Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Heres a point, while we wait for @theoldrouge to condemn rather than promote and support right wing bigots spouting genuine and clear monstrous antisemitic rhetoric ... Isn't it actually specifically unlawful to promote violence against politicians on top of laws to criminalise such things? ... As is reported happening in these closed facebook groups run by Tory staff and where a Tory police minister and the Tory London major candidate are members and post?   .. or do the Tories (seemingly like tor) only promote laws for protecting the hate spouting hard right ?   "“Some of these (Tory facebook groups) posts constitute the most appalling racism and I would urge the Conservative Party to swiftly distance itself from these hate-filled groups and urgently investigate what role any Conservative politicians and officials have played within them. “Susan Hall and the Tory MPs who have belonged to these groups need to come out and explain why – and to denounce the content they have tacitly endorsed by their membership.” "Reporters found widespread racism and Islamophobia as well as conspiracy theories and celebrations of criminal damage on the pages, including sharing the white supremacist slogan and antisemitic videos. " "Unearthed found that 46 out of the 82 admins have clear links to the Tory Party, including a recent digital campaign manager for the party and a conservative activist. Conservative councillor for Haywards Heath, Rachel Cromie, is an admin on all the groups. "     Also interesting that Facebook groups opposing 20mph speed limit in Wales are being run by English Tories   Conservative-run anti-Ulez Facebook groups hosted racist and Islamophobic posts - Unearthed UNEARTHED.GREENPEACE.ORG Tory staff running Facebook groups described as 'cesspits of vile racism' WWW.THENATIONAL.SCOT TORY staff and activists are running Facebook pages which are riddled with white supremacist slogans and Islamophobic attacks... Conservative-run anti-ULEZ Facebook groups are rife with racist and violent posts   Conservative-run anti-ULEZ Facebook groups are rife with racist and violent posts - London Post LONDON-POST.CO.UK A coordinated network of 36 Facebook groups opposing London’s ultra-low emission zone (ULEZ), run by Conservative councillors and...  
    • Morning dx and thank you for your message.   With regards to your comment about them not needing to produce the deed, the additional directions ordered by the judge included 'a copy of any assignment o the debt or agreement relied upon'  so that is why I thought that point was relevant?
    • Sorry for the long post but I don't want to miss out any relevant information: My wife bought a car from Trade Centre UK and have been having nothing but trouble with it. Unfortunately we paid of the finance used to buy the car as we weren't expecting this much trouble with the car as we we though we would have protection as buying from a dealer. We are wondering if we can still reject the vehicle since the finance plan has been paid off. Timeline is as follows: 13/12/2023 -15/12/2023 Bought car from Trade Centre UK for £10548 £2000 deposit paid on credit card on 13/12/2023 £8548 on finance from Moneybarn (arranged through Trade Centre UK). picked up car on 15/12/2023 Also bought lifetime warranty for £50/month 25/12/2023 Engine Management Light comes on. The AA called out and diagnosed the following error codes: P0133 - Lambda sensor (bank 1, sensor 1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Slow reaction. Error sporadic P0135 - Lambda sensor heat. circ.(bank1,sensor1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Component defective Due to it being Christmas took a few days to get through to them but they booked me in for 28/12/2023 to run their own diagnostics. 28/12/2023 Took car in to Trade Centre so could check the car – They agreed it was the Oxygen Sensor and Booked me in for repair on 30/01/2024. I was told they had no earlier slots, and I would be fine to carry on driving car when I said I was afraid of problem worse. During diagnosing the problem, they reset the Engine Management Light. During drive home light comes back on. 29/12/2023 - 29/01/2024 I carry on driving the car but closer to the date, engine goes to reduced power every now and again – not being a mechanic I presumed that this was due to above fault. 20/01/2024 Not expecting any more problems paid off the finance on the car using personal loan from bank with lower interest rate. 30/01/2024 Trade Centre replace to O2 sensor (They also take it on a roughly 60mile road trip which seems a bit excessive to me – I can’t prove this as something prompted me take a picture of milage when I handed car in but I forgot take one on collection – only remembered next day.) 06/02/2024 Engine goes in reduced power mode again and engine management light comes on – Thinking the Trade centre’s 28 day warranty period was over I booked the car the into local garage for the next day to get problem fixed under the lifetime warranty package. Fault seems to clear after engine was switched off. 07/02/2024 In the Morning, I take it to local garage who say as the light gone off – the warranty company is unlikely to cover the cost of the repair or diagnostics and recommend I contact them when the light comes back on. In the evening the light comes back on and luckily I manage to get it back to the garage just before it shuts for the day. 08/02/2024 The Garage sends me a diagnostics video showing a lot error codes been picked up by their diagnostics machine including codes for Oxygen sensor and Nox Sensors, Accelerator pedal and several more. Video also shows EGR Hose not connected to the intake manifold properly, they believed this was confusing the onboard system as it is unlikely this many sensors would trigger at same the time but they couldn’t be certain until they repaired the hose. 13/02/2024 Finally get the car back as it took a while to get approval and payment for the repairs from the Warranty company. Garage told me to keep an eye the car as errors had cleared with the hose but couldn’t 100% certain that’s what caused the problem. 06/03/2024 Engine management light comes on again. Fed up I go into Trade Centre as I was just around the corner when it happened and asked them how to reject the car or have the problem fixed. They insist that as it’s over 28 days I need to get the car fixed under the warranty package I purchased and they could no longer fix the car as it was over 28 days. When I tried telling them it appeared to be the same or related problem they said they couldn’t help as I hadn’t contacted them earlier. I asked them if they were willing to connect the car to the diagnostics machine and tell me what the problem was, as a goodwill gesture, which he agreed to do and took the car to the back He came back around 30 minutes later and said they took a look at the sensor they replaced previously and there was nothing wrong with it and engine management light went off when they removed the sensor to check it. When I asked what the error code he couldn’t give me an exact fault but the said it one of the problems I told him earlier (Accelerator pedal). I have this visit audio recorded on my phone – I informed the reps I was recording several times. As the light wasn’t on, local garage couldn’t book me for a repair under warranty. 07/03/2024 Light came on so managed to book back into local garage for the 12/03/2024 Whilst waiting to take car into garage, I borrowed a OBD sensor and scanned for errors on the car. This showed the following errors: P11BE – Manufacturer specific code (Google showed this to be NOX sensor) P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow 12/03/2024 Took car to local garage and the confirmed the above errors. This leads me to believe that either Trade Centre UK reps lied and just reset the light or just didn’t check properly (Obviously I am unable to prove this) 22/03/2024 Finally got the car back as according to garage, the warranty company took a long to time to pay for the repairs 28/04/2024 Engine management Light has come back on. Using the borrowed OBD scanner I am getting the following codes: P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow P2138 - Accelerator Position Sensors (G79) / (G185): Implausible Correlation I have not yet booked into a garage as I wanted to see what my rights are in terms of rejecting the car as to me the faults seem related. I can’t keep using taxi or train to get to work every time the car goes into the garage as it is getting very expensive. Am I right in thinking that they have used up their chance to repair when they conducted the repair end of January or when they refused to repair it in February ? If I am still able to reject the vehicle could you point to any sample letters or emails I can use. Thankyou for your advice on my next steps.
    • Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st credit Stat demand


