Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Invalid Default Notices


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4966 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We get blinkered by our own narrow objectives into not seeing the overall picture.

 

By and large i think the judges get things right- many of the cases i see on these forums being lost are either on spurious challenges or are improperly prepared or argued. I’m not blaming the individuals concerned since they often have no other choice, but i don’t believe that all that many judges are “bent” or “stupid”, as some try to make out when a case is lost - they can only make decisions based on what is put before them,

 

I am all for challenging creditors who get things wrong – they live by the sword therefore must expect to die by the sword, but we can’t SERIOUSLY expect to have the letter of the law applied to every last word, comma , full stop or hyphen in a document, and to my mind the absence of such things as underlining of words in a document or the fact that a set of words was in capital text rather than underlined or vice versa is indeed (unless taken in concert with other errors or omissions) clearly not to the detriment of the recipient and looking as i always try to do from both sides of the fence – clearly “loophole seeking”

 

To encourage others to run these “trite” defences is easy from the comfort of ones armchair- after all it is not we who then end up dry mouthed in front of the judge in the sudden realisation of just how stupid the argument sounds when spoken in the calm and quiet of his courtroom.

 

All i am saying is that often we are guilty of not stopping and looking at the arguments and issues from both sides of the fence .

 

Very well put DD.

 

A good argument and I would like to make it clear that I had no intention of encouraging anyone to argue a case on underlining alone. But I do believe it is an issue for consideration to add to other creditor errors to prove negligence. In fact the whole paragraph has been missing from some DN's and no one has picked it up.

 

However, you said it yourself, Judges can only make decisions based on what is put before them.

 

Its a bit like the 'Credit Limit' or 'Approved Limit' argument. Some argue that it means the same thing and some claim unenforceabilty as its not as stated in the regulations.

 

Thanks for the debate, I don't want to continue it though, as you are quite correct it is not a strong point and I would be in danger of misleading newcomers if I do.

 

Pedross

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

 

By and large i think the judges get things right- many of the cases i see on these forums being lost are either on spurious challenges or are improperly prepared or argued. I’m not blaming the individuals concerned since they often have no other choice, but i don’t believe that all that many judges are “bent” or “stupid”, as some try to make out when a case is lost - they can only make decisions based on what is put before them,

 

 

To encourage others to run these “trite” defences is easy from the comfort of ones armchair- after all it is not we who then end up dry mouthed in front of the judge in the sudden realisation of just how stupid the argument sounds when spoken in the calm and quiet of his courtroom.

 

 

 

I would have to say I disagree with you here DD. I don't think judges do get it right "by and large" - many of the judges I have encountered when in court have shown an unhealthy bias towards the creditor from the start. Many of the cases on here where people have lost when they have a very solid defence happens far too often. I think the best chance anyone has of winning their case is to attack at an early stage and hope that it is struck out or discontinued before reaching the actual trial stage. Having a barrister to represent you, which of course the claimant will, makes a huge difference - no matter how well the LIP is informed or how eloquently they put across their points, the judge will always afford more credibility to the barrister, who is his colleague, after all. This is just my opinion and from personal experience and reading the threads of others on this forum. I know from my local court that most of the cases the judges deal with are family law issues - and while they may have a great deal of knowledge in this area, their knowledge of consumer law is sadly lacking, again something many people on this forum have encountered first hand.

 

further, I don't think many (any) of us on this forum encourage anyone to run "trite" defences - you have to remember we are all adults and the decision/responsibility on whether to defend on any particular issue, or to negotiate settlement with the other side, or even to admit the claim, must lie with the person concerned. That's why I always say it is their decision, not mine, on whether to go one way or the other.

 

If I decide to defend a claim and I lose in court, I can't then blame anyone else - they have tried to help, but ultimately, it was my decision to go ahead. This applies to all of us.

 

Unfortunately, we are not solicitors/barristers, and often the defences/arguments used on this forum are going to be easily beaten by a barrister in court, especially when the judge is firmly on their side from the word go.

 

 

regards, Magda

Edited by MAGDA
Link to post
Share on other sites

Very well put DD.

 

A good argument and I would like to make it clear that I had no intention of encouraging anyone to argue a case on underlining alone. But I do believe it is an issue for consideration to add to other creditor errors to prove negligence. In fact the whole paragraph has been missing from some DN's and no one has picked it up.

 

However, you said it yourself, Judges can only make decisions based on what is put before them.

 

Its a bit like the 'Credit Limit' or 'Approved Limit' argument. Some argue that it means the same thing and some claim unenforceabilty as its not as stated in the regulations.

