I wonder if somebody can help me. I need a postal address of the following company: essaywriter.co.uk I checked company house but it's not there. I need a postal address but they won't tell me directly. Can somebody help? Many thanks

There was a discussion regarding judicial review. I have now got the information about the applications since 2007: JR applications 2007-08: 13 2008-09: 6 2009-10: 10 Important to know that no JR application was successful agains the FOS so far!

Ashford County Court, Case: 6AS00169, Michael vs British Airways Easyjet mentioned that court case where they rely on Art. 12 EG 261/2004. However, I am of the opinion that we should be entitled to the 250 EUR plus further expenses. The court should put the proceedings on hold until the ECJ makes a decision about it.

Just a short notice worth lookin at case C-83/10. Is Art. 7 with EC261/2004 compatible with further compensation (like hotel costs, food, telephone, taxi)? At the moment british courts tend to subtract the compensation laid down in Art. 7 EC 261/2004. Hopefully a good outcome for consumers.

Does anybody know the principle on setting aside a judgment? I won against easyjet (default) but want to make sure they are not applying to set aside. I know the CCR 13.3. but wonder if there is case law I could use.

The airline is paying for accomodation and food in the meantime. It does not have to do with "EU Airline" its regulated via the Montreal Convention.

My easyjet flight had a delay of 4 days. I arrived in Gatwick at 3am without further assistance. Now I got a succesful claim through the small claims court online. I can only suggest you do the same thing!

Its getting difficult if you do not have the signed policy anymore as the company only keeps records of 6 years as far as I know. One possible way is to ask the provider when you made the claim if they have any records of the originals. Apart from that I do not think its going to work in your case as pretty much is not the original sells policy, that you don't seem to have anymore.

The PPI came with the credit card and I think it went back to 2005. PPI is very complex I think and it depends on the individual case. If you let me know some details I might be able to suggest something although I am not a lawyer.

Good news, after nearly 2 years of a complaint with the FSO we get our PPI back because of misselling! Furthermore on that I took MBNA to court last year because of credit card charges and they settled out of court. Of course they thought that even 12 Pounds charge was ok for them but I took them a second time to court for the 12 Pounds per charge and got EVERYTHING back from them.

Since when is Ryanair a foreign company??? Its MAIN HUB is in Stansted, it uses a loophole to avoid action by consumers and workers as it has a Dublin office. It reminds me of tax avoiding. Similar thing is here. What would you do if I operate as a dentist in the UK and tell you "Oh no you can not sue me, I have a second home in Dublin, go there."

I would like the UK law to change so we can take Ryanair to court in England. I was unsuccessful to take the airline to court in the county court in Brighton. Although cross border juristication exist the court declined to serve the papers to Dublin. I did complain to the OFT and the european commission. They may take up the case and fine UK, hopefully. In the meantime I wan to press for a change of law in the UK, making it possible to sue Ryanair in England (office in Stansted). Who is with me and support me? I need many people for that. Give me your thoughts.

I was wondering 2 things. 1st: If credit cards are set at 12 Pounds in light of the OFT finding then it would be useful to try to argue in a similar way regarding bank charges. Am I wrong? 2nd: We are really interested in a class action process. I wonder if we find enough people for a good lawyer we could share the costs of the proceedings. Isn't it worth it? Also a thought to the moderator here to start something? Just let you know a little good story. I got clamped beginning of the year and took the edit to court. They have settled out of court now. I only have to reclaim the interest charges. Thanks to the forum. I did donate a little bit as well.

Hi got 1st direct application refused. Credit score is over 900 but linked to partner who got default in 2006. Still trying to get the default out of the way with the Information Commission but does not help me in my situation at the moment. Anybody experience with 1st direct? Would be thankful of any adice. many thanks

Thanks, can you please send it around? Its hard to get 500 supporters for that as it seems nobody bothers when people don't face the problem But considering so many wrong defaults on credit files I think it is essential to help consumers.

Please send emails to the court service: [email protected] To whom it may concern, it is now possible to make a claim against Ryanair in England as a recent ECJ judgment states. http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2009-07/cp090062en.pdf I was wondering if you can include the address of Ryanair in your automatic address as otherwise it would be difficult for consumers to make the right claim as consumers must find first the correct address for Ryanair in England. The company is listed in: RYANAIR UK LIMITED SATELITE 3 LONDON STANSTED AIRPORT STANSTED ESSEX CM24 1RW Status: Active Company No: 01917579 Date of Incorporation: 30/05/1985 Country of Origin: United Kingdom

I am trying to take Ryanair to a court in England. Ryanair is still trying to get out of it saying that Dublin should be the court to deal with my compensation claim. They will decide next week if it is possible to take Ryanair to court in England. Hopefully that will force the small claims court to give the correct address for Ryanair as it is not listed yet when making a claim online. See also press release of a similar case: http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2009-07/cp090062en.pdf

I have a default on my credit file from EGG, hoever the company refused to answer to my complaints or cancel the default (as its wrong). I complaint to the OFT and got the following answer (that should be encouraging as if those companies get more complaints OFT might intervene finally!): We have therefore noted the details of your complaint, and we will consider this alongside any other complaints we have received with a view to any consumer credit licensing or other action we may decide to take. If we do take any action against this trader, it is likely that we would need to disclose your identity to this trader along with details of your complaint. I should therefore be grateful if you could sign the enclosed consent form and return it to me. Unfortunately, we cannot disclose any details about any action we may take, due to legal restrictions on the OFT relating to disclosure of information.

Got a similar one: http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/InfoCommission/

I tried to change it but they did not let me.

We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to ensure that the Information Commission makes decision in a reasonable time. Petition to: ensure that hte Information Commission makes decision in a reasonable time. | Number10.gov.uk

I got a new petition and would like support. It is regarding the lenght of time the ICO needs to sort out data protection concerns from consumers. http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/InfoCommission/

I did submit a petition regarding the Information Commission and would like to ask you to sign and pass it on to friends. I need the magig 500 to get through. Many thanks: http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/InfoCommission/ Jörg

As some might know I am fighting a default on my credit score. I have now applied to the Information Commission to review it urgently arguing I am applying for a mortgage. As some might know the ICO is not the quickest way and I have applied for a petition to reduce the lenght of the procedure regarding data protection issues. When my petition comes through I hope to get much support here. Will keep you up to date with the default. Wish me luck to get it out of the way.

Why bother with requestinig information? At the court THEY have to prove everything. So send them a letter telling the default is wrong and that they have to remove it. Allow them 40 days and then send a letter to the Information Commission. You need prove of sending though. In the meantime send a rimder to Avon.