Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Daft question - but you filed the defence on-line on MCOL as dx indicated, right?
    • We looked up the e-mail address so communications would be in writing.  If you do stuff on the phone the other party can just deny the contents of the conversation.  They can't deny what's written in an e-mail. So time to sort Pete out.  Check the following for accuracy and change anything I've got wrong.  Then e-mail Pete this evening.  I was thinking of threatening the pub with legal action but let's initially be nice.   Dear Pete, Re: PCN no.XXXXX, claim form no.XXXXX on 23 July 2022 I was a customer at your pub and I attach proof of purchase. I was picking up my cousin Ms XXXXX and her family as she was working as a cook with you at the time.  I entered the pub through the back door, went to the bar, and ordered a drink and a meal.  At no point did any bar staff alert me that I needed to add my registration number or did I see any signs advising me to do so.  I then took a seat outside in a small seated area so I could chat to my cousin while waiting for her to finish work.  We were joined by the management of the pub and bar staff during my time waiting  I was shocked a few days later when I received a demand for £100 from Civil Enforcement Ltd.  i contacted the pub and was told "don't worry, it's not enforceable". Well, that information turned out to be nonsense because I have now received a county court claim form from CEL. I contacted the pub again on XXXXX and was extremely disappointed to be told "there's nothing we can do". Of course there is something you can do.  You are the organ grinder.  You called CEL in.  You can call your dogs off.  Your pub has absolutely superb reviews on Google Maps regarding the way in which you treat guests.  Do you really think customers should be dragged to court?  I'm sure you don't. I am therefore requesting that you intervene and instruct CEL to cease court action. Yours, XXXXX
    • Thank you - Defence has now been filed Doc_20240501_182920_Redacted.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DLA refused-not sent forms for reconsideration of ruling


jamjaf
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5689 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,my son was refused dla after reapplying. He has aspergers syndrome, chronic fatigue is dyspraxic and mostly confined to the house because of the above.

 

My son was first diognosed when he was fourteen and his condition has not altered, he is now twenty three. He is waiting specialist help from a special unit in Sheffield for his chronic fatigue but will always be constrained by his other conditions. When we received the letter stating why he was refused, none of it made sense. It was almost as if they were talking about another person. Much of their criteria are met by my sons condition unfortunately, however you would not think so if you read their response. I am receiving some help dealing with this from a charitable organisation as I myself suffer from mental health problems but though they have requested that forms be sent so that we can contend their decision on five occasions (and they promised they would post them) each time we have been let down.

Finally we were contacted by a lady in a department who follows up on multiple phonecall records. When appraised of the situation she suggested that we write a letter along with a docters letter instead. She agreed though that a form would be best as we would then see what information they needed.

We are going to send a letter and docters letter to them but I have no confidence in them at all, their performance so far is appalling. Does anyone have any suggestions please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest also contacting your local MP and advising him/her of the situation and request their help. A lot of them sit on these kind of boards, and may be able to get involved.

If you do not know who your local MP is, either search it on google or ask at your local library.

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

See your Welfare Officer at the Local Council, unfortunately, it is sometimes the way you answer the questions, wrong I know, but the same thing happened with my daughter and if you read other threads the same thing happens all the time.

 

It would also be good to include your MP, as someone has mentioned, as it is about time they stopped all this messing about after all they have a doctor's report and in my daughter's case had a a report from her Psychiatrist and still she got turned down.

 

Good luck with your claim, don't give up, keep pushing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to throw in my 2p, I don't agree with contacting the MP or the newspapers, at least at this stage.

 

All the populist newspapers promote prejudice against both benefit claimants and mental health sufferers so they are hardly likely to be sympathetic. They should be, but it just wouldn't fit the agenda.

 

An MP cannot do much at this stage as the proper procedure has to be followed according to the legislation: ask for the decision to be reconsidered (there is no special form for this), and then appeal to a tribunal (form GL24, available here.) Because the tribunals are independent an MP is not allowed to influence them.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason I suggested the MP it is about time that something was done about how claimants are treated and how it all relies upon how you complete the form. I think MPs should be made aware how legitimate claimants are being treated, you only have to read some of the stories on GAG to see how they have been discriminated against and how some of them have been refused DLA. Also, it only goes to show that my daughter was refused the first time around and yet now gets it indefinately so what does that tell you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

And the reason i suggested the MP is because they are there to help, and although its true about them not being able to influence certain things they are able to have their two pences worth. People who dont deserve it get it, and legitimate claims are turned down. If MP's see all this first hand, then they will be the ones to go to parliament and change the outdated and antiquated laws of this land.

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sorry to say that but who believes in their MP??? Look at the recent criminal and justice bill. MPs got influenced by our "Oh so good Prime Minister" and promised funding for their councils. Who is believing in their MP??? I would like to get that answer. It is a dream to believe that your MP can sort out your own DLA claim for you. YOU HAVE TO FIGHT FOR YOURSELF! Nobody else can do that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have got to say our MP is excellent. When my daughter was claiming back charges from Lloyds and they kept taking her benefits I wrote to him and he went to see Lloyds personally, within a week she had £350 in her account as a gesture of goodwill and he claim for charges is still pending like everyone elses at the moment. He was really incensed by what they had done. If you don't try you don't know!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too have contacted my MP on several occasions, and in approx 90% of those he has helped.

We all have doubts when it comes to asking for health from various sources, but as surprise says, if you dont try, you dont know.

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...