Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'd get back to them tomorrow, and explain the circumstances, that you have a wedding reception, and just appeal to their better nature. Hopefully they will be able to move sooner rather than later, especially if you go in in person and speak to them, and show them the issue.
    • The 3 pieces of mortar that fell on the same day, at the same time, were approx. 25-30cm long and weighed around ½-1 kilo each from a roof that is above the 2nd floor; they were by no means tiny pieces of mortar but large chunks falling from a rather great height. I believe the size and weight is enough to cause serious injury and if it falls on your head, I assume it could potentially be lethal if unlucky, but we don't wish to put that theory to test... We can't in good conscience let a contractor install a patio and a gazebo as it is in the exact spot where the mortar fell, nor do I think anyone would be willing to take the chance. Looking at the roof, there are multiple other remaining pieces from the same 'line' or 'row' of mortar that can potentially fall. The mortar is right underneath the slate tiles on the neighbour's roof and I don't know whether the tiles are also (becoming) lose due to the loss of the mortar. I was trying to upload a photo but it seems it's not allowed. The first contractor to work in our garden in preparation for the patio and gazebo is scheduled to start on 10th June, that leaves the neighbour 5 workdays to sort their roof which is unlikely, so it seems we will have to postpone our patio contractor without knowing when they can come back. We have already had extensive work done in the garden in preparation for the wedding reception and it will become very costly for us if we have to move the wedding reception to a venue (if we can even get one at this short notice) rather than have it at home which was our dream.
    • Is this sufficiant for a letter of claim  ? Letter Of Claim       Reference: Techzone Mobile Phones Samsung A71 Mobile Phone £140 Purchase date 29. 5. 24     I the claimant purchased a 2nd hand Samsung A71 mobile from Techzone Mobile Phone unit 10 of the indoor market at the Potteries shopping centre. Initially the phone worked well until I used the camera and found debris in the camera lens spoiling pictures making it not fit for purpose. I contacted the seller who offered a replacement which I initially accepted but later rejected and wanted a refund in full which the seller refused saying they Do Not give refund is unlawful and goes against the Consumer rights act 2015. Therefore I intend to issue proceedings against you in a county court without further notice unless you reimburse me the above amount in Full within 7 days from the date of this Letter     ------------------------------------------    I think its best if i hand him the letter as posting it might not get through so can claim expenses traveling up there ?   or would it be best to just post and get 'Signed for'  ?   Should i also put in the letter of claim interest added or leave that till the Particulars letter ?
    • Ok thanks, I really need help with my mental health over this I’ve called 111 Hi sorry just one more thing can they contact my workplace?
    • Sorry to shatter your leftie dreams 🤣😂🤣😂     Donald Trump gets a SIX-POINT bump in approval after being found guilty on 34 counts according to snap Daily Mail poll: 'I think it was a waste of taxpayer money' WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK Teflon Don rides again, according to an exclusive poll for DailyMail.com which found that the guilty verdict in Manhattan... James Johnson, who conducted the poll, said Trump might be waking up as convicted felon but he was winning over the voters who matter.   Our snap poll of a representative sample of likely voters shows that for most Americans the trial has not changed their deep-set views of Trump,' he said.  'But amongst those who are open to changing their mind, people feel more positive by a margin of 6 points. That is outside of the margin of the error of the poll and we are saying that is significant. 'It extends to Independent voters too. Look at the explanations and it is clear why: people feel it was a politically motivated trial and view Trump as a "fighter" against what they see as injustice.     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Guess the next bankrupt DCA Tally


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5557 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Aktiv Kapital are on their way out - a lot of them are in real trouble. They invested heavily, aren't getting the returns on what they bought and now cannot get finance from the banks. I hope Hillsden Securities bites the dust.:D

 

Hell will not be fulluntil they are all in it. I wonder what sort of a job an unemployed threat monkey could get.

 

DLC/Hillesden workers - ideally placed for 'poultry processing' ;)

(Look up Faccenda) :D

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if all goes well tomorrow could...potentially see the demise of Cattles/Welcome !!!!!:p

 

Any news on this...i cant wait:evil:

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see the DCA deadpool being distributed between a new breed of debt collectors... ones that buy debts for even lower sums and thus are able to extend their sphere of harrassment - i.e. more intense collection procedures.

