Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • £85PCM to sky, what!! why are you paying so much, what did you watch on sky thats not on freeview?  
    • Between yourself and Dave you have produced a very good WS. However if you were to do a harder hitting WS it may be that VCS would be more likely to cancel prior to a hearing. The Contract . VCS [Jake Burgess?] are trying to conflate parking in a car park to driving along a road in order to defend the indefensible. It is well known that "NO Stopping " cannot form a contract as it is prohibitory. VCS know that well as they lose time and again in Court when claiming it is contractual. By mixing up parking with driving they hope to deflect from the fact trying to claim that No Stopping is contractual is tantamount to perjury. No wonder mr Burgess doesn't want to appear in Court. Conflation also disguises the fact that while parking in a car park for a period of time can be interpreted as the acceptance of the contract that is not the case while driving down a road. The Defendant was going to the airport so it is ludicrous to suggest that driving by a No Stopping  sign is tacitly accepting  the  contract -especially as no contract is even being offered. And even if a motorist did not wish to be bound by the so called contract what could they do? Forfeit their flight and still have to stop their car to turn around? Put like that the whole scenario posed by Mr Burgess that the Defendant accepted the contract by driving past the sign is absolutely absurd and indefensible. I certainly would not want to appear in Court defending that statement either. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I will do the contract itself later.
    • Yes - ignore. Because of another MET victim today I looked at all our MET cases back to June 2014 ... yes, 10 years. They have never dared take a motorist to court and argue their case before a judge.  They have started the odd court case, but as a means of trying to intimidate the motorist into coughing up, when the motorist defended and refused to give in it was MET who bottled it and discontinued.
    • Unpaid wages should be pretty straightforward if you did the work. Don't be intimidated. You need only show you were due money, and did not get money.   The risk is that they have no money to pay you (and legal fees) - frankly a solicitor maybe be costing them more than your claim is for and I might have expected them to make a commercial decision to settle before this point regardless of the merits of the case.
    • Thanks so much FTMDave.  This is so much better   I'm still tempted to leave the blue section in is as if I lose it will at least save me a little bit of money.  But I get your point that it's pretty superfluous.   Thinking I'll get this in the post on Monday unless you think it's worth delaying?   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Studying while claiming JSA


Stressed150
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4469 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, could someone please advise me on what my position is with regards to studying while claiming JSA. My jobcentre seem to be extremely confused..... one person tells me that my study hours must be less then 16 hours per week, which they are, another tells me that my course must not be classified as full time regardless of hours of study, however, if it is classed as part time it must be less then 16 hours. My course is however, calssed as full time, although I only go in 3 days a week, and it is 15 hours...... can someone please advise further?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's unlikely that you will be eligible for JSA as the course is classed as full time. Remember, it's not just time spent in class that is counted it is also the amount of hours needed for studying, research, completing essays and other assignments, etc. A degree is full time but most students will spend only a fraction of their week in lectures and seminars the rest of the time they are supposed to be carrying out the work mentioned before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your response Aviva, I understand what you are saying, however, what difference would it make if my course was part time and I was studying for 15 hours? I'd still be doing the same amount of research and studying outside of classroom time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The course should be worked out on how many hours in total a week that you would be expected to do by whoever is running the course not the amount of hours you do.

 

So you should look at the amount of class time you have and the amount of study time they expect you to do. If you feel that this does not add up to a full time course ask them why it's been put down as such.

 

I work and am doing a course at the moment but I only have 3 hours of class time a week and am expected to do about 8 hours of personal study a week. So as they work out the amount of time needed is 11 hours a week it's classed as part time. I could study more or less hours than this but the course would still be classed as part time by the College.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just been to sign on and was told as i go to college ONE day a week they may not pay me??? At the very least i was told i could lose that days JSA..........

For goodness sake i am going to college to try and better myself and retrain as i have been out of the workplace for many years caring for my ill husband.........

 

So if the want to penalise me for one day i am guessing full time you will have to claim another benefit??

 

Looks like i will have to give up my course as i cannot afford to lose a days money :(

 

Good luck with your problem

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just been to sign on and was told as i go to college ONE day a week they may not pay me??? At the very least i was told i could lose that days JSA..........

For goodness sake i am going to college to try and better myself and retrain as i have been out of the workplace for many years caring for my ill husband.........

 

So if the want to penalise me for one day i am guessing full time you will have to claim another benefit??

 

Looks like i will have to give up my course as i cannot afford to lose a days money :(

 

Good luck with your problem

 

Surely the 16 hours rule would apply to you, dont just take the word of an individual at the job centre, they are often clueless and are unaware of the rules and regs. Check it further.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am investigating further.........good old Google.......

 

Seems unreasonable to not allow you to try and make finding a job easier by retraining.:???:

 

Eerr..this is the Job Centre we are talking about they operate purely on a 'computer says no' system.

 

I would be willing to do some sort of advanced IT training to help me with my career but of course I'd prob fall foul of their rules....I'd still obviously be looking for work but the Job Centre just can't understand that..dimwits !

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oe day should not make a diff at all!!!! Definitely do not take one persons advice, especially as the DWP have just undergone a massive recruitment campaign and have many new memebers of staff, the old lot don't know what they are talking about let alone the new ones....!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never mind the Jobcentre. Get in touch with the processing centre, as these are the people who make the decisions on your benefit and administer it, not the jobcentre.

 

I'd advise writing to them with this enquiry (specifiying that it is just an enquiry to equip you with the knowledge to plan what is best for you) and asking for a response in writing rather than over the telephone. That way, you have it on paper for future reference if there is any discepancy at a later date in regard to your own personal sitaution.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

A course is considered to be full-time if you would get 120 credits or more in a year. The number of hours is not the deciding factor for determining the eligibility of the course. However if you also want to work part-time not only does it need to be less than 16 hours, the rate of pay will also have an impact on other benefits such as Housing Benefit.

 

It would be best to contact the provider of your course directly about how many credits the course you are doing is worth, if for example you will only complete 2 units in a year and they are 40 credits each (towards a full qualification) then you should be able to claim JSA.

 

Hope that helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I was signing on I did a course that the Job Center recommended, I always assumed that it didnt affect my eligibilty for JSA...I worked prob many hours each woerk but mostly at home although did have to attend the actual college twice a week.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Years ago i was told that 4 hours a week would mean I was not entitled to sign on !! (evening class) and I was only wanting to sign on to show to my insurance company that I was not working for 6 weeks (between jobs) so that I could claim my mortgage repayments from them certainly didnt want any money so how mad was that.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Closing this thread as it is years old!

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4469 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...