Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
    • Yes, I believe the Starbucks was closed at the time the car was parked there 
    • hi lolerz many thanks for your reply and help. My 2 months has passed i was waiting until the court proceedings started. As i went through this process not that long ago, i shall look back at my old thread for how to respond. Ill get the docs scanned soon thanks.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

iuc, please please help, I Hav an anxiety disorder, this letter has caused me distres


Wizzer77
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4582 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 175
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

They can put the case forward for prosecution based on the 'evidence' they have. Whether the case is prosecuted will be up to the prosecution team (are they the CPS?), and whether the evidence is good or bad would be argued in court. I don't really have any experience of the criminal side, only the civil side, ie the Tribunal. In a tribunal they decide on a balance of probabilities which is different to criminal court. Some authorities won't put the case forward for prosecution if an appeal is to be heard, others will press on regardless. Its a large overpayment, and normally I think this would be prosecuted, so if they offer you a lesser option - a caution or administrative penalty (a fine on top of the overpayment), then get professional legal advice before making a decision.

 

Its best to try not to think too far ahead. Just think one step at a time - first appeal and tribunal. Deal with anything else as it comes. Best not to panic and get ahead of yourself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for ur advice lee :-)

Im just such a mess, i dont really think they have any evidence :-( i really dont, its so unfair, im hoping the fact that i didnt financially gain from this has got to be in my favour :-/ my partner hasnt been asked anything... Which ithink is bit odd. But i would have him and i would also have a friend who would be my witnesses, to me living alone. Arrrggghhh Obviously people from the school believed at i lived with my partner, could hardly tell any1 i lied to the school :-/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hifirstly please dont worry yourself into an early grave like I almost did.You just stick to your gunsthe worst that can happen is they take you to court but going on what you have said wont happenif you are as you say better off now they tend to write them off against each other - this happened to my friendif they do take you to court you have nothing to loose cos all they will do is ask you to pay back the moneyand thats nothing worst than the situation your in, they are not going to put you in prison - i know someone who is paying back £10,000 at £5 a week I remember the guy in CAB saying "they cant get water from a dry lake" and its true if you avent got it they cant take itI am now nearly 6 months down the line from where you are and my life is back to normal mostlystick to your guns and tell the truth - they have to prove otherwiseJ :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Wizzer, for the sort of money they are talking about, they will be looking to prosecute, do you have a solicitor? You need one now!, Get the solicitor to ask them what they are going to do, most councils will continue with a prosecution even if you are waiting on an appeal/tribunal.

 

I know this is not what you want to hear but you need to know the truth now more than ever. I really know how you are feeling at the moment.

 

I will keep an eye on your thread and help if I can.

Take care

XX

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im sorry to disagreebut i was in same boat and i owed them around the same amount they cut it down for this n that and never charged me a penalty and are taking weekly payments that i can afordI would apeal it all the way and as i said in PM they can only take what you have to give :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im sorry to disagreebut i was in same boat and i owed them around the same amount they cut it down for this n that and never charged me a penalty and are taking weekly payments that i can aford

 

Joanne, I'm glad that you managed to get your own case sorted out. However please bear in mind that your case was in relation to tax credits. This is an entirely different thing to housing benefit and is administered by another governmental body and they have differing policies and laws when it comes to fraud cases.

 

HMRC who administer tax credits rarely prosecute but Local Authorities who administer housing benefit and DWP who also administer other benefits, do prosecute more often and for far less amounts. For local authorities and DWP every fraud where the resulting overpayment is in excess of £2000 is referred for consideration of prosecution. That's not to say that every case over this amount will be prosecuted but they wil be referred. Once a referral is received, departmental solicitors have to apply both of the tests (the evidential test and the public interest test) to the cases to determine if prosecution should proceed.

 

In any event, you cannot compare your own case to that of someone else's. Each case considered is weighted on a variety of factors inluding the type of fraud committed and prior offences - in addition to the sum involved. Having dealt with literally thousands of welfare cases over the years, I have seen many frauds and alleged frauds which have been for approximately the same sum but which have had very different outcomes.

 

as i said in PM they can only take what you have to give :)

 

They can take more than you have to give if you are in receipt of benefit. They can take up to the maximum deduction for fraudulent overpayments directly from benefit to recover the overpayment, and though they can consider lowering the amount of deductions if a person is in hardship, if they choose not to lower them there is not a great deal that can be done about that.

