Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • sorry I have been confused by Statute Barred meaning. I thought with Statute Barred the debt cannot be chased 6 years after you have stopped paying.  Originally I set up a payment arrangement with all the companies around 2008 when things went horribly wrong. At that time the payment arrangement was with the original creditors.  I still have one of the original creditors who I pay each month (Cap1). I thought that if you make a payment arrangement you have to stick to that situation throughout. Also, MDR (Moorcroft) have been taking a monthly payment on behalf of M & S Bank for about 5 years. When I sent MDR a CCA request I got a copy of the original agreement sent to me directly by M & S Bank about 5 weeks after my CCA request. Sorry for my ignorance but would you suggest I stop paying all including Cap1 who are the original creditor? TIA
    • London1971 without divulging too much into his mental health he has issues regarding anything to do with government and so is it ok to fill the forms provided and what do I put on there  thanks  
    • Dear all, I am hoping for some advice/guidance on this matter. I received a LoC dated 12/04/24 and replied to this on the 2/05/24 disputing claim with the following reasons: 1: [Inadequate Affordability Assessment]: I contend that your institution failed to conduct a thorough assessment of my financial circumstances prior to approving the loan. As a result, the loan amount and repayment terms were not suitable for my income and financial situation. 2: [Unsustainable Repayments]: The repayment schedule imposed by the loan agreement placed an undue burden on my finances, making it impossible for me to meet my other financial obligations without experiencing significant hardship. 3: [Lack of Transparency]: Your institution did not adequately disclose the risks associated with the loan, including any potential increases in interest rates or fees over the loan term. I also added the following: Under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regulations, lenders have a legal obligation to conduct thorough affordability assessments and ensure that loan agreements are suitable for borrowers' circumstances. I hereby request that your institution: 1: Conduct a full investigation into my claim of irresponsible lending. 2: Provide me with copies of all documentation related to the loan application and approval process, including affordability assessments, credit checks, and correspondence. 3: Cease all collection activities related to the loan until this matter is resolved. Yesterday i received the attached reply via email and it included: 1: The Original Loan agreement 2: An account statement 3: A copy of a default notice letter. The email included a link for a direct debit set up page where you enter their reference and your bank account details (looks like a standard D/D set up page) but there is nothing to indicate the amount of the D/D that I might be agreeing to. I also think two days response time is not long enough to appropriately reply. Any thoughts appreciated   Email-compressed.pdf
    • Easy to set one up on Gov.uk , search on Google.
    • Hi London  he doesn’t have government gateway. Should we do it via post?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Partners Unknown Debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4608 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My new partner has received a letter from Robinson Way Limited (ex LSB) for a debt of £2,324.24 under her old married name. She knows who has set the account up but has been advised by her solicitor that it's not a matter for the courts to deal with as it's not a criminal matter, Is there any legal stance that she could take to get this debt wiped off completely as the person involved in setting it up was her ex husband getting his own back on her because she left him back in 2006 due to his violent behaviour

Link to post
Share on other sites

She knows who has set the account up but has been advised by her solicitor that it's not a matter for the courts to deal with as it's not a criminal matter,
That seems odd advice from a solicitor considering it's fraud. She should report it to http://www.actionfraud.org.uk/report_fraud She'll be given a reference number which she should quote to any DCA who tries to pursue.
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest contacting the bank directly in writing and tell them she is reporting this as fraud as she has no knowledge of this account. Report it first so she can include any crime reference number etc.

 

Other people know more and can give you more detailed advice

Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday, and all is well!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In almost identical circumstances I was given the following advice.

 

Write to the creditor stating you have no knowledge of any such debt and asking for proof. If/when documentation is supplied (it already had been in my case) write back stating categorically that it is not your signature and that you never opened the account/had the loan involved. If the creditor or anyone official asks you can tell them your suspicions as to who did open the account. I was advised that I couldn't report it to the police since I had suffered no crime or loss - any fraud was against the bank.

