Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, Thanks for the responses. Just a few follow up questions in light of what's been said:   If I dont appeal to PPM, who can I appeal to?   Why should the PCN been attached to the windscreen? Is this written in law?   I assumed the document I had received was the NTK, if this is not the case, what does a NTK look like?   Regarding the compliance with the Protection of Freedoms Act, could the "period" of parking not be argued either way? The legislation doesnt state it must have a start/end time of parking, which I assumed an ANPR camera would pick up if it had one. Is 4 minutes not technically enough to show the vehicle was parked?    Thanks !
    • I see jenrick has stuck his head up with them, and I'm sure this wont faze their nasty rhetoric one wit-less UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report | Economic growth (GDP) | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Resolution Foundation report suggests parties are dodging the economic challenges facing the country   Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it Immigration: how 14 years of Tory rule have changed Britain – in charts | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it    
    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

County Court claim for ebay item sold however paypal refunded it last year?


jayc001
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4533 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I have received a court claim form from a person a sold some goods to on ebay last year however to my knowledge paypal refunded the buyer after the dispute process.

 

The goods were used and tested by myself prior to sale. Sold on ebay via buy it now (I'm a personal seller not a business). Buyer emailed after receiving to say the goods were faulty. I troubleshooted the goods via email (computer goods and I'm an IT tech) however it was my opinion that they were not faulty and I initially refused to refund. The buyer got very angry by this with lots of heated emails so I chose to inform him how to raise the dispute via paypal (knowing full well that paypal always find in favour of the buyer) so they could deal with it and could refund him in the correct manner.

 

Paypal after a few days removed the funds from my account and they found in favour of the buyer as expected. The buyer returned the screen to myself and as far as I was concerned (until today) the case was over.

 

Anyhow today i received a court claim for the original amount (actually not sure if it original amount or plus return P+P costs). The transaction was from 27th July 2010 and I can't pull any info relating to it from either ebay or paypal as it's past the 180 day cut off. I've emailed paypal requesting all details relating to the case so awaiting their response.

 

The claim states POC to follow which I understand to be the "particulars of claim" so until i receive that i can't make my defence. Also the form to fill in to make defence is unreadable due to the toner being run out on the court photocopier (some brightspark still hand wrote the claim number on the totally unreadable form though!)

 

Has anyone any experience of someone taking them to court even though paypal have refunded them? Any suggestions on where to go from here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well looks like I might be screwed. I can't pull any of the information relating to the buyer receiving a refund from my paypal account due to it being over 180 days. I contacted paypal via phone to request a copy of this information only to be told they won't give me it without a court order due to data protection.

 

So I need a court order to get details to help me defend my case in court? Oh dear!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have heard of an eBay case where the buyer sued over the cost of the return postage that a seller refused to pay. The buyer won and was awarded the costs, a good deal more than the £5 postage.

 

Was there no email message sent by Paypal when a refund is made? I get and keep all the reciepts they send when a payment is made for a purchase, so would have thought that the same should happen when a refund is made.

 

The most obvious need is to contact the buyer as soon as possible. It is extraordinary if something like this arrives completely out of the blue. The buyer should have tried to sort it out before resorting to legal action.

 

Can't help but think that there is more to this than meets the eye.

 

8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.i should make sure that the claims form as come from the court,i'ts funny if court sent out a form that you can't read,due to toner cartridge running out of ink.It is possible i suppose but i would check,just in case.

 

barns66

Edited by barns66
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

The claims form is defo from the court. The clerk there obviously isn't on the ball.

 

I don't keep emails over 3 months so I have no proof of the funds being taken from my account, I guess in future I need to.

 

Paypal are not playing ball. I've spoke to their complaints department and the following is what they sent :

 

Thank you for contacting PayPal regarding case id PP-001-xxxxxxxxx.

A solicitor or law enforcement officer must submit a court order to request information about a customer’s PayPal account or claim.

PayPal requires that legal documents be sent by mail to the following

address:

PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. & Cie, S.C.A.

Legal Department

22-24 Boulevard Royal

L-2449 Luxembourg.

PayPal does not accept personal service, nor do we accept service via electronic means, such as fax or email.

Thank you for your time.

Yours sincerely,

Esther

PayPal

So with no defense available I guess I'm going to have to get my cheque book out :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

gmail works well is for this sort of thing.

 

Because the archive of original messages is kept at their end, that is as good as you get in terms of authenticating the evidence, and it is easy enough to find the original with a suitable key word in mind to search for.

 

8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you not send a Subject Access Request to Paypal to get your account details?

 

:!:

 

If as a matter of fact, they keep the details, I am at a loss to see why the information would not be routinely available, in the same way that a recent detail is.

 

Is there a conceivable benefit to paypal, to remove a detail except to save the space it takes, or to limit their liability by completely removing?

