Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case when the penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ingeus


Raven1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2483 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So where does a provider focus? On the roles that are going to have the most impact for the most people?

I reckon that I’m safe in saying that it’s not a shocking revelation to most folk in this thread that in reality providers provide solutions on a majority-rules cost basis rather than the claimed provision of solutions that fit the individual client. Providers tend to be very coy in admitting their limitations in servicing their assigned client base to anyone, which is unhelpful for all concerned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I have a £50 HMV voucher, I was going to buy a new Xbox game today...

 

My vouchers were declined!...

 

Iv'e read on a webpage that Deloitte have helped HMV out???

 

Does this mean that I now ask Ingeus for my money back? hahahahaha

Sadly not. But it does mean that potentially Deloitte stand to gain more than their administration fee from HMV’s demise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

...now I'm back at Ingeus, who send me appointments by text after office hours at 21.00, expecting me to arrive the next morning sharp at 9.00. Not the decency of a phone call to check when I'm available beforehand. I complained when I next attended but they just pass you around to the next advisor.

 

On one of the earlier pages in this forum, someone gave a link to the WP contract with the DWP (sorry can't recall which post it was, you'll have to check). In the contract, it said that in the case of a mandatory appointment (which they all are), the WP must notify the client IN WRITING and either post it to them, or hand it to them in person. This is under the heading of 'High Level 'Must Do' requirements so the DWP obviously mean it do be done this way and no other.

 

In addition, there is also an extra rule stating that if a letter is posted out to a client, 2 working days must pass before the client is deemed to have received the letter. In other words, if Ingeus post a letter to you on Monday, you are not classed as having received it until at least Wednesday - so they can't ask you to come in first thing next morning. All interesting stuff which we should all be reading and be aware of, to assert our rights.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On one of the earlier pages in this forum, someone gave a link to the WP contract with the DWP (sorry can't recall which post it was, you'll have to check). In the contract, it said that in the case of a mandatory appointment (which they all are), the WP must notify the client IN WRITING and either post it to them, or hand it to them in person. This is under the heading of 'High Level 'Must Do' requirements so the DWP obviously mean it do be done this way and no other.

 

In addition, there is also an extra rule stating that if a letter is posted out to a client, 2 working days must pass before the client is deemed to have received the letter. In other words, if Ingeus post a letter to you on Monday, you are not classed as having received it until at least Wednesday - so they can't ask you to come in first thing next morning. All interesting stuff which we should all be reading and be aware of, to assert our rights.

 

Interesting. I received a text one time at 9am on Monday for an appointment on 9am on Tuesday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On one of the earlier pages in this forum, someone gave a link to the WP contract with the DWP (sorry can't recall which post it was, you'll have to check). In the contract, it said that in the case of a mandatory appointment (which they all are), the WP must notify the client IN WRITING and either post it to them, or hand it to them in person. This is under the heading of 'High Level 'Must Do' requirements so the DWP obviously mean it do be done this way and no other.

 

In addition, there is also an extra rule stating that if a letter is posted out to a client, 2 working days must pass before the client is deemed to have received the letter. In other words, if Ingeus post a letter to you on Monday, you are not classed as having received it until at least Wednesday - so they can't ask you to come in first thing next morning. All interesting stuff which we should all be reading and be aware of, to assert our rights.

Two useful links to DWP docs:

This one is generic guidance covering anumber of DWP contracts and programmes:

 

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/supplying-dwp/what-we-buy/welfare-to-work-services/provider-guidance/framework-generic-guidance.shtml

 

This one is specifically about the Work Programme:

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/supplying-dwp/what-we-buy/welfare-to-work-services/provider-guidance/work-programme-provider.shtml

 

From time to time the guidance is updated.

 

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/supplying-dwp/what-we-buy/welfare-to-work-services/provider-guidance/archive.shtml

 

The site contains a useful search functionality which can save wading through a lot of verbiage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter in the post over a week ago…

 

Addressed to myself at my home address. The only people that know my home address are the job centre/Ingeus. Clients at Ingeus don’t know my address!!!...

