Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow/? claimform - M&S Chargecard changed to Credit card


maureen1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3644 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES GIVE THEM THE HEADS UP ON ANY ERRORS IN PREV DNs.

You could reply stating that their claims you have not responded to their communications, are both untrue and misrepresentative of the situation. And that to be factually correct - you are still awaiting their resolution of your compliant.

You may also want to include ref to the OFT regs on debt collection i.e prohibited whilst an account remains in dispute - and that any default registered whilst the matter remains unresolved is unlawful under OFT regs.

They will register a default, so that they may pass on to DCAs - so you will have to bite the bullet on that I am afraid - but it also tells you that they have nothing to take it any further. Aunts credit record will be affected for 6 yrs.

 

Abby x

Edited by Abby25
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Because the CRAs just accept what credit providers tell them to add to a credit record, even if it is argued unless the lender tells them to remove it, the cra's won't amend the record. You would need for it to go to court I would guess.

 

 

Abby

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Here i am back for more info please:oops:

Aunt received 2 letters i'll type them up for you all to read

 

1st letter from resolvecall

 

We are acting on behalf of M&S Money and have been instructed by them to assist in collecting the outstanding arrears on this account.It is in your interest to contact M&S Money immediately upon receipt of this letter to discuss repayment of this account.

Failure to do so may lead to one of our representatives calling at your home.Should you fail to contact M&S Money they may commence legal proceedings to recover sums due on this account.

 

 

2nd letter from M&S Money

I write in relation to your letter received 4th July,the contents of which have been noted.

As previously stated our agreement is compliant with the CCA 1974.

 

The agreement is a single document in more than one piece,however,even if this were not so,section 61(1)(b) of the cca 1974 requires that the signed document embody all the terms of the agreement ,other than the implied terms.

 

Section 189(4) of the act provides that a document embodies terms if they are set out in that document or are in another document referred to in it.Either way ,the agreement you signed conformed to the requirements of the Act.

 

We have provided a copy of the original agreement for the card and fulfilled our duties under section 78 of the cca 1974.There is no other agreement under which the credit card was provided.It was provided under the same agreement ,as varied from time to time,as your original card agreement and this constitutes a valid and enforceable agreement.Nothing said or published by the OFT regarding the 2003 provision of credit cards indicates anything to the contrary.

 

We believe that your view on the position of a debt arising under an agreement which may be unenforceable is,in any event,not correct.We refer you to the guidance published by the OFT at http://www.oft.gov.uk/about-the-oft/legal-powers/legal/cca/unenforceable-credit-agreements.You took and had the benefit of the credit provided under the agreement and we look to you to honour your debt.We DO NOT propose to "write off"the sum owing under the agreement.

 

As the requested documents have been provided our normal collections action will continue.

your sincerely

Stuart Weir

 

Any advice what to do now please,im sure my aunt has had another version of the last letter a few months back also.......

 

thank you

Maureen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ...

 

Oh, this brings back such sweet memories ...... you see the letters you are receiving from M&S ... well I have had them all before - they are standard template letters, the contents of which are both incorrect and designed to mislead.

 

The DCA - well the fact that M&S have fobbed it on to one, tells its own story - fret not - the DCA does not have the power to take legal action as they are not the legal owner of the debt - so ignore any comments or threats they make to the contrary.

 

M&S have contrary to their mis-leading statements, not conferred with s78 request under the CCA, as they have not supplied a legal enforceable copy agreement, neither for a store card or a credit card - simple as.

 

It is also not OFT guidlelines that say they can or not just issue credit cards without a new agreement as they appear to claim, further and falsely claiming that OFT were perfectly happy with how the administered this transition. The replacement of a store card with a credit card (without the signing of a revised contractual agreement) is in clear breach of CCA74 rules.

 

So your reply to the DCA is that the alleged account remains the subject of a serious dipsute, and rejcting any doorstep visit. Your reply to M&S is just a repeat of your previous correspondence, as nothing has changed. I would conclude in stating that you have made your position clear, and have nothing furhter to add until M&S satisfy the outstanding dispute, and you duly await their resolution.

 

 

Abby x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much Abby for giving me your time and effort on this matter,i will send ANOTHER letter back to them and see what happens no doubt i'll receive the same dribble :!:

 

Maureen

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found M&S to be quite understanding, but perhaps I was just lucky, they accepted very small token payments from me and ceased interest and charges, they refused 2 F&F offers I made, but have just accepted the third one, which ironically is less than the other two.

 

Good luck :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always advocate lowering your offer of payment each and every time they refuse them, work your way right down to the token £1 a month...teach them to be so ruddy greedy.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your comments so do you think i should advise my aunt to offer £1 month ? As this is what she could afford? Do you think they would accept that minimal amount ?