zolajack
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4760 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I hope someone can give me some advice here. Had a man called at my door and handed me a load of forms , when I asked said what were they he said it was from 1st credit and a demand , not having my glasses with me , although i made out the words statuary demand , I handed them back , said I didn't want them and went to close the door he said they have been served and picked them up from the floor I had by then closed the door so wasn't in possesion of them.

I admit that I owe the over £3000 and did have a payment plan with them untill last year when the threats and phone calls got too much, so I stopped paying. I have been down the cca route and recieved the agreement from them and various Solicitors letters /threats, and untill today thought they had gone away.

Was I wrong to refuse the papers , and do you think they will go down the bankrupcy route now evev though I have not got the demand. I did not sign for them btw.

Thanks in aprehension.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is best to always consider the receipt or service of a Statutory Demand serious.

 

Even though you havn't got the papers it may well be deemed that they have been served - all it would require is a sworn affadavit from the guy trying to deliver.

 

A difficult one this as if they go down that route they could well end up getting it through Court because you will not be able to defend not having the papers.

 

Hopefully, what will happen is that they will now be sent by post and you will receive them in the next few days.

 

Are you sure that the Agreement they send in response to your CCA request is enforceable, have you had it checked out on here yet.

 

Having said that, I would think they are assuming it is ok as that would why they have issued the SD.

 

In answer to your final question, if the SD goes to Court with you not defending, then yes, they could go down the bankruptcy route, but hopefully we can help stop that before it happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick reply. I have just found the SD on my doorstep. I don't think i have a leg to stand on really, as the cca they sent me was above board. It was a MBNA loan agreement and looks like a copy of the original.

Would Connaughts (the server) usually accept another repayment plan in your opinion? or will they carry on with the bankruptcy.

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, are you a home own, a car, etc. This would make bankruptcy proceedings more likely, but it costs them, the DCA an awful lot of money to issue bankruptcy proceedings.

 

If you are sure that all paperwork is correct and above board, then I would make an offer of payment.

 

Work out an Income and Expenditure for yourself, make sure all priority debts etc. are taken into account , then living expenses, before deciding how much you can afford to comfortably afford to maintain.

 

If you are in receipt of any benefits then it would be probable that even if this went to Court, a judge would only order you to pay £1 per month

 

If you do go ahead and make an offer, do not under any circumstances set up a Direct Debit always insist on paying by Standing Order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Liliwhite, yes, gone the whole hog with these people. Default from MBNA, letter of assignment from 1st crud set up a repayment with them, then they got greedy and started with the threats of doorstep calls, Bailliffs etc, unless I upped the payments. Untill I came across this exellent forum, I was absolutley terrified of them. I CCA'd them and they sent me a copy of the agreement, (I had the Original) which was basically the same with my signature. When I stopped paying I had letters from amongst others J&P, Debt Help Services, LCS Solicitors, DLA Direct.