 

Please do not advise people via private message.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see what your saying, I was just saying i have a little more insight into this than i'd care to put on these forumsand from my experiences they dont prosecute but as you said ever case is individual dependant on what other evidence they have etc. the likelyhood is they will have been watching you and if you have been staying there they will know about it - so if your telling the truth then you shouldnt worry just stick to your guns.if as you said you will be better off when you claim together I dont see how they can claim it back - you could go down the notional offset route and then they will owe you money which you wont see btwRegardsJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

They only told me about this after i had moved in with my partner so, if they wouldnt have started watching me after the iuc as i obviously was here. I have also got a letter from a friend of mine (who is a proffesional guy so i hope the letters after his name help a bit lol) who has not only written a statement to say that i was at my property and that he helped me out when i ran out of electric etc but would also be willing to stand up at tribunal/court to say as much also. I have also got a letter from my letting agent which staes that they had reason to believe i lived there and have provided logs to them of calls i had made, in regards to property and let them know if i was ever away... Do you think these things will help. Spoke to some1 the other day n she mentioned nothing about prosecuting, just that if they couldnt make a decsion about overpayment then it would be sent for tribunal. Which i hope it does! I really do cos i know i havent done anying wrong. I havent got a solicitor or anything yet. Was going to see if i even needed one.... Arrrghhhhh still out of my mind over this. As far as im aware the evidence they have is 1) i changed schools in 2009 n put my boyfriends address down as home address 2) not enough electricity units used, half of which the times they took the electricity reading i wasnt there anyway as i had informed them i broke my leg! 3) a neighbour told someone when they called round that i didnt live there anymore.... Which i domt know why they did this and im sure they wouldnt stand at tribunal or sign a statement to that effect as its a rough council estate n they wouldnt ' grass' as they call it on someone! If it was the case, which it isnt. I dont know what else i can do. Im not paying that money back...i bloody lived in a crap life to do things properly and protect myself, went bankrupt, turned my life around just to be in more debt than i was?!?! No way, im innocent, and im sooooo angry that this has happened cos i couldve been living a happier family life with my prtner in a nice house for past 2 years, been better off....but stupid me wanted to do things properly and make sure i could never get in same position again...and its all for nothing if i pay this money back :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ya I dont really have any experience in anything like this but it does sound very serious I am guessing you could get legal aid so I would get solicitor asap.

 

However if I was in your situation i would start collating as much proof that i lived at address as I could I was thinking have you ever had anything delivered through post that you had to sign for that would be proof you where living there although not sure how long post office holds info for, also did you have a landline surley calls in and out would def proof how often you where there.

 

Did you have visits from midwifes or health visitors to your address ? Basically visits from anyone who could confirm they saw you in your own home. If you have bad debts where the bailiffs calling did you ever open door to them if so I am sure that would be logged somewhere.

 

I know you say some neighbours reported you where their others that noticed you coming and going that would be willing to confirm. Litrally if i was you and i had been living at that address then I would know there must be proof I would go knocking on doors just explaining situation making sure your clear not to try and pressure people but just saying if you have seen me regularly would you be willing to sign something to say this.

 

I would explain the school thing honestly and I would also contact the school and make them aware of whats happening and apologise for misleading them about where you lived explain what lead you to do it and I am sure they will understand you wanted what was best for your children.

 

I hope your successful in proving your case and wish you lots of luck with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't have any post really :-/ I also don't want anything to do with any neighbours, wouldn't know where to start. I had no landline :-( the only time I had home visits from healthcare people was after I had my twins, during which time I was staying with partner cos of c-section. Arrrgggghhhh it's so annoying! I was hardly ever there but I did sleep there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would consider sending out letter maybe get legal aid and get it checked by solicitor as send it to neighbours I know its tough and embarassing but 30k is a huge amaout of money and it may be worth it i am guessing if you have your children even if you where out all day you must have had to come home early eve to get them settled for bed and also doing the school run in morn I am betting people noticed you leaving to take kids to school as lots of people are up and about at that time. I would be very very very careful what you do write if you contact neighbours but as long as its not trying to influence people I am betting at least some will help. I would if something came through my door and someone was going to get into trouble and I had seen them. I dont know how things like that stand in court but I would try and do everything I could.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not even that im embarrassed, but neighbour told some1 from council i didnt live there and only came back for my mail, i dont know who is this. This is a VERY rough council estate, it truly is full of scumbags, police were always at neighbours houses, they are not nice people and i want no involvement, and i know they wouldnt help me, they honestly wouldnt :-( i wish it were at easy :-( i would help someone too but i know they wouldnt. They didnt like me, called me a snob (cos i was normal and wasnt interested in getting involved in there fights and dramas. They dont hate me or anything but i know they wouldnt help me :-(

