Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Third party disputing liability car accident


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4812 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was driving down a basic single lane road with traffic traveling in both directions on each side of the road with a standard White dashed dividing line.

 

I was following another car in front of me who slowed down and pulled up on the left, as he slowed down so did I to 20mph to work out his intention after making the judgement that he was pulling over to stop I checked the other side of the road which was completely clear I then pulled my car out to straddle the White line to give ample room for the car that has just pulled over on the left side of the road near the curb, on me pulling out the third party swung his car out infront of mine as if he was going to do a U turn and got about 70 degrease turn I saw him do this and swerved to avoid him randomly pulling out but couldn't manage to miss him with him giving no indication of his intentions and with a split second of me passing.

 

His car sustained a small scratch yet I got pushed off the road and up a curb smashing 3 of my alloys killing 2 tires and knocking my alignment out as well as ruining my bumper and wing.

 

After I managed to avoid hitting parked cars after being shoved off the road I came to a stop and remaining in a completely shocked position he come over to me with a pen and paper and told me to admit fault I did not agree or sign nor did I get out the car as my wrist was killing and I was starting to go into shock with my breathing going very shallow. (due to him intimidating me) there was a huge crowd that started to appear that didn't help (all of which were Asian same as the driver) and were saying things at me in a language I didn't understand and nasty things in English with me being White.

 

I stayed in the car until the police arrived due to shock and fear for my safety, on arrival of the police the officer said if you wasnt doing anything wrong you have nothing to worry about because it's all on CCTV, so I felt quite a lot happier knowing this as I'm 110% confident it was his fault.

 

After alerting my insurance, giving them massively detailed drawings of the incident (graphic designer) and areal photography of the exact location it happened along with corresponding photos of the damage to my car and giving the insurance direct details to the station that had the CCTV I'm still waiting for a resolved to my case (5months today), my insurance sent out an engineer that said my car is repairable and a month later sent out a private investigator to interview me! Which was a horrible experience treat me like a murder suspect!!

 

The third party is disputing liability, I'm petrified it will end up going to cort because stuff like this dosnt happen in my life and I'm completely not used to it, I feel like telling my insurance not to bother because iv already fixed my car myself even though I am fully comp I'll be paying more in insurance premiums if I lose my NCB than I have paid to fix my car where do I stand? My insurance has since passed all the case and it's details over to their solicitor company... ??? :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lee

 

With CCTV you would think this would be straight forward, 'Private Investigators' never heard the like. Your insurance company should have a target date to resolve

claims. I would send a letter of complaint to them, send it recorded. Explain all the circumstances. Once you get a reply, let us know what they say. I see no reason

why it should go to court. Have you seen the CCTV footage? You might be able to gain access to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just let your Insurance company deal with it and help them when required. They will have employed private investigators to look at the whole claim incident. It is possible that the 3rd party planned the accident and is trying to make a dodgy claim. There was a recent case in the Manchester area, where people were involved in the staging of accidents to fraudulently make claims.

 

Be warned that this could drag on for sometime. It is possible that the 3rd party has submitted a claim against your policy, so you should ask them whether this is the case.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The appointment of a PI or an enquiry agent (the nicer term) is normal practice if there is a dispute over injury, I'd be concerned if there wasn't. If suspected fraud from the tp, all avenues need to be covered, you cannot wait for the questions to be asked, to combat fraud, speed is everything. Gather al the info whilst it's fresh.

I'd imagine the OP had a PI without much personality, they should have taken the time to explain why they were there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

'Speed is everything', 5 months on Lee is none the wiser, the insurance hasn't paid out his claim. He's paid for it himself. Say he didn't have the money, his car would still be sitting there, parked in his drive. From the sound of things the other party was out of his car PDQ, so can't see how he was injured. Lets wait and see.

 

The appointment of a PI or an enquiry agent (the nicer term) is normal practice if there is a dispute over injury, I'd be concerned if there wasn't. If suspected fraud from the tp, all avenues need to be covered, you cannot wait for the questions to be asked, to combat fraud, speed is everything. Gather al the info whilst it's fresh.

I'd imagine the OP had a PI without much personality, they should have taken the time to explain why they were there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks kindly for all your information and concern.

 

Currently in one night i have received more ideas of what could be going off than my insurance have let on, i have to play stupid every time i call up to the guys on the phone for them to accidentally tell me stuff that they would otherwise hold back...