 

I think I’ve upset someone, lol….Michael was my old Advisor, Mark my new one….

 

 

Dear Miss Brayde,

 

I am writing to complain about the behaviour of one of your advisers at Ingeus in Preston.

 

When I was in Ingeus on Thursday 3rd January 2013 just before closing time and I was sat with four other people at the computers job hunting when an advisor called ‘Michael W######S came over and sat with another advisor called ‘Mark. ‘Michael began to use foul language and use bad names to call a job seeker by the name of Richard Massey whom I know personally. Michael came over and said to Mark have you seen the email Richard Massey sent. ‘Mark said that he had and Michael then said I have sent a great reply back to him, you should read it. Michael also said that he had been on a website forum where Richard Massey has supposed to have been writing things about Ingeus and ‘Michael in particular?

 

‘Mark said that he had seen the email and ‘Michael asked him what he thought of it and ‘Mark said that he found it strange. ‘Michael then said yes he is a wan#er. ‘Michael was discussing ‘Richard Massey at great length and everyone on the computers could hear him. He was also sat with another advisor who was wearing a suit and glasses who must have heard what ‘Michael was saying?

 

I think this is a very bad way for your advisor to behave and I am disgusted at the language. I have head Michael speaking badly to other people in there and I think it should stop.

 

I have sent this letter anonymous as I don’t want to be singled out like that and be called by ‘Michael as I still have to go to Ingeus to get my benefits. I have sent a copy of this letter to Richard Massey as it is only fair that he knows what is being said about him.

 

I was given your name from the contact centre to write to as you are the main boss and hopefully you will sort It out.

 

Thank you for listening to my complaint.

 

Anon

Link to post
Share on other sites

:-o OMG Masso, I hope that your adviser is reading this forum and feels thoroughly ashamed of his actions and also of his fellow colleague.

Dispicable behaviour and something I loathe.

I also hope that the complaints procedure is something that is set in motion over this and also that you followit up with a personal complaint yourself.

Could be worth sending a copy to the JCP for it to be taken up via the customer service management to reprt to district office too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:-o OMG Masso, I hope that your adviser is reading this forum and feels thoroughly ashamed of his actions and also of his fellow colleague.

Dispicable behaviour and something I loathe.

I also hope that the complaints procedure is something that is set in motion over this and also that you followit up with a personal complaint yourself.

Could be worth sending a copy to the JCP for it to be taken up via the customer service management to reprt to district office too.

 

Totally agree.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@flumps..

 

I actually found it quiet funny when I opened and read it. I'll be taking it into Ingeus when I'm in next...

 

I will ask Michael if he really did call me a W####ER! :lol:

 

To be fair I wouldn't engage with him. Just deal with it though the manager and don't give anyone a chance to get into a confrontation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a £50 HMV voucher, I was going to buy a new Xbox game today...

 

My vouchers were declined!...

 

Iv'e read on a webpage that Deloitte have helped HMV out???

 

Does this mean that I now ask Ingeus for my money back? hahahahaha

 

If I were in your position, I'd have walked into HMV, chosen goods to the value of the voucher, left it on the counter in front of the cashier regardless that they are declining to accept them, and exited with the merchandise.

 

They've already had payment in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My new Advisor seems really nice, he phoned me at 7pm tonight to discuss a job opportunity at Pontins. I have no problems with him, we've put the past behind us....

 

Congratulations, they're not all xxxx'ers, some do 'seem' really nice (time will tell:-) ).

