Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PRA - Letter before Claim - old barclaycard debt


KarenLilly
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 113 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey... I was defaulted in 2012 for 4 separate credit cards.  I made agreements to pay a certain amount each month with them all (albeit not a lot).  One is with Capital One, I continue to pay directly to them as they never transferred the debt. 

The others was transferred to PRA; 2 x MNBA these was defaulted in 2012 so no longer show on my credit file

The 3rd one originally with Barclays was defaulted in 2016, so is still on my credit file

I have never missed a payment in the 6+ years the agreements was made.

My husband has been made redundant, he will be entitled to a little bit of redundancy via the government scheme around 4k, so not a lot. 

I phoned PRA to see if I could settle the 3 accounts with the redundancy money. 

On the Barclay's card as the balance is now only £1800.00 I have to pay the amount in full. 

With the two MNBS they are both around the 4k mark each - they said they would settle with a 5% reduction. 

Far more that the redundancy money will be.

Is this debt classed as Statue Barred?

if not, if I no longer pay what could be the consequences (if any)? 

I obviously will not be able to afford the payments but don't want to get into any legal trouble or my credit file be marked for another 6 years.

Any advice will be very much appreciated. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and Welcome to the forum.

 

A debt can only become statute barred if there is no acknowledgment or payment for a period of 6 years (5 Scotland) from the cause of action or issuance of a valid default notice.

 

you can only be defaulted once on your credit files.....save your redundancy money

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope you sent everyone you are blindly paying a cca request first?.....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

get some CCA request s running tomorrow.

without enforceable paperwork no-one is going near a courtroom door.

wait and see what toilet paper each one returns with.

they have 12+2 days else one of your options is too cease payment until they do.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

and?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh please to holy God did she not throw her husband's redundancy at these bloodsuckers.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 I requested a CCA for all 3 accounts. 

As you predicted, they took longer than the 12 days to respond. 

They have now provided the information for 2 of the accounts and I'm still waiting for the 3rd. 

They're all copies of the documents and not originals.

PRA have written to me stating "they have deemed the debt unenforceable" 

I have therefore stopped paying any monies to them, I will not be using any redundancy monies to paying them off... and although I'm receiving emails/letters regularly; I'm refraining from answering them and hoping they will eventually stop!!

Thank you for your advice.

  

 

PRA Barclaycard CCa return.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

one fleecers gone...see!

 

read our upload guide carefully

and scan up to ONE multipage PDF ONLY

the 2 CCA returns 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

 I complained directly  to PRA over one of my accounts (Barclays) as I had previously requested for CCA;

they had originally deemed the debt unenforceable due to them being unable to provide ALL the relevant documentation within 12 days. 

On their response to the original complaint; they confirmed that they stated that the Barclays debt is now actually enforceable as I have now received all the relevant documentation! 

I wrote a response stating why there was a contradiction and the debt should remain unenforceable as they originally stated.

Their response is also attached!

Where do I now stand?

although they have stated in the letter they have no intention of enforcing the debt; I am concerned they can change their mind at any time.

The documentation I received was  all copies of the documents and not originals; does this make a difference?.  

I have not paid any monies to them for all the 3 accounts I requested CCA since Feb 21 - they have classed the other two an unenforceable, I cannot understand why this one is different?

Hope this makes sense!!

 

complaint letter tennis.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

1st please stop entering into pointless letter tennis with a powerless DCA, NEVER do that, if they fail the CCA request, end of, you go radio silent until/unless they latterly comply (with documents that we deem enforceable..NOT them!)  or until/unless you get a letter of claim.

 

no-one told you to write and this 'can't enforce after 12+2 days', even if they do later, where did you get that twaddle from? 

 

we asked long ago to scan to one multipage PDF any CCA returns you get so that we can see them and decide not you or them decide.

 

we need to see the barclays CCa return please one multipage PDF read upload carefully

i've had to hide your last post as your uploads contain pers info. please redact them properly and i'll put the post back up.

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
I want some advice please on an outstanding debt of £1,757.97.
 
The credit card was originally taken out with Barclays around 2009; we ran into trouble with a few credit cards and was therefore defaulted in 2012, for the card and others.
 
We paid an agreed amount to Barclays until the debt was transferred to PRA Group a few years ago.  We were paying PRA £5.00 per month, then after a post on this site we were advised to write to PRA in January 2021 asking for a copy of my agreement and a full breakdown of the account including any interest or charges.  I understood that they had to supply these details within 12 working days or the debt became unenforceable.
 
They responded with some details and they confirmed in their letter that a copy of the agreement was not yet available, and they had enclosed a copy of statements. These statements were not enclosed with the letter. The letter also confirmed that the debt at this time was unenforceable.  I received another letter in April 2021 with the remaining details and they stated that the debt was now "enforceable" I wrote a complaint letter in April 2021 asking for an explanation on why the debt is now enforceable.  Their response and details are all attached.
 
I have not paid anything towards the debt since Dec 2020; I have received a few letters over the last year requesting to set up an agreement, to which I did not respond. I have now received a letter stating they have defaulted my account, although it has been defaulted in the past and 6 years have elapsed; they are also demanding an agreement/payment or they will take me to court.  Letters are also attached.
 
I have checked my credit file, at it does not yet have a new default listed. 
Can they default my file and can they enforce a court order?
 
Can you please advise where I stand and the best course of action I can/should take? 
I have until 11th January to write back to them.
 
I appreciate any help and advice you can provide, as I do not understand the legal details.

 

PRA Letter 7th Dec 23.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to PRA - Letter before Claim - old barclaycard debt

old and new threads merged

as andy mentioned before a debt cant be defaulted twice so it cant comeback on your filer no.

hit letter of claim

follow post 2

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thank you for the response.

I read on the Internet that you could be defaulted twice;

If Barclay is the original defaulter and they passed the debt to PRA, PRA could default me if I have not kept to the agreement "

Quote

You cannot have two defaults for the same debt.

What sometimes happens in these cases is that the original creditor defaults your account and passes the debt on to a debt collection agency.

if you fail to meet the criteria set out for you by the debt collection agency, they might default your account as well.

Could this be the reason why they are threatening to default?

Shall I continue to ignore them?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

you cannot have 2 default notices issued on the same debt, end of, unless you of course you met the criteria of paying what was required on the 1st one. 

typically it still gets registered regardless as the defaulted date, and thus on the DN's 6th B'day the whole account is removed from your credit file, never to return. regardless to you meeting the criteria stated on it. so how can someone issue a new DN if theres no account showing and it can't comeback on!

trouble with the internet is muppets get confused between calendar D(1-6)  markers and a registered default following a default notice letter, they are NOT the samething and cal markers can be totally ignored. no-one bar you and the debt owner can ever see them.

1 hour ago, KarenLilly said:

Shall I continue to ignore them?

NO!! you've had a letter of claim

 

13 hours ago, dx100uk said:

hit letter of claim

follow post 2

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, it's clearer now for the default.  Next steps?

You just mentioned "No" to ignoring them as I have a letter of claim...

Do I have to fill the letter of claim and send it off to avoid Court Action, or if I just start paying them a small monthly amount of £5pm would this stop them from being able to take me to court?

 

Thanks again, I do appreciate your advice, just trying to understand it

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i cant keep saying the same things..again and again

read my posts CAREFULLY

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KarenLilly said:

Do I have to fill the letter of claim and send it off to avoid Court Action, Yes if you wish to challenge the debt  or if I just start paying them a small monthly amount of £5pm would this stop them from being able to take me to court? Possibly buts that's your decision if you wish for it not to escalate any further.

Andy

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...