Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm trying to unravel this – but I get the impression that there was no contract between you and EVRi and that you didn't even choose them but instead you decided use some third party parcel broker in the USA which organised the delivery. Is this correct? EVRi came into the picture because they would then eventually selected for part of the journey although you had no knowledge that it might be them and I suppose it didn't really matter as long as the item got to you. Secondly, I really don't understand the journey which this item made. You bought the item from somebody in the USA. They then were meant to dispatch it to you to another address in the USA but for some reason or other it came to the UK and then into the hands of EVRi at which point it was lost or stolen. More confusion here because you now tell us that EVRi marked it as being out for delivery but it was never delivered. This suggests that it was going to be delivered to a UK address but earlier on you said that it was going to be delivered to USA address. I think you need to look at the story. Maybe show it to a friend of yours who is not particularly where the details and ask them if they can make head or tail of it and then come back to us with clarification so that we fully understand. Also, I think we'd like to know what the item is, how was it declared, what was the value which was declared. You said it was a valuable item because it was rare and collectable. I gather from this that it is non-fungible. We need to understand more about this. Was an insurance policy purchased to cover it during the delivery process. I understand that this rare and collectable item be valued at £200. Have evidence this value. This could become very important. Also you have given is no idea when this happened. We need to understand the full timescale. There are a number of possibilities here including the possibility of the contract action against EVRi on the basis of your third party rights or an action for negligence but we need to know far more and we need to get a story that makes sense.   Finally, I understand that you have sent the letter of claim. What did it say? How much time did you give them? What did you expect to happen as a result of the letter of claim? Whatever the answers to those questions might be, clearly you had no idea how to proceed after having sent such a letter. A letter of claim is meant to be a serious threat of some legal action if some condition which you have stipulated is not complied with. You set a deadline for compliance and at the end of that deadline you issue the court action. Clearly you are not in a position to do that so your letter of claim is a bluff and undermines your credibility and it will find its way into the EVRi wastepaper basket – if it's not there already.  
    • Good morning. I just wanted to check something please. The other side have moved slightly and negotiated a full and final offer price to end this matter. I am happy with this. However, I want to make sure this is the end of the matter and am emailing the following over to them prior to payment. Is this enough to ensure they can come back for nothing else? Thanks -------------------------------------------------- Dear Sir.   With regards your last email below.   I am pleased to agree to the full and final settlement figure given below.   Can you confirm this payment will be in full and final payment with no further claim to be brought against me in this matter?   Best regards
    • 100% sure I didn't receive it, that why my first post is with the £100 letter.
    • Engine, the technology business Starling Bank was built on, has been busy launching banks around the world, from Romania to Australia.View the full article
    • use this your WS and inc this as an exhibit off to bed now 3 nights been up till 4am aurora watching wont be on too early as it's lambing season out herding with the dog. your WS main thrust is the debt would now be SB'd , the DN was filed xxxyrs+months after it should have been thus unlawfully extending  SB date to infinity. highlight their admittance regarding errors at that time period in your 'redetermination'  paragraph. agreements unreadable. would have already been written off due to SLC age write off criteria has they not issued the claim to stop the SB clock when they had no paperwork to prove their case in the 1st place. never earned over threshold. dx       Erudio - stopped sending email deferments won at FOS DRN-4141462.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can they put a charge notice on my house?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5374 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI All,

 

This is my 1st thread so very new to this great site.

 

I have had a letter from Mercantile Data Bureau saying i owe 13K from an old Abbey dept 2+ years ago, i don't know how they found out where i live (Maybe some one can tell me how they do this?) what should be my next step they are saying they are profiling me to find out if i am a home owner etc.

 

My questions are

 

1. What sould my responce be?

2. How did they find me?

3. Can they put a charge order on my house for the dept (it was an unsecured loan)

 

Please help as this is playing on my mind

 

Nickfrombristol:sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

first thing is to send a letter asking them to prove you owe the money

second they probably found you on the voting list

they certainly cant put a charge on your house ONLY a court can do this and you are a long long way from court yet

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/581-cca-request-letter

link here enclose £1.00 p.o. DO NOT SIGN LETTER just print name

You could try this prove it letter first, wait for a response, then send the CCA request. Make them work to prove the debt.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just got a letter saying i owe 13k from 2yrs back, the dept is to the Abbey and the collection agency is Mercantile Data Bureau.

