Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
    • I think you need to tell us what actually happened. Your original post gives the impression that you were taken to court for a speeding offence. But you go on to say that you received no paperwork. So you could not have been summonsed for a speeding offence because the police had no evidence that you (or anybody else) was driving (and it seems you were not anyway). You were probably summonsed (or more likely received a Single Justice Procedure Notice) for "failing to provide the driver's details." You would not normally be banned for this offence if you were convicted - it carries six points. So did you have any earlier points which meant you were liable to a "totting up" ban?  If you were originally convicted (as it seems you might have been) how was that conviction set aside? Did you perform a Statutory Declaration? There is simply too much missing for any meaningful help to be given. It seems as if there may have been an error by the DVLA but before you consider suing those idiots until the cows come home, you need to explain exactly what has happened.  
    • Point 4 and 10 duplicate Point 5 and 8 duplicate  Try to keep to one para with regards the agreement...various paras duplicating the same. Statement of truth is out of date refer to the claimants statement    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dog Attack - - - Advice Needed, Please.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5240 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

this is the last thing ime going to say on this thread

 

on my delievery, i know all the dogs

 

i have dog biscuits in my van.

 

in my case, the house holder had a cage behing the door

 

i did not know he had taken it down

 

people who are making fun of dogs and fingers kindly stop.

its not funny.

 

enough said

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It's my understanding a sign may not be enough to absolve you of liability should someone suffer injury or damage on your property. This issue has cropped up a few times on the Traffic Offense/Parking forum - one case concerned warning notices put up in a hotel warning of theft from vehicles - vehicles parked at own risk was the notice. They were still liable if they failed to warn vehicle owners that thieves were know to operate or they'd had a spate of thefts from cars.

 

In this case I think the owner had reasonably restrained his dogs. If however (and proving it would be difficult) the dog has a history of doing biting or attacking delivery people (e.g. the postman) then you could have a case.

 

Another angle that you may not have consider is the Health and Safety Act. If you were injured during the course of your employment then technically this should be reported to the HSE. Your employer is supposed to ensure you have sufficient skills and knowledge to highlight any dangers that you may encounter in the course of your work. You also have a duty to ensure that you get the necessary training. In this case it sounds as if your employer has been negligent (the Royal Mail obviously knows to brief its employees -why not someone delivering leaflets.) It sounds as though you were not warned of this danger. To some it will seem like commonsense but I will put my hands up and say I wouldn't have thought about it (and I delivered papers in my youth).

 

You may or may not have a case against the dog owner. I would suggest you look at case for compensation from your employer.

 

pin1onu;2645449 - many thanks that is all fascinating advice, which I shall ponder over. The "employer" thing won't work though as I was delivering for someone on a voluntary basis. Possibly therefoer a no goer - but worth seeing what others say. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

All puerile, sarcastic and insulting posts have been removed, as have all instances of bad language.

 

If you have any doubt as to my meaning, then I suggest that you re-aquaint yourselves with the Site Rules regarding making posts!

 

Forum Rules - Please read before posting - The Consumer Forums

 

Rooster-UK.

  • Haha 1

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is the last thing ime going to say on this thread

 

on my delievery, i know all the dogs

i have dog biscuits in my van.

in my case, the house holder had a cage behing the door

i did not know he had taken it down

people who are making fun of dogs and fingers kindly stop.

its not funny.

enough said

 

I apologise for my sarcastic post earlier (which has been deleted).

I have been rightly Cagbotted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, more posts in one day for quite a while!!! Having dealt with a claim like this recently I will throw in my two penneth!

 

You probably do have a valid claim. However, it will not be against the dog owner. It will be against the company that you delivered the leaflets for. Although you were a volunteer, you were acting under their control (carrying out instructions) as if you were an employee. The company has "a non-delegable duty" to ensure the safety of their employees. Unless they have explained to you the dangers of posting leaflets, and how to minimise the risks they will at risk should the matter litigate.

 

I am suprised the solicitor has not gone down this route...

  • Haha 1

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the OP he did. The police should have learned from the Liverpool tragedy.

 

No he didn't. I have no doubt that the OP gave a truthful account of events and admits he has no idea what breed of dog caused the injury. He had no reason at the time to believe it was an illegal breed and has not tried to embellish the tale in claiming so. For some reason other posters have wanted to add this idea.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No matter what I say I seem to have brought out anger in some posters on here who appear to have enjoyed using me as a scapegoat for their internal private frustrations. I wonder how many of these posters are in fact the same one?

 

My crime?

To try and get a twisted leaflet (that I was delivering as a favour to a loved one) through a stiff letterbox - I admit this and I had no training of how to go about such a business but why I have been treated so poorly by my own species on here is beyond me.

 

My punishment?

 

Loosing a part of my finger very frighteningly and with much pain.

 

I simply asked for a little advice over the legalities of the issues and received hate, scorn, mockery and abuse from those who’s motives and agendas I seriously question.

 

Give me dogs any day!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

He had no reason at the time to believe it was an illegal breed and has not tried to embellish the tale in claiming so. For some reason other posters have wanted to add this idea.

 

Yes - I think it's called: being set up!

 

To this day, I do not know what attacked me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No matter what I say I seem to have brought out anger in some posters on here who appear to have enjoyed using me as a scapegoat for their internal private frustrations. I wonder how many of these posters are in fact the same one?

