Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
    • might of been better to have got them all defaulted 2yrs ago as we carefully explained before then you'd already be 1/3rd there and your current issue would not be one.    
    • No doubt the hotel will have security cameras on the floor you were staying to confirm or deny the allegation??   The only compensation you will probably get, which will be discretionary as a goodwill gesture, will be a credit voucher for the entire hotel group. Very much doubt anything more than that as you have not substantiated, the hotel committed the transgression 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ingeus


Raven1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2495 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

flumps1976

 

What happens then if a claimant genuinely does not own a phone? I know at least one person who cannot afford a land line, and gets totally confused using a mobile so won't own one.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Not trying to rock the boat just saying from what I see at work iygwim?

 

If you fail to declare a telehone number to the JCP or WP they could refer you for a sanction to DMA as you are potentially restricting your availability as how can people get hold of you to invite you for interviews etc?

 

I now forsee an argument :( which is not what I want but simply wanted to pose this as an option that could be argued by WP in the referral to DMA

you do not have to supply a phone number flumps in fact on the pittance paid you could argue that you cannot even afford to have a phone...they can contact you by letter....you cannot be sanctioned for not supplying a number....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the pimps have my tel number, given by the DWP but never had a call unless

they call from an 0845 number as I don't answer those,Debt collectors 99% of the time.

 

 

Anyone know how much you can earn in a part time job while on JSA?

 

I foresee a nice part time job coming up around my appointment times and if you can work

and earn a certain amount before it effects JSA all the beter, or I could just be doing the job

for free.

 

George

to keep

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah but be careful...there are plenty of stories of people being sanctioned for missing appointments..even when they have been going to a job interview....I believe the amount is 20 quid but i would google it if i were you to make absolutely sure....if you do not turn up expect to be sanctioned by the pimps....

Link to post
Share on other sites

To Bakstcha sorry to bother you again but you know your stuff, should I take the complaint up would i the complaInt be supported with evidence of my advisor saying to me by e-mail that she filled in the application form for me? I still have the e-mail, thanks

Th e-mail would be useful - don't delete it!. I don't think it is a "killer" though since the advisor could argue that she filled it in but you signed it - after all "filled in" doesn't necessarily mean signed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have been trying and failing to find what w2w providers supply...I am thinking perhaps illogically how we can begin to cost them money..apart from withholding data....as in the way of new suit for interviews, money for bus/train/petrol costs.....we really need to start to hit them in the pocket if we possibly can...anyone know legally what we can get off them?....

Link to post
Share on other sites

have been trying and failing to find what w2w providers supply...I am thinking perhaps illogically how we can begin to cost them money..apart from withholding data....as in the way of new suit for interviews, money for bus/train/petrol costs.....we really need to start to hit them in the pocket if we possibly can...anyone know legally what we can get off them?....

 

So far as I know, the new clothes allowances for interviews or work boots etc. are 'discretionary'

which basically means 'feck off, you ain't getting it' .

 

fares are a no win though, as you have to pay them out to claim them back. I would make the most of withholding data as I don't think this loophole will remain open much longer.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the phones were to accommodate me. I had to fight for it thought - been with them on and off since September and was fine until I had my ears syringed. They then decided that because it had only just happened, I was lying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So far as I know, the new clothes allowances for interviews or work boots etc. are 'discretionary'

which basically means 'feck off, you ain't getting it' .

 

fares are a no win though, as you have to pay them out to claim them back. I would make the most of withholding data as I don't think this loophole will remain open much longer.

so no way to cost em money....the pimps are simply there then to make money out of you....is gonna be difficult but not impossible for them to alter the data protection act.....it does make you wonder what the hell they do or are supposed to do...apart from naff peoples life up.....ah the future looks bleaker by the day.....god help my grandkids when they leave school..no jobs, no hope, no money..

Link to post
Share on other sites

The pimps are pushing part time work, 'part time is the new full time'.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So far as I know, the new clothes allowances for interviews or work boots etc. are 'discretionary'

which basically means 'feck off, you ain't getting it' .