 

Thanks for the debate, I don't want to continue it though, as you are quite correct it is not a strong point and I would be in danger of misleading newcomers if I do.

 

Pedross

 

Hi pedross, I don''t see any harm in raising the questions that you have mentioned about the last paragraph on my DN?

I could just write to Littlewoods and raise this and see what they come back with, I mean what have I got to lose? I am not starting any court proceedings, but would be very interesting to see what their response is. Maybe many could learn a few more things?

Link to post
Share on other sites

then maybe these judges need reminding of there duty.

 

Section 8.2 of the Civil Bench Book (2006) gives the court guidance on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and its applicability in cases such as the hearing before the District Judge.

 

The last paragraph of Section 8.2 states:

Article 6 gives a party to a hearing the right to put his case forward under conditions that do not put him at a disadvantage in relation to his opponent. This may require the judge to afford some assistance to creditors or debtors appearing in person. The court is under a duty to conduct a proper examination of the submissions, arguments and evidence adduced by the parties.”

The case law of the ECHR makes plain the courts duty in respect of undertaking a proper examination of the submissions, arguments, and evidence.

 

cab

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know from my local court that most of the cases the judges deal with are family law issues - and while they may have a great deal of knowledge in this area, their knowledge of consumer law is sadly lacking, again something many people on this forum have encountered first hand.

 

 

Magda picks up on a point here that makes me pretty livid. If a judge has insufficient knowledge on a type of law why and how are they entitled to be considered as a competent person for the job? Can you imagine if some bloke who wasted too many hours on flight simulator software in his bedroom was employed by BA to captain an aircraft based on the fact 'he probably knows pretty much what he's doing'? No PPL, no flight time at all.

 

Extreme example sure but when you're considering facts, which have the potential to cause huge harm to an individual just where is the level of capability drawn? A barrister is not able to accept work he/she is incapable of dealing with but the judge...it's just fine? Since when should a barrister be controlling the direction of a hearing? Seems to me too many judges are essentially out of their depth and are too pompous to admit as much, instead getting by on a wing and a prayer at the expense of the LIP who may well have a perfectly valid defence.

 

I'll get my dad, you get your dad seems a bit useless and entirely inappropriate for a court system. Barrister one side, LIP the other, what's the point of even starting the trial? I get two barristers and I'll win, unless you get three then I'll let you win? Madness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then maybe these judges need reminding of there duty.

 

Section 8.2 of the Civil Bench Book (2006) gives the court guidance on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and its applicability in cases such as the hearing before the District Judge.

 

The last paragraph of Section 8.2 states:

Article 6 gives a party to a hearing the right to put his case forward under conditions that do not put him at a disadvantage in relation to his opponent. This may require the judge to afford some assistance to creditors or debtors appearing in person. The court is under a duty to conduct a proper examination of the submissions, arguments and evidence adduced by the parties.”

The case law of the ECHR makes plain the courts duty in respect of undertaking a proper examination of the submissions, arguments, and evidence.

 

cab

 

Bearing in mind that it has taken the credit industry almost 30 years to put a DN together or even a credit agreement. I think may be in the next 20 years the judges will are conversant with the Civil Bench Book and hopefully the CCA.icon9.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never had to fight my corner in a court and can only admire those who have done so and presented a credible,well researched and well reasoned argument and had the understanding of the relevant legislation to back up their defence to a claim.

 

I can also sympathise with those who thought they had a credible defence but found their knowledge,argument and presentation sadly inadequate when the chips were down.

 

If during the trial one knew that the Judge had made a serious error in his understanding of the relevant legislation,such as the one day short on a default notice that was mentioned a few posts back,is it permissible to point this out to the Judge at the time assuming that you had a copy of the correct legislation to back up your submission?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never had to fight my corner in a court and can only admire those who have done so and presented a credible,well researched and well reasoned argument and had the understanding of the relevant legislation to back up their defence to a claim.

 

I can also sympathise with those who thought they had a credible defence but found their knowledge,argument and presentation sadly inadequate when the chips were down.

 

If during the trial one knew that the Judge had made a serious error in his understanding of the relevant legislation,such as the one day short on a default notice that was mentioned a few posts back,is it permissible to point this out to the Judge at the time assuming that you had a copy of the correct legislation to back up your submission?

 

You could point it out to the judge, whether he would take any notice, is another thing entirely.

 

We were at an allocation hearing recently and the judge asked the claimant's solicitor to explain our defence - she turned to us and actually started to explain our own defence to us! She didn't have a very good grasp of it anyway, but the judge nodded and was more than happy. He should have read the documents submitted and had this information to hand anyway. This is the sort of thing we are up against.