 

Please don't let it get to you. There are some decent people who will try to help you and not make judgements.

 

If you get any replies that are unpleasant, insulting or not relevant please click the warning triangle on the post and report it. As was seen earlier in this thread. The mods will take action.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please don't let it get to you. There are some decent people who will try to help you and not make judgements.

 

If you get any replies that are unpleasant, insulting or not relevant please click the warning triangle on the post and report it. As was seen earlier in this thread. The mods will take action.

 

Thank you - I just do not know why folks got so nasty with me over this. I am a dog lover and my first reaction was that I did not want the dog blamed in anyway. I told that to the police. I just thought it was so wrong that a person doing a favour in delivering leaflets could be so badly injured. And the owner must have heard me screaming outside his door in pain and saw the blood in the porch etc. When I went back minutes later he was clearly NOT surprised to see me. After his initial peep at me he virtually closed the door in my face. I got the distinct impression that this was no big deal to him. I was also worried that a kiddie could get the same treatment as paper boys and girls do struggle as I did to get thing past the stiff letterboxes and especially the new ones with brushes. There was no barking or warning.

 

I am sorry if my injury has offended some posters and I will be more wary in future. I had never done this task before.

 

I will have to think about this again and possibly seek recompense off the party who owned the leaflets.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you - I just do not know why folks got so nasty with me over this. I am a dog lover and my first reaction was that I did not want the dog blamed in anyway. I told that to the police. I just thought it was so wrong that a person doing a favour in delivering leaflets could be so badly injured. And the owner must have heard me screaming outside his door in pain and saw the blood in the porch etc. When I went back minutes later he was clearly NOT surprised to see me. After his initial peep at me he virtually closed the door in my face. I got the distinct impression that this was no big deal to him. I was also worried that a kiddie could get the same treatment as paper boys and girls do struggle as I did to get thing past the stiff letterboxes and especially the new ones with brushes. There was no barking or warning.

 

I am sorry if my injury has offended some posters and I will be more wary in future. I had never done this task before.

 

I will have to think about this again and possibly seek recompense off the party who owned the leaflets.

 

Again I would like to apologise for my sarcasm earlier in this thread. Childish and stupid.

 

I agree about not taking it further with the dog owner.

I also agree that it is perhaps the party who own the leaflets you should concentrate on.

You might want to politely ask the dog owner to put a cage over his letter box so this doesn't happen to anyone else in the future.

 

BobbyH

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might want to politely ask the dog owner to put a cage over his letter box so this doesn't happen to anyone else in the future.

 

BobbyH

 

If you do ask the dog owner to do this I'd suggest doing it in person and not hand delivering a letter.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

All puerile, sarcastic and insulting posts have been removed, as have all instances of bad language.

 

If you have any doubt as to my meaning, then I suggest that you re-aquaint yourselves with the Site Rules regarding making posts!

 

Forum Rules - Please read before posting - The Consumer Forums

 

Rooster-UK.

 

No matter what I say I seem to have brought out anger in some posters on here who appear to have enjoyed using me as a scapegoat for their internal private frustrations. I wonder how many of these posters are in fact the same one?

 

My crime?

To try and get a twisted leaflet (that I was delivering as a favour to a loved one) through a stiff letterbox - I admit this and I had no training of how to go about such a business but why I have been treated so poorly by my own species on here is beyond me.

 

My punishment?

 

Loosing a part of my finger very frighteningly and with much pain.

 

I simply asked for a little advice over the legalities of the issues and received hate, scorn, mockery and abuse from those who’s motives and agendas I seriously question.

 

Give me dogs any day!:)

 

Please don't let it get to you. There are some decent people who will try to help you and not make judgements.

 

If you get any replies that are unpleasant, insulting or not relevant please click the warning triangle on the post and report it. As was seen earlier in this thread. The mods will take action.

 

 

Okey dokey.. just popped in to stop some of the unpleasantness, but see Rooster beat me to it. :D

 

questioner, I hope that you have at least been given some sound advice, I notice Rooster has removed the more unpleasant posts.

 

How is your finger now ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still watching this thread! :-x

  • Haha 1

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd sooner mess about on my mother's PC than mess about with a dog.

 

Or perhaps flame and troll along great sites like this where many people are actually seeking good advice?

 

I think your attitude is cold, unhelpful and I just cannot see what joy you in fact get from abusing CAG site like this.

 

Regards to your mummy :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again I would like to apologise for my sarcasm earlier in this thread. Childish and stupid.

 

I agree about not taking it further with the dog owner.

I also agree that it is perhaps the party who own the leaflets you should concentrate on.

You might want to politely ask the dog owner to put a cage over his letter box so this doesn't happen to anyone else in the future.

 

BobbyH

 

I believe that the owner put wire box on plus warning signs 'after' the warden went to advise him of the dangers ,subsequent to the attack.

 

Yes - I agree about the leaflet people and I have asked the solicitor to look into this.

 

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never offered any advice pal - and I didn't mean to bring it down to a slanging match - I was just having a bit of banter - surely you're okay with it though as you sure give as good as you get!

 

How is your finger anyway is it getting better?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but “banter?”

No “pal” your post number 10 was uncalled for and distasteful. You have no idea what I was or was not delivering and to call it “turd” is disgusting.No matter what your opinion of my misfortune may be, your rude response was totally uncalled for.

You are correct though that I do give us good as I get and who knows – one day you may be glad to have me on side.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...