 

fares are a no win though, as you have to pay them out to claim them back. I would make the most of withholding data as I don't think this loophole will remain open much longer.

 

I don't think its closeable without serious legislating in multiple areas tbh - whilst they might be able to fudge a way to stop us having to sign a data waiver, it would I suspect, require a lot more legislation changing to still stop us prohibiting our new employer from communicating with a third party - especially since, once we are with said employer, we are out of the benefit system, the JSA one, anyway. I doubt they can easily impose a contractual term on someone when their "contract" is to all intents and purposes ended.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

The pimps are pushing part time work, 'part time is the new full time'.

Well they get paid the same no matter if P/T or F/T (subject to a min no o0f weekly hours).

Part time work will not remove a lot of people from benefits.

So we have the ridiculous situation where pimps are being paid possibly more than those who find work and people are still on benefits!

Link to post
Share on other sites

they shouldn't be paid unless they get a person completly off benefits, part time or MW jobs would not fit this criteria. Any job requiring HB, TC, etc would not count the only exeptions would be child and disability benefits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they shouldn't be paid unless they get a person completly off benefits, part time or MW jobs would not fit this criteria. Any job requiring HB, TC, etc would not count the only exeptions would be child and disability benefits.

 

Yep that's about right

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The pimps are pushing part time work, 'part time is the new full time'.

The pimps are also coercing candidates into registering through "Self Employment", and for candidates to claim "Working Tax Credit" (provided they make up the hours to 30 hours per week). Some delude themselves with the belief that all candidates need do is walk from company door to door as if they were starting a Gardending Business, and that the "Fields of Dreams" Principle applies.... "If We turn up asking for work, work will always come".Unfortunately, the Universal Credit will torpedo Working Tax Credit, and if candidates who apply Working Tax Credit are not careful, they may be liable to repay several £'000 Working Tax Credit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate Ingeus.

I suffer with panic attacks and anxiety and since going to Ingeus I have regressed so much.

I'm depressed for the first time in months (I had battled my way through it only to be pushed back in by Ingeus) I even had self-harming thoughts, I'm having anxiety and panic attacks more often now and I feel worthless.

I'm adamant that this is the doing of that hell-hole.

My adviser doesn't give two hoots about me. She made out she was there to help and my naivety made me believe her until she threw all of my prospects back in my face. She told me she'd help me become self-employed, got me to fill out a business plan and really made me believe I had a good business idea and then told me none of it was realistic and told me I'd need a job, that self-employment for me isn't a realistic option.

She knows that I have poor mental health (anxiety, depression, panic, stress) but seems completely uncaring. I've tried to tell her that it's difficult for me to go out and approach employers or phone them because I suffer with anxiety and panic but she ignores me.

Now apparently my efforts are not enough and she wants me to apply for a minimum of 15 jobs a week.

I see her on a weekly basis and I hate it, 15 jobs is not realistic! I struggled to apply for 2 this week and I felt that was a good effort. I feel so pushed down and undervalued.

 

Honestly, I'm considering just telling the job centre they can stuff their benefits because the thought of going back into that Ingeus office makes me feel physically ill, it genuinely upsets me and I cannot stand the thought of being their puppet any longer. I just want rid of Ingeus and it's claws.

I feel so trapped, this is a 2 year plan... If I sign off, will that mean I'm free of Ingeus too?

 

I'd rather struggle and have no money than be miserable like this. :help:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate Ingeus.

I suffer with panic attacks and anxiety and since going to Ingeus I have regressed so much.

I'm depressed for the first time in months (I had battled my way through it only to be pushed back in by Ingeus) I even had self-harming thoughts, I'm having anxiety and panic attacks more often now and I feel worthless.

I'm adamant that this is the doing of that hell-hole.

My adviser doesn't give two hoots about me. She made out she was there to help and my naivety made me believe her until she threw all of my prospects back in my face. She told me she'd help me become self-employed, got me to fill out a business plan and really made me believe I had a good business idea and then told me none of it was realistic and told me I'd need a job, that self-employment for me isn't a realistic option.

