Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFO services / Barclycard


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4632 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 186
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi all just checked and both the SAR & CCA letters have been delivered and signed for I have printed out the receipts.

 

So the clock is now running HFO have got until the 2nd December for their 12+2 working days.

Will keep you update with any developments.

 

DT

:-) Just Keep Smiling.

as Some days your the Dog and Other days your the Lampost :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello - First time for me on this site but i had a letter exactly the same delivered to me two days ago. Never been in this situation before so had a bit of a panic and then read the threads on here and didnt feel so bad.

I defaulted on a Barclaycard bill 4 and a half years ago and thought in my ignorance that i had out run it. But no!

After reading alot on here i took a trip to the CAB and they put me in touch with National debt line who i spoke to last night. My situation is that i am on long term incapacity benefit and have hardly any money coming in at all. After my out goings i am left with about £ 30 a month.

After a very helpful chat with the debt line man he suggested that i might be eligible for something called a debt relief order - this basically means that so long as i dont have more than £50 a month left after paying all my out goings that in a year the debt will be wiped and HFO will get nothing at all. I am going to send HFO a hold action letter but i dont k now if you can do a recorded delivery to a PO box address?

If for some reason the debt relief order is unsuccessful then i will have to agree a repayment scheme with them.

Basically i was just writing here to say thank you to all the people who have contributed on this forum for calming me down because i was on the verge of ringing them up or ignoring it ! And i know that many people here may not be able to apply for the debt relief order but if you have a debt of less than 15 thousand and no assets and basically no available funds then this might be the way to go.

Fingers crossed and thanks again :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have other debts then a DRO is a good thing for you, if this is your only debt then you can ignore the letter from HFO quite safely, if you ignore them they will continue to send threatening letters and eventually either give up if there is no reply or send court papers, in which case there are good defences you can give.

 

Do not do a DRO if this is the only debt you have. You also should have a new thread for your own problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

HI all just to up date you

 

This letter arrived to day with 2 years 4 months of statements nothing else

http://i423.photobucket.com/albums/pp316/dogtrainer05/scan0013.jpg

 

What should I do next with Barclaycard.

Nothing yet from HFO but they still have 6 working days.

:-) Just Keep Smiling.

as Some days your the Dog and Other days your the Lampost :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have not complied with your request. Write back and ask for the specifics missed, viz. default notices, termination notices and details of to whom and when the account was sold.

 

Idiots. Seems to be becoming a standard response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI all just to up date you

 

This letter arrived to day with 2 years 4 months of statements nothing else

http://i423.photobucket.com/albums/pp316/dogtrainer05/scan0013.jpg

 

What should I do next with Barclaycard.

Nothing yet from HFO but they still have 6 working days.

 

Watch for the post! I had the same responce from Barclaycard and 18 months of statements, that was two weeks ago, this morning the rest of my SAR came by recorded delivery - makes for interesting reading, I can tell you! It's a possibilty yours may do the same!!

L/Woods B/Card/Cabot - Unenforceable CCA, SD Issued *WON+COSTS*

Capital One/Cabot - No CCA account irrecoverable.

Citi/DLC Hillesden - No CCA account irrecoverable

MBNA/Aegis - Unenforceable CCA

B/Card/HFO - Unenforceable CCA

Fashion World - No CCA account irrecoverable

TRUECALL IS A GODSEND!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send em this

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account:

 

I am in receipt of the documents that you have supplied in response to my Data Protection Act information request dated --.--.-- The disclosure of personal datalink3.giflink3.giflink3.gif is incomplete in that at least the following documents are missing.

 

 

1) You have failed to provide a Default Notice and Notice of Assignment

2) You have failed to inform me to whom the account was sold. Please note that this must include company name, company registration number, full address and telephone numbers. Also the exact date on which the account was sold.

3) You have provided no notes, or documents relating to instances of manual intervention.

 

This is not an exhaustive list by any means, it is just an example of some of the information I am missing.

 

Accordingly, I have to tell you that you have not yet complied with your obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

You have a further 24 days to comply.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

-------------------

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Coledog.

 

I will send it of tomorrow when I am at the post office.

 

I have just came a cross this statement of account from Turnbull Rutherford from January this year.

http://i423.photobucket.com/albums/pp316/dogtrainer05/scan0014.jpg

 

Also checked the statements and the last payment was was a token one made on the 14th February 2005 .

 

I am write in thinking because I live in Scotland this debt is statute barred as its now over 5 years since I made a payment.

 

DT

Edited by dogtrainer
spelling mistake

:-) Just Keep Smiling.

as Some days your the Dog and Other days your the Lampost :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you are correct. It will be now SB.

 

That ‘statement’ is full of cr*p.

 

They state the legal owner as HFO Capital Ltd. This cannot be the case, and we can prove it.

 

They state the contractual interest rate as 12%. What contract?

 

They have added interest from the date they claim to have acquired it. They can only claim it from the date you were notified by NoA.

 

It says you have a contract with Turnbull Rutherford Solicitors. Exxcuse me? You’ve just claimed the legal owner is HFO Capital! How can there be a contract with TR?

 

They are not allowed to add administrative charges – OFT guidelines, unless it’s in the contract. Oh, what contract?

 

What a pile of dissembling rubbish. These idiots must be put under close scrutiny by the OFT for these misleading and frankly unethical business practices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Donkey B

 

What do you think I should do next just ignore them and hope that they will crawl back under their stone again as the clock is ticking on CCA request

 

I will send of the letter Coledog wrote of tomorrow and wait and see what comes back .8)

:-) Just Keep Smiling.

as Some days your the Dog and Other days your the Lampost :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Coledog

 

The CCA request is up a week tomorrow 2nd December

 

The last payment according to the statements was a token one received by B/C on the 14th February 2005 cant remember making it though:!:

:-) Just Keep Smiling.

as Some days your the Dog and Other days your the Lampost :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Below is the link to the in dispute letter to send if no CCA response - await the result of SAR and let us know if you receive anything

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?419-Letter-used-when-a-DCA-refuses-to-comply-with-a-CCA-request

 

,

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

well wot can a fella say?

 

I'm always drinking - tea, coffee, water, squash, sherry, wine, the odd pink gin

and I do like a nice long G & T... oh, and a glass of decent mild now and then -

or whenever I can find one

 

The line from the Goon Show song seemed so appropriate at that moment -

glad I could raise a grin or two... my wife tells me I have a dreadful sense of

humour so I have to try very hard.

 

It's being so cheerful that keeps me going :-)

 

 

Cheers guys,

charlie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...