Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

B+B Mortgage shortfall sold to mortgage express now DCA Chasing.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2330 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 206
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Get one running

 

Could be a minefield for them

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes; Always goes to the Original Lender.

CCA Requests would go to the DCA if it was a Simple Contract for a Loan, Credit Card or Credit based service.

 

With Mortgages, its different as its a complex contract and is 12 years instead of 6.

Most Debt Purchasers (DP) wont take on these amounts.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I have requested a SAR and await to recieve it.

 

In the interim, the mortgage company have advised me that they have passed my account onto a DCA

and enclosed a copy of the "order of possession" from 2011.

 

It states that the judge awarded the mortgage company possess, also it states:

 

"And it is adjudged that

The claimant recover against the defendant the sum of £xxx,xxx.xx for the debt and interest to date of judgement"

 

Now.......after they sold the house, they are chasing me for approx £65k.

 

Does the above term mean that i cannot dispute the shortfall amount as its been decided at the time of the possession?

 

at the time my house was repossessed so it was all abit of a daze

and didnt know at what point i should/shouldnt of challenged the outstanding debt.

 

If the shortfall is as the judge decided, why has the lender passed it onto a DCA for such a substantial amount and not forced me into court to pay?

 

From the possession to sale was approx seven months (£1100pcm), I have been given a final balance costing which i feel i need to dispute:

 

Interest-£7,719.32 (?? the judge stated "interest to date of judgement")

shouldnt this interest amount have stopped from date of judgement?

 

Insurance-£171.70

Solicitors-£260.40

Conveyancing/searches-£352.00

Management fee's-£319.20

Estate agent fee-£5,880.00

One stop package-£222.00

EPC/HIP-£78.00

Lock change-£144.00

Chattel insurance-£276.00 (?)

Clean & clear-£114.00

Valuation fee-£108.00 (is this not free?)

Gardening-£66.00 (why would they do this?)

Tree removal-£717.60 (No tree was causing a problem)

Removal of white goods-£162.00

Total: £23,000 approx in costs (this seem's outrageous!)

 

Balance owing-£310,752.37

House sold for £280,000

 

Should the shortfall not be around £30k plus an estimated £6k costs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes the int stopped on the day of judgement.

 

 

If the shortfall is as the judge decided, why has the lender passed it onto a DCA for such a substantial amount and not forced me into court to pay?

 

 

yes totally agree

 

 

something fishy going on here.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh god that lots

 

 

yep they always fleece people blind

 

 

who was the org mortgage with ME are buyers?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have proof also that i had a buyer nearer the date of possession willing to pay £285k

but the lender refused to consent to the sale 3 days prior to exchange

as i refused to sign one of their documents "sale of shortfall" acknowledging the debt and proposals to pay.

 

 

If they had just let the the purchaser proceed i would have gained £5k more for them

and avoided the £23k "costs" that they have added for the 7 months the property then sat empty/vacant...

 

 

..my debt would have been approx £25k and not £65k

 

I had the house 10 years, was originally Bradford & Bingley (I think!), then it changed to Mortgage express for the last 7 years before repossession.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

re read the thread and prove you were fleeced blind

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Dear Caggers,

 

I raised a complaint with mortgage express, disputing £25k of 'un-necessary' charges

 

an explanation as to why they left the house vacant for 12 months from the date of the repossession before they instructed an estate agent to sell it, which then took a further 6 months,

 

Therefore, I incurred 18 x £1100 worth of interest only payments.

 

They should of rented the property to off-set such charges.

 

They have replied with a final decision to my complaint stating that they disagree with every point I raised.

 

Should I go to the financial ombudsman?

 

I explained that this repossession has had a huge negative impact on my mental health but this fell on deaf ears.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone advise me here please?

 

Have just had a quick read of the thread and would just ask whether there is any hurry needed in resolving this ?

 

If you don't have the means or assets, then it is a case of ignoring the DCA chasing this debt, until you have decided what to do. You might decide to save up for bankruptcy, if this is something that you have decided is worth pursuing after getting advice.

 

Mortgage shortfall debts don't become statute barred for 12 years, so what tends to happen is that a DCA is quite happy to receive very small regular payments, as it just entends the period into the future in which the debt could be subject to a court claim. Also once you start paying the debt is more saleable as an asset. If you look at threads on CAG about mortgage shortfalls, the debts get passed on by mortgage companies to DCA's who no doubt gain from anything they collect. There does not seem to be any rush to obtain a CCJ, as if they wait for the debtors finances to improve, they might get more later. I have seen threads, where 10 years has passed before court claims are threatened.

 

What i would suggest that you do is look into the Council for mortgage lenders handbook details on how repossessions should be dealt with. Their should be industry standards that apply and if you go to the Ombudsman, they will want you to make a case to them, as to how Mortgage Express have failed to meet standards required. You have up to 6 months from the mortgage companies final letter, to go to the FOS to take the complaint further. So plenty of time to gather evidence.

 

If you have not done so, send Mortgage Express a subject access request for a complete copy of the repossession file, as well as all available data on the mortgage file, including statements of account.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I haven't proceeded with the financial ombudsman just yet.

 

 

The mortgage company have asked me to submit medical evidence and three months bank statements before they consider forgiveness.

 

 

I have a car that I pay insurance for each month,

this will be seen in my bank statements,

will this go against me being considered?

 

 

Car value approx. £1200 and needed for work (trade,mobile beautician).

 

 

Also, do I need to give three months of incoming and outgoing,

is just proof of incoming amounts sufficient would you say?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do they mean by forgiveness ?

Writing off the whole mortgage, writing off part of the mortgage or just not requiring payment for a period ?

 

You are under no obligation outside of a court, to provide financial information to a creditor chasing a debt.

 

Not sure they will be interested by car insurance and a low value car. I think they are just wanting to see how much income you have spare after normal living coste to make payments. I suspect after sending bank statements, you will get a letter saying that you can afford to pay them say £100 a month and after 12 months they will review again.

 

It is your choice what information you provide to them. Perhaps they will write the debt off, if you are never really likely to pay the debt off within reasonable time period. If you don't send the information, you will never find out what their intentions were.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...