Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have the Sims 4 on Macbook. Over the last year I have paid for multiple add on packs spending a lot of money on them. I bought them all in good faith as my Mac met all the minimum requirements to play them. I have been playing happily for about a year and bought my latest pack just over a week ago. The games were all working fine yesterday. Then suddenly today EA released a new app to launch the games and this new app requires a MAC OS that my computer cannot use. Now suddenly none of my games are accessible and I am unable to play anything. They did not warn us about this change in requirements and if I had known they would be doing this I wouldn't have bought all these add ons as they are now all totally unusable. The games themselves have not changed, only their app to launch them and I can't afford to buy a brand new mac just to play. So my question is how can they change the minimum requirements after I have paid for a game? I agreed to pay for them based on the fact my mac met their requirements and was not informed when purchasing that this would be an issue in the future. I understand new games (like Sims 5 which is to be released next year) might not be compatible but this is a 10yr old game that they have suddenly made inaccessible due to their new launch app. Does anybody know if I can do anything or anyway to get a partial refund from them? Thanks   Here are their T&C... I can't find anything in there about them being able to do this so not sure what to do https://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/US/en/PC/
    • OK. Thank you all for the input.  I'll ignore their letters of demand but NEVER ignore a letter of claim. I'm bracing myself for the stress as their demands £££ goes up and the case gets sent to debt collectors. 
    • OK.  It was worth a try. Their case is still pants and they have broken their own Code of Practice numerous times.
    • @BankFodder sorry for the delay and thank you for the lengthy reply. Yes, I agree. It's a small business and the guy is very very decent. I know someone else said my priority shouldn't be worrying whether he gets shafted but I'm not here to try and screw him over because I feel like if someone behaves decently and gets exploited, they might not behave so kindly in the future. I know DX mentioned he thinks I've caused the issue by leaving multiple instructions, but I have already explained why and both instructions were to leave it with a neighbour and there was nothing advising the driver to abandon the parcel on my doorstep. I don't think leaving it there could be considered a safe place.  I am still waiting on the retailer to respond. Ultimately, I wanted to know how he would proceed if DPD's response isn't favourable. I am certainly not looking to cause any problems. I just want my laptop. I will read the other posts for sure. I've been a bit preoccupied with family stuff. I have nothing in writing from DPD as I phoned them, but they did advise it should be the retailer that liaises with them. I tried contacting the driver straight after deliver via Whatsapp, as that's an option, but it said I couldn't send him a message and I have kept that log. We all know who took the parcel on our street, because that person has a history of parcel theft, but I don't have a doorbell camera or cctv. Police are refusing to intervene, despite the fact that I, along with several other people, spotted another's neighbour's parcel in said "suspect's" car and confronted her to get the parcel back. If the police had acted sooner, I might have had a better chance of getting the parcel back, but I suspect the laptop has long been sold on.  When the retailer responds, I will send him the link to this thread. Hopefully, he will benefit from the information on here as well.
    • @dx100uk none of the instructions advised them to leave the parcel on my door step and without such instructions., I'm struggling to see why they think it's ok to just dump it there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My lloyds tsb credit card debt


MorganaNK
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3901 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

sorry to jump into your thread.

It sounds like we are in a similar position I may be slightly further down the line as I have been through the Rob Way lot and now its with CSL.

 

baby bear are they really not allowed to combine debts, I seem to get mixed messages on this?

They have combined all of by debts and keep sending them to various DCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 178
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The various accounts would be covered by different rules, T & Cs, acts and guidlines making their combining a stupid and pointless move. If they continue in this vein report them...Simples :D

 

Also passing on accounts in dispute is another breach of OFT guidlines and the CPUTR 2008.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the SAR the one that costs £10? Can you link me to the letter please?

 

Thanks for all your help...

"I am prepared to meet my Maker. Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter" - Sir Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again... I will do the letter, and I will report them (they are going to be very sick of us as I am already battling Barclays through them and have reported others...)

