Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ParkForce - UK Parking Enforcement Agency Ticket - Help!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5176 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received a parking ticket from Parkforce - The UK Parking Enforcement Agancy for parking in Tunbridge Wells a little under 2 weeks ago. I was trying to get into the legitimate car park, but it was blocked by a lorry and the guy at the kiosk said "dont worry love, park on the road here and I will tell the warden that you could not park in my car park and had to park on the street - you wont get a fine" so, of course I parked and vowed to be no more than an hour. I was 35 minutes, and had received the parking ticket 4 minutes after i had left the vehicle!! There was no one around to ask about this when I had returned to the car, so I drove off. The permit, was literally shoved under my wiperblade, not stuck to the window. They are now asking for £60 if i do not pay by tomorrow, then it will go to £85. If I then do not pay, it will go to £135 and will go to a civil enforcement agency.

 

I have read lots over various forums to say that Parkforce should not be paid, and that people were just ignoring it, but thats it, no one ever posts any outcomes... So what should I do...? Shall I pay now, to avoid inevitable charges later, or ignore and ride it out...? Can anyone give me any advice...? Has anyone out there, had the bayliffs round, or does it just get ignored...? If Martin Lewis is to be beleived, I should not pay and then I will get no more than 5-6 scary leters, then it will all just disappear.... I wanted to see if anyone has taken this route and won....

 

 

Many many thanks in advance,

 

A very stressed out ConfusionGirl...

 

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

When the letters dry up, it's some weeks since it all started, so nobody bothers logging back on, finding their thread and then posting the exciting news they have had no more letters.

 

Ignore everything - we know Parkfarce well.

 

They are now asking for £60 if i do not pay by tomorrow, then it will go to £85. If I then do not pay, it will go to £135 and will go to a civil enforcement agency.

 

Shall I pay now, to avoid inevitable charges later

 

You're not getting your head around the [problem]. The 'increases' are arbitrary - they are random figures plucked out of the air in an attempt to get you to pay up because you fear they will spiral out of control.

 

I'm guessing a 'civil enforcement agency' is a hilarious name for a powerless debt collection company. So look forward to some fancy new letters from them before they give up.

 

This is a mail [problem].

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

So having researched on lots of forums, with lots of posts from different people all saying the same thing (including Martin Lewis), I can't imagine you'll beleive me either :D

 

You seem to want 100% guarantee, which is impossible. At some point you are going to have to use your own judgement

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore everything. they send you

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No... Of course not... All I am saying is that every post I have read that directly relates to Parkforce (only about 6 od so) says that people have been advised to ignore the notices, letters etc... No one ever says that they got away with it! What I was asking, was if I am going to end up paying anyway, shall i just save myself the stress of actual real life bayliffs at my door...????? There are no outcomes, only people saying that they received a notice, and that they think they will ignore it... To be honest, given the comments of Al27, I am probably just going to ride it out, and then whatever the outcome I will post feedback... I'm useful like that.

 

PS: I did not actually speak with Martin Lewis regarding my specific parking ticket, we only discussed private tickets in general. :D

 

Thank you Mr Browne for taking time out of your day to give such an informative comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When the letters dry up, it's some weeks since it all started, so nobody bothers logging back on, finding their thread and then posting the exciting news they have had no more letters.

 

Ignore everything - we know Parkfarce well.

 

 

 

 

 

You're not getting your head around the [problem]. The 'increases' are arbitrary - they are random figures plucked out of the air in an attempt to get you to pay up because you fear they will spiral out of control.

 

I'm guessing a 'civil enforcement agency' is a hilarious name for a powerless debt collection company. So look forward to some fancy new letters from them before they give up.

 

This is a mail [problem].

Thank you for this... and for replying so quickly... I will ignore, and see what happens!

 

Thanks again...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are 310 parkforce threads/posts from just CAG alone:

 

site:consumeractiongroup.co.uk Parkforce - Google Search

 

I haven't read them all, but I very much doubt there is one that mentions being taken to court or bailiffs visiting.

Thank you for this... do appreciate it... I can have a goood old read of it all now, cant think of a better way to spend company time!

 

Really, Thank you...

 

CG

Link to post
Share on other sites

and just to further un-confuse you.

 

it's a civil matter parking in a private carpark, it's not criminal, so bailiffs will never be involved.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had two Penalty/Parking Charge Notices from Parkforce, both nearly two years ago and neither amounted to anything.

 

Firstly don't contact them at all, they will get your details from the DVLA and they will send you a letter advising you as the registered keeper that you are responsible which is nonesense.

