Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Aktiv Kapital


boxer18
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5300 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have Aktiv Kapital chasing me on behalf of GE Capital. i I had a loan of them and at the end of the agreement i was told that i had missed one payment, i was fairly sure that i had not and told them to prove it and then it all went away. Now a couple of years later Aktiv pipe upasking for £140, I have put in a CCA request to Aktiv Kapital 10 days ago. However this morning i get a letter from Buchanan clark and wells solicitor sting that the have been instructed by Aktiv Kapital to recover the debt and havemade a formal denad for the money, and are threatening legal proceedings. do I just wait for the 12+2 days to go by and then send an account in dispute letter, also is there a letter that I can send to BCW.

 

and finally the BCW have offered a limited time special offer

 

Option 1: a you pay, we pay scheme with silver, gold, platinum and diamond repayment plans where I pay a set amount each month for 3 months then future payments are reduced by a percentage dependent of the scheme you have taken. I Cant see where the we pay bit is myself

 

Option 2: a stretch and settle plan where I pay six monthly payments of 10% of the current balance, and after 6 months its paid off, therefore a 40% discount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have Aktiv Kapital chasing me on behalf of GE Capital. i I had a loan of them and at the end of the agreement i was told that i had missed one payment, i was fairly sure that i had not and told them to prove it and then it all went away. Now a couple of years later Aktiv pipe upasking for £140, I have put in a CCA request to Aktiv Kapital 10 days ago. However this morning i get a letter from Buchanan clark and wells solicitor sting that the have been instructed by Aktiv Kapital to recover the debt and havemade a formal denad for the money, and are threatening legal proceedings. do I just wait for the 12+2 days to go by and then send an account in dispute letter, also is there a letter that I can send to BCW.

 

and finally the BCW have offered a limited time special offer

 

Option 1: a you pay, we pay scheme with silver, gold, platinum and diamond repayment plans where I pay a set amount each month for 3 months then future payments are reduced by a percentage dependent of the scheme you have taken. I Cant see where the we pay bit is myself

 

Option 2: a stretch and settle plan where I pay six monthly payments of 10% of the current balance, and after 6 months its paid off, therefore a 40% discount.

 

Do you have a copy of the letter you sent Aktiv and was it by recorded delivery, I'd be inclined to send a letter back to the solicitors stating that

 

"their client knows full well why payment has not been made, and until they prove the debt is actually owned and that a payment was missed they will not receive a penny. You feel sure a judge/court would see that you have reasonably asked for evidence of this missed payment and until you receive it would expect you not to pay a penny."

 

and enclose a copy of the original letter if possible....

 

Or something similar

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

send bcw the letter below

 

 

letter when solicitors are threatening with legal action whilst a company are in default of your request for your agreement.

 

 

Dear Sirs

 

I refer to your letter of XXXXX 2008, the content of which is noted. No debt to your client is acknowledged.

 

On (date) I made a formal request to your client pursuant to s.78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. They have failed to comply within the statutory time limit, or at all. It should not be necessary to have to remind solicitors that the provisions of s.78(6) now apply.

 

In the circumstances, your/your clients threat of legal action would appear to be a breach of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 and the Office of Fair Trading Guidance on Debt Collection. Should you or your client bring proceedings, they will be robustly defended, and the Court's attention drawn to the above statutory breaches . Furthermore, I reserve the right to bring the conduct of your client to the Court when the issue of costs is being considered.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cannot pass on the debt whilst it is in dispute !! - send this recorded to Buchanan Clarke & Wells..(they are a debt collector and not a solicitor) - http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/574-letter-when-account-has-been-passed-on-whilst-agreement-request-is-in-dispute

Link to post
Share on other sites

So BCW are not solicitors. I thought that they were by the langauge they were using in the letter i.e that they have been instructed by Aktiv Kapital to recover the debt. That make me feel less nervous about this. I will send BCW the recommended letter and se what comes of if. Mind you i did think it was a bit funny them offering special offer payment terms. Thanks for the information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mind you i did think it was a bit funny them offering special offer payment terms.

 

DCA's are not as generous as they seem, when they purchase a debt it's for pennies in the pound but still try to claim the full amount

No matter what discount they're offering they'll still make a decent profit on any payments they can blag from the unknowing

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] I asked them to wait whilst I got my Bank card :violin:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Information that may help if a CCA request is refused due to the lack of a signature . . http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?248863-Signature-demands-fight-back-possible-!&highlight=

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Option 1: a you pay, we pay scheme with silver, gold, platinum and diamond repayment plans where I pay a set amount each month for 3 months then future payments are reduced by a percentage dependent of the scheme you have taken. I Cant see where the we pay bit is myself

 

Option 2: a stretch and settle plan where I pay six monthly payments of 10% of the current balance, and after 6 months its paid off, therefore a 40% discount.

 

Arent you lucky? - BCW havent offered me such similar schemes :sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

With reference to this the account does not go into dispute until the 16th of October, therefore what do I do in the mean time with BCW do I ignore them, send them a CCA request, or is there something else that I can send them.