 

SAR never actually got sent due to my Grandfather falling ill and being in and out of hospital... which meant me and my car got to know the M25 more intimately than I ever wanted... he has only just come out of hospital again now, and Mum is looking after him whilst I try and sort all of this... I will SAR them asap...

 

Thanks

 

Thanks x

"I am prepared to meet my Maker. Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter" - Sir Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

apart from threatening to CHOP THEIR LEGS OFF -- I'd LOVE to do that to most Sols in the debt collection business but fantasising won't solve the immediate problem.

 

Write back to these guys saying

 

1) PLEASE NEVER SEND DISGUSTING THREATENING LETTERS AGAIN -ESPECIALLY YOU HAVE ISSUED NO PROOF ABOUT THIS DEBT .

 

2) If you can't deal with people like SENSIBLE HUMAN BEINGS don't waste your time and energy as everything will end up in the bin anyway.

 

3) IF you had even the slightest knowledge of Common law that a First Year Law student was expected to know after 1 week you would realize that this account is in DISPUTE since the relevant requested documentation has NOT been supplied namely the CCA which I requested on XXXXX from DCA YYYYY.

 

So before we proceed any further I want AN APOLOGY FROM YOU for sending this type of letter out without having ANY LEGAL RIGHT whatsoever.

 

Sending out threatening letters likely to cause offence or harassement to the recipent(s) is a SERIOUS OFFENCE and could lead to your Disbarment from practising Law or even Improsnment if a Court viewed that an illegal demand for money was Extortion.

 

So lets start again

 

1) Apology for letter 1

2) If you really believe I DO owe the money then a letter in POLITE CIVIL TERMS without the following words ANYWHERE in it -- this will test there literay powress BTW.

 

UNLESS

PAYMENT

WITHIN

BY

DATE (or days)

COURT.

 

I of course have a complete defence at law since no CCA is NO valid agreement -- and

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jimbo... like the letter... shame a length of 2x4 isn't a legitimate response :wink:

 

I am going to SAR, but I am also going to write to them

"I am prepared to meet my Maker. Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter" - Sir Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Meanwhile it sounds as though LTSB are still the owners of the account so neither Debt Morons or any other DCA can take legal action against you - only LTSB can - so its worth a call to Trading Standards & a formal complaint to Debt Morons & LTSB (because DMs are their agents so LTSB are responsible for their actions) as this can only be classed as intimidation.

 

Follow up the formal complaints with complaints to the Financial Ombudsman so tey get charged £400 for passing go ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

OK, have been ill for weeks, but am finally facing all these letters head on. The Lloyds TSB one is their headed paper but Moorcroft's address... is there a template letter before action or can I just concoct one using the phrases above?

 

We wrote to a DCA for the CCA, and then Moorcrap wrote to us telling us that they were taking action, we wrote back saying "in dispute" and the letter we got showing that they had swiped the £1 was the last thing we got.

 

Thanks

"I am prepared to meet my Maker. Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter" - Sir Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

No there isn't any template really for a LBA, just ensure that you head it "LETTER BEFORE ACTION" & it must be sent recorded delivery,

"Dear Sir/madam,

I relation to your last letter dated dd/mm/yyyy I will now bring to your attention that not only are you in serious breach of the CCA 1974, in that you have not replied satisfactorily to my legal request for said document, but you have misappropriated the statutory fee of £1 sent with my request, and have used this against the alleged debt which you state I owe, and I have no knowledge of.

Therefore, in light of the above, I send this letter before action and give you a further 14 calender days in which to reply suitably to my original request dated dd/mm/yyyy, if you are unable to supply me with the document then you are to return the statutory fee of £1 to myself and cease all further collection activity against this alleged debt which you cannot prove.

Failure to do so will result in my reporting you to the relevant organisations including, but not limited to, the Office of Fair Trading, Trading Standards, and the Financial Ombudsman Service, I also reserve the right to take any necessary legal action against yourselves for the return of the statutory fee and any incorrect information you may feel is necessary to place on my credit file.