 

I think I'd have a slight problem with them ringing at 7pm though. That's outside working hours for the unemployed - wtf!! lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dreading going here on tomorrow -.- Especially with the predicted snowfall! No one can quite relay their disgust with this place, and many (not all) who work there. Last time I was waiting to be seen, there was an advisor chatting on the phone with someone who was clearly taking details off of them about where they just secured employment. After the conversation, she hangs up the phone, punches the air with her first and declares 'YES!!'...Now call me suspicious but I hardly doubt that outburst of joy was for the wonderful news that the individual in question secured employment (good luck to them...they'll need it if ingeus are badgering them for the next 24 months even after they land a job) and it was more for the fat bonus she secured for herself. whether she did help the individual (doubtful) in getting the job or not, that was pretty Disgusting. Further highlights that we are mere prized cattle to these people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dreading going here on tomorrow -.- Especially with the predicted snowfall! No one can quite relay their disgust with this place, and many (not all) who work there. Last time I was waiting to be seen, there was an advisor chatting on the phone with someone who was clearly taking details off of them about where they just secured employment. After the conversation, she hangs up the phone, punches the air with her first and declares 'YES!!'...Now call me suspicious but I hardly doubt that outburst of joy was for the wonderful news that the individual in question secured employment (good luck to them...they'll need it if ingeus are badgering them for the next 24 months even after they land a job) and it was more for the fat bonus she secured for herself. whether she did help the individual (doubtful) in getting the job or not, that was pretty Disgusting. Further highlights that we are mere prized cattle to these people.

 

I though advisors were just payed a set salary, ars they paid bonuses when 1 gets a job? And say a client leaves ther new job on as month or so, are they triggered back to their old advisor?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I though advisors were just payed a set salary, ars they paid bonuses when 1 gets a job? And say a client leaves ther new job on as month or so, are they triggered back to their old advisor?

 

Advisors are paid a set wage. Advisors who hit targets gain brownie points and can get a pay rise.

 

Bonuses aren't given to individual Advisors...

 

Normally if you leave a job, you will be referred back to your previous Advisor.

Edited by Masso
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for those links, Bakatcha. In the 'Mandation' PDF guide, Chapter 3a, it confirms my earlier comments - I've underlined the relevant bits.

 

Method of sending the MAN

The MAN must be either handed directly or posted to the participant. If it is posted it is deemed to have been received on the second working day after posting (see above).

 

It is not acceptable to use electronic methods, such as text or email, to send the MANs to participants. However, it is acceptable to communicate electronically with participants to remind them of mandatory (or non mandatory) activities.

 

Next time they try to text you your next appointment, tell them they're in violation of DWP rules and that you'll report them to their manager AND the DWP. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advisors are paid a set wage. Advisors who hit targets gain brownie points and can get a pay rise.

 

Bonuses aren't given to individual Advisors...

 

Normally if you leave a job, you will be referred back to your previous Advisor.

 

And does you old advisor check up in your file every now and then to see if your still working? Or is that someone else's job? Ad do your old advisors have to stay in contact with you?

Edited by G4C389
Link to post
Share on other sites

And does you old advisor check up in your file every now and then to see if your still working? Or is that someone else's job? Ad do your old advisor's have to stay in contact with you?

 

Well, when I got a got last March I was contacted by the head office...Basically to check how i was £££££ doing, and if i was still working lol...

 

Your Advisor will probably keep a check on you. Especially when you've been in a job for nearly 6 months. They will want you to hit 6 months, so they can claim the golden ticket (£££££££££££££££££££)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for those links, Bakatcha. In the 'Mandation' PDF guide, Chapter 3a, it confirms my earlier comments - I've underlined the relevant bits.

 

Method of sending the MAN

The MAN must be either handed directly or posted to the participant. If it is posted it is deemed to have been received on the second working day after posting (see above).

 

It is not acceptable to use electronic methods, such as text or email, to send the MANs to participants. However, it is acceptable to communicate electronically with participants to remind them of mandatory (or non mandatory) activities.

 

Next time they try to text you your next appointment, tell them they're in violation of DWP rules and that you'll report them to their manager AND the DWP. :)

 

That's quite right, a MAN must be sent in the manner specified. A non mandatory appointment can be arranged in a way that doesn't meet the MAN criteria. I would often send reminder messages to people, especially if they were regular non attenders but only if it'd been preceded by a MAN letter.

 

It may be that the appointment is non mandatory in which case there's no harm in asking if someone can come in the following day.

 

Check the address on file for you to make sure the MAN is being to the correct address. The JCP would often not inform us of any changes for a few weeks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...