Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That is a big improvement Dave and I do agree that it s best to leave it till the last moment to prevent VCS from countering your WS. [usually using doubtful logic that can't be easily argued against in a Court atmosphere] However my first post [no. 32] about the contract is the one that really exposes Jake's flummery and calls into  question jost how close he comes to committing perjury. And that is what hopefully VCS will not want questioned by a Judge. 
    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

rossendales - unpaid Council Tax. **Now back with Council**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3806 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks.

 

I have had the misfortune to deal with Rossendales due to unpaid Council Tax.

 

The tax is for this current year, and they have slapped £90 fees on top, I signed a walking possession on my car, and offered them £100 per month.

 

THey have sent me a letter today saying they have agreed £92.00 per week, which I can't pay.

 

Any ideas on the best course of action?

 

Thanks

 

Jason

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 6 months later...

I have put this in an existing thread and am starting a new one.

 

I could not keep up with my council tax this year. The bailiff arrived, I sat in his car and he levied distress on my vehicle.

 

 

I rang the council, who took it out of the bailiff's hands and agreed a payment plan, but unfortunately, could not keep up with it.

 

The bailiffs are now back, acting on the original documentation, and have charged me over £240.00 on top of what I owe.

 

The council are refusing to take money from me. They tell me to complain to the bailiff about the charges; nothing to do with them. He has not been in my house, but has asigned walking possession on my car.

 

Question

 

I have an amount of money in my account, but if I pay the full amount, we don't eat or heat the house, simple as that.

 

Can I dispute the charges? Can the bailiffs chase me for charges? Can the council refuse to take my money?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Call the national debtline 0808 808 4000 its free, as it was done so long ago and the bailiff never acted on it then perhaps it could be seen as being abandoned by the bailiff...if this is the case then the bailiff would need a new walking posession.

 

In the meantime hide your car.

 

Let us know how you get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Call the national debtline 0808 808 4000 its free, as it was done so long ago and the bailiff never acted on it then perhaps it could be seen as being abandoned by the bailiff...if this is the case then the bailiff would need a new walking posession.

 

In the meantime hide your car.

 

Let us know how you get on.

 

Thanks

 

Have justpaid the council direct in full online, thus circumnavigating their crap about not being able to pay them.

 

What is the law on Bailiff charges? Can they chase me for them? I have a receipt from the council now saying the year is paid for in full. If I had underpaid