Its 19k to housing, 6k to dwp, ic, and rest in council tax, about 28k all in all! I had a solicitor for my iuc and she walked out of there saying they had nothing and she was confident it wouldnt go any further!!! So hmmmmmm :-/

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have my dad who came to stay at mine as a witness, also in the logs from my letting agent in regards to calls i had made to them during my period there, i would inform them that my dad was staying, so that letter from letting agency would confirm my dad as staying there. I havent put a statement in my appeal from him as i dont want to worry about it as he is having treatment for cancer of oesophagus at the mo, and dont wanna involve him unless it becomes at tribunal stage. Also they have never asked my partner anything? Is this normal? He has never been called for interview, and again i havent got a statement from him in appeal as i wanted to make sure that i had plenty of evidence left for a tribunal, dont wanna use it all up on appeal. He has never claimed benefits so he hasnt been accused of defrauding anyone, but as it was me claiming and myself who signed declaration saying i was living alone, im assuming it isnt anything to do with him....i dunno, They havent said anything to him!

I feel soooo drained!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Any help would be greatly appreciated, here goes....

I am being accused of living with my partner from feb 2009 -april 2011. Which i didnt, i moved in april 2011. But heres the story...

 

In october 2008 i moved into my old address, i then met my now partner and i fell pregnant with our twins (i had 3 older 1's) he lived in a town about 3 miles away from me. I had our twins in august 2009. But i moved my daughter from the school in our town to 1 in his town in feb 2009. I did this because 1- the school is alot better, andhas ofsted report to prove this. 2- because my daughter was unhappy at school, which i have a visit documented from welfare officer attending the school in december 2008 to support my claim my daughter wasnt happy. But stupidly because i knew she wouldnt get into the school without living in area, i put my bf's address down as home address :-/

 

Also my electric records show very low use of electric. Which they say is proveable that i didnt live there.

 

My response- as i stated in my iuc, i was looking togo bankrupt (which i did feb 2011) and i was in a very bad financial situation. My partner wouldnt let me live with him until i had gone bankrupt as he didnt want me to go bankrupt at his address. So i had very little money and admitted that there was periods that i didnt have electric, and during those times my partner, and a very good friend who lives in same town as i did let me use there washing, drying and bathing facilities. My friend has written a statement to this effect also.

Also, i am originally from a completely different county, and would spend periods of time with my best friend, whilst my eldest 3 were with there dad. My friend whom i stayed with, my ex (who had our 3) and my dad who i sometimes stayed with, are all willingto write statements for this for my tribunal.

 

Also i broke my ankle in july 2010, and had to stay with my partner during this time as i was non weight bearing. I informed housing, dwp etc of this andwas told it was fine. I stayed from august-december 2010.

 

So surely all this evidence supports my reasons for not having electric. Also have in my friend from a different county's statement, which supports my statement of being brought up in a home which was very run down, and had bad childhood in regards to livingin conditions that may not appear normal to some. Am also trying to trace any records from social services to try and support this claim. As i know we had involvment withthem but unsure how much.

 

Also in regards to my broken ankle....why would i phone from hospital bed (which is documented) to say i wasnt going to be there as i had injured myself...if according to them i hadnt been there for over a year anyway !?!?

 

I have medical records from 2008 and these refer to me suffering from an anxiety disorder. Also has mention of home visits from health visitor. Also a dr had written during a consoltation that i dont live with partner butsee him most days. All appointments made in the practice in my old town where i lived, and not my partners town.

 

A neighbour told a worker that i didnt live there. But wouldnt make a statement as the area is a very rough area. Which it is! Which is why i never spent much time at home!! But obviously they have brought this for their evidence! I dont really know the neighbours, and is an awful area :-(

 

I also have call logs from my regular contact with letting agent, which state that i told them i go away to visit family often. Also that my dad had come to visit at my property and has done some gardening and heavy work in the house. My dad is willing to write me a statement to say that he did stay with me, but he does have terninal cancer of the oesophagus so wouldnt be able to attend as a witness in person.

 

Lastly, they say that i did live with him from 2009 as i couldnt go bankrupt at his address, which is the reason i commited the fraud. But this doesnt really make sense, as if i had done this, then why would i, because surely the only reason to commit benefit fraud is to have financial gain. Well.... As a single person, my rent was paid directly to landlord, so i had no gain from this money except to have occupancy of the property, and received £280 p/w as a single mother. Now, as i couple, we are entitled to £330 p/w!

