Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Nothing will happen in regard to this one shoplifting event, other than Sainsburys won't let you shop in this store again.   But, if you continued to shoplift, then the consequences are more serious. Local to me, there  is a town where about 13 people have been banned from shopping in many of the shops. They are subject to some form of order, where if they set foot in any of the stores, they will be subject to arrest by Police.  
    • Agree with DX, Sadly, from the pics, it looks like you're bang to rights😪 The rules are very explicit. Before entering the box, you must ensure that you are able to completely exit. It looks like the car in front may have moved a couple of feet and tempted you to set off, but when you did that, there still wasn't enough room to completely exit the box. By all means ask to see the video evidence, but saying you had to stop because the vehicle in front stopped, isn't a valid defence.
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I imagine the letter that the security guards talked about will be a letter from a company or lawyers who specialise in trying to extract money from shoplifters. I think Sainsbury's use DWF solicitors, otherwise it could be a company like RLP. It won't be a 'fine', only the police can do that. Look at this as a parallel 'justice' system that doesn't involve the plice. If you read around the forum for other cases of shoplifting, you'll get the idea of how this all works. If you think your behaviour has become compulsive, we suggest having a chat with your GP who should get you help for this. Best, HB
    • despite our wettest 18 months on record,  Low levels of rain and snow have cut Canada’s hydropower production, forcing it to increase electricity imports from the U.S.   - NYT
    • Hi all…. i was wondering if someone could help me. I am ashamed I have been caught shoplifting from Sainsbury’s by two undercover security guards who I suspect have been following me for a week now… I have been impulsively shoplifting due to what I think could have become an addiction of some kind. I am ashamed of what I had been doing and I do believe being caught has been for the greater good. i was taken to a room and asked to empty my bag, the guards were slightly rude but I complied with them politely as I know they are just doing their job and I am in the wrong. They retrieved my address, name, birthdate and took a photo of me, they asked me how many times I had shoplifted and I said twice and I didn’t want to be foolish and say just once. They issued me a letter of ban from the store and if I was caught in the store again the police would be called. They told me I would be paying 2x what I had stolen today as the goods had been damage which I am guessing is stole around £65 worth roughly. I did offer to pay for the items I had stolen on the day but they declined. They did not call the police but let me leave after claiming I was a lucky person. They told me to expect a letter in the post and that I “would be smart not to ignore it”  what should I be expecting in the post from them? I am aware from reading a lot online about security costs.. people mentioned to ignore these costs however as I had damaged the labelling on the goods should I still comply and pay the fines ?  kind regards awful shoplifter
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Letter explaining why you failed WCA?


speedfreek
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5043 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Morning all :)

 

The letter I received from JCP saying that I'm fit for work states that

 

We will send you a separate letter explaining the full reasons why you have failed the Work Capability Assessment.

 

Any ideas on how long this takes or where it comes from? As it's been a week now since that was sent and there's no sign of it

 

Now I've just called the DWP and they've told me that it's nothing to do with them and that it's down to ATOS (# spits) to write to me.

 

Is this correct and since I will need this info next week is there anyway I can get it like pronto?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right I am really confused here :mad:

 

I thought all decisions on benefit had to come with an explanation from the DM who made the decision?

 

So I've just rung again and they say they will pass a note to "Medical Service" (or provided on behalf of DWP by ATOS) to get a copy of my medical report sent to me.

 

Is this correct? Did anybody else get a statement of reasons for your failure off the DWP as surely this should be coming from the DM who decided my claim not ATOS.

 

Help.... my brain hurts :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mine came from the DWP. It was a list of the descriptors with tick boxes to show which ones they disagreed with. I think it came as part of the letter saying my IB had been stopped.

 

dj

Benefits rules are complex, and although I do try to inform and support people, I may get it wrong because the rules apply to individual claimants and their particular circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DJ :)

 

I'm just trying to figure out how your are supposed to write the initial appeal letter when you are not give any information that tells you how they've come to that decision?

 

I'm just getting that feeling that something just isn't right and I'm usually correct when that happens.

 

Any more all welcome :D

 

I'm off to de-stress by pawning some noobs on Mario Kart for a bit :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure about pawning noobs, I'll have to research that. I'm sure it's above board.:D

 

dj

Benefits rules are complex, and although I do try to inform and support people, I may get it wrong because the rules apply to individual claimants and their particular circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well mysterious letter update. : suspicious :

 

My protestations at not receiving an explanation have born unexpected fruit :)

 

The form ESA85 Decision Makers Scoresheet popped through letter box this morn.

 

I'm quite relieved as it will now give my appeal maker something to work with.