 

I look forward to your prompt response.

Sincerely.

 

Edit that to suit, and others might advise what to add or take out, my heads not really in it today, but that is the sort of thing you need to be telling them.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A variation on BB's rather good letter might be:

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

With reference to your last letter dated dd/mm/yyyy I wish to bring to your attention that not only are you in serious breach of the Consumer Credit Act (1974) in that you have failed to comply with my legal request, but you have also misappropriated the statutory fee of £1 which I clearly stated was to be used soley to cover the cost of my CCA request. This fee appears to have been used to offset against the alleged amount which you claim that I owe.

 

In light of the above, please consider this a letter before action and note that you have 14 calendar days in which to furnish me with a full and satisfactory response to my original request, dated dd/mm/yyyy.

 

Should you be unwilling or unable to supply me with the requested documentation then you are obliged to return the statutory fee of £1 and cease all further collection activity against this alleged debt.

 

Failure to comply with my legal request will result in my reporting you to any and all regulatory bodies as I see fit, including, but not limited to, the Office of Fair Trading, Trading Standards, and the Financial Services Ombudsman.

 

I also reserve the right to take any necessary legal action against you for the return of the statutory fee and for the removal of any unproven and/or erroneous entries that you may have made on my credit file.

 

I look forward to your prompt written response.

 

Yours faithfully

 

(DON'T SIGN - PRINT NAME)

Edited by Halibutt

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys - letter has been sent by "you can't deny you received it" mail today! :wink:

 

Apex have now joined the game - I wrote and told them politely to foxtrot oscar as I had written to L-TSB telling them that it was not our fault that they started playing Musical DCAs after we had negotiated an agreement! Today we got a letter from Apex saying that their client had received no such letter... this is my response:

 

Thank you for your letter of the 4th November 2010, the contents of which are duly noted.

 

Please see the enclosed, which proves that the letter that I sent to Lloyds TSB on the 22nd October 2010 was received by them at 07:12am on the 25th October 2010. I therefore suggest that your client searches their files just that little bit harder.

 

I reserve the right to report their behaviour to the Financial Ombudsman, and any other relevant organisation.

 

:razz:

 

Got a lovely letter from Apex of the weekend.. went a little like this:

 

We've done some investigations and we believe that you can pay... so call us because we are not going to go away

 

Bless their little debt collection agency hearts - they could be nominated for Poet Laureate! :whoo:

"I am prepared to meet my Maker. Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter" - Sir Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

As you can imagine... I rushed to contact them... not!

 

Just about to take a photo of my doorstep and mail it to iQor to save them coming out and collecting it personally... oops, the deadline's passed, my bad! :lol:

 

Anyone who has been following the exploits of my mum and her game of "Musical Debt Collection Agencies" via Lloyds TSB will know that we have already had dealings with Wescot before the music started again and the debt moved on the the next hapless idiot.

 

On Friday we got a letter from them at our new address, dated the 18th January and saying the following:

 

Important: Address Verification

 

We are attempting to contact XXX and have been provided with this address.

 

If you are the person names above, please call us urgently on 0844 XXX XXXX or contact us on the above address quoting the Wescot reference number.

 

You should also contact us if you believe the information we have is incorrect (this made me laugh as the letter is in an envelope bearing the missive "to be opened by addressee only") so that we may update our records accordingly and stop further correspondence on this matter being sent to your address.

 

If we do not hear from you by 25/01/2011 we will assume the contact information we hold for XXX is correct.

 

We look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible.

 

£$£$£$£

 

We have been using our old address and having the mail forwarded. I want to ignore this letter because we have a SAR in place with Lloyds TSB that they have so far ignored, as well as a complaint about them moving the debt from Wescot when we had made a payment agreement with them and then expecting us to make a new agreement with the next hapless idiot (there have been three so far and we have told them all to "foxtrot oscar" their way back to Lloyds TSB) which they have also ignored; and a complaint about them using the CCA £1 as a payment - they've ignored that too! Mum is worried about them turning up on the doorstep - what should be the next course of action?