 

Magda

Link to post
Share on other sites

Magda picks up on a point here that makes me pretty livid. If a judge has insufficient knowledge on a type of law why and how are they entitled to be considered as a competent person for the job? Can you imagine if some bloke who wasted too many hours on flight simulator software in his bedroom was employed by BA to captain an aircraft based on the fact 'he probably knows pretty much what he's doing'? No PPL, no flight time at all.

 

Extreme example sure but when you're considering facts, which have the potential to cause huge harm to an individual just where is the level of capability drawn? A barrister is not able to accept work he/she is incapable of dealing with but the judge...it's just fine? Since when should a barrister be controlling the direction of a hearing? Seems to me too many judges are essentially out of their depth and are too pompous to admit as much, instead getting by on a wing and a prayer at the expense of the LIP who may well have a perfectly valid defence.

 

I'll get my dad, you get your dad seems a bit useless and entirely inappropriate for a court system. Barrister one side, LIP the other, what's the point of even starting the trial? I get two barristers and I'll win, unless you get three then I'll let you win? Madness.

Maybe, the right School tie or club membership is enough.

 

I have to add, that I thought Judges had Clerks for points of law?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could point it out to the judge, whether he would take any notice, is another thing entirely.

 

 

I simply can't get my head round all of this! Any other profession and you make an arse of things you'll have a professional body call you in for a chat about your conduct with the view to removing your ability to practice/do your chosen profession.

 

If I simply couldn't be bothered to stay up to date with building regulations and designed and had built a custom staircase that was too steep for example or had insufficient height above it, or any other number of things, I'd not only be in trouble with the client (if they found out...and why shouldn't they) for wasting money, the practice would kick my booty, the project manager would be on the phone asking why his schedule has gone to pot and anyone on site who found out about such an error would make you feel like a complete *** if you ever visited.

 

Refer this everyday and oh so simple scenario to a supposedly noble and learned profession and what do you get. Can't be bothered to read up on anything, prejudice and presumption against the defendant before they even hear litigation has commenced, wide spread disregard of basic legal premise and a level of plain incompetence, arrogance and contempt beyond belief for the 'little man' they presumably swore an oath to help protect at some point in their life.

 

The more I learn about the legal 'profession', and I use that word with increasing discomfort, the more I realise just what an out dated, cantankerous and corrupt 'service' we have. Question is why should we put up with it? I don't understand why we can't demand a change, we pay for it, we have to live by it, it's not a big ask for it to be correct.

 

Sorry for the rant but this back hander type prejudice and plain ignorance really fires me up. I'd like to see Judge John Deed clones delivered across the country to ensure fair is fair and all is above board, even if that means I suffer because of it.

 

I can face losing in a fair fight every time, there is honour in that despite any defeat. What I cannot stomach is the sly under handed tactician cowering in the shadows of a court room whispering everything and anything into the ears of some dullard who purports to be 'in charge'.

 

So angry :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to butt in on this thread but I had an email from the OFT today that said that under the CCA 1974 anyone or business involved in debt collection or debt management needed to have a CCLicense. The OFT told me that the Process Server that served me a Statutory Demand had no such license and Trading standards are going to investigate. Would that invalidate the SD?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually beachcomber, when was the agreement taken out and how much for?

 

Thanks Vint,

 

March 08 (a couple of weeks before they up'd the limit :( )

 

Car finance £25,155 after deposit paid (was £24,500 but added negative equity from px into agreement)

 

First DN gave me 2 days to remedy, after complaining they issued another giving 7 days from date of letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya all

 

i thought id seen it before on this thread that the 7 days to remedy default had been changed to 14 days i thought was amended a couple of years ago?

 

anyone if has the info and dates only quickly to hand would appreciate it, if not pls dont worry i will continue searching

 

wishing you all a fun eve angel x

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

i thought id seen it before on this thread that the 7 days to remedy default had been changed to 14 days

 

I don't have the details to hand but it definitely has been changed to 14 days (from date of service, which is two or four working days for First and Second Class respectively).

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you nks22 - thats exactly what i was thinking cheers for your quick update

 

laters angel x

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983, Page 8:

NOTES

 

 

Para 3: in sub-paras ©, (d) words "not less than fourteen days" in square brackets substituted by SI 2006/3094, regs 2, 3.

 

Date in force: 19 December 2006: see SI 2006/3094, reg 1.

 

Para 6: words "not less than fourteen days" in square brackets substituted by SI 2006/3094, regs 2, 3.

 

Date in force: 19 December 2006: see SI 2006/3094, reg 1.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4966 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...