 

I replied in my own words after reading the template letters above stating they needed to contact the driver not the registered keeper, if you decide to reply never give them your phone number or email address and never telephone them, keep all correspondance to letters, its more expensive and time consuming for them and they soon get fed up.

 

A few weeks after you reply you will receive another letter advising you the charge has increased and you must pay or they will involve a debt recovery agent.

 

I replied again stating the same as my original reply and even enclosed a copy of my original reply.

 

After my second reply to them, they then for some unknown reason sent me a letter saying my appeal had been rejected and i owed them the original amount which was £80, i wrote again because i was enjoying it by this time advising them that they were getting confused as i hadn't appealed against anything.

 

A few weeks later came the debt recovery agent letter, again using my own version of the template letters i wrote advising them that the alleged fine was in dispute and not to contact me again or i would treat it as harrassment, they replied stating they had handed the case back to Parkforce and that was the last i heard from them.

 

Then Parkforce tried again with another couple of letters a few months apart which i completely ignored and that seems to be the end of it.

 

I havn't heard anything for a year, if you want a bit of fun write to them like i did, i enjoyed compiling my own versions of the template letters and getting their threatening replies knowing they were talking nonesense and once i got fed up of replying i just stopped.

 

If you don't want to get involved writing to them just send them the one letter telling them to contact the driver and leave it at that.

 

Just remember, no telephone calls or they will harrass you.

Edited by joe5
Link to post
Share on other sites

writing letters back to these clowns should only be done by people confident enough to deal with them.

They advice of no contact still stands.

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much Joe5... That makes me feel much better about it all... I will ignore and maybe write a letter if it gets a bit much...

 

Thanks again, really appreciate it...

 

CG

x

If you do decide to write to the PPC, expect even more threatening letters as they will believe you are wavering. As I said letters should only be sent by people confident enough to deal with the extra letters the ppc send in return.

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is really no stress when you understand the process, the whole idea is to send you scary letters to try and frighten you into paying.

Even more people would ignore them if they just sent a. 'please, pretty please pay us' letter.

Stay strong

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Stay strong

regards

 

 

Hi Guys.... Me again.... I am trying to 'Stay Strong!!' This has now been going on for a little while and I thought I had got away with it! However this morning I have had a letter from Debt Recovery Plus Ltd. They have quoted all of the usual 'legal recovery may commence' etc, but I just wanted to get your thoughts... Shall I write to them and state that I was not the driver and blatently lie?

or Shall I just continue to ignore?

 

I am presuming this is usual for them, but it just all get me a bit shakey...

To be honest, I am broke, so they will have to take me to court if they want their money that bad!!

 

Thanks again for all of your advice, just looking for a little reassurance now... :confused:

 

C

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

"To be honest, I am broke, so they will have to take me to court if they want their money that bad!!"

Its not "their money" its "your money"

Would you pay me if i sent you a letter demanding "your money"?

No you would'nt!

Carry on ignoring.

Merry Christmas.

hello all:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys.... Me again.... I am trying to 'Stay Strong!!' This has now been going on for a little while and I thought I had got away with it! However this morning I have had a letter from Debt Recovery Plus Ltd. They have quoted all of the usual 'legal recovery may commence' etc, but I just wanted to get your thoughts... Shall I write to them and state that I was not the driver and blatently lie?

or Shall I just continue to ignore?

 

I am presuming this is usual for them, but it just all get me a bit shakey...

To be honest, I am broke, so they will have to take me to court if they want their money that bad!!

 

Thanks again for all of your advice, just looking for a little reassurance now... :confused:

 

C

xx

 

 

Never ever lie. Lies have a habit of coming back and biting you.;)

 

If you continue to ignore them, eventually they will give up. Please trust all the advice you have been getting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I could be wrong, but by calling this private company "The UK Parking Enforcement Agency" it may lead some people into believing that this is a government department/quango, just like the "Food Standards Agency" ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Either do nothing as most people on here suggest or write to the debt recovery company stating the debt is in dispute with Parkforce, there is a template somewhere on here for that letter.

 

I actually wrote disputing the debt and that was the last letter i got from the debt recovery agent other than one stating they had handed the debt back to parkforce, Parkforce then tried another couple of times which i just ignored as i was fed up by then and that was it, but just remember only a court can order you to pay money and nobody in this country to my knowlege has ever been taken to court for non payment of a private parking charge.

Edited by joe5
Link to post
Share on other sites

I could be wrong, but by calling this private company "The UK Parking Enforcement Agency" it may lead some people into believing that this is a government department/quango, just like the "Food Standards Agency" ?

 

Well that's the purpose, yes! Doesn't break any laws though as far as I know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...