Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Under the consumer rights act 2015, if a defect manifests itself within 30 days and you have a right to return the vehicle for a full refund. If any defect manifests itself within the first six months of ownership then you have a right to return the vehicle for a full refund subject to the retailers right to carry out a repair. If the retailer declines to repair or if the repair fails then you have the right to return. The problem here is that you have to assert their right. It's a bit ridiculous – but you have to do let them know preferably in writing that you are asserting your rights under the consumer rights act either the 30 day right or the six month right. I suppose that you haven't done this – which would be quite understandable because most people don't know that these rights exist and that they are subject to these conditions – the condition that the right must be inserted. It is frankly ridiculous. The dealers know it and we have lots of instances of this company delaying appointments et cetera and our strong suspicion is that they are simply trying to run their customers out of time. On the basis that you haven't asserted your rights, we now have to look to ordinary contract law. You are entitled to purchase a vehicle which is of satisfactory condition and which remains that way for a reasonable period of time. Clearly it is in satisfactory. They are blaming you. Has your independent inspection identified the reason for the defect? This will be important because as you have seen BMW are already saying it is down to your driving and you are going to have to produce evidence that it wasn't down to your driving and the you drove it absolutely reasonably and it was simply the condition of the car. Have you been without the car for any period of time. Is it driveable now? If the car was off the road for a substantial amount of time and was still off the road then you would be able to argue that this is a fundamental breach of contract and that you have been deprived of substantially the whole benefit of the contract and therefore you will be entitled to treat the contract as breached by Big Motoring World and insist on cancelling the contract. It may be that you will eventually be obliged to keep the car but have the repairs paid for. Have you had any quotations for the work that needs doing? I asked you questions about the MOT – but you haven't responded.
    • A 'violent left wing mob', comprised of a chap in a red hoody with a damp polystyrene coffee cup and a bit of wet cement, gets nowhere near cowering frightened farage some distance away on top of his double decker bus .. as farages security and support seem to film the incident grinning     Farage bravely flinches, grimaces and seems to almost burst into tears as the 'objects managed to travel a part of the way toward his position on top of his bus. His reactions honed by having a bit of milk splash him at a prior incident allow him to swiftly fall into a protective cower and grimace .. .. Sometime after, once the mob of 1 had been safely bundled away, farage apparently wipes his eyes of tears, and rising from his cowed and frightened pose, bravely shouts “I will not be bullied or cowed by a violent left-wing mob who hate our country.” .. however few they may comprise of.   https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/nigel-farage-cement-barnsley-reform-uk-b2560501.html  
    • According to Parkopedia parking is limited to two hours.  I don't know how accurate this is though. What were you doing there for four hours?
    • no its friday 21st by 4pm if you'd done it properly and read the sticky in post 2 it clearly says: ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total)  if your defence filing date falls on a W/End, you must file by friday @4PM  
    • Have had a read up just to double check last day to file defence is 24 June (claim form date is 22 May)
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

£400 for clamp removal..........


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5388 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hellp people

 

I really hope someone will be able to help me here and give some good advice

 

I am writing this on behalf of a friend who was charged £400 yesterday for the removal of a clamp on his car

 

My friend was in Chester to get some road tax on his car and their was nowhere to park. He saw a bit of derelict land so put his car their while he went to get his road tax. He returned less than an hour later to find a clamp on his car and note on the window.

 

He phoned up the number he had been given and said he would pay the £90 to get it removed (even though he thought this was a bit steep).

 

The person on the phone then said it was actually £150 as it states in the smallprint. He then turned round to my mate and said as their was a tow truck already on the way that would cost him another £250 hence leaving the bill at £400. He paid all this to get the clamp removed and they would only accept cash.

 

He has got a reciept for this with the persons name on but i must add at no point did a tow truck arrive and £150 just to remove a clamp seems to be excessive at the best of times.

 

Is their anything he can do to get his money back or has he just basically thrown it away.

 

Thanks for your time in reading this and hopefully be able to give me some advice please

Andy...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well it depends ... firstly you're going to have to get some photos of the signs and also the receipt too.

