Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
    • 3rd one seems the best option, let 'em default, don't pay a penny, nothing will happen, forget about all of this. As for Payplan don't touch them with a bargepole, nothing they can do that you can't, and they will pocket fees. A do it yourself DMP is pointless as it will just string out the statute barred date to infinity.
    • Because that’s what the email said. Anyway it’s done now. Posted and image emailed.    im doing some reading in preparation for defence but I will need my hand holding quite tightly by you good people.  I’m a little bit clueless
    • why do you need adobe...use a pdf online website. all for now...no get reading up and do not miss your defence filing date no matter what. post it up in good time no!!    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help!!! Are they allowed to do that ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4700 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey i have just been told about this site so i'm new and not even sure if i'm posting this in the right place!!

 

I need some advice please.

 

I had a bailiff a letter through the door just before xmas about a debt that had not been paid, my ex was previously dealing with but is no longer with me.

I am on my own with 2 children and on benefits and explained all this to the bailiff, only to get a 'thats not my problem response' anyway i agreed to pay half of the debt, which i did over the phone. The bailiff then said he would ring me on the 28th dec 2010 for me to pay some more, i did not recieve any call from them.

 

I checked my bank account tonight only to find they have taken the full amount £241.91 which is just short of my fortnights benefits. I am left with £38 in my bank and havent even got food in which is where i was going tomorrow and get no money for 2 weeks.

 

Are they allowed to do that?

 

Grateful if someone can help please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome, Vicki.

 

I'll move this thread to the appropriate Forum where you should get the help your looking for.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contact your bank and ask for a refund, if this was a direct debit then you can ask for a refund under the direct debit guarantee.

 

If they swiped your debit card then you will need to complete a form and apply for a refund because the merchant bailiff drew money from your account without permission. They may have their terminal suspended and will have to lodge a deposit with the merchant service provider before they have it switched back on.

 

If this is a credit card then ask for a 'chargeback'.

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Fork-it,

Thanks for your reply, I paid my first payment to the bailiff over the phone with my debit card, thas where they've got my details from, so today they have just taken the rest themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the branch, and take lots of ID with you, 1 x photo ID and a recent utility bill with your address on it (not mobile phone). They will ask you to complete a form, and will cancel your current card and arrange to send you a new one.

 

Mention you are on a low income and this money is your lifeline benefits. Ask you are refunded as a matter of urgency.

 

The bailiff will pay a £60 transaction reversal fee, but they are liable for this because they agreed to pay it by contract (their merchant service agreement) if they are found to have made an unauthorised tranasaction using their online card terminal.

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

So in theory, if we had a concerted campaign of people using the "unauthorised transaction" which as I understand it, is legally speaking, true anyway, if they have added their infamous "payment by card" fees, then in a few hours we could cause Bailiffs a very serious amount of money - not to mention potentially making them unable to take payments if the terminals are shut down.

 

Would this cost the individual bailiff's or the company?

 

If 100 people did this today thats £6,000 in fees alone for the Bailiff!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would this cost the individual bailiff's or the company?

 

It costs the whoever is responsible for the Merchant Service contract, typically the bailiff company. The fee varies but Cardnet reversal fee is currently £60. Its debited from their card payments account before the balance is paid on to the merchants bank account.

 

Its more akin to Paypal charging a fee before you get the remainder of your ebay sales income.

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey all,

 

Well i went to my bank today and done as advised, turns out they 'ARE' legally allowed to do that, as it is debt money...if it had been any other money then no it's not legal!!!

So there was not a thing i could do, but thank you Fork-it anyway

 

The bailiff was Jacobs

 

Vicki

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bank gave me a number to ring....a dispute number, it was them that told me it was legal for them to do this, and the only thing a could do was go to trading standards if i felt i was misguided in anyway by the bailiff company by them telling me about their services. They said as far as taking money without consent...as i gave them my details for my initial payent they can take whatever they want because it's debt...and it's lawful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So does this mean that every time you make a payment to a creditor by debit card they are legally allowed to help themselves to your money whenever they fancy?

 

I think not!!!!! and I would be looking to question the Bank very closely over this and ask them to point me in the right direction to show me where I ever signed to permit such abuse.

 

WD

,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think its legal for anyone to obtain a money transfer from an account without the account holders permission. Otherwise its perfectly legal for me to debit my tenants cards whenever they fall into rent arrears.

 

Try the Banking Ombudsman.

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

do a chargeback and don't let them tell you you can't on a debit card you can

 

phone your banks card number and tell them its been lost too.

 

that will stop anymore such transactions.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

I'd open another Bank account to stop this happening again.

Both TESCO and The CO-OP have basic bank accounts with Hole in the wall cards and online transactions available -- no credit check either.

 

Keep this account secret from any DCA etc -- these accounts are often called "Parachute Accounts".

 

AFAIK NOBODY can take money from your Bank account unless its done via a Court Order -- The Inland Revenue (Income Tax) might also have some powers but even then they go to Court first.

 

The BANK is in ERROR here -- get the money refunded and STING THEM for hassle, incovenience, stress etc etc etc.

 

If you've got a DIRECT DEBIT arrangement then unfortunately the person receiving the money can alter these at will which is why I advise people NEVER EVER to use Direct Debits - specially to DCA's etc. Use a Standing Order instead.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask which bank was this?

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally out of order and I would say that the bank is incorrect. I would pursue the bank angle by contacting the Financial Ombudsman. As someone pointed out, this would allow creditors to dip into our accounts whenever they felt like it!

If it was council tax debt, then contact the council and advise that their agents have acted fraudently and that you are holding the council responsible.

Don't let them fob you off. Either insist on speaking to the CEO or write to the CEO once you have obtained their name and also the name of the person at the council that you have spoken to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive spoken to my bank about this and they have informed me that if said bailiff took this money without authorisation then you should report this to the police and get a crime number and then go back to your bank and report the money as stolen. It is possible that the bank will cancel your card and reissue you with a new one. Unless you have set up for the payment to come out with the bailiff then what he has done is illegal as they have to by law destroy your card details a soon as they have taken payment. Regardless of whether this was a debt or not no one is allowed to use your card to gain payment without your full permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As per the above post, report to police that there has been fraudent activity on your card. Take along a statement showing the debit. the bank will then have to investigate it as they should have done in the first place. Just to be cheeky I would be claiming compensation from the bailiff and the bank!

Link to post
Share on other sites

agreed

and reclaim any charges etc

if applicable

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...