 

You can either wait it out or send them something like I suggested in post #2, I saw that you hadnt reached the 12+2 days when I suggested the contents of the letter, if nothing else its a stalling tactic which attempts to get them to respond in writing by which time it will have reached 12+2 days.

 

Edit: No need to send CCA to BCW as they have been instructed by Aktiv who you have CCA'd already and they should have passed that request up to GE Capital (confusing aint it :-))

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

The Saga continues, I have sent the Account in dispute letter to BCW by recorded delivery, which I sent on the 18th. However today I have received a Final Notice from BCW stating that unless I pay up they will start legal proceedings against me. I have still had nothing through from Aktiv Kapital reference the CCA. Is there Final warning letter that I can send BCW as they obviously dont understand or decided to ignore the account in dispute letter. Any advice greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, can you scan (making sure that any personal details and barcodes are not visible) the letter or copy it onto the forum. Would like to see exactly what they are threatening you with.

Beating the DCA's day by day

 

My fight:

NDR - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Bank of Scotland - CCA'd 12+2 passed

CFS - Win by Technical Knock-out!:lol:

HFC Bank - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Chantry Collections - CCA sent

 

Time flies like an arrow

Fruit flies like a banana :D

 

<---------- Have I given you top advice, have I made you laugh, click on the scales, it won't hurt you! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunatley I am unable to scan the letter at the moment but I will type what it says

 

We refer to previous correspondance regarding our clients Aktiv Kapital UK limited and regret to note that your debt, in the sum of £140.00 remains outstanding.

 

Since you have failed to notify us of any legitimate reason for non-payment we can only assume that you do not wish to settle this matter amicably.

 

Accordingly this letter should be accepted as a final notice that unless payment is made immediatley, we shall seek to commence legal proceedings against you, with the payment of interest and costs in addition to the principle sum being sought.

 

The rest of the letter basically gives contant info. Hope that enough

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh its the empty threat letter. Notice that they say "we shall seek to commence legal proceedings..."

 

If they had any legal right to commence legal proceedings against you they wouldn't need to seek them.

Beating the DCA's day by day

 

My fight:

NDR - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Bank of Scotland - CCA'd 12+2 passed

CFS - Win by Technical Knock-out!:lol:

HFC Bank - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Chantry Collections - CCA sent

 

Time flies like an arrow

Fruit flies like a banana :D

 

<---------- Have I given you top advice, have I made you laugh, click on the scales, it won't hurt you! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunatley I am unable to scan the letter at the moment but I will type what it says

 

We refer to previous correspondance regarding our clients Aktiv Kapital UK limited and regret to note that your debt, in the sum of £140.00 remains outstanding.

 

Since you have failed to notify us of any legitimate reason for non-payment we can only assume that you do not wish to settle this matter amicably.

 

Accordingly this letter should be accepted as a final notice that unless payment is made immediatley, we shall seek to commence legal proceedings against you, with the payment of interest and costs in addition to the principle sum being sought.

 

The rest of the letter basically gives contant info. Hope that enough

 

 

 

I thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xxxx where the threat of court action was made.

 

It should be noted and I'm sure you are aware, there is a perfectly valid reason why payment has not been made in that there is a dispute ongoing with Aktiv Kapital and until that dispute is settled there is no obligation on me to furnish payment at all until this debt is proven to be owed and equally importantly proven to be owed to your client.

 

I note your threat of court action and would advise that I would rely on the CPR protocols to obtain a copy of my credit agreement, this being the same credit agreement that your client Aktiv Kapital are in default of sending me, prior to any court hearing.

 

Something along the lines above perhaps...

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That makes me feel a bit better, however BCW seemed to have completely ignored the account in dispute letter that I sent them. It seems obvious that Aktiv Kapital can't supply the requested CCA and gave passed it on to BCW, which they shouldn't have done. I just want to stop these threats by BCW and issue a few of my own, and if required report them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably just crossed in the post tbh. Send the note the Shadow suggested recorded delivery.

Beating the DCA's day by day

 

My fight:

NDR - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Bank of Scotland - CCA'd 12+2 passed

CFS - Win by Technical Knock-out!:lol:

HFC Bank - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Chantry Collections - CCA sent

 

Time flies like an arrow

Fruit flies like a banana :D

 

<---------- Have I given you top advice, have I made you laugh, click on the scales, it won't hurt you! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

An update on what happening. I have now received from AK the documentation from the CCA request and all the prescribed terms appear to be on it so it looks valid. However on the statement for the account i have noticed that the outstanding debt is made up of charges for letters. At the start of the loan in 2003 a couple of payments were recalled by the bank but were later paid, and all of the payments were completed and the full loan amount paid off. Now is there anything I can do about the charges for the letters, I know the amount I owe isn't massive but I do not see why I should pay for £20 for a letter. Any advice would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, it is GE Capital who are charging me for the letters £140 worth of them, all dating back to 2003, I know you were able to claim back charges from the banks etc, but is there anything I can do in this case.

Edited by boxer18
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anybody help me with this please, I really want to get this sorted, does anyone know if I can do anything about these charges for the letters, as I said the loan was fully paid off and Its just the charges for the letters that they are chasing, any advice would be appreciated, Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...