Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have never heard of any such law. Please post a link to what you have read online that explains this law. And please confirm whether you were ever married to or in a formal Civil Partnership with your Ex.
    • Today has been hectic so  have been unable to complete the whole thing. If you now understand it and want to go ahead with a complaint to the IPC, fine. If not then I won't need to finish it. But below is my response to your request  on post 64. No you don't seem stupid, the Protection of Freedoms Act isn't easy to get one 's head around at first. The part of the above Act referring to private parking is contained within Schedule 4 which you can find online under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Section 9 of SCH.4 relates to how the parking scrotes have to perform so that they can transfer their right to pursue the keeper from the driver when the PCN is still unpaid after a certain amount of time. In your case the PCN was posted to you the keeper and arrived within 14 days from when they claimed a breach occurred. That means they complied with first part of the Act. The driver at that time was still responsible to pay the charge demanded on the PCN and PCM now have to wait for 28 days to elapse before they can write and advise the keeper that as the charge has not been paid, that they now have the right to pursue the keeper. They claim they sent the first PCN on the 13th March, five days after the alleged breach and it arrived on Friday 15th March. So to comply with the Act they have to observe Section 8 subsection 2f   (f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given— (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So the first PCN was deemed to arrive on the 15th March and for 28 days to have elapsed is when the time is right for them to write and say you are now liable as keeper. So they sent the next PCN on the 12th April which is too early as you could still have paid until midnight of the 12th. So the earliest their second PCN should have gone to you was  Saturday 13th April so more likely on Monday 15th April. The IPC Code of Conduct states "Operators must be aware of their legal obligations and implement the relevant legislation and guidance when operating their businesses." So by issuing your demand a day early, they have broken the Act, the IPC Code of Conduct, the DVLA agreement  to abide by the law and the Code of Conduct not to mention a possible breach of your GDPR .   I asked the IPC  in the letter on an earlier to confirm that  CPMs Notice misrepresenting the law was a standard practice for all of PCMs Notices or just certain ones. Their distribution  may depend on when they were issued and whether they were issued in certain localities or for certain breaches. Whichever method used is a serious breach of the Law and could lead to PCM being black listed by the DVLA . One would expect that after that even if the IPC did not cancel your ticket, PCM could not risk going to Court with you nor even pursuing you any further.
    • thanks jk2054 - do you know any law i can quote (regarding timeframe) when sending the email as if i cant they'll probably just say no like the normal staff have done? thanks.
    • I lived there with her up until I gave notice. She took over the tenancy in her name. I had a letter from the council and a refund of the council tax for 1 month.    She took on the bills and tenancy and only paid the rent. No utility bills or council tax were paid once she took it over. She will continue to not pay bills in her new house which I'm now having to pay or will have to. I have looked online I believe the police and solicitors are going by the partner law to make me liable.   I have always paid my bills and ensured her half was paid then see how much free money is over.   She spends all her money on payday loans and rubbish then panics about the rent. I usually end up paying it or having to get her a loan.   Stupidly in my name but at the time it was because she was my partner. I even paid to move her and clean and decorate her old house so she got the deposit back. It cost me £3000 due to the mess she always leaves behind.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Amex debt catches up - SCOTTISH LAW APPLIES


clarrabell
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4721 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I had a gold amex charge card back in 2006 and to cut a long story short - split up with my boyfriend, got into debt and stopped paying amex. Balance due was about grand and a half.

 

Moved house but told nobody and tried to start fresh - got a basic bank account and after 6 months got a small overdraft. This led to a mobile phone contract and before i knew it I was able to get credit again.

 

Then one day a letter dropped through the door from amex demanding the money from my last address. I ignored it and eventuallly a decree/ccj was issued at the new address.

 

So then I closed all the new accounts at the new address ( all balances paid in full this time) and moved house again.

 

I done the same again - started with a basic account and worked up but amex have caught up again. They are now threatening to enforce the decree. I have claimed that this is not my debt and that I had never lived at the original address - my credit reports show this and they also don't show the decree as it was at the second address.

 

The situation at the moment is that I have recalled the decree to prevent the charge order being enforced. I am still claiming that this is not my debt. I asked for proof and all they sent me was the original signed application form . I asked if they could provide the 2 forms of ID from the application but they said they do not have this. ( I don't know if this is true or not)

 

My question is can amex really win in court if all they have is an application form? Surely this is not proof that I opened the account?

 

I know I have been a very dishonest person and I am not proud. But I just started to get on my feet again and this would be a definite blow as they now want over 3 and a half thousand because of all the interest and charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Clarra

 

Welcome to CAG

 

The guys will advise as soon as they are available.

 

What you need to do is have a read of (1) (2) (3) (4) and (5) in my signature.

 

Send a SAR Request to get all the statements. You can claim back all the charges and compound interest over the last 6 years.

 

Use this spreadsheet:- http://www.shweb.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/interestcalcs.xls

 

You've got a Legitimate Dispute.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

You mention a decree....Are you in Scotland?

 

You also mention the year 2006. When was the last time you made any payment or acknowledgement of this debt/account.

 

I think that if you have not acknowledged or made a payment on the account for a clear 5 years in Scotland, it is Statute Barred.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I am in Scotland. Amex have BTO solicitors involved.

 

I do not have a statement of accounts so I don't know when the last payment was made. But if i ask for a statement of account is that me admitting that the debt is mine?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

While I don't condone debt evasion, you do have a legit claim for a refund of charges on the account. They may well add up to a bit and would put a dent in the amount you owe especially when you add interest to them at the rate Amex charged you.

