Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

wife getting letters from different debt angencies for Barclays plc HELP


andrew1402
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4955 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:sad:i just recently my wife has been recieving letters from 2 debt agencies mackenzie hall and dlc (directlegal and collections)these debts are from 2002 for a credit card from barclaycard and barclay loan which was given to my wife 1 when she was unemployed and 2 they come in wifes maiden name and one in her married name we got married on march 15th 2002 what can i do about this thats the only knowledge we have because we moved from the address in question in 2006 our previous we moved in 2000 what can we do to stop this?.

 

we have checked with credit report these are not on there:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Report Mackenzie Hall to Alan Stewart at East Ayrshire Trading Standards, he can get them stopped.

 

It sounds like the debt is STATUTE BARRED and they are chancing their luck. Don't speak to any debt collecting company on the phone, just send a simple letter stating at the top "I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY ALLEGED DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY OR YOUR CLIENT"

 

and state that you do not recognise the debt and you need proof of when the last payment was made on the account, including details of any bank account the money came from and the name of the person making the payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for replying m8 it's a big help but we do know of the debt but with it being years old can't remember the details of payments etc we just know that it's in the maiden name one of them which didn't change till 2002 which would make the debt 8 years old and i think with the loan it's the same year but wife doesn't remember getting the loan and she is a bit careless when it comes to debts if you know what i mean so what do i do first a letter to both companies asking for details?.Do my wife need to use her maiden name or her married name with these letters?im no good at writing letters as you can see.

Edited by andrew1402
Link to post
Share on other sites

As sillygirl says report to TS, here is a letter i have for you to send to leeches

 

I DO NOT ACK NOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY OR ANY COMPANY YOU CLAIM TO REPRESENT

Dear

 

Acc/Ref No

 

You have contacted us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by ourselves.

 

We would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

 

We would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

 

The last payment of this alleged debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred” could lead to a prosecution under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008

 

We await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

We look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

HI guys as you can see there is post heading wife getting letters from different debt agencies Barclays PLC mackenzie hall well i got one this morning in my name looking for me no amount to pay just reference number what can we do to get rid of these guys i just want to kill them they are starting to get on my nerves i forgot what letter or template for request for information oh and by the way this letter had email address could i send letters to them through there or recorded delivery?.Also has anyone got a letter i could use and address for Alan Stewart any help to get rid of these guys for would be greatly appreciated.

Edited by andrew1402
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi andrew

 

Send everything Recorded, keep copies.

To request information send a SAR Request with £10. They have 40 days to respond to your request.

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/576-subject-access-request-debt-a-dca

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/resources/templates-library

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know what these alleged debts are?

If not send the prove it letter to each DCA chasing you.

Link here http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/573-general-debt-letter-if-you-know-nothing-of-the-debt

At the top of the letter write I DO NOT ACKNOWLEGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY

Send a £1 postal order and do not sign the letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks guys for replying so promtly and the help but why do we have to pay them £10?as well as the recorded delivery can't afford to keep sending money to companies that should give the information in the first place?.i have no knowledge of the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi andrew,

 

Subject access request (Data Protection Act) Under the Data Protection Act, individuals can ask to see the information about themselves that is held on computer and in some paper records. If an individual wants to exercise this subject access right, they should write to the person or organisation that they believe is processing the data.

A subject access request must be made in writing and must be accompanied by the appropriate fee. In most cases, the maximum fee will be £10, but this can vary, particularly if the information requested is for health or educational records. If a subject access request is made to a credit reference agency for financial information (ie a credit file), then the fee is £2, and the information must be provided within seven working days. A request must include enough information to enable the person or organisation to whom the subject is writing to satisfy itself as to their identity and to find the information.

A reply must be received within 40 days as long as the necessary fee has been paid. A data controller should act promptly in requesting the fee or any further information necessary to fulfil the request. If a data controller is not processing personal information of which this individual is the data subject, the data controller must reply saying so.

 

http://www.ico.gov.uk/tools_and_resources/glossary.aspx

 

thanks guys for replying so promtly and the help but why do we have to pay them £10?as well as the recorded delivery can't afford to keep sending money to companies that should give the information in the first place?.i have no knowledge of the debt.
Link to post
Share on other sites

To get a DCA to prove you owe the debt you send a £1 postal order as this amount is to cover their costs. If they cannot provide the proof i.e. credit agreement then they will return your postal order and go away. Not to say another DCA won't try the same thing.

 

A SAR request is what you would send to Banks the fee is £10 and for that you should get all the info they hold on your account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

right we've heard from hillesden securities formily Barclays letters states* thankyou for your letter reguarding the account we have referred back to the original lender for further information and will advise you accordingly upon reciept of their response* i sent recently recorded letter acknowledging that i do not know the debt previously advised by creditcardmug im a bit suprised at this i thought they'd leave us alone but they continue not heard of mckenzie just this company dlc yet hillesden security formily barclays is same company DLC (direct legal collections) please advise us whats next?.Also just realised they know how the debt is and put an offer to pay by so much by certain date but they are formerly barclays and know of the debt and information why refer back to themselves sounds odd or am i misunderstanding what it means?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, you have writtent to them advising that the debts are statute barred - if they try to press for payment after receiving those letters you need to report them to the OFT. They will know that the accounts are statute barred and are just chancing their luck that you won't know about it. Make sure you keep your copies of the letters and recorded delivery signed for receipts in a safe place in case you need to prove they got them.

DO NOT speak to them on the telephone under any curcumstances - if you get any more letters from them let us know on here and we can help further.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you guys very much for your help i'll sit tight and wait and see what happens also report them to Alan stewart i've kept the letters from Mackenzie Hall and HILLESDEN TOO not heard from MACENZIE but last mail we had was from hillesden we kept recorded delivery reciepts too and i never phone or email these type of ppl i'll keep you all posted on the situation thanks again BY THE WAY WHICH DEPARTMENT DO I LOOK AT FOR ALAN STEWART ON THE WEBSITE REBELL11?

Edited by andrew1402
Link to post
Share on other sites

Andrew when was last payment on the account made?

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WHICH DEPARTMENT DO I LOOK AT FOR ALAN STEWART ON THE WEBSITE REBELL11?

 

Hi andrew

 

Report Mackenzie Hall to Alan Stewart at East Ayrshire Trading Standards, he can get them stopped, I think that is a step you need to take next.

 

http://www.east-ayrshire.gov.uk/item_detail.asp?UIN=1492

 

You need to report them for chasing a debt that is statute barred.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...