She knows that I have poor mental health (anxiety, depression, panic, stress) but seems completely uncaring. I've tried to tell her that it's difficult for me to go out and approach employers or phone them because I suffer with anxiety and panic but she ignores me.

Now apparently my efforts are not enough and she wants me to apply for a minimum of 15 jobs a week.

I see her on a weekly basis and I hate it, 15 jobs is not realistic! I struggled to apply for 2 this week and I felt that was a good effort. I feel so pushed down and undervalued.

 

Honestly, I'm considering just telling the job centre they can stuff their benefits because the thought of going back into that Ingeus office makes me feel physically ill, it genuinely upsets me and I cannot stand the thought of being their puppet any longer. I just want rid of Ingeus and it's claws.

I feel so trapped, this is a 2 year plan... If I sign off, will that mean I'm free of Ingeus too?

 

I'd rather struggle and have no money than be miserable like this. :help:

 

Are you on JSA? You say you have been battling depression so I am just checking....Have you told your GP? They may think you may not currently be fit for work....you admit that your mental health has declined....

 

You can still look for work whilst on ESA but if Ing..and their ilk are making you ill then surely you need medical assistance.....and your GP is the first stop. And you may even have a fair argument for an exceptional circumstance not to be forced into WRAG should you remain ill after the assessment period (no guarantees unfornunately).

 

It is fortunate that you have something to fall back on financially so you can even consider signing off but for how long could you survive?

 

It is a shame that what the general public believe is geared to helping people get back into work and supporting the sick and disabled to achieve employment seems to be making people stressed and ill....

Link to post
Share on other sites

So far as I know, the new clothes allowances for interviews or work boots etc. are 'discretionary'

which basically means 'feck off, you ain't getting it' .

 

And they want people back to work? If you can't afford these things, how can you get back to work?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I am on JSA. That's how I ended up with Ingeus. After being on JSA for a certain amount of time, they put you on the Ingeus program.

I'm worried about going to my GP because the last thing I want or need is medication. I've had medication from my GP before to chill me out but they made me ill.

I should talk to someone but I just don't want to be end up a drugged zombie.

What is WRAG? I'm not sure what you mean.

 

I have a little money saved away thankfully but it wouldn't last for long, at the moment all I can think of is just getting away from Ingeus. I'd rather struggle financially than end up regressing further with my mental health.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And they want people back to work? If you can't afford these things, how can you get back to work?

 

From the feedback over on the 'dark side'......... The pimps have the

attitude that you must be able to provide proof of a positive outcome i.e. proof of a job start before they will consider any funding, too many people got new suits and shoes but no job at the end of it.

The same goes for certificates and work licences, so it's catch 22 for many claimants.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WRAG (sorry I have ended up using jargon) stands for the Work Related Activities Group and, believe it or not those still deemed unfit for work are deemed fit to go to Work Programme if they are expected to get better soon (you may find it informative to look at some of the ESA threads on this forum!!!). That said, I believe Ingeus are not the only providers in each area.

 

If it is the "regime" making you ill surely your GP needs to know that anyway....do they all thrust pills at you at the practise? Surely you have a choice and if it is the cirucmstances that are contributing then that should be something they address....with you...? If not I am sorry to hear that...GPs do differ I'm afraid.

 

I would have hoped that any GP worth their salt would help you improve your mental health and ESA assessment is the same money (I believe) as JSA (for the 13 weeks assessment period and there is no pressure to attend even Jobcentre during this time either....). As you have said "all I can think of at the moment is just getting away from Ingeus" then if your GP agrees that your health has deteriorated sufficiently then you will get away.....at least for a short while...time to think and get better......hopefully..

 

The problem is if you use all your money there is no guarantee that you will not end up back in the same boat, but even more stressed as then there is no safety net to cope even with any sanctions etc

 

.....and I am not sure struggling to make ends meet and worrying that you may have to return to WP later may help mental health, it wouldn't mine......it is not as if jobs are out there easily......

Link to post
Share on other sites

That said, I believe Ingeus are not the only providers in each area.

 

No, one could be really unlucky and end up with A4e, or Working Links, in which case hide your wallet/purse.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...