 

I will admit that it did take some persistence to get the bank to leave me alone but I really didn't want to risk involving the police myself if it could be avoided. So far as I know the bank never involved the police, and they never asked if I knew who's signature it was. The debt is now statute barred.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A very awkward situation, but, if, as you say this was done in spite then reporting it would be a logical action and not spite. It could be reported, saying that it is only a 'suspicion' that you know you did it, but you would prefer, unless pushed, not to name names.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

*UPDATE*

 

Partner received the evidence from Robinson Way with regards to her debt (or so they claim it's her debt) I noticed the following mistakes on it instantly, the debt was a loan taken out by her ex husband back in 2004, on the loan papers it's his name only, the credit agreement has his signature and what seems to look like an attempt to forge her maiden name signature, yet Robinson Way write to her under her maiden name. She has filed a fraud allegation and got the CRN and has been to the police who took her statement. Now Robinson Way are demanding that she makes full payment with 10 working days or they will take action against her. The Police managed to get the debt held. Also when I have contacted Robinson Way on her behalf they refuse to talk to me without written consent from her, claiming it's under the DPA that stops that communicating with me.

 

Is this true or are they just holding out until they receive her signature so that they can forge it onto the documents?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they are right she must give

written permission for you to act.

Make sure that there is a variation

to the signature she provides that

you can identify if there is any doubt

about any thing they come back with.

Tell them that until the fraud has been

fully investigated YOU have put the matter

on indefinite hold:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Robbersway are barking up the wrong tree, I personally would ignore them, they can't do anything, they don't own the account, they have suffered no loss, they're petty little children with naff all to say and are saying it too loudly!

 

Give them nothing, don't ring them, if they ring you just laugh at them and hang up.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

*UPDATE*

 

Robinson Way have now contacted my partner, asking for the following information:

 

A signature on official documentation

 

Proof of residence when the loan was taken out.

 

As this matter is being dealt with by Staffordshire police, she has informed Robinson Way that the signature will be provided direct to the Police and that as this is 100% fraud that she has declared this debt as an indefinite hold. Should she provide robinson way with proof of residence and a copy of her signature on official documentation or should she cease all future contact with Robinson Way and let the police deal with it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO! Robbersway are deluded, this is a Police matter, if they continue to attempt to frustrate the legal process and the Police investigation you should report them to the Police.

 

Robbersway are NO longer involved, tell them to take a hike and if they fail to stop harassing you you will report them to the police for attempting to pervert the course of justice. Who on earth do these fools think they are??

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are under no moral or legal obligation

to prove or disprove anything to these morons.

As BOO says it could be construed as perverting

the course of justice, so report them.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote=BRIGADIER2JCS;3570421As BOO says it could be construed as perverting

the course of justice, so report them.

 

That was just a good guess, I just wanted to shout at somebody......I should have rung SRJ!!:mad2:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The good news is she has emailed Robinson Way and informed them that she will not be providing them with her signature. She has also informed them that she has classed this debt on indefinite hold as it's a police matter and should they continue to send her threatening letters again, she will report them to the police for harassment, perjury and attempting to prevert the course of Justice, So far robinson way have not replied back. We will keep you informed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The good news is she has emailed Robinson Way and informed them that she will not be providing them with her signature. She has also informed them that she has classed this debt on indefinite hold as it's a police matter and should they continue to send her threatening letters again, she will report them to the police for harassment, perjury and attempting to prevert the course of Justice, So far robinson way have not replied back. We will keep you informed.

 

I agree that she has no obligation to provide them with a signature .... It is for them to prove the signature they have " is hers" , not for her to prove "it isn't hers". Be prepared for the DCA to spout off all sorts (especially by 'phone - why it is wise to record any calls, or deal in writing). However, is it helpful for you or your friend to (similarly) stretch the boundaries of legal credibility?. She might report them for harassment, but "perjury"? (have they given a false sworn statement?) and "attempting to pervert the course of justice" (again, how and where?).

Is it not better to concentrate on what they have done wrong, rather than threats you may find it hard to substantiate?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neither accusation would have merit

in any action, no court hearing has

been held so n perjury.

There is an investigation in progress

but as I read it there is at present no

cause for perverting the course of

justice, eg., lies in evidence to the

police.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who really cares, they spout all sorts of legal jargon and inaccurate statements, so IMO give them a piece of their own medicine, I'd add treason on there as well....:madgrin:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...