Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the side street solely for access to your garages? who owns the land and thus the road? dx  
    • A local business has been parking on an off-street parking space in front of my garages (in a side street).  I wasn't using them for a while so didnt bother to do anything.  But now a second local business is also using the osp - taking it in turns with the 1st biz.  This has started to nark me.    The employees choose to drive to work.  There is no private parking in their business's street.  But there are some underground secure garages in their street - which cost apx £2.4k/y to rent - which works out apx £6.60/d. (I believe one of the biz owners already rent one for storage purposes).  If the employee had to park on a meter it would cost them £6.60/h - £66 for 10h and have to move every 4h.  They just don't want to pay for parking. I haven't confronted either of them.  Instead I just put 2 clear "no parking" signs in front of the garages. And a note on one of the cars specifically saying that as they don't live or rent in the street and it's private land could they stop parking.   They ignored that.  And just put notes on their dash with a # to call if one needs the car moved.  There is a sign and they've been told in writing to stop parking. And they are just ignoring it.    I don't what a confrontation.    I don't want to go to the expense of bollards (other than maybe traffic plastic ones - but they'll probs just move them).  Council won't do zilch cos it's private land. And police won't get involved - unless I clamp/ tow the cars and then they'd be after me, not the drivers!    What's the best thing to do?
    • yes might be the best idea. you'd only at best get 8% flat interest and that unusual on a GOGW if this was what it was. simply contact the FOS and let them know its resolved. dx  
    • If you’ve ever wondered how you might fare in armed combat, the first 20 minutes of Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan is likely to make you thank your lucky stars you were born too late to storm the Normandy beaches on June 6 1944. I suspect many of us might be driven to identify with those men who were absolutely turned to stone by fear. And yet these young men, mainly conscripts, screwed their courage to the sticking point and did the job the fate had chosen for them, heroes all.   .. UK PM Sunak perhaps thinks he understands mind numbing fear better than many as he dishonorably fled the beachhead to do nothing more than double down on dishonest spin and lies from the safety of a UK studio .. The Normandy heroes who not only held their positions, but advanced through hell to a victory that changed the entire course of history .. undoubtedly hold a different perspective.     from a perspective in TheConversation     .. 'That was the slot that sunaks team offered for the interview
    • Yes, send a message to the purchaser but keep it very friendly and simply that you noticed that the package has now been delivered.  I suggest that you ask them if they want to keep the package still or if they would rather return it and that if they want to keep it then please will they return your payment to you to your PayPal address. Keep it as polite and friendly as possible and then we will decide what to do if he doesn't reply or refuses.  Meanwhile I will have a look at Google earth and see if you are able to spot the gas meter outside the house to get an idea if the delivery is real. Get a screenshot
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lost tribunal today :(


subwoofer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4743 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I lost my DLA tribunal today

 

I have chronic arthritis in my hips and awaiting a hip replacement

 

i told them i could not take a single step without sever pain and had a report from my gp which stated i could not walk any distance at all without pain but they said this report was dated 16 days after the decision was made on my claim and that it would not be accepted because it was not related to the time of the claim! instead they choose to use evidence from a 2 year old esa medical which stated i could walk over 100 meter's!!

 

so a 2 year old medical is more relevant than a 2 week late one?

 

im totally gutted i cant think straight at the moment i dont know what to do!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sub

 

Welcome to CAG

 

The guys will be happy to advise as soon as they are available.

 

Its cleary not right, it seems like they wanted your claim to fail. It's disappointing, but I'm sure it can be fought.

Don't let them get you down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They basicaly said all of my evidence was after the original decision was made and therefore it was not to be accepted they said if were to re apply today i could use my current evidence but could not use it for this current claim. i did not sent any of my own evidence at 1st as i thought the dwp would ask my gp for it themselves as they ask in the claim form to give your gp's details but they didn't do this.

 

i arrived in a wheel chair and showed them my letter stating i was waiting for a hip replacement which is due to the same condition i applied for in the original claim but again they said it was dated after the original claim and not relevant

 

i can maby understand the letter which says im awaiting a hip replacement as it was dated 5 months after but the letter from my gp which states im in pain at all times when walking was only 16 days after the original decision surely that is more relevant than a esa report that was 12 months old at the time!

 

They also said that i should not need as much time to get in and out of the bed and bath as i stated in my claim form which was 30 minutes, i explained that this was because it is so painfull it takes several attemps to get in and our of bed i have to stop due to the pain then try again later and they said that if i had to stop due to pain and try again that the time i stopped shold not be counted as you are not reviving help in the time and that the time counted should start when you attempt the task again. i argued that i still needed somebody to wait with me before i attempted it again but they just moved onto the next questions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear you lost.