 

Thank you Maureen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Offer it YES.

Will they accept it NO.

 

But who cares? Make them the offer in writing, I say offer, it's more of a "this is the amount I will pay you until further notice". "you do not need to agree to this it has already been put in place. If you wish to send me a letter thanking me for payments please feel to do so, however if all your going to do is whinge and moan and continue sending your empty threats, I will continue to ignore you and forward them on the relevant authorities to investigate, and if you think of starting to harass me over the phone then I will report you to the Police for the criminal offence of harassment.

 

If their is anything you do not understand please pass it to an adult or your legal team!

 

Regards

PRINT NANE

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I have found M&S to be quite reasonable, they again accepted my token payment when reviewed after one year... But I wonder if there thinking maybe we should have not changed store card for credit card me thinks.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Happyhippy1959

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all back for more help please received this letter on Friday

 

NOTICE OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

Your account is overdue and we have been instructed to recover the above amount.

in order to avoid further action,payment is required within 5 days choosing one of the following methods,

credit/debit card over the telephone

cheque/postal order(payable to Collect Direct

cash by registered post

online at www.collectd.co.uk

 

PAYMENT /CONTACT MUST BE RECEIVED BY US WITHIN 5 DAYS

YOUR FAITHFULLY

collections department

(collection direct (uk)

 

any help please thanks

Edited by maureen1
more info
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi Abby back for more help please :oops:

 

received two letters i'll type up first one .....

this is from collect direct (uk)

 

Our client has provided all the information they are required to provide under sections 77 or 78 of the CCA act 1974.They have examined this agreement,and your account,and are satisfied that there is no valid dispute and that they have a legally enforceable agreement with you.

 

You may be aware that the office of fair trading has now published draft guidance for consumers and the credit industry on the application of sections of the Consumer credit act 1974,and quote"there has been a great deal of confusion over the meaning of these sections with many borrowers being misled into thinking that they can get their debt written off.This guidance is to clarify the legal position and the OFT view on standards expected of the industry,and to make consumers aware that they may be at risk if they seek to use these sections to avoid paying legitimately owed debts.

In the circumstances, we will not be entering into further protracted correspondence and therefor request that you contact this office upon receipt of this letter to discuss the options available to you, as our client is prepared to offer you a substantial discount to settle this account

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know I am coming to this thread late,

did you send the CCA request with the £1 stat

fee, and have they provided a copy of the

agreement with the letter you have posted.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Offering discounts is often a pointer

to the fact either they have not got

the agreement or that it has errors etc.,

Is this a complete agreement with signatures

and all the terms and conditions?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

we will not be entering into further protracted correspondence and therefore request that you contact this office upon receipt of this letter to discuss the options available to you, as our client is prepared to offer you a substantial discount to settle this account

 

Ooh goody, send them a letter thanking them for their written confirmation that they will no longer enter into any further correspondence, and as they fail to recognise there is a dispute, you have closed your files accordingly, all further protracted correspondence from them will be used for your hamsters bedding.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Maureen ...

 

Brigadieer welcome .. we are well down the line with this, the CCA they have sent the OP is for a store card that was later (on an unsolicited basis) replaced with a credit card. Furthermore the CCA they have sent is an application form, and containts no pres terms at all - all this has already been discussed with M&S.

 

Mo, this letter tells you that you have won, and they are unable to answer any of the qs we posted to them (for obvious reasons), because to do so will hang them further. The offer of a reduced settlement is you indication that this has already been written off as bad/unendorceable debt for tax purposes, and anything they get now is a bonus. And as you might have guessed I have already had one or two of these ..

 

You could choose to leave things as they are, you have not had a reply to your qs so the account is still in dispute, and can be demonstrated to be so, so we are at stalemate. Just because they say there isn't a dipuste, because they cant address the issues at hand, does not mean there isn't. You have exercised your consumer rights, which they have failed to satisfy.

 

Or, you could reply to them, thank them form their letter, dispute their claim to have satisfied your s78 request ,for a true copy of a correctly executed agreement in respect of the alleged account, and accordingly advise them that whilst your lawful request under the CCA74 remains unsatisfied, you will not engage in any further communication in the matter. (because 2 can play at that game !! )

 

Then sit back and enjoy the flowers ...

 

Abs x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I often in the course of dealing

with ''stalemate'' situations change

tactics from requesting information

to making Formal Complaints to the Compliance

Managers/ Directors and demanding information

within a definite time scale, this proves most

effective in getting the information required.

  • Confused 1

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...