Looking through the 1st credit file I have found another SD from 2007 signed by David Barry Davies solicitor, which wasn't acted upon, so i wonder if this is another shot across the bows.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

I think DCA's now who used to GREEDILIY go down the Charging Order route have decided that issuing SD's is much more likely to get results for them.

 

First CO stops INTEREST stone dead for any debt covered by the CCA's. They've finally realised that getting a CO is not the Cash Cow they thought it was.

 

Secondly they can often have to wait YEARS until you move or sell the house before they get paid -- often by then inflation will have eaten away the debt to almost nothing.

 

Thirdly -- there is displeasure in various govt circles at this mechanism for turning unsecured debt like Credit Card debt into secured debt especially for amounts of under 25,000 GBP.

 

Finally -- a forced order of sale will almost NEVER EVER be granted-- only a handful of these are ever granted and then for really extreme cases so it really isn't a solution for them.

 

Getting an SD means that YOU actually have to take some sort of action --meanwhile Interest and other charges pile up.

 

The best thing in this case IMO is to offer either a full and final amount or try and make some payment arrangement - even though paying ANY slimy DCA goes 100% totally against the craw.

 

SD's actually are a better weapon for DCA's than CO's although a lot haven't changed yet --expect more to do so as the CO process becomes more discredited.

 

 

Note of course Doorstep calls are NOT allowed unless you want to make an appointment -- you can have such callers removed by Police and charged with trespass if they don't go away and as for Bailiff's -- the less said about these obnoxious vermin the better. But before these can be used a Court judgement has to be obtained --say a CCJ and then this not complied with, The creditor then has to go back to court to get a warrant of execution and I doubt that a typical house these days have enough saleable items to make this a worthwhile option -- and in any case Bailiff's for civil debt can't force their way on to your property either.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Edited by jimbo45
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Has anybody come across Assist debt recovery and creditor service.

A letter arrived today to say that an agent called to serve a Bankruptcy petition on behalf of 1st credit and I was unfortunately not available. (I'm virtually house bound and allways in)

A further attendance will be made on (time & date) for same purpose. It also says that if I'm not available on that date to please ring this no 01992501037, to arrange another time.

If I fail to keep this appointment an application may be made to court for Substituted Service of the petition.

I was served with a SD last month, and I wrote to Connaughts to make arrangement to pay monthly and also offered a full and final offer of 50% of debt .This was ignored so sent another letter recorded delivery which was also ignored even though it was signed for.

What do you think of it ?

thanks in anticipation.

Edited by zolajack
double post
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Babybear, It was our friends MBNA for a loan.taken out in 2002. I was paying 1st credit under agreement untill they started to get greedy and kept phoning me with different threats unless I upped the payments. I cca'd them and they sent me the cca which was kosher . As I said I got a SD three weeks ago, which I ignored and now this letter.

Getting a bit worried now .

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got records of all that you sent them?

 

SD's MUST not be ignored. you should ALWAYS reply and state that you will be defending the claim.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have copies of the offers made, and proof they were both posted and delivered, then at least you can show a court evidence that you tried to, and were willing to honour the debt. Also, if you were paying under an agreement that they have had second thoughts about then for me that isn't your doing - and they may end up with less awarded in court. Seems reasonable to me, anyway.

 

Defending a claim seems the way to go mate.

 

Good luck with it, too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Have you applied to get the SD set asside yet?"

 

No I haven't Babybear and it is too late now, it's well after the 18 days allowed. As this was the second one I've had from 1st crud and the first wasn't acted on, I thought this might have been another threat from them.

Still don't know who Assist Debt Recovery is though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is the second SD you have received from them then, as BB says, this is them using SD's as a means of debt collection and MUST be reported to the OFT&TS via http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/contact

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It also sounds as though because you ignored the first one, they are attempting to "serve" another one so that they can attempt to pursue it.

 

In order for a Statutory Demand to succeed, one of the qualifiying conditions is that the DCA can prove that you received or were "served" with the SD form. Having ignored one they are possibly using Assist to serve it personally. It may be that they are affilliated with Ist Crudit and Con-nought (they all have very incestuous relationships) and have offices in your area so it would be easy for one of their agents to serve you with it.

 

I agree that the letters offering to make some payments are your evidence that you have made efforts to deal with the situation however it might also be used as proof that you recieved the original SD! If they are trying to serve you with another it may be that they are making sure on this one that all the i's are dotted and the t's crossed.

 

I suggest that any further SD's are set aside...or not acknowledged in any way dependant on your stance on the best way to deal with them, (personally i would always set aside).

 

MONX

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

An update , a young oink arrived today from Assist and served me a bankruptcy petition. I've got a form 6.19 ready to send to the court and 1st credit solicitors with my defence to fight the petition on the grounds that I have tried to get in touch with Connought with an offer of payment, or a Full and final offer , both letters ignored.

Any thing else I need to do? Don't really want to go BR for £3500.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Baby Bear, the first one was about 6 months ago for 5% of total just to test the water and it was refused. Wrote again after the SD with a £30pm offer or a 40% F&F,Two letters were sent, second one recorded , and both have been ignored .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...