 

Thanks for your help

 

:-)

"I am prepared to meet my Maker. Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter" - Sir Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Thanks. The post has just arrived and L-TSB have provided a form for us to sign - like that's going to happen. We can collect the documentation from a branch, so I will be going with that option... I don't let them take copies of any identification do I?

"I am prepared to meet my Maker. Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter" - Sir Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Report that letter to Trading Standards via Consumerdirect and the OFT, they are not supposed to send out misleading or 'assuming if we don't hear you are the person we will take it that you are'. As good as the old 'valid even if not read by you....'

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regard to the letter above, they will totally ignore any replies and the next letter will be assuming they have now 'found' you and will move on to their next set of meaningless threats.

 

Personally, I would not let them take copies of anything, but not sure if they can legitimately do this.

 

With regard to the form they have said you must fill in, again you could state the following, in writing:

 

I note that you have sent statements and correspondence containing sensitive private information to me at same address as that detailed in my SAR request. If you are concerned that you are corresponding with the correct person I wonder why you have not verified the information before.

 

As you are aware, disclosing data without adequate checks of identity is contrary to the 7th principal of data protection, listed in schedule 1 of the Data protection Act 1998. The time to confirm my identity was before you sent your first threat letter.

 

Please now comply with your legal obligation without further delay

Link to post
Share on other sites

The norm would be to take your passport, I know that they DO photocopy this when you are opening an account, as it is buried somewhere in the money laundering act and probably various other acts that they have to do so, so don't be surprised if they do copy your ID, however as I understand it, you are merely showing them ID in order to PROVE you are who you say you are, so there should be no need to be copying anything.

 

And one other point on the letter they sent, you MUST make a copy of it and report them to the OFT&TS via http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/contact

That is their written confirmation that they do not abide by the DPA and as far as their tracing procedures go, they merely rely upon a phone call from a faceless stranger to either deny or confirm identity to the alleged owner of the debt.

 

They really do love shooting themselves in the foot, send a copy of that to the ICO and your Local MP, lets start getting these issues raised in Parliament seeing as the banks and financial institutions haven't learnt their lessons from the last few years.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

They are still refusing to release anything without proof of who I am - grrrrrrrrrr and we have now had a letter from Apex chasing another L-TSB alleged debt!

"I am prepared to meet my Maker. Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter" - Sir Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they indeed! Did you go to your local branch with a DL or Passport?

 

If they are still refusing to disclose YOUR data, then I wouldn't give it a seconds thought and deem the matter closed!

I would even tell them as such, the time in which to confirm my identity is before you sent your first threat letter, as you are now unsure as to whom you have been sending sensitive, and confidential information, I have reported your breach of the DPA to the ICO, and I now deem this trivial matter closed, if I hear anything further from you, I shall report this as harassment to the Police.

GOOD RIDDANCE!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Life in Lloyds-TSB land is getting more and more stupid.

 

 

There are two alleged debts with them, and now Apex and Wescot seem to have swapped debts.

 

 

I have informed them both that the alleged debts are currently SAR,

 

 

Wescot wrote back saying that they had spoken to their client and SAR has to be done through L-TSB

(umm, yes, that's what I wrote and told you, that the alleged debt was currently SAR via L-TSB)

and now Apex have written a very angry letter saying that we are ignoring them

and that they know we can pay so they are speaking to their client to ask them what they want to do next.

 

 

I also sent L-TSB signed SAR paperwork using the SignGuard that you can obtain via this site,

and they are refusing to acknowledge the validity because they look scanned in and not an original signature!

 

It is so hard to keep up with things when L-TSB keep swapping DCAs and also ignore any paperwork you send them. I raised a complaint about their "musical debt collection agency" game, and the fact they use a £1 postal order meant for a CCA as a payment on the account and they have just ignored us and carried on playing games.

 

I think my head may well explode :mad2:

"I am prepared to meet my Maker. Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter" - Sir Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...