 

I can see companies becoming even more reluctant to provide sub-prime credit leading to a constriction of purchasing power by the credit hungry on the high street leading to a cataclysmic fallout of the entire financial system.

 

Sorry all... been reading up on how to scare the public via the route of Global Warming and Climate Change myth. Crossed over onto this debt thing too much...

 

Sorry

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see the DCA deadpool being distributed between a new breed of debt collectors... ones that buy debts for even lower sums and thus are able to extend their sphere of harrassment - i.e. more intense collection procedures.

 

I can see companies becoming even more reluctant to provide sub-prime credit leading to a constriction of purchasing power by the credit hungry on the high street leading to a cataclysmic fallout of the entire financial system.

 

Sorry all... been reading up on how to scare the public via the route of Global Warming and Climate Change myth. Crossed over onto this debt thing too much...

 

Sorry

 

Hey dont be sorry, all views are welcome on here, and theres a lot in what you say

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have set a new record...

 

£6.40 from a Blockbuster video account!!! Chased by Wescot too!!!

 

Mindboggling, Trouble them to provide you with a copy of the agreement/ proof of debt etc/ ask for their complaints procedure.

 

It wont be long before they have run up more expenses in postage/man hours to more than make this not worthwhile pursuing...idiots:D

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was a recent one and although I haven't used Blockbuster for 4 months or so the account, as far as I am concerned, is still "active" so I just phoned up Blockbuster, paid it, and called Wescot to tell them to leave me alone.

 

I don't think they would have been impressed if I had offered £1 per month haha!

 

I will have to post up the letter if I can find it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Id go for Moorcroft next, they have a moron who continues to call our payroll department at work after a colleague who has been on long term sick leave (interesting story here but not for public consumption yet) and won't take NO for an answer, insist they have an 'attachment of earnings' for £300 for him but no legal paperwork as it 'isn't needed'.... luckily payroll are wise to these idiots and unless the paperwork is received through the correct channels they tell them to go forth....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know, its fun now listening to their lies and rubbish, best two so far for me have been

 

Idiot 1 wanting to fast track me to a bailiff - to which I replied "Not without a court order...)

 

Idiot no 2 informing me that I needed a licence to record a telephone conversation with them - I asked where I could get this licence and they didn't know!

 

Back on the thread though my list would be (apart from Welcome)

 

Moorcroft

Westcot

 

and once the DCAs are down their little legal friends will surely follow

 

Bryan Carter

Hamptons Legal

Eversheds

Howard Cohen (if he's not already gone)

 

and then the courts won't end up with backlogs of dodgy claims from these idiots and can get down to weeding out the claims that don't follow the correct procedure

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry all... been reading up on how to scare the public via the route of Global Warming and Climate Change myth. Crossed over onto this debt thing too much...

 

Sorry

 

Hve you noticed how more and more tv shows always seem to add global warming into anything they possibly can?

 

Yet more and more scientists are starting to question it. Just before christmas one of the climate research labs were exposed for using August's figures for Siberia and China in October and November. Therefore making average global temperatures to seem warmer than normal. The guy who's in charge of the lab has no qualifications in the subject at all.

Yet these are the people the goverments are basing our future on. :rolleyes:

Get on bittorrent or emule and download, "The great global warming swindle."

 

 

The best way to tackle climate change if there was such a thing, is to stop the DCA threat monkeys from spouting all that hot air. ;) Got to get this post sort of on topic somewhere.

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

This threat arm of the Leeds Losers is already under scrutiny and will soon be getting the Worst Credit treatment

 

stoke on trent TS.looking into hamptons.

letters containing "we now intend to require a copy of your credit file,to help us deceide which legal action to take"

 

veiled threat meaning we intend to f*** up your file:rolleyes:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

stoke on trent TS.looking into hamptons.

letters containing "we now intend to require a copy of your credit file,to help us deceide which legal action to take"

 

veiled threat meaning we intend to f*** up your file:rolleyes:

 

 

 

One of their threat monkeys actually promised to F*** Up my Credit file forever if I didnt pay them. Needless to say that was Pre_Cag

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think their business model is stuffed. Remember they didn't really exist in their current form until 12 years or so ago (what a coincidence same as Liebour's misrule). This business model was imported from the US along with their sub prime fest etc etc.

Their success was based on buying low, chasing for full payment and trying it on with people who didn't know their rights and didn't ask for paperwork etc.

