Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can easily argue your case with no sign on the nearest parking sign
    • Same issue got a fine yesterday for parking in suspended bay which was ending at 6:30 yesterday, next thing I see a fine 15 minutes before it. The sign was obstructed 
    • Hi all, an update on the case as the deadline for filing the WS is tomorrow i.e., 14 days before the hearing date: 7th June. Evri have emailed their WS today to the court and to myself. Attached pdf of their WS - I have redacted personal information and left any redactions/highlights by Evri. In the main: The WS is signed by George Wood. Evri have stated the claim value that I am seeking to recover is £931.79 including £70 court fees, and am putting me to strict proof as to the value of the claim. Evri's have accepted that the parcel is lost but there is no contract between Evri and myself, and that the contract is with myself and Packlink They have provided a copy of the eBay Powered By Packlink Terms and Conditions (T&Cs) to support their argument the contractual relationship is between myself and Packlink, highlighting clause 3a, e, g of these T&Cs. They further highlight clause 14 of the T&Cs which states that Packlink's liability is limited to £25 unless enhanced compensation has been chosen. They have contacted Packlink who informed them that I had been in contact with Packlink and raised a claim with Packlink and the claim had been paid accordingly i.e., £25 in line with the T&Cs and the compensated postage costs of £4.82. They believe this is clear evidence that my contract is with Packlink and should therefore cease the claim against Evri. Evri also cite Clause 23 of the pre-exiting commercial agreement between the Defendant and Packlink, which states:  ‘Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 A person who is not a party to this Agreement shall have no rights under the Contracts (Right of Third Parties) Act 1999 to rely upon or enforce any term of this Agreement provided that this does not affect any right or remedy of the third party which exists or is available apart from that Act.’ This means that the Claimant cannot enforce third party rights under the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 and instead should cease this claim and raise a dispute with the correct party.   Having read Evri's WS and considered the main points above, I have made these observations: Evri have not seen/read my WS (sent by post and by email) as they would have recognised the claim value is over £1000 as it includes court fees, trial fees, postage costs and interests, and there is a complete breakdown of the different costs and evidence. Evri accepts the parcel is lost after it entered their delivery network - again, this is in my WS and is not an issue in dispute. Evri mentions the £25 and £4.82 paid by Packlink - Again, had they read the WS, they would have realised this is not an issue in dispute. Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency   This supports the view that once a user (i.e, myself) selects a transport agency (i.e Evri) that best suits the user's needs, the user (i.e, myself) enters into a contract with the chosen transport agency (i.e, myself). Therefore, under the T&Cs, there is a contract between myself and Evri. Evri cites their pre-existing agreement with Packlink and that I cannot enforce 3rd party rights under the 1999 Act. Evri has not provided a copy of this contract, and furthermore, my point above explains that the T&Cs clearly explains I have entered into a contract when i chose Evri to deliver my parcel.  As explained in my WS, i am the non-gratuitous beneficiary as my payment for Evri's delivery service through Packlink is the sole reason for the principal contract coming into existence. Clearly Evri have not read by WS as the above is all clearly explained in there.   I am going to respond to Evri's email by stating that I have already sent my WS to them by post/email and attach the email that sent on the weekend to them containing my WS. However, before i do that, If there is anything additional I should further add to the email, please do let me know. Thanks. Evri Witness Statement Redacted v1 compressed.pdf
    • Thank you. I will get on to the SAR request. I am not sure now who the DCA are - I have a feeling it might be the ACI group but will try to pull back the letter they wrote from her to see and update with that once I have it. She queried it initially with 118 118 when she received the default notice I think. Thanks again - your help and support is much appreciated and I will talk to her about stopping her payments at the weekend.
    • you should email contact OCMC immediately and say you want an in person hearing.   stupid to not
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hoist/? claimform - ex barclaycard 'debt'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2787 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i've got an admission to make . .

 

. i used an 'easy' option in using Bank-Smart to do my leg work regarding 2 credit card debts with BarclayShark .

. . happily they confirmed that both the debts are unenforceable blah, blah, blah . .

