Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • a CCJ does not 'expire' thus does not need any application to a court to 'extend it'. if a CCJ has not been enforced within 6yrs, then it is very unlikely any court would grant such should the claimant return to court, of which the defendant would be advised -( unless they have moved and not informed the court & the claimant such) .  
    • I contacted them when it happened. The caretaker came over, looked at it, and walked off with the tree chunks of mortar. Next morning, they had a roofer come over and enter our garden to inspect it. Friday they were supposed to speak with a scaffolding company. I had to bring up liability and potentially calling the council to report 'an unsafe structure' before they even got moving. They know all about the wedding, the preparations, our patio contractors etc. but their attitude doesn't instill me with confidence. My fear is it will end up being a legal matter which is why I posted here to hopefully receive some advice. As far as I can see, the roof is in a state of disrepair, even if it's just the mortar breaking lose due to the size and weight of the chunks - and even from ground level it's visibly clear that multiple pieces have fallen over time (though never this size so we haven't been able to identify the issue till now - we thought it was rubble left in the garden by the previous owner). Currently, we can't use 25% of our garden due to the risk of more falling mortar which is more than just an inconvenience, we can't proceed with our contractors, and at worst, it will run up in several thousand of extra expenses for us, if we have to find a wedding venue. Even if they do have it fixed in time, and we have to settle for renting a marquee and floor for the marquee and furniture and whatnot it will be additional costs only due to the neighbour's roof.
    • please create your OWN topic by hitting create or + in the top red banner  
    • It will be years before Banks would sell to a debt buyer.  Sometimes Banks will use external debt collectors to try to collect, but generally Banks don't take Court action.  So you could be looking at 3 to 6 years, before any dca owning debt looks to take any Court action. And it is not definite that this would happen. So no need to feel pressured at this stage. In the event you found yourself unemployed, you have time to engage with Banks to advise of your situation and ask for time to deal with the situation, find new employment. As long as you inform the Banks they will offer assistance they can. E.g offer payment holiday or accept reduced payment for period. What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. 
    • I'd get back to them tomorrow, and explain the circumstances, that you have a wedding reception, and just appeal to their better nature. Hopefully they will be able to move sooner rather than later, especially if you go in in person and speak to them, and show them the issue.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Discrimination due to a criminal conviction


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5341 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received a driving disqualification in April this year. I have now received my license back and its clean (i.e there are no points on it) but I am having major difficulties in obtaining a job on moving to a new area.

I have a Degree in Psychology as well as an HND in Business Management and have been applying for various roles within the NHS, CPS, Prison Service and the Council. However, I am not even getting interviewed for any positions and feel this could be due to the fact that I am disclosing on the application forms that I have a criminal conviciton.

Would a driving disqualification be classed as a criminal conviction and if so, do prospective employers have the right to decline me even an interview due to this?

I hope someone can help as I've now been out of work for over 2 months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Legally, discrimination can only be on certain specific grounds: age, sex, race, disability, religion or belief and sexual orientation.

 

Therefore, you can not be discriminated against because of the reason you mention.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

I received a 6month driving disqualification in relation to a driving offense. I feel it may prevent me getting employment within my chosen career as it is now classed as me having a criminal record.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was two speeding offences within the first 2 yrs of passing my test but due to various issues with the DVLA they offered me a ban and to receive my clean license back after the 6 months or to revoke it and for me to take the 6 points n do my test again. Not quite sure how I could take the points when I'd have a new license tho??? I opted for the first option, although I regret it now with me having so many difficulties obtaining insurance now.

 

I have just read some information posted by someone else saying that because the disqualification has now passed that the conviction will be classed as spent which means I do not have to disclose it on applications, unless obviously the form asks for spent and unspent convictions which most of them do which is something i guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may or it may not... In this current economic climate, employers have so much choice, they can afford to pass up people they would have happily taken on a couple of years back. But it is their right and privilege to do so, as long as they are not discriminating within the above given criteria.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there.

 

The absolute best place to contact is www.unlock.org.uk. They are a fantastic charitable organisation who help people turn their lives around after a criminal conviction.

 

They will give you advice and support and, if they don't know the answer to any question, they will find it out for you.

 

Join the forum or telephone them in the morning.

 

I hope it helps.

 

just to add.......Unlock often posts job advertisments on it's forum.....Organisations will contact them as some employers are keen to employ people with first hand experience ie Criminal Justice, Prison Service etc. Worth a try.

Edited by Button1
to add further info
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just read some information posted by someone else saying that because the disqualification has now passed that the conviction will be classed as spent which means I do not have to disclose it on applications, unless obviously the form asks for spent and unspent convictions which most of them do which is something i guess.

 

Whether you have to disclose spent convictions depends on whether the occupation is one which is exempt, not whether they ask. Exempt occupations are mostly ones involving working with children or vulnerable groups.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

???

I'd just put, if anything, i got banned for 2 speeding tickets??

What this has to do with any job, except where your driving, is beyond me!

 

There are hundreds of thousands of people who have more than 6 points on their license.

 

Really gobsmacked on this one!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The vast majority of driving offences are dealt with the Magistrates' Court. If you are banned under the totting up procedure, or receive an instant ban for say, speeding, you will not receive a criminal record as these are not arrestable offences. However, the more serious offences, such as death by dangerous driving etc will result in a criminal record.

Lived through bankruptcy to tell the tale! Worked in various industries and studied law at university. All advice is given in good faith only :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have been declaring that you have a criminal conviction. That is untrue and as such you may have been declined interview on the basis you lied about having a criminal conviction.

 

In a nutshell, you do NOT have a criminal conviction. You were banned from driving which is not a criminal conviction. You have no criminal record and thus there would have been a discrepancy when they checked and you would have been rejected on the basis of providing false information - albeit honestly!

 

I would either recontact the said jobs and point out your perfectly honest mistake or just move on and start applying again but do NOT say you have a criminal conviction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi simbatim,

 

JimmySpangle is correct in what he says.........I apologise, I didn't read your post correctly. Had it been for something like death by dangerous driving, that would have resulted in a criminal conviction but no, your's isn't.

 

I'm sorry I didn't read your post properly in the first place before I advised you to contact unlock.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...