This is the first letter i have got after 2yrs from anyone regarding this dept.

 

Are they just sending letters out on the off chance i will respond or are they certain i live there, i am on the voting register but have been at past properties aswell.

 

Do i just phone and say not known at this address or what do i do?

 

nickfrombristol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I take it the letter was addressed to you, what was the debt.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two threads merged.

 

nickfrombristol,

 

Please stick to this thread on this subject.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

In short yes!

 

They can put a charge on your house, they would need to take you to court first of all to do so. For a debt of 13K I would be very carefull because this is the kind of balance a Debt Collector would want to get secured upon your home.

 

Many Debt Collectors will enforce Judgement via a charging order regardless of whether you are paying or not. This secures their interest, also because the debt was taken out after 2006 they are within their rights to apply post judgement interest.

 

You could CCA them, however because the debit is only two years old there is a good chance they will be able to provide an agreement and enforce the debt.

 

They will have tracked your adress using your Experian file most likely which will link from your old address to your new one. They are entitled to trace you provided they do not break the law in doing so.

 

It is a simple matter to see if you own your own home, they will simply do a land registry search of your address which will say who the proprietor of the property is.

 

My advice to you would be to acknowledge the debt and come to an affordable monthly payment plan with them. You may be lucky and they may not have the agreement but this will antigonise them. You have admitted to the debt in your first posting.

 

On the same subject do not take any **** from them, make sure you pay what you can afford and provide them with an income and expenditure form. If they reject your offer of payment then they will most likely get a charging order against you.

 

I know this is not what you were wanting to hear, but I am just being honest. There are far to many people on this forum who have ended up with Bailiffs at their door because they boycotted their debts on the advice of somebody in this forum.

 

It would be foolhardy for you to defend any claim on the advice of a total stranger in a web forum. If you know you owe them the money fpay it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just got a letter saying i owe 13k from 2yrs back, the dept is to the Abbey and the collection agency is Mercantile Data Bureau.

This is the first letter i have got after 2yrs from anyone regarding this dept.

 

Are they just sending letters out on the off chance i will respond or are they certain i live there, i am on the voting register but have been at past properties aswell.

 

Do i just phone and say not known at this address or what do i do?

 

nickfrombristol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you owe this money?

Have you ever had an account with abbey?

If not, then they are on a fishing trip sending out threatogrammes to every one with the same name as you.

If you don't owe them this debt, then I would simply file the letter for future reference and simply ignore it, NEVER PHONE THEM, if you do not owe them this money and you make contact disputing it they will bombard you with empty threats, thinking they have got the right person.

 

Ignore it and wait to see if they send anything else, then we can go from there.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think I'd just wait and see what I got next from them.

Have you checked your credit file with someone like experian if not I certainly would just to make sure they've not put anything on your file?

DG

I have no legal training my knowledge comes from my personal life experiences

Please help keep the forum alive by making a donation

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with f dcas as he says ignore bigkacker asking for a cca is your right and whether or not this antagonises them is irrelevant, mostly they will supply you with a copy. whether or not it is enforceable is the next step in take. you can roll over, pay and every month they will ask for more and more until they are bleeding you dry, you are better fighting them at this stage than later.

as bigkacker says Many Debt Collectors will enforce Judgement via a charging order regardless of whether you are paying or not. This secures their interest, also because the debt was taken out after 2006 they are within their rights to apply post judgement interest.

and yes post judgement interest is sometimes allowed but not before judgement...if you read around these threads many people here have taken the advice of site and have come out much better off than just acknowledging and paying

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you scan and post the letter they sent, removing all of your details and anything that will Id you to them, Ref. No's, bar codes etc

This lot are well known for phishing for information.

Was it signed by a 'Mark Davies'??

 

According to companies house, this company was called Mercantile Debt Management Ltd but dissolved in 2006.

 

If you think you owe the debt, then as DG says, have a look at your CRF, but be warned, doing this may start a barrage of other DCA's jumping on the bandwagon. However it will tell you whether or not this outfit has placed a mark on your CRF.

 

If your CRF isn't important to you, and lets be honest why would it be? Then checking it will be of no real benefit, just file their letter and wait their next move..

 

 

Boo;)

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...