Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Next Directory and bailiffs help please.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5168 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have already posted this in legal issues as I was not sure where best to post.

 

Hi

I am hoping that someone can help me please.

I bought items from next directory in the year of 2005/6, and i struggled to pay for them :Cry:

It was passed to Howard Cohen and co, and ended up with a ccj and me agreeing £5 a month.

I continued to pay this until july of this year, when i could not manage the £5, and me asking if this could be reduced.

the first I have heard is a letter from the court this morning 19th december telling me that I have to pay in full before the 22nd december £197.25 (debt) plus court costs now totalling £245.00. or the bailiff will call and may remove your goods for sale at public auction. the notice of warrant of execution was dated the 15th dec09 but i recieved it on the 19th09(friday) giving me till the 22nd09(tuesday)

 

I really do not know what to do, tried calling howard cohen this morning and told them that the debt was not inforceable, she replied by saying it doesn't come under the CCA it comes under the sale of goods act. you have asked for goods and recieved/used them.

 

Is this true how do i now proceed, many thans in advance.

Edited by sarnie2109
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It can stay for now,since it does no harm.

How long ago was the CCJ registered ?

Did you challenge the account at that time ?

Was your purchases from the next directory done on credit ?

So at this point you are unlikely to know who the bailiffs are.

I agree that you are going to have to apply to have the warrant set aside,which needs to be very quickly.

The basis on the arguements to do this will depend on establishing a couple of things.

Please be patient as others will be here to give you some pointers.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its unlikely that the Court will allow arguements to be entertained on the actual validity of the CCJ.

They will also point out that in making payments you have admitted liability to the debt.

So the focus here should be on getting the warrant set aside.

So have you got copies of communications that you have made with Cohens to try to agree repayments of arrears ?

What about your financial status-has there been any changes recently which would give you some defence ?

Are you on any benefits ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I will just explain the process in simple terms.

 

You will need to fill out a form N245.

On this you can make an offer of payment or else ask the Court to vary the original amount ordered.

Give a statement of means in support including an income and exp sheet.

It needs to be handed into your local County Court ASAP with the fee £35

You may qualify for fee remission if you are in receipt of certain benefits.

Leaflet EX160 gives details.

Once this has been done,the creditor can either agree to the offer you have made,or else there is a short hearing listed to decide.

In the meantime bailiffs cannot take any goods.

It is important to act quickly given especially the Christmas holidays.

If you are unclear on anything feel free to ask further.

The forms are available online Welcome to hmcs.co.uk

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So have you got copies of communications that you have made with Cohens to try to agree repayments of arrears ? I have a copy of the letter i sent, but I never received a reply.

What about your financial status-has there been any changes recently which would give you some defence ? Yes i am now £315 a month down.

Are you on any benefits ? Yes I am on incapacity benefit, long term.

 

Do you think it would be acceptable to make a payment of £5 on the 21st then pay the £30 arrears, in january to get me update?

As I do not have £35 to go to court with an N245.

Again many thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cohens obv did not regard your financial difficulties as good reason.They are unlikely to listen now-since they have obtained a WOE.

Your only course should be an application to the Court which suspends the warrant-otherwise it will be passed on to the bailiffs.I would not trust Cohens to verbally accept your offer as long as the warrant remains in force.

Check out your entitlement to fee remission-I understand £35 appears to be a lot for you to find right now-but you dont have a lot of alternatives.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hallowich-I see you are around-any other thoughts here ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah some food for thought there then.:)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DEALING WITH BAILIFFS ON YOUR DOORSTEP

1. ALWAYS! Keep your door LOCKED SHUT at all times. NEVER open the door to a bailiff - speak to him through a window or the letterbox

2. ALWAYS! Hide your car - in the garage or park it well away

3. ALWAYS! Take photographs of the bailiff and his vehicle, even better use a camcorder and video-record EVERYTHING

4. ALWAYS! Speak as LITTLE AS POSSIBLE and let the bailiff do the talking

5. ALWAYS! Ask for his bailiff's certificate number

6. ALWAYS! Ask which court issued his certificate

7. ALWAYS! Ask for a full breakdown of his fees IN WRITING

8. ALWAYS! Ask who the creditor is (if you don't know)

9. ALWAYS! Pay using a credit card, avoid cash and debit cards if possible

10. ALWAYS! If you have grounds, get an appeal lodged immediately (parking tickets) - it stops enforcement

 

1. NEVER! Sign any documents handed to you by a bailiff

2. NEVER! Phone a bailiff (unless asking him which Court issued his certificate)

3. NEVER! Admit any debt

4. NEVER! Say or "confirm" your name address or date of birth

 

this is very good advice originally posted by Happy Contrails

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Happy Contrails

I really do not know what to do, tried calling howard cohen this morning and told them that the debt was not inforceable, she replied by saying it doesn't come under the CCA it comes under the sale of goods act. you have asked for goods and recieved/used them.