 

8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jay,

 

I have just logged in to my paypal account, clicked on HISTORY and then did a search for my transactions between 10/1/10 and 09/02/11 and it came up with everything that happened in that period.

 

If I can search for payment data older than three months so you will be able to as well.

 

You should also be able to define a search in your ebay account for old transactions too. As Paypal is nothing more than the bank of Ebay, then you should be able to see the history of this transaction in their too (as lodging a complaint with one automagically locks the other and vice versa!).

 

There is also the possibility that if the guy complained to ebay, ebay would have locked your paypal account but then a few days later could have dismissed the complaint and then unlocked your account. Because of that you might have thought the money was paid back when it never was. So best you check ebay too.

 

Finally, from the wording of your letter from paypal, it sounds like they are referring to you as not being the account holder. There is no data privacy issues here simply because its YOUR data to start with.

 

But definately check your paypal history. I was able to search further back than three months by defining the search dates myself. If I could do that after 5 seconds you are going to be able to do this too.

 

Best of luck.

 

Regards

 

Mailman

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS. I had a contested transaction in my history (with a grippy customer), which shows up when I do my search...so if I can find this from June last year then you are going to be able to find yours too.

 

PPS. NEVER DELETE ANY EMAILS! Storage is so cheap these days that there is no excuse for not keeping copies of your emails.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Did the customer open a dispute through paypal or ebay? If opened through ebay it should be in your dispute folder.

As said above you can access old payments through paypal, if you know the dates go into veiw all transactions a date box or 2 should come up at the top then you just set the date you want. Also, there is a dispute folder in paypal and you can find it in there to. You need to use the drop down boxes alot.

 

It is quite easy to find.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paypal after a few days removed the funds from my account

 

From your bank account? Or did you have available funds in Paypal? If bank account, then a bank statement will show the funds leaving your account.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As posted above (I just tried too, I viewed stuff from August 2010), you can view Paypal transactions older than 3 months so that should not be a problem, also did you have money in your Paypal account at the time (if so, not a wise thing to do !), if not then the money would of been taken out of your account via direct transfer or debit card from your bank account and you will be able to get proof of this.

 

Only keeping 3 months of emails is rather silly, its easy to setup an email client such as Outlook to archive older emails, this is very important for finicial stuff such as buying stuff online and using ebay/paypal.

 

If you can find no proof of the refund then you may be in hot water.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

The buyer got very angry by this with lots of heated emails so I chose to inform him how to raise the dispute via paypal (knowing full well that paypal always find in favour of the buyer) so they could deal with it and could refund him in the correct manner.

 

That is not the correct manner.

 

The correct manner is for the seller to agree to cancel the transaction, or to continue to be bound by the contract with the buyer.

 

A seller could otherwise elect to disagree with Paypal and proceed to sue the buyer for the money. Paypal owns no authority to affect the contract between a buyer and a seller, in any way. They have to do that for themselves.

 

8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Well looks like I might be screwed. I can't pull any of the information relating to the buyer receiving a refund from my paypal account due to it being over 180 days. I contacted paypal via phone to request a copy of this information only to be told they won't give me it without a court order due to data protection.

 

So I need a court order to get details to help me defend my case in court? Oh dear!

 

That is a complete lie on the part of PayPal, It's your account, DPA has no bearing upon it as you are requesting information from your own account not that of a third party. Speak to someone more senior at Paypal

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the buyer insists that a refund was never made but you are sure that it was, that is tantamount to an accusation of fraud, so the way forward is to report the suspicion to the Police, to investigate.

 

Simple.

 

In the mean time, the account owner is not the only one involved so Section (4) of the Data Protection Act may apply:

 

(4) Where a data controller cannot comply with the request without disclosing information relating to another individual who can be identified from that information, he is not obliged to comply with the request unless—

 

(a) the other individual has consented to the disclosure of the information to the person making the request, or

 

(b) it is reasonable in all the circumstances to comply with the request without the consent of the other individual.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Just an update on this. I ended up paying the amount. It was pretty small £65 and was stressing me out getting now where with paypal. I managed to hold off as long as I could as the filing of the claim with the courts had a lot of errors and I quoted CPR as much as I could to try and get it thrown out.

 

Even when the amended particulars of claim came through I had a decent chance of defending it as the claiments facts were incorrect but worrying about it and having to take time off from work to attend court meant it was better for me to write a cheque.

 

Thanks for the help though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I realise this is an old thread but wanted to speak generally ..

 

ANY person can open a claim through the small claims court without even having ever met you before. If you just pay without contesting then you're just being taken for a ride.

 

This guy sounds like he tried it on and got double his money. I bet he wouldn't even have turned up in court.

 

All you had to do was print out your PayPal transaction history (they even provide it for you in various accounting program, spreadsheet and pdf formats) and you would have seen the money refunded on that date.

 

When you had gone to court with your evidence you can then counter claim for your time, the costs of taking time off work to defend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...