 

The only way to get those statements and subsequently find the quantum of the charges is to SAR Amex. This is purley a request for information and will include a copy of the agreement if they have it.

 

I don't believe that a SAR request is an ackowledgement of the debt. You could, I suppose, start your SAR letter with the line that you do not ackowledge any debt to them. You are seeking information to establish what has happened on this account. DO NOT USE THE WORDS "MY ACCOUNT" in your SAR letter. Keep it simple and say that you require all details and information they hold on you in connection with any dealings you have had with them. Just don't put anything in the letter that admits the account.

 

Others will advise if they think differently.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

While I don't condone debt evasion, you do have a legit claim for a refund of charges on the account. They may well add up to a bit and would put a dent in the amount you owe especially when you add interest to them at the rate Amex charged you.

 

The only way to get those statements and subsequently find the quantum of the charges is to SAR Amex. This is purley a request for information and will include a copy of the agreement if they have it.

 

I don't believe that a SAR request is an ackowledgement of the debt. You could, I suppose, start your SAR letter with the line that you do not ackowledge any debt to them. You are seeking information to establish what has happened on this account. DO NOT USE THE WORDS "MY ACCOUNT" in your SAR letter. Keep it simple and say that you require all details and information they hold on you in connection with any dealings you have had with them. Just don't put anything in the letter that admits the account.

 

Others will advise if they think differently.

 

ims

 

So do you think the best option would be to own up then? The only problem with that is that when I put in the form to recall the decree- I put down "never had an Amex account" as the reason for my defence. will the judge not just Think I'm a liar?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Well I didn't know you put in your defence through a court of law that you never had an Amex Account!

 

That does put a rather different complexion on the matter wouldn't you say?

 

There will be some of the guys better versed in Scottish Law looking in so lets see what they advise.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is what I ave decided to do. Any pointers or advice or anything you think that might need changed - please do comment!

 

1) Obtain SAR from American Express

2) Obtain all correspondence from Amex Solicitors (as most of it was sent to the address I had already moved out of, including the court papers)

3)Write a letter to Amex solicitors to confirm that the debt is indeed mine (and make an excuse as to why I didn't recognise the debt before)

4)At the hearing tell the judge I did not receive the court papers (I can prove the address I was living at was different to the address they were sent to)

 

That's pretty much the plan. By the way is the 1st hearing to decide whether the decree should actually be recalled or not? Or does it mean that it has already been recalled and that it is time to provide evidence etc?

 

Basically all I want is for the decree to be recalled on the grounds that I did not receive the court papers so that I may have the opportunity to pay the original amount as it is approx half of what they want now because of interest and charges!!

 

I'm sure I read somewhere that if you genuinely did not receive the papers then the judge will recall it and you then have the original 28 days to clear the full balance and thus avoiding the decree/ccj - I hope it's the case in Scotland!!

 

Cheers everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have amended the title to show that this is in Scotland :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The first hearing is to decide on the recall. You must be there. If successful, it will be as if the decree had never been granted and you will be able to negotiate payments. Your local CAB should be able to help you with all of this, and most courts have an in court adviser who you should find before the hearing.

 

B

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The first hearing is to decide on the recall. You must be there. If successful, it will be as if the decree had never been granted and you will be able to negotiate payments. Your local CAB should be able to help you with all of this, and most courts have an in court adviser who you should find before the hearing.

 

B

 

Thank you. I have arranged to meet with a solicitor next week to get some advice.

 

So if I were successful in getting the decree recalled would I then only have to pay the original decree amount within 28 days or would I still be responsible for the interest that has accrued ( 8% granted by the court from the date of the decree) as this has more than doubled the original amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just so worried about court. AMEX are obviously going to make this as difficult as possible.

 

The thoughts running through my head at the moment are- what if amex contest the recall? If I don't get the recall then I will almost certainly be paying the ridiculous amounts of interest.

 

What if the recall is granted but then the judge then decides that the full amount should be paid? Do I then have to argue over the charges?

 

I thought of a solicitor because I thought he/she may be able to broker a better deal than I ever could in court!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry too much about Amex. They will probably use a local solicitor as their agent who are rarely fully informed! The sheriffs have a field day with them!

 

You can start reclaiming unfair charges PPI etc.

 

Please phone your local court and ask to speak to the in court advice service. If there isn't one then your solicitor although this will cost you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry too much about Amex. They will probably use a local solicitor as their agent who are rarely fully informed! The sheriffs have a field day with them!

 

You can start reclaiming unfair charges PPI etc.

 

Please phone your local court and ask to speak to the in court advice service. If there isn't one then your solicitor although this will cost you.

 

That's providing the sheriff doesn't decide to toy with me instead!!

 

Thank you for the reassurance but if you don't mind me asking how do you know all of this- are you in this line of work?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What information did you require from the Subject Access Request ?

 

I dont know how the courts work in Scotland, will they adjourn if you dont have information required in order to fully defend yourself ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, clarrabel.

 

I'm not sure what the point was trying to recall the Decree saying you had know knowledge of this debt, surely you had been paying Amex from the address you aquired the account and they know this.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, clarrabel.

 

I'm not sure what the point was trying to recall the Decree saying you had know knowledge of this debt, surely you had been paying Amex from the address you aquired the account and they know this.

 

I was trying to recall the decree because there was a charge for payment of money approved by the court and would have been enforcable within 14 days had I not taken action. As I said before the court papers for the decree were sent to an address that I had moved out of 11 months previously so I did not have the opportunity to pay the full amount within 28 days. Which I most certainly would have done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...