 

 

howard cohen's website says they are solicitors, and are giving factually inaccurate information to obtain a money transfer. You should consider reporting them to the Law Society. Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 makes the lender and merchant jointly liable for breach of contract if the goods purchased under the credit agreement fail to perform as described.

 

The statutory fee for enforcing a CCJ is £45. The law doesnt provide for this £245 they want from you. Ask for a copy of the court order awarding costs, civil procedure does not provide for claimants to claim costs other than the prescribed amounts - nothing close to £245 and solicitors fees cannot be claimed at all.

 

This could be a debt collectors [problem].

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I am on incapacity benefit, long term

 

If it doesn't get set aside and the bailiff do come you may be classed as vulnerable depending on your circumstances

 

Thank you for your replies, I am very grateful.

In what way may i be classed as vulnerable??

I am a single mum, with a 7 year old daughter.

I lost my mum 5 years ago and ended up having a break down because of this, and now suffer severe depression, several years ago i had an accident and fractured my neck, I am now mobile but this was one of the reasons for being awarded incapacity benefit, I have stage IV arthritis in my right knee and am currently awaiting a knee replacement.

I have ended up with a mortgage because of my mums death which i really struggle to pay but I do pay it.

 

A friend has helped me with other debts i have, he has done Notice of conditional agreement and request for clarification letters, of which he has had success, but this one was before I knew we could dispute them.

So I agreed the ccj route being somewhat stupid!

 

thank you again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In what way may i be classed as vulnerable??

 

 

 

Those who might be potentially vulnerable include:

  • the elderly;
  • people with a disability;
  • the seriously ill;
  • the recently bereaved;
  • single parent families;
  • pregnant women;
  • unemployed people; and,
  • those who have obvious difficulty in understanding, speaking or reading English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Put what you can reasonably afford...nothing more-nothing less.If you are -£188 a month then something needs checking.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Interpretation of what Cohens do is that mostly they are full of hot and gas and use a lot of mights and maybes. I understand from other postings they are less than economical with the truth and have been reported on various occasions for their misleading information. It follows therefore that those who complain are either not making enough noise to the right departments or what is more likely is that those departments are ineffectual.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been to court this morning and have put in application to stop the bailiffs. Which they have told me will stop the bailiffs.

Also I have applied for a hearing, as i have been told without a CCA the debt is not inforceable.

They are saying that a Sale of goods act covers them.

Any advice on this would be very much appreciated.

 

Thank you everyone for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sarnie, glad you've started the court thingy. I trust that, being on IB, you were excused the fee.

Important point, have you also notified the court that you are on IB, for what reason, and that you are a single parent family? These are points they should take into consideration and will help them determine your status as vulnerable. This in turn will mean no bailiffs in the future and an agreement to pay that is affordable and sustainable.

Rae.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i agree with you on that kiptower! thanks.

Kelcou..... yes i didnt have to pay, didnt really make a thing about my IB etc was going to bring that up on the day.

 

 

 

Can you give me some pointers on how to fight this now please guys n gals

 

.... wait for the hearing and then say, i have asked COWARDS for a copy of the CCA and it aint here. and surely even if i have had a ccj set against me and i have paid it..............how can it be upheld if no proof to the validity of the debt can be proved???.

 

would they listen to this argument on the day ?

 

my friend phoned them today (recorded) and asked them for a copy of the CCA and to let them know to bring it as we have applied for the warrantOE to be set aside..... they, in there fumbling manner said yes if we need to provide it we will. but i will be sending a notice off to COWARDS tomorrow am asking for the CCA etc to just make sure.

 

COWARDS said because i had agreed to pay the ccj then i have agreed to the debt so basically there is nothing to argue...... am i right in thinking that how can i agree to honour a debt and have a ccj against me if the debt/CCA cannot be proved/enforced ?????.

 

i want to ask was the CCA ever shown in COWARDS case/paperwork to gain the ccj..... if not then this should all be reversed until they can prove it ???

 

 

not totally up to speed with the court system so not sure what to expect to be able to say etc and what i will be able to ask for, CCA etc.

 

im struggling to find any use full info on this COWARDS comments regarding me having the CCJ and having paid it after, so the CCA isnt important anymore ???

 

comments pointers of plan of attack :confused:

Edited by sarnie2109
edit
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...