 

If your friend parked in front of a sign saying "If you park here without tax you'll be clamped" then there's not much you can do .. if on the otherhand the signs were not visible then that's different!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. Well i haven't got it obviously but i can get it. I will scan it on when i get it hopefully in the next couple of days. Please bear with me on this one then. will post when i get it

Andy...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look through the clamping guide in the stickies section to gain some background.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest lipupfatty
Hellp people

 

I really hope someone will be able to help me here and give some good advice

 

I am writing this on behalf of a friend who was charged £400 yesterday for the removal of a clamp on his car

 

My friend was in Chester to get some road tax on his car and their was nowhere to park. He saw a bit of derelict land so put his car their while he went to get his road tax. He returned less than an hour later to find a clamp on his car and note on the window.

 

He phoned up the number he had been given and said he would pay the £90 to get it removed (even though he thought this was a bit steep).

 

The person on the phone then said it was actually £150 as it states in the smallprint. He then turned round to my mate and said as their was a tow truck already on the way that would cost him another £250 hence leaving the bill at £400. He paid all this to get the clamp removed and they would only accept cash.

 

He has got a reciept for this with the persons name on but i must add at no point did a tow truck arrive and £150 just to remove a clamp seems to be excessive at the best of times.

 

Is their anything he can do to get his money back or has he just basically thrown it away.

 

Thanks for your time in reading this and hopefully be able to give me some advice please

 

the clampers canot charge you for clamp relese fee and towing charge

one or the other

Link to post
Share on other sites

the clampers canot charge you for clamp relese fee and towing charge

one or the other

 

Why can't they? There's nothing stopping the clampers putting a clamp on all four wheels and then towing it and expecting to be paid for the service! Anything goes ... just waiting for this government to wake up and actually do something about it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

a certain female is now serving four years for doing just that

 

Indeed. There are two clamping firms with employess given long sentences for blackmail, for behaviour which on the face off it is indistguishable from every other clamping company we see on this forum. Yet the police usually claim it's a civil matter despite these apparent Crown Court precedents.

 

Perhaps we needs someone suitably equipped to bring a judicial review along the Debbie Purdy lines to force the CPS/Police to reveal guidelines on what they consider prosecutable conduct with respect to blackmail. (The same for trading standards on what is an aggressive practice under the CPRs: any act of clamping would appear on the face of it a very serious offence of aggressive practice which always warrants prosecution.)

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good idea. Any judicial review should also examine whether it is truly in the public interest to prosecute their victims for "criminal damage" where the victims have responded to such blackmail and extortion by cutting off the clamp (no reasonable alternative, given the tendency of cowboy clampers to ignore CCJs).

 

Indeed. There are two clamping firms with employess given long sentences for blackmail, for behaviour which on the face off it is indistguishable from every other clamping company we see on this forum. Yet the police usually claim it's a civil matter despite these apparent Crown Court precedents.

 

Perhaps we needs someone suitably equipped to bring a judicial review along the Debbie Purdy lines to force the CPS/Police to reveal guidelines on what they consider prosecutable conduct with respect to blackmail. (The same for trading standards on what is an aggressive practice under the CPRs: any act of clamping would appear on the face of it a very serious offence of aggressive practice which always warrants prosecution.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup. :)

 

There would arguably be a defence to a charge of criminal damage, by arguing that you honestly believed that you had a "lawful excuse" under section 5 of the Criminal Damage Act 1971.

Criminal Damage Act 1971 (1971 c 48)

 

In practice, prosecution in such a case is relatively unlikely, unless the police are actively colluding with the clampers. Ironically, any fine imposed would probably be much less than £400.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the clampers canot charge you for clamp relese fee and towing charge

one or the other

 

Why not? Most of the signs I've seen say they will, and even if it's not technically allowed, if you said you were willing to pay the release fee but not the towing cancellation charge, they'd probably just say suit yourself, and tow your car away.

 

They are certainly not reasonable people!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under case law the release fee is the only part you have to pay.

 

Clamping and Towing under the PSI act are licensable activity in the category "vehicle immobilisation". They are both examples of distress feasant and I would argue that the two acts would be looked on as the same thing by a court. One release fee should be sufficient.

 

IMV If they insisted on you paying extra charges on top of the release fee and refused to release your car you would have a very good case for hitting them with court action. A judge would take a very dim view of the failure to release when an offer to pay has been made. Remember that case law carries equal weight to statute law.