 

Iv been given a direct dial to the two people running the team at the claims handlers and they are wittier than the normal call receivers (that's no disrespect to them just an observation) so i find i cant get anything out of the head handlers.

 

All im aware of at this moment is that they have passed the work onto their solicitor department? - and that im just waiting.

 

The guy who pulled out on me, got out and started shouting at me, then bent down and leant in through my open window while i was still in my car with my wrist in great pain, he said "sign this, you know it was your fault" a few times i just shook my head and stayed put, then another gent (who wasn't in the other car) and came from no ware started telling me to put my name and address down, again my wrist was painful so i shook my head (not to mention i didn't trust this random bloke who was nothing to do with the incident) so i just sat there and waiting for the police to arrive, the officer after the incident and my hospital visit called me and stated she had seen the CCTV from both angles at either end of the street and it looked very much like the other driver was at fault. so i was elated to find that out and jumped onto my insurance and informed them as soon as i was called from the officer.

 

I tried requesting the CCTV from the police directly and through their different departments but they refused me access to it and said i "have to call my insurance, they normally deal with that sort of thing, and that's what you pay them for" although i did try a bit of idiot "but i thought the data protection act 1997/8 stated that i could request any footage of myself that is recorded as long as none else is recognisable"

 

Another note to remember is that after the driver of the other car was shouting and balling walking about on his mobile waving his arms around and strutting back and forward in front of my car, on hearing the sirens from the police and ambulance he was strangely in loads of pain and couldn't move much, they took him off in a stretcher and i got out my own car and walked in quite a lot of pain to the small paramedic car (the driver of the paramedic car stated to me, although he most probably shouldn't have said anything as an independent part in the whole thing: "when you are involved in an incident with Asian men we always advise the drivers to lock their doors and stay put till the police arrive because they are very aggressive towards others" and he also stated "looking at the damage and area of the two cars that were hit and the low speed incident it was massively unlikely he would have sustained any injuries from the ricochet angle that we just clipped each other"

 

I was is far more pain with my lower + middle back and wrist than him as i had mounted the curb and travelled along the walk way for a car length before throwing my car back onto the road for fear of hitting any pedestrians on the walk way.

 

I was shocked that my insurance still state they "have not received to their knowledge the footage that im speaking of" i feel like asking the officer at the scene directly through her police station can i please take a copy off your cd (she had one with her when she came to take my statement although only for her records) i know there is a fat chance that she would let me if she was even still in possession of the cd - at least i could make a copy and send it to my insurance and they would have no excuse i feel like they aren't that bothered, i know the claims handler said they would try to get the other party to admit it was his fault before spending money getting CCTV - im just worried its going to have been deleted before they requested it if it hasn't already

Edited by Leecant
Link to post
Share on other sites

If this accident was a [problem] i.e. a staged accident, with the aim of defrauding Insurers, any evidence that the Police have e.g. CCTV coverage, cannot be released. By releasing the coverage the Police could potentially damage any chance of them gaining a prosecution.

 

Your Insurance company may know that there is an ongoing Police enquiry into this and they will have been told that they cannot advise you of this. If you ask the Police, they won't comment on any ongoing enquiries.

 

If I were you, I would stay patient for the minute and hope that action is taken against the 3rd party driver in due course or the Insurers decide what they are going to do.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope so, i just feel lost and the insurance dont or cant tell you anything, just a little disheartening thats all, you feel like the one time the insurance should jump up and down and help they "appear" to be sat doing nothing...

 

I can see where your coming from if they are wanting to build up something against him, one of the normal phone answers said by accident that they may have suspicions about the bloke and thats why they are taking so long, there were some "flags that popped up on his policy" or something huh?

 

Im a little concerned regarding my car as the front disc has warped and i could realy do with buying some more discs for the front to solve the steering wheel wobble but obviously im dubious about fitting new discs incase they take all my 3yr ncb away and make my pride and joy too expensive to own :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
Mr Solicitor seems to have disappeared, Mwynci. Could it be to do with advertising? :)

 

My best, HB

 

This is currently still ongoing, the 3rd party's insurer has the CCTV however I have no confirmation as to wether my insurer has or not, the claim has been passed onto a solicitor by my insurance 9months and counting...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 3rd party will have to disclose it if it gets to court, if it will ever get that far.

Probably with the insurer's solicitors to maintain the defence/be ready for any action the third party takes. Good to see their taking it seriously.

 

Thanks for the update.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...