 

I've also joined the gang with nil points :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hellow speedfreek:)

 

YOUR ESA 85 should be a copy of your medical report(done by the person who did your medical:confused:)"atos person".

 

 

This bit ,ESA65 what i receieved from Belfast BDC (not atos),way back in

Febuary. "here goes";-)

 

The section in this letter(esa65) callrd your limited capability for work assessment shows the points we have given you. We call this a

"written statement of reasons" for the decision. This not a copy of your medical assessment. if you want a copy of your medical assessment report,please write to us. ( so i phoned up, did not write and was sent a copy of my medical report (ESA 85)

 

cheers happyhamr:) chin up speedfreek:)

 

how can a D MAKER scoresheet be a ESA 85:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hellow again speedfreek:)

 

With regard to your post number 1 , atos did not send me NOTHING.

 

ALL done/ letters from Belfast bdc.

 

so , like what you say "my brain hurts as well":) ,and something is not quite right:rolleyes:

 

cheers happyhamr:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well spotted that man :D

 

It is the actual 23 page ATOS medical report in all it's wonderful glory!

 

That's hidden behind 3 pages of a filled in by ATOS but not by the DM - DM's scoresheet.

 

The DM's scoresheet is basically a cover sheet followed by 2 tables one on each page for the scores from the Physical and Mental assessments.

 

click bellow link for my zero points table :roll:

Image - TinyPic - Free Image Hosting, Photo Sharing & Video Hosting

 

So still no official word from the DM explaining why I failed. :???:

 

I'm with you on the head hurting :mad: But my work here is done and it's time for tea :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

hellow again, speedfreek:)

 

I have one these 3 page DECISON MAKERS scoresheet (physical/ mental , 2 tables :rolleyes:)"nil point".;

 

mine is a ESA 56 (3 page sheet),which i receieved in MAY(bundle of evidence for my reconsideration,first time I SAW IT:confused:

 

The funny thing is this was dated the 11th of febuary:rolleyes::confused:

 

yep "something not right" happyhamr:)

 

mine was 26 pages of ; well , whatever atos person wants it to be.

 

"for my next TRICK.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the Null Pointers speedfreek! :)

I still have my [strong] suspicions that ATOS are far more involved in what a DM should be doing than the DWP would like to confess to...

Best wishes

Rae

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers all :D

 

Well it does say that Mr X (Registered Nurse) Approved Disability Analyst (not sure why that the only thing bolded in 23 pages :lol: ) has produced the report from all the evidence provided, citing additional evidence and ESA50 forms.

 

So it does sort of suggest (and support the theory) that where a claimant scores very little or zero points all the DM does is sign off their decision without looking at anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont forget to check if the person really is a registered nurse and then you can complain against them - do this via the Royal College of Nursing wbesite... it can be very revealing - I believe if a nurse only does temporary work they should be reassessed every two years...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ta sg1 :D

 

Couldn't figure out how to find em using the RGN site :o

 

I found em using this link though Search the register | Nursing and Midwifery Council

 

Don't know how they can have (or put down) the made up title of 'Approved Disability analyst' when there's no 'Recordable qualifications' listed on their records :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the ESA Handbook for Medical Professionals.

 

A 1 hour course on how to greet and speak to 'disabled' people + 1 hour course on using the LIMA computer system. Approved by the DWP conditional on passing a short multi choice test after both lectures.

 

It's a bit like calling yourself a 'food technology hygienist expert' for scraping the Maccy Ds grills free of fat :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys. While I was away looking for what a disablity analyst is, you came up with most of the answers. I hope this link will be allowed, I found a lot of job ads for guess who, Atos, for this kind of work.

 

https://careers.atosorigin.com/fe/tpl_AtosOrigin01.asp?s=MbkMjPUrEcTFkHhTcz&jobid=61335,2371584772

 

It's all starting to sound rather dodgy.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like pin the tail on the donkey. A picture of a person in a wheelchair on the wall (Course element 1: How to recognise a disabled person), then a picture of a person in a wheelchair and a person walking with a stick (course element 2: identify which of these can work - both) Congratulations, give the correct answer and you win a shiny framed certificate and the right to make people's lives a misery!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well my mystical letter has finally arrived.

 

Dated 23/07/10 arrived 14/08/10!

 

As happy stated it's my ESA65 with the DMs reason for decision.

 

Stamped top right by the "Royal Mail Preston 10.08.10 Mail Opening Unit"

 

Maybe all the zeros on it opened up a time warp which meant it came in an envelope with a return address of Belfast?

 

Where has this sweet prince of decision making been for 22 days :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...