Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • An update! I emailed both Andrzej.Tuleja and James_Goldsmith at Whirlpool dot com. I got a phone call from their executive team a couple of days later, and a replacement part dropped on the mat a week after. She was quite apologetic, however, also reiterated the "90 day warranty" period on customer fitted parts, and did not comment when I mentioned that the CRA also applies as I was a consumer buying from them directly. So I now have a spare door switch if the machine decides to eat another in the future! Cheers all!   Note dx100 that the "Hotpoint CEO" you linked to is not related to the hotpoint appliances, but some kind of marketing app.
    • yep, throw that morality card out the window....9/10 you never owe a DCA ANYTHING!! they are NOT BAILIFFS!!
    • (See the link to DVLA’s INF188/6 document I posted above, page 4 as cited) “I have a new medical condition that I have told the DVLA about on my recent application. Can I drive? As soon as the DVLA receives your correct and complete application for a new licence and as long as you meet all the Section 88 criteria, you may drive. It is important that you are satisfied that the medical condition you have declared on your application does not stop you from driving. If you are unsure, check with your doctor or healthcare professional before you make a decision. You can also look up your condition in the ‘Assessing fitness to drive’ guide, which you can find at www.gov.uk/dvla/fitnesstodrive to see whether you meet the medical standards for driving. As this guide is intended for healthcare professionals, it can be complicated. Your doctor or healthcare professional should be able to help you if necessary." It seems that DVLA think that S.88 does apply for applications disclosing a new medical condition after all. Why might this be so, and what of “qualifying application" and "relevant disability"? S. 92(1) imposes on the driver a requirement to disclose a relevant disability. S.92(3) requires the Secretary of State to refuse such an application disclosing a relevant disability ….. EXCEPT S.92(4) requires the Secretary of State to grant such an application if the relevant disability is “adequately controlled”. Hence my belief S.88 can apply for medical conditions (if the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive) as the application remains a qualifying application IF the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive, until DVLA (on behalf of the Secretary of State) say it doesn’t, provided the driver believes they meet the (medical) standard. Additionally, at (or before) June 2013 (as noted in my previous post) the medical standard for fitness to drive for conditions involving excessive daytime sleepiness was changed from “completely controlled” to "adequately controlled".  
    • CFO Bill Guan allegedly led a team at the news outlet that was behind a global money laundering scheme.View the full article
    • Anyway, I've asked my Booking.com flat-rent-out-bloke what needs to be done on the Booking.com portal to cancel a reservation. I got a late message "I'll let you know tomorrow".
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

andrew hart/hartinvestments/paydayoverdraft.com/Wage Payments and Payday Loans Ltd - claimform - PDL i know nothing about - scam? **Claim Discontinued**


ads_uk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4438 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 935
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

so basically my name has been tarnished by Mr H

 

The Police probably won't release the email without a court order, so you have to make a formal complaint to them and as apart of the complaint they should look into who sent it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

without sounding stupid(er) how do I go about that, is that a visit to my local or ring the person whom delt with the case as the Dc said eailer taht I was more than welcome to call and speak to the officer whom i spoke with

Link to post
Share on other sites

without sounding stupid(er) how do I go about that, is that a visit to my local or ring the person whom delt with the case as the Dc said eailer taht I was more than welcome to call and speak to the officer whom i spoke with

 

Yes, speak to the officer concerned and make it clear to them that you will lodge a formal complaint with their inspector if this is not looked into further.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would the email be included in a SAR to the police?

 

You can't send the police an SAR. In harassment cases, it is only a judge that can order the release of the information to the accused. Hence making a complaint about the accusation and conduct of the officer concerned, forcing them to look into it further.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi unclebulgaria67 police can be sar, sar includes details held on pnc and details of past cases directly involving the subject can be requested. I got details for it at home as I've recently sent a sar request and just waiting a reply. I won't be home till tomorrow but can forward the details on if needed.

Have £20k+ in debt, seriously want to be debt free, currently in temporary accomodation and having business problems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi unclebulgaria67 police can be sar, sar includes details held on pnc and details of past cases directly involving the subject can be requested. I got details for it at home as I've recently sent a sar request and just waiting a reply. I won't be home till tomorrow but can forward the details on if needed.

 

Yes post up the details if you have proof that police have to release details of harassment allegations following an SAR.

 

I think you will find that you can only get hold of certain information held about you on databases. This is when it relates solely to you.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was only asking if details of the email would be released in a sar, I.e a copy of the alleged email.

Have £20k+ in debt, seriously want to be debt free, currently in temporary accomodation and having business problems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't SAR the police but you can do a specific data access request persuant to the pre-court protocols. Are the police aware there is a court case about this?

Mr Hart told them that the case was now closed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr Hart told them that the case was now closed.

 

You will obviously keep checking with the court, just in case !!!

 

Advice stands about making the complaint if you want the Police to look into who sent the email. They might refuse citing cost reasons, so you might need to speak to an inspector.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding is that as long as the data requested is solely relevant to the person requesting it, and does not involve a third parties details.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to me that the issue here is that the Met have simply taken Hart at his (deeply dubious) word, and rather than investigate - and confirm what Hart says about the court case, for example - have taken the easy option and issued a template letter. Ads needs to take this further, by speaking to the officer and making clear that has not sent any harassing emails; in fact, it is the other way round and Hart is trying to manipulate the police into harassing Ads on his behalf. Ads must make clear that he will make a formal complaint against police if this is not looked into properly. It would, for example, be very easy for the officer to phone the court and discover that the case has not been discontinued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an observation about the latest developments on this thread, but dont wanna post it in the open...

 

Can I PM it to one of the more senior people who are involved here first of all to see what they think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing thread and story all of this is lol

If the court case has been stopped then its a case of job done on op's part really, they just need to clarify it officially from the court just to be on safe side.

If the police started chasing everyone who sends bad emails then they'd be knocking on virtually everyone's door quite frankly as most people have done things like that to one extent or another since email was invented. im not saying its not a bad thing to do just that the police have a bad enough time trying to even find the local burglar or mugger these days never mind chasing up everyone who says bad things over the internet! lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe all the latest twists and turns! Ads, you have more than enough evidence to report Mr H for harassment, so I would consider reporting this to the police also.

 

The whole 'phone call from the "police officer" seems very fishy......why would she know anything about paypal payments etc etc?? The ins and outs of the claims against you re the alleged debt are not a police matter at all.

 

You know I am definitely on your side on this one. Take care!

Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday, and all is well!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what i can conclude wouldnt it better to see what Mr H does next if anything at all? sounds to me like that man is rattled and may now realize that messing with ads is no longer worth his while. If ads hears no more from him then great. I just hope that next person Mr H targets finds cag as well sooner than later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Losing the plot on this - can someone fill me in please?

Try loosing the will to live.....

From going so high as to seeing a light at the end of the tunnel to have it turned around and make myself not the victim but the culprit is beyond belief. Mr Hart if you are reading this, you succsessfuly broke an ill person, but guess what I am a great believer that KARMA is a bitch, liars, cheats and underhandedness (i know its not a word) screws us all in the end. NB This is not a threat of harrassment or libal -- MODS please edit post if you believe so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...