 

On a more practical note - they can't tow your car if you are sitting in it. I would at this point involve the police, indicate that you've offered to pay the release fee and they have refused. IMV in attempting to sting you for more dosh, they breach the rules for clamping and commit extortion.

 

If the police show and collude with the clampers by threatening you with arrest for breach of the peace then I would be naming the force involved in court action. You would certainly be within your rights why they aren't arresting the clampers when you have offered to pay.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hellp people

 

I really hope someone will be able to help me here and give some good advice

 

I am writing this on behalf of a friend who was charged £400 yesterday for the removal of a clamp on his car

 

My friend was in Chester to get some road tax on his car and their was nowhere to park. He saw a bit of derelict land so put his car their while he went to get his road tax. He returned less than an hour later to find a clamp on his car and note on the window.

 

He phoned up the number he had been given and said he would pay the £90 to get it removed (even though he thought this was a bit steep).

 

The person on the phone then said it was actually £150 as it states in the smallprint. He then turned round to my mate and said as their was a tow truck already on the way that would cost him another £250 hence leaving the bill at £400. He paid all this to get the clamp removed and they would only accept cash.

 

He has got a reciept for this with the persons name on but i must add at no point did a tow truck arrive and £150 just to remove a clamp seems to be excessive at the best of times.

 

Is their anything he can do to get his money back or has he just basically thrown it away.

 

Thanks for your time in reading this and hopefully be able to give me some advice please

 

 

''' Hi Mate,

 

This is some advice for you and for the other readers.

 

From my personal experience...

 

I was clamped in London approx 2 weeks ago, the clamper demanded £300 plus.

 

What i did when he went away.

 

Got a hammer and broke off the clamp , snapped it off and took the clamp with me to teach them a lesson that not to mess.

 

No i keep a cordless grinder, if needed by me or any of my freinds they can call me i will come and grind the clamp off.

 

Advice: do not negotiate with the clamper, do not talk with them as then they will stick around thinking you are going to pay them. Just ignore them when they go grind the clamp off.

 

But even if they do not go grind it off whilst they are their, they can not physically touch you as they will get done for harrasment.

 

If they try telling you that it is criminal damage you are causing, they are wrong and tell them that they broke the law by 'tresspassing on to your vehicle' also caused damage to your wheel by tightening the wheel clamp.

 

Every case that has gone into court for vehicle clamping the clampers have lost out and had to pay out to the victims.

 

These clampers can not touch your property as that is an offense.

 

So if they do you just grind the clamp off!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

''' Hi Mate,

 

This is some advice for you and for the other readers.

 

From my personal experience...

 

I was clamped in London approx 2 weeks ago, the clamper demanded £300 plus.

 

What i did when he went away.

 

Got a hammer and broke off the clamp , snapped it off and took the clamp with me to teach them a lesson that not to mess.

 

Now i keep a cordless grinder, if needed by me or any of my freinds they can call me i will come and grind the clamp off.

 

Advice: do not negotiate with the clamper, do not talk with them as then they will stick around thinking you are going to pay them. Just ignore them when they go grind the clamp off.

 

But even if they do not go grind it off whilst they are their, they can not physically touch you as they will get done for harrasment.

 

If they try telling you that it is criminal damage you are causing, they are wrong and tell them that they broke the law by 'tresspassing on to your vehicle' also caused damage to your wheel by tightening the wheel clamp.

 

Every case that has gone into court for vehicle clamping the clampers have lost out and had to pay out to the victims.

 

These clampers can not touch your property as that is an offense.

 

So if they do you just grind the clamp off!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's hard to see how it could be reasonable force to tow a car away simply because a fee/bribe was not paid to prevent it.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Every case that has gone into court for vehicle clamping the clampers have lost out and had to pay out to the victims.

 

These clampers can not touch your property as that is an offense.

 

So if they do you just grind the clamp off!!!!

Are you referring to cases of criminal damage or cases where clampers were taken to court for the act of clamping?

 

If it's the latter then you are in-correct as Arthur vs Anker and Vine vs Waltham Forrest will bear out. If you're in Scotland then you would be correct as the courts have ruled that clamping amounts to extortion (Black vs Carmichael).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...