 

so why would i live at an address for over 2 years...commit a serious offence (im of good character, no convictions, as are all my witnesses) when i couldve saved the £450 needed for bankruptcy, in only 9 weeks of living with partner. We wouldve been over £5000 better off in our pockets over this period had we claimed as a couple. Unless i kept the house because i wanted to live there! I have provided evidence that my relationship with my ex was violent, followed by a period of homelesness, so surely it is understandable why i wasnt quick to hive up my home and move in!

 

Anyway, if any1 has any advice/opinions.... Anything would help, as i do suffer from anxiety, and this has caused me so much distress :-( thank u

Edited by Wizzer77
Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to say the amount over paid is close to 20k!!!!!!

 

Also noticed in my last paragraph i spoke about in the 9 weeks of living with my partner we wouldve been able to raise the £450 needed for bankruptcy from the extra £50 a week better off we was

Edited by Wizzer77
Link to post
Share on other sites

We aren't disputing we're in a relationship. But we wasn't living together. If you're single parent u don't have to live together with every1 u go out with surely?!? Obviously it worked out we did move in together. But I hadn't in notice on property etc before my iuc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also when looking at the decision they aren't just looking at you actual whereabouts, they are looking at whether you were a couple wjho were geographically rather than maritaslly separated.

In all other aspects you were a couple and you have stated as such however due to financial reasons you couldn't live together until you had completed your bankruptcy.

In the balance of probability you could be classed as being a couple for the duration of the allegation even if you weren't living together but were spending a regular amount of time together.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes he was/is my boyfriend, but ur allowed to have a relationship... I only met him in November 2008!! I'm being accused of living with him from feb '09! I fell preg with twins the 1st time we slept together. It all happened so quick, my hormones and emotions were all over the place, then I broke my ankle, then we moved in... Like I sed in original post, my past has been horrific and I had o ly just settled in the house with my kids... This is nightmare

 

It wasn't only due to financial reasons. It was also due to me being homeless before and in a violent relationship, so obviously was very apprehensive to move in with any1. The bankruptcy was just his reason that he didn't want us to live together, I had my own reasons as stated. We shared no finances, had our own mail going to our own houses, my friend who lives in same town helped me out more with practical things! And I'm not being accused of living with him! Of course I spent some time with him. But surely that's not classed as living together?!?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone is entitled to have relationship and also to have a sex life.

The title of living together does tend to lead people to believe that it is literally about living under the same roof together but there are other things that are taken into consideration, the length of time that you have been in a relationship, whether there are any children as a result of the realtionship, how friends and family members perceive you to be as a couple and if you don't actually live together are there any reasons preventing this such as finances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I understand what ur saying. Friends perceived us ass living apart and 2 of those friends are writing statements to that effect.

From the time theyre claiming we lived together from, we'd only been together 3 months!

The bankruptcy thing made him reluctant to have me move in, and for myself it was various reasons previously stated, as my life has been incredibly unstable (which I can provide evidence for) and moving in together was a big step for me :-/

Link to post
Share on other sites

one of the potential difficulties you may have is the fact that you have made previous statements in feb 2009 saying that you were living at your partner's address, that can go against you in two ways.

 

it either means that you were living with your partner and had a false claim for benefit, or that you were not living with your partner but were willing to lie to change your child's school. that can cause difficulty as a judge may view it as if you are willing to lie about one thing, how can they believe any evidence you provide

 

also you mentioned that you have low utility usage, am not sure how low, but from experience a family with several children normally has higher than average utility bills

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i put it on school form that i lived at hisaddress, but did that as they wouldnt get into that school otherwise. I would accept any relevent punishment for that, assuming its an offence. Alot of parents do this to get into school, doesnt make it right, but does make it alot more understandable. Ihave supportive evdience for everything i say, about education welfare visit, i have the report which only took place month before i changed schools. Have medical records to prove my anxiety. And even have a statement from my violent ex partner, admitting he was violent and as a result i was made homeless, and from his knowledge i lived at the address i claimed for.

 

Yes my electric was incredibly low, but i was hardly ever there during day, i never had any money, hence going bankrupt. And have statement from friend that he would make us meals etc and help me with laundry. If anything, i was at his house more than my partners, as my partner worked alot. Plus i visited iow frequently, which i can prove. Also had periods of time when i was staying with partner, for 6 weeks after csection with our twins, and for 4 months when i broke my leg. So kind of makes sense that elec usage was low. Which was only utility used as evidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...