 

. when i pushed them on the next step they fobbed me off and were useless .

 

. . now one of the debts has been sold to MKRR and of course they are chasing me for it .

 

. . i now realise i have to deal with it myself otherwise it's just not going to go away as no one else is interested etc .

. . so if anybody could give me a heads up please on my next step

before the other cc debt gets sold as well and/or MKRR start legal proceedings,

which as yet they have not . . .

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi stu

 

I think you need to establish if the agreements are unenforceable, find out what they have got?

 

Send MKKR :- http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?414-CCA-request-letter

 

Send it Recorded, they have 14 days to respond, lets see what they send.

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/about-the-oft/legal-powers/legal/cca/unenforceable-credit-agreements

 

Lets see what they send.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks guys, Bank-Smart have sent me letters confirming that both cc's are unenforceable . .

. how much that means as i've not confidence in BS at all . . . the CC debts are as follows . . .

 

CC 1 - BarclayShark - Now with MKRR

£5800 'ish

 

CC2 - BarclayShark - Being chased by Credit Security Limited on behalf of Wescot Credit Services Ltd/Barclaycard

£7000 'sh

 

Both these debts arose when my business suffered in the recession in April 2009 and eventually I had to liquidate it,

 

 

prior to the administration I contacted BC to tell them I forsee problems due to the current situation .

. . it would be no surprise to those on here they weren't interested .

. . so the phone calls and letters began . .

 

 

. I got bullied into making a payment to a DC over the phone which would return the debt back to BC and save the doorstop collections going ahead etc .

. . about 3 months later I fortunately came across CAG . .

 

 

. I read and read and read the many posts and took great heart that others were having the same problems

and how CAG informed the masses on how to fight back against this bullying .

 

 

. . So i sent out the Tort of Trespass letters and the Agreement Letters but didn't know where to go next . .

. that's when I used Bank-Smart, who in fairness did the CCA Letters etc and eventually confirmed that both debts are unenforceable,

I do still have the correspondence from them . .

 

 

. however since BC sold the debt of the first Card to MKRR I now don't know what to do .

. . BS aren't interested and put me towards CAB???

 

 

can't see them telling me what to do . .

. I'll now send off your suggested letter to MKRR and see what they say .

. . thanks again guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Well I know I say it all the time but so many people miss it unless advised.

 

Are there late payment fees or over-limit fees on these cards? If so, you can claim them back with interest.

 

And is there any ppi on the cards which you can calim back if mis-sold?

 

Points 1, 2 and 3 in rebel's signature above maight be worth a read.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The PPI, especially if you were self - employed.

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html

 

Hi

 

Well I know I say it all the time but so many people miss it unless advised.

 

Are there late payment fees or over-limit fees on these cards? If so, you can claim them back with interest.

 

And is there any ppi on the cards which you can calim back if mis-sold?

 

Points 1, 2 and 3 in rebel's signature above maight be worth a read.

 

ims

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, not to jump on your thread, as intend to get my own threads going tonight/tomorrow, but I too have had both my BC accounts sold on and what I'd like to know is can I SAR the DC who has bought my debts or is BC? Who do I reclaim late charges and the like back from?

 

Thanks very much for any advice and again apologies for jumping on your thread

 

Best,

 

Coffee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, not to jump on your thread, as intend to get my own threads going tonight/tomorrow, but I too have had both my BC accounts sold on and what I'd like to know is can I SAR the DC who has bought my debts or is BC? Who do I reclaim late charges and the like back from?

 

Thanks very much for any advice and again apologies for jumping on your thread

 

Best,

 

Coffee

 

 

Hi

 

SAR the Original Creditor and claim back from the Original Creditor as well

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

You said you had two accounts and the SAR should have provided information on both.

 

What you are looking to do is seperate the papers into the two accounts and you are particularly looking for the copy statements and/or transaction history.

 

Get them in date order and see whether there were late payment/over limit fees charged and whether there was any PPI paid on these accounts.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Hi fellow caggers,

 

After years of arguing with the relevant CC companies,

Barclayshark has finally sent a CC Summons.

