Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Paying back Benefits


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4757 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, hope you can help me with the best course of action for my predicament.

 

I have been out of work for nearly 2 years and now and have been claiming JSA and housing benefit. Late last year, my parents gave me some money to get me a car (to help me get a job as I seemed to be turning work down due to lack of my own transport) and pay off a huge debt that had been acquired from a previous relationship. I did not declare this money (very stupid in hindsight) and continued to receive my benefits.

 

I recently stopped receiving my benefits due to a few days break abroad. I have since not re-applied for benefits and am wracked with guilt over what I have done and it is causing me to not sleep. I currently have sufficient funds left to be able to pay back what I was paid from the time of my parents gift until I stopped receiving my benefits.

 

What I really want to know is what will happen to me if I declare these facts and offer to pay back the money I should not have received and what is my best course of action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you need to get some legal advice on this because that's a lot of money to not declare.

 

How long ago was it paid - ie how long were you still in receipt of benefits after you'd received the gift?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was about 4-5 months receiving benefits when I shouldn't have, I know it is a lot but didn't realise it made that much difference as it was a gift, I know now that it was the wrong thing to have done and feel really bad about it that is why I am looking for advice, but it would need to be free as need to keep the money to pay back the benefits I should not have received, will set up appointment with the CAB and take it from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One question that will be raised when calculating your overpayment will be did you have you pay off your debt straight away, or did you do it just to totally clear it?

 

I do have sympathy with you, as if you took advice before hand you could have avoided the problems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a gift, technically no I didn't have to pay it off in one go but felt obliged to and wanted to finally be debt free for the first time in a long while in my life. But now through my own naivety/stupidity I have incurred more debt and just want to get back to zero even if it means I have nothing left.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have two problems.

 

Firstly, you have committed benefit fraud, and will have an overpayment to pay back. The best way to handle it is to come clean and offer to pay the money back. These things will usually get found out and the consequences are far more severe if they find it out, rather than you volunteer the information.

 

Secondly, You may have issues with benefit claims in the near future. This is because on claiming, the DWP/LA may consider you to have deprived yourself of capital, and may calculate your claim as if you still possessed most of the cash. You would then have to appeal and try to prove that your intent was not to deprive yourself of capital in order to continue claiming benefits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's weird, the last few days a few threads have been very similar. Not totally, but I have picked up a definate link. Seems you're not alone in this predicament. Have a look on this forum as I say, there are a couple more threads at least that relate to the same thing. Money as gifts...

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is sad that with a bit of advice it could all have been avoided.

 

Parents pay off loan directly and buy then give car to OP.

Give OP £6K

 

OP declares £6K but as long as that's all the money OP has then gets full benefits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure that is correct, LGO.

 

I believe that even if the OP's parents had paid that sum of money to pay off the debts, the OP should still have declared it and that would have affected his benefit entitlements.

 

Also, the JC might have allowed him to be given a car for a grand or so, but £17k??? That's way more than a reliable car just to improve the possibility of getting a job.

 

The DWP will want to know where all the rest of the money went too so I think the OP really does need to get some proper advice and bite the bullet to sort this out, asap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is sad that with a bit of advice it could all have been avoided.

 

Parents pay off loan directly and buy then give car to OP.

Give OP £6K

 

OP declares £6K but as long as that's all the money OP has then gets full benefits.

 

If you add it up, there's also an unaccounted for 14k.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who are the best people to ring to sort out paying back what I shouldn't have claimed, is it via the 'benefit fraud' line or should I go into my local JobCentre Plus office, also am I likely to get any decent advice if I go to CAB ? Thanks for the replies so far, just want to get this sorted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who are the best people to ring to sort out paying back what I shouldn't have claimed, is it via the 'benefit fraud' line or should I go into my local JobCentre Plus office, also am I likely to get any decent advice if I go to CAB ? Thanks for the replies so far, just want to get this sorted.

