed term (equanimity), which cannot expire before last day of fixed term. Only after SPT is created can you give min 1 month Notice to terminate T.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I see. Well I've never heard of anyone being on a month by month basis except for someone being a lodger. So for AST's it's 2 months notice the T has to give the LL as well a vice versa. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I see. Well I've never heard of anyone being on a month by month basis except for someone being a lodger. So for AST's it's 2 months notice the T has to give the LL as well a vice versa. Thanks

 

except if you move out the day before the last day of the AST then you have to give NO notice, just tell them that you are going before you do.

I am not a solicitor :!::!:

 

Most of my knowledge came from this site :-D:-D

 

If I have been helpful in any way at all .............. Please click my star..... :-(:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite right Sally

 

Not if moving out at the end of AST Tenant does not have to give ANY notice at all.

 

Tenant has to give 1 months notice and LL 2 IF tenant stays 1 day after the end of AST as it becomes a periodic tenancy then.

I am not a solicitor :!::!:

 

Most of my knowledge came from this site :-D:-D

 

If I have been helpful in any way at all .............. Please click my star..... :-(:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I did it, LL didn't like it Letting agent told LL they would back her up. I took them to court for non return of deposit, and she counter claimed I gave no notice. Judge told her a contract is a contract and has a beginning and an end. So she lost. NO sign of Letting agent at the court though..

I am not a solicitor :!::!:

 

Most of my knowledge came from this site :-D:-D

 

If I have been helpful in any way at all .............. Please click my star..... :-(:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

marlow, your situation is complicated by the advance agreement you signed. Thus there is an Contract to supply / occupy for both sides. LL would not be able to hold you to new terms of AST, as that new T has not yet been created, he could sue for breach of Contract and claim consequential losses, eg up to 1 months rent and cost of re-marketing if you withdraw and vacate. If you stay, the new AST terms will take effect.

IMO you should contact LL asap and reach an agreeable solution for both.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. I'm not actually wanting to leave as yet. I'm just looking to the future because all this sending me stuff to sign just 3 months into a 6m contract is pretty damn annoying! Guess I'll just give them the 2 months notice for when I do want to leave. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. I'm not actually wanting to leave as yet. I'm just looking to the future because all this sending me stuff to sign just 3 months into a 6m contract is pretty damn annoying! Guess I'll just give them the 2 months notice for when I do want to leave. Thanks.

 

Would you prefer that LL/LA did not contact you in plenty of time?

 

You have various options

1 Negotiate early surrender of T during fixed term

2 Provide ASTreqd NTQ during fixed term, which cannot expire before end of fixed term

3 Vacate T ON last day of fixed term, without Notice. Not advised if you want a positive LL ref

4 Once SPT has been created, serve min 1 month Notice under SPT requirements

5 Accept current AST extension or new AST with new provisions.

 

Any T NTQ is enforceable on expiry, any overstay may attract civil compensation & eviction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Title pretty much explains most of it. Difference with me is I pay the full 6 months up front. So, contract was renewed on 1st Sept 2012. From the agent I would usually get the next contract 3 months in advance asking if I'm staying on etc but this latest contract was agreed between just me and LL. So the 6 months was due up end of Feb and I've not heard a single thing. What does this mean? Don't see how how I'm the one responsible for sorting this. If she's forgotten in her failed management of her files why should I care? I won't be lawfully subject to any charges will I?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you havent heard phone and find out rather than leave it and find out whats happening, could be that the paperwork has been sent but lost in post, no rent arrives so LL goes for eviction, might not be your responsibility but I would have thought that where your homes concerned you want to know whats happening sooner rather than later.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, one thing I forgot to add is that I recevied the mandatory agent's letter a few months ago as if she was still using them. They had carried on with it because she just left without saying anything to them because she felt they'd ripped her off because they were trying to charge both me AND her for fees that only one of us should be paying. Anyway the letter stated contract was due end of March not Feb which was obviously some kind of admin mistake, so am wondering if she thinks it's the same timeframe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...