 

The first step is to write to the tribunal service and ask for a statement of reasons - this can take several months. I don't know how they will logically justify using the older report, so this should give you grounds to request an appeal to the upper tribunal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I lost my ESA tribunal and the panel will not consider ANY evidence whatsoever if it is dated after the date of the initial claim. I suspect the law doesn't allow them too. I requsted a statement of reasons a day after my tribunal and then simply made a fresh claim for ESA the following day for the same conditions. Then the process begins all over again.

 

You must make a fresh claim (assuming the 6 month rule as been satisfied). I could have gone to the upper tribunal but then you don't get the ESA assessment rate while this is taking place so that wasn't an option and can only be instigated on a point of law..it's a long shot in my opinion

 

gl

 

SD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your tribunal is based on how you were at the time of the claim - any evidence dated after that is useless.

 

SD - there's no 6 month rule for DLA. You can make a new claim whilst appealing too. (I think I've misunderstood you!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your tribunal is based on how you were at the time of the claim - any evidence dated after that is useless.

 

SD - there's no 6 month rule for DLA. You can make a new claim whilst appealing too. (I think I've misunderstood you!)

 

Is this correct, there is no waiting period.

So if someone gets turned down for DLA they can immediatley apply again.

I was not aware of this.

Wouldnt this make the whole process go round and round for ever?

What would the point be of appealing then?

So if I was awarded mobility and not care, could I safely apply for the care element with out an appeal which could put my whole claim in danger of being changed for the worse.

Hope this makes sense, just taken a sleeping tablet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you can apply again. Your new claim must be based on what you're like now.

 

The point of appealing - if you don't appeal and just put in a new claim, your money will only be backdated to the date your new claim started. Appeal and the money is backdated to the date of that claim.

 

If you already receive DLA and put in a new claim, your current award would be in danger. However, that's not to say you'll lose your current DLA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you ,something to think about.

My husband was turned down after two years on high mob and care to zero but all the same illnesses plus deafness.

He tells doctor of his joint pains and gets prescribred painkillers and anti inflammatorie for 3 years.

He has hearing aids and needs help to cope.now has a letter from his gp backing him up, hes a cortezone, athroscopy, mri, physio, blood tests and xrays

He is waiting for a paper appeal as it will be quicker, he had a date of Nov for the oral tribunal.

He has pain, depression,iliteracy, anxiety, innsomsia .

He doesnt feel ready to face a tribunal face to face si I will let you know what happens, whenit happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I lost my ESA tribunal and the panel will not consider ANY evidence whatsoever if it is dated after the date of the initial claim. I suspect the law doesn't allow them too. I requsted a statement of reasons a day after my tribunal and then simply made a fresh claim for ESA the following day for the same conditions. Then the process begins all over again.

 

You must make a fresh claim (assuming the 6 month rule as been satisfied). I could have gone to the upper tribunal but then you don't get the ESA assessment rate while this is taking place so that wasn't an option and can only be instigated on a point of law..it's a long shot in my opinion

 

gl

 

SD

 

Not so. I've repped and won plenty of appeals where the evidence is post decision - the only thing that needs to be pointed out is that the evidence represented how you were at the time of the decision. What I'm guessing happened is they did the old 'how you were then, how you are now' confusion which leads in my experience to inevitable failure of the appeal. Admitting to deterioration without being incredibly clear in a written statement (submission) about when the deterioration occured only leads to confusion and failure.

 

Even so, with evidence 16 days after the decision, it will be very difficult to deny that this is representative of condition at the time of decision. As long as all evidence was presented well, and there were no contradictory statements on the record of proceedings, this is one that I would have been confident of arguing to an upper tribunal.

 

Forgot to say - also ask for a record of proceedings - it should be, but isn't always, included with the statement of reasons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you ,something to think about.

My husband was turned down after two years on high mob and care to zero but all the same illnesses plus deafness.

He tells doctor of his joint pains and gets prescribred painkillers and anti inflammatorie for 3 years.

He has hearing aids and needs help to cope.now has a letter from his gp backing him up, hes a cortezone, athroscopy, mri, physio, blood tests and xrays

He is waiting for a paper appeal as it will be quicker, he had a date of Nov for the oral tribunal.

He has pain, depression,iliteracy, anxiety, innsomsia .

He doesnt feel ready to face a tribunal face to face si I will let you know what happens, whenit happens.

 

Unfortunately paper DLA appeals are much more likely to fail as the tribunal members won't be able to ask questions - but if he's not up to it there is little else to be done. Just make sure that you write a submission (statement) putting your case forward and arguing against the DWP's reasons for refusing benefit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leemack,

Is it correct that he can reapply for DLA before his tribunal date with the same medical condition before 6 months of being turned down?

Thank you.

 

The medical condition doesn't matter, it's the needs that arise from it. So if needs have changed then you can apply ASAP

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leemack,

Is it correct that he can reapply for DLA before his tribunal date with the same medical condition before 6 months of being turned down?

Thank you.

 

Yes he can reapply again, its not like ESA and doesn't have the same 6 month rule.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...