Hurrah for we CAGers and other groups who by sharing information and mutual support have pushed them down a blind alley. We have refused to be bullied and intimidated, have used the law against them and topped this up with an avalanche of complaints to bodies and the media.

I know Cabot is seeking new financial backers (among others) but with the shortage of international credit and the fact they won't get the returns any more they will struggle and, we hope, bite the dust.

Militant debtors of the world unite!

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are stuffed

 

I was poking around for stuff this morning,and I found an old letter from LCS threatening legal action for a "debt" (which incidentally still hasn't had a penny more paid off it....and you're talking 2 years now.....)

 

I actually hid it and never told my wife at the time because I was scared,I have to admit

 

roll on a bit,and what a change

 

now we just roll around laughing when they come in

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think their business model is stuffed. Remember they didn't really exist in their current form until 12 years or so ago (what a coincidence same as Liebour's misrule). This business model was imported from the US along with their sub prime fest etc etc.

Their success was based on buying low, chasing for full payment and trying it on with people who didn't know their rights and didn't ask for paperwork etc.

Hurrah for we CAGers and other groups who by sharing information and mutual support have pushed them down a blind alley. We have refused to be bullied and intimidated, have used the law against them and topped this up with an avalanche of complaints to bodies and the media.

I know Cabot is seeking new financial backers (among others) but with the shortage of international credit and the fact they won't get the returns any more they will struggle and, we hope, bite the dust.

Militant debtors of the world unite!

The DCAs cannot now promise their merchant bankers huge returns on the money they borrow. People are discovering their Legal Rights. Someone who becomes unenmployed is going to prioritise what they spend their money on and the bloodsuckers of DCA land come well down the list. Given a choice of feeding a family or paying a telephone threat monkey is really a no brainer.

Looks like a lot of souped up Saxos will be going up for sale and the sales of WKD and Hair Gell go down as the threat monkeys fail to meet their monthly blood money total.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the defence of a zero balance. It was argued recently by a poster in court that the original creditor had written off the debt so how could a DCA buy a zero balance? The judged agreed with her and the DCA was thrown out of court. If we all refused to pay on masse, there is nothing they could do about it - that would help them on thier way down the tubes!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is that the DCA's relied upon fear and people's perceptions of bailiffs...

 

I think there's something in the idea too of the stigma attached to debt which was inherent from the older generation. In the village where I used to live people used to know everything about each other and gossip was rife... since the expansion of the towns and general proliferation of the consumer society people now brag about their debts in obvious ways... such as a new car (on HP of course), extensions paid for with the capital in the house (remortgage) and Christmases paid for on the credit cards.

 

My wife (then girlfriend) used to literally shake and cry a few years ago before I came along and told her not to worry and that it couldn't be that bad. She had around £28,000 of debt once the interest payments added up... I mean she was a single mum, in a council house with £800 per month after tax... if there's anything telling about the state of our banks then it is lending to people like my wife in the quantities involved (she agrees with me on this - but had to keep reborrowing to pay off things).

 

They stung her on things like PPI, massive late payment charges and interest because she didn't realise they were optional...

 

She now laughs with me when the DCA's ring up... she knows the same as me that the errors of the banking system in the past are haunting them. Seriously... unless you have a house and items worth a hell of a lot of money the attempts by DCA's are futile.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The zero balance argument is compelling. Nearly all these debts have been securitised so who actually owns them anyway? There was a repo case for half a dozen houses in the US where the Judge threw it out as the mortgages had been securitised so no-one knew who actually owned the houses anyway.

I think the securitisation aspect of DCAs is one we have yet to explore properly as what is it they claim to be buying?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The zero balance argument is compelling. Nearly all these debts have been securitised so who actually owns them anyway? There was a repo case for half a dozen houses in the US where the Judge threw it out as the mortgages had been securitised so no-one knew who actually owned the houses anyway.

I think the securitisation aspect of DCAs is one we have yet to explore properly as what is it they claim to be buying?

 

Exactly Rhia!

Great Big Buckets of debt;

1 or 2 good ones mixed in with a some mediocre ones and a multitude of lemons.

What a mess...

AC

x

Edited by angry cat
addition
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the attitudes that DCA's show is systemic now.

Its been built up over so many years, were by they think its their right to speak to debtors however they want & harrass them however much they want..totally oblivious to the legal aspects of it all.

Slowly but surely...sites like CAG are now becomming systemic as well ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...