 

If you can get a welfare rights caseworker to help, or if you have a good CAB in your area, that would work. Otherwise the best approach is to type up a letter and send it to the departments you were claimimg from - as Nystagmite indicated above. You can take the letter into the Local Authority and get a receipt. Post the other letter to the DWP benefit delivery centre dealing with your claim - the address will be at the top of any letters you received about your claim.

 

Good on you for trying to sort this out now and pay back your debt. Too many people stick their head in the sand until they get a letter from the fraud team.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would at the very least try and talk to the CAB before you do anything.

 

I'm not sure that it's correct about contributions based JSA either because it was not what I was told when I went on it last year.

 

However, there is a clear requirement to inform the DWP/JC of any change of circumstances, and that includes receiving what would be consdered a signficant sum of money.

 

 

Also, just to ensure there are no other issues with the situation, maybe check out the tax implications for gifting that sum of money. Better to have all the facts first before you open the inevitable can of worms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have since spoken with the CAB and they could not offer me any help directly but put me in touch with Community Legal Advice. I am still unsure about what to do next, will read the paperwork from CLA when it arrives. I have read elsewhere on this forum that they 'rub their hands with glee' at a confession and am still severely worried and losing sleep/not eating properly with regards to what will happen to me and what I should do next. Should I really ring them and admit what has happened, from what I have read they will not allow me any benefits so how am I supposed to live and pay my rent etc and before somebody says I should have thought about this before I KNOW that now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave - if you are still currently not receiving benefits, my advice would be to wait for a few more days to see what the CLA come up with.

 

In the meantime, you need to sit down and itemise where all the money has gone because they will want to know. If you still have that car, you may well need to think about selling it because one way or another, if it hasn't helped you get a job, and you don't have the money to pay for living with no benefits, then the car becomes an unaffordable luxury.

 

The other people you need to tell are your parents for a number of reasons. a) they deserve to know that they're throwing good money away and may want to have time to consider if they can, or if they will, help you again. The JC may even suggest that you will have to apply to your parents (or friends etc) to live without benefits if your benefits are withheld. b) I am not sure about the tax implication, but the last time I knew about it, the tax-free gift threshold was £3,000 per annum, or £6,000 for the first gift if one had not been given in the previous tax year. Whilst there may be ways around the tax, as this 'gift' is going to come to light, your parents may prefer to know so they can ensure that there is no liability upon them.

 

In the meantime, no point in fretting - you're doing the right thing by moving this along as best as you can to get it all cleared up. So, step back and chill. Work on your finances to cut your outgoings to a minimum so you can show you're bringing things back under control.

 

And - keep looking for work - focus on that more than anything because that's what will get you out of the dumps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is the Benefit Centre that you will need to speak to. You can either put your case in writing or speak to them.

They will need to to te knoe the date you received the money and will require you bank statements to show how the money decreased. You will also be asked to provide receipts for any purchases made.

 

Several years ago I had to sit with my section supervisor and sort through several carriers bags of receipts putting them into date order and photocopying them before returning them to the customer. There is a calculation called "diminishing capital" which is calculated by the section leader and they have to look at what expenses youincurred, what you paid out and if any of the bills you paid were essential, e.g. you mentioned debts that you had, were those companies about to take you to court or did you decide to pay off the debts, it could be deemed that for benefit purposes you deemed as still having that cash as it was not an urgent essential item that had to be paid immediately.

e.g you have a mortgage for £15k but also have arrears of £2k, your lemder could request immediate payment of the arrears but not for te outstanding balance, if you then paid off the mortgage you could be deemed as depriving yourself of £15k.

I cannot remember how the calculation is made sorry but the team leader will look at what you acceptable living costs could have been for the period of time in question and will then calcualte how long that £50k should have lasted if you were not in receipt of JSA and you will not be eligible for any further payments until that date has been reached.

You should be given copies of how the decision was reached so that you can know wher you might need to request a reconsideration if there is a part you don't agree with.

 

I wish I could remember what is allowed and how te calculation is made but only coming across 1 case in my processing days it just didn't stick in the brain sorry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...