This has no doubt been sold on many times,

how many I don't know as I have 3 old CC debts.

Any helpful advice would be gratefully received .

. . starting with a defence to reply to the summons . . .

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well its not Barclaycard that has issued the summons is it?

 

Its been sold nothing to do with them

 

Can you fill this in please

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? - Hoist Portfolio Holding 2 Ltd

Date of issue –. - 26 July

What is the claim for –

-

1.This claim is for the sum of £6000 in respect of monies owing under an Agreement with the account no. xxxxxxx

pursuant to The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA).

The debt was legally assigned by MKDP LLP (Ex Barclaycard) to the Claimant and notice has been served.

 

2.The Defendant has failed to make contractual payments under the terms of the Agreement. A default notice has been served upon the Defendant pursuant to s.87(1) CCA

 

3.The Claimant Claims

1. The sum of £6000

2. Interest pursuant to s69 of the County Court Act 1984 at a rate of 8.00percent from the 24/09/10 to the date hereof 2127 is the sum of £3000

3. Future interest accruing at the daily rate of £2.00

4. Costs

 

What is the value of the claim? - £9000 approx

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? - Credit Card

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? - 2003

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. - debt purchaser

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?

- having received numerous correspondence over the last 6+ years

i've lost count of who was chasing for what and who is the legal debt purchaser

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?

- not sure, not to my knowledge, but cannot be sure,

again having received hundreds of threatening letters they all merge into the same spam mail and were filed under B

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? - again, unsure

Why did you cease payments? - my company got into difficulty after the crash of 07/08, eventually went into administration in 09/10 and subsequent liquidation.

What was the date of your last payment? - unsure

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? - outstanding balance unpayable due to lack of income

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementlink3.gif plan?

I contacted barclaycard to outline I was getting into difficulty,

only to be told that due to my account being ok and not in arrears there was nothing they could do

, I pleaded for them to help me as I knew there was difficulty ahead.

They flatly refused to help, I had 2 cards with them I think,

or maybe one plus an egg card, which i believe was taken over by barclaycard.

 

A year of so later I won a contract of work which enabled me to settle some debts,

namely the bank 50p in the £ and Capital CC who accepted 35p in the £,

this cleared a substantial amount of debt, £61k to be precise

 

. . . I approached barclaycard to see if they would be able to do a deal and they refused . . .

of course once this money was gone, that was it and i've been struggling ever since.

 

I can go into more detail on email if you wish . . .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look at your credit files with either Noddle or ClearScore and see when the last payment and default dates are ?

 

 

However, if you believe the last payment date was around September 2010 - it looks like they have just managed to slip in under the 6 years :(

 

 

How did you approach B/shark - was it by letter/email or by phone ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll check via noddle shortly . . .

i contacted BC via phone, several times .

. . got told the same thing, you're not in arrears so there's nothing we can do . . . blah, blah . . .

 

looks like I started the CC in 2003 .

. . according to noddle the default was 23.9.2010,

however, I don't recall paying any of them other than full and final settlement by 2010 .

 

 

. . we liquidated the company before that,

so I'd have expected to not have paid any payments prior to that for obvious reasons .

. . i'll need to check my history of course but i'd be very surprised if we did pay anything as noddle states.

 

actually hard to say .

. . there's 2 outstanding cc debts,

one is roughly the money they're talking but the default date is october 2010

and the other is september 2010 . . .

 

also, not wanting to detract from the subject in hand,

but one of the CC's got a ccj against me after i'd vacated the house I was living in,

didn't know anything about the court case until I looked on Noddle a month after the judgement etc . .

. asked the court to set aside and was told to speak to the claimant who of course rejected my request .

. . not sure what to do with that one . . .

 

it looks like the CC we're talking about here was started in 2008, the other outstanding CC is 2003 . . .

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok

 

 

get the claim ack'd

defend all

leave juris unticked

 

 

 

 

and get a CCA request running to the claimant

and

a CPR 31:14 to the sols.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Acknowledge

Jurisdiction

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what will go recorded tomorrow?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...