Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Is the letter headed Letter of Claim/before Claim or similar? If not, it sounds like more of the threatogram chain. If you're not sure, post up an anonymised copy of the letter and we'll check. HB
    • So guess what, we have received a final demand letter for £100. It states if payment is not made by 11/06 they will have no option but to forward the case to their litigation dept with a view to commence County Court Proceedings. So just wondering if anyone has any advice. Do we ignore this? or do we need to take action? Thanks 
    • hi dx, thanks for helping just re-reading everything this morning and I must have missed this one from uncle in his thread "What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. "  are you in disagreement with this based on your last sentence?
    • Thanks for the reply and clarification, that might just explain why in my case contact has pretty much ceased. Though with such companies it doesn't mean they won't ever threaten to return to court as a tool to force one's hand if they feel they are not self informed on their chances etc.  But concerning how last year they tried to use the CCJ to get a charging order and the court granted an intirum order on our mortgage using the CCJ that would have been a good 2-3 months beyond the 6 years, should the court not have checked the age of the CCJ in the first case or would they always grant an interim order simply off the back of a CCJ being produced without even checking the age of it?.  Had I not defended that action at the time they may well have got a default using a CCJ older than 6 years which could be a concern going forwards. At the time when I contacted the court to question the paperwork for a final order application the clerk suggested people don't get informed when companies apply for interim charging orders, they are automatic if a claimant has a CCJ and people only get contacted once a date for a final order application goes through. kind of begs the question if such companies can continue a seemingly backdoor method to attempt default action if un-defended if the initial application doesn't need to check the age of a CCJ?.
    • Hello!  Wondering if someone can help with this.  I suspect not but worth a go.  I appreciate the "contract is with the seller" line, which is what Evri has fed me but wanted to see if someone with experience in these things could suggest anything else I could do here.  I appreciate there are many topics about lost parcels - My parcels weren't lost, until the driver walked up to my door with them and then decided to make them lost/stolen... I'll summarise what has happened.  Wednesday of last week - Evri delivery driver stole / walked off with 3 of my parcels.  -  Arrived outside my properly, took photos (3 separate photos as its 3 separate deliveries) of the tops of the parcels (pointlessly zoomed in on just the labels, couldn't see anything else, other than a small piece of the pavement and a little weed, which doubly confirms it was outside my door as I can see the same plant), marked the order as delivered and walked off with them.  He's marked on the Evri GPS marked that he was outside.   -  3 different deliveries, from the same company (same boxes etc.), but 3 separate tracking numbers. -  Went through the Evri bot which opened a case on each tracking number.  I then phoned them and left a voicemail explaining what had happened. -  24 hours later had a canned response asking me if the packages had turned up and to check around etc..  I responded explaining again what happened and that they've definitely been taken. -  4 days later,  this morning, I get a response telling me to ask the merchant to refund me. I've responded to this message with a long email, repeating what I said, that I believe the driver has stolen these packages and that he took those suspicious top down shots of the packages, marked them as delivered without ringing or knocking etc.  I've said that I expect them to investigate further, but I gather they won't. In my several messages to them initially and later, I told them I don't care about a refund and wanted the parcels.  They contain some sentimental stuff, nothing of high monetary value, hence me going to this trouble.  I only paid £25 for the contents. I did contact the merchant when this first happened and they asked me to wait a few days.  They ended up refunding me despite me asking them not to and that I wanted them to escalate it with Evri because this appears to be a case of theft.  They didn't seem bothered - Refunded me and told me to go back to Evri and escalate it with them? So - Is there any way to compel Evri to conduct a proper investigation with this driver?  Search for my parcels? I have quite a lot of deliveries handled by Evri (not out of choice) - They used to have a fantastic chap and I rarely had any issues.  He has been replaced by a new guy and I believe the route is handled by this same guy who I believe has taken my packages.  Naturally, I fear this is going to happen again in the future if no investigation occurs. Appreciate any assistance - Thanks for reading. Al.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

almost statute barred


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5400 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

sister had old debt sold to westcot last december.

oc was natwest.as it was a overdraft she didnot cca .

the amount claimed is correct(just under 1200)

SAR from natwest.no charges were added after last payment.

credit file states default date 5 july 2003

last payment date xxxxxxxx

 

have told her it will be statute barred in 13 wks.?

they dont have her number so have to keep sending threatograms.

yesterday they stated that she must contact them/pay them in 7 days or they will "look to bankrupcy as it is over £750"

 

will they? can they?

I thought it would cost them around £500 to do this.and payed peanuts for this debt would they try it,could they get this to court before june.

 

the last 2 months I have told her to ignore and claim statute after june,but not sure about this.help needed from more experiance cagger plz.

Edited by sam614
removed date
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 175
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You need to play them for time. Write and tell them you did not receive a Notice of Assignment from Natwest to say the alleged debt had been sold to Wescot so you have no proof they have any legal right to pursue this alleged debt. Incorporate that into this letter:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Once they have replied to that, ask them for a copy of the letter that authorised the overdraft. As there won't be one, the bank will have to provide them with the details on an overdraft letterhead and that will take time.

Once you have done that, come back an we will think of something else - lol!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

she has not replied to westcot at all.so for all they know it could be a empty house

they introduced themselfs as the new owners.

nothing from natwest since 2003.

she was not sure if statute barred .got credit file and sar from natwest.

that give us last payment and default date.but nothing at all about noa/westcot.

so i told her to ignore till june and if they had not given up write saying statute barred.

shes bricking now has she thinks they can make her bankrupt.

if she contacts them /trys to play for time will they put the pressure on.

just had her in tears on the phone she says she is going to get a loan and pay them off:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it states on the SAR that the last payment was 4 June 2003, it is Statute Barred on 4 June 2009 (4 June 2008 in Scotland). Sending the Prove It letter does not acknowledge the debt - it merely asks them to prove it exists. In any case it would take time to get to court if they did raise proceedings - 6-8 weeks. By ignoring them they may just go ahead and take action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not hard to delay a DCA for 3 months. Just don't tell them it's close to being statute barred though. ;)

 

Make them find the info to prove the debt.

 

Insist that all correspondance is in writing only.

 

Post everything second class recorded delivery.

 

Post letters on a wednesday, so they are timed to arrive on a friday, so they have to wait over the weekend to process them.

 

Then CCA request anyway. Even with a overdraft they have to provide some kind of agreement/contract for it.

With a debt that has been floating around for 6 years the DCA won't know it's for an overdraft until the bank tell them, and that takes time. ;)

 

Then ask for the Default Notice

 

Then the Terms and Conditions for the account.

 

Poke holes/fault with as many of the documents as you can.

 

Raise a formal complaint about whatever you can.

 

They cannot take court action if the account is in dispute in some way.

 

Hopefully they won't be able to provide any documents anyway.

But all the above should ensure that that by the time they can get you into a court, your defence will be, "Statute Barred" and they're stuffed.

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all about cajones right now...

 

...just got to sit tight and send letters left, right and centre requesting credit agreements/statements/NoAs etc etc.

 

If you ignore it they could just take action anyway... if you send letters they might believe you are stalling for time and take action anyway... either way it could end up bad so just do what you can to delay them and keep them guessing!

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

"slightly confused!"

 

We all were once!

 

"Is a debt statue barred from the default/ settled date or from the date of the last payment"

 

...from the date of last payment/acknowledgement on the account i.e. written letter/recorded phone call

 

"and is that the last payment to the OC or the new DCA?"

 

More than likely to the DCA... however... say for instance your debt with the OC is 6 years old + 1 day - this is statute barred. If you paid a DCA anyday after this you would be able to claim your money back from them and claim the debt as statute barred.

 

UNLESS...

 

It is a CCJ... in this case the petitioner (the DCA/OC) would need special permission from the court to enforce the CCJ.

 

Hope this clarifies it for you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt is NOT Stat barred from the last date paid.

 

It is stat barred from the date the first missed payment becomes apparent.

 

This will sometimes be the same day as last payment, but it would normally be a month on.

 

 

JOgs

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a CCJ... in this case the petitioner (the DCA/OC) would need special permission from the court to enforce the CCJ.

 

 

To be honest, if the CCJ had not been enforced in 6 years, the OC/DCA would need one hell of an explanation for the Judge to allow them to reinforce it......

 

I had Aktiv Krapital chasing an 11 year old debt, for which I received a CCJ about 8 years ago. Sent an SB letter to AK, to which they replied (with utter rollocks), sent another letter and they have gone away (been 9/10 weeks now).

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest, if the CCJ had not been enforced in 6 years, the OC/DCA would need one hell of an explanation for the Judge to allow them to reinforce it....

 

 

and judge will only give permission to dca with original court details and claim number.as they are removed from central court file after 6 years.they also need doa.

and has to be within 6 calendar months of purchased date:sad:

 

this is how i got rid of leeds losers:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt is NOT Stat barred from the last date paid.

 

It is stat barred from the date the first missed payment becomes apparent.

 

This will sometimes be the same day as last payment, but it would normally be a month on.

 

 

JOgs

 

Under the Limitations Act 1980 the time limits are

  • in simple contracts, 6 years
  • in contracts under seal, 12 years.

"If the debtor acknowledges the debt in writing or makes a part payment within the original limitation period, then the time limits start to run again from the date of acknowledgement or the date of payment."

 

Sorry but not sure where your information is from...

 

...if you didn't acknowledge/pay a debt for 6 years... then made a payment a day after and therafter the debt is still statute barred. But if acknowleged/paid within the limitation period then it starts from the date of last payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone, this has helped loads. The one debt in particular is nearly 9 years old and only started paying 18 months ago because it turned up after I requested my free CR from Equifax. (won't do that again). I CCA'd this company last month and SAR'd them. No CCA and deadline has passed so i have sent SB letter and told them to get lost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I got my credit file, I was suddenly bombarded with adverts for debt management companies, and a I get hassled for a HFC loan that I know nothing about. :rolleyes:

 

Lots of people on CAG have been finding this out. So, it's not a coincidence. Experian, etc are selling your information. Now where did we sign anything to say they can sell your information to third parties?

 

All I see on contracts is where the creditor can pass info to the CRA to give other creditors an idea of your credit rating and ability to pay. Nowhere does it say they can sell the info to DCA's,Debt Management Companies, etc.

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

prove it letter signed for last friday.nothing back as yet:D

11 wks to go fingers crossed:)

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER

 

Keeping 'em crossed for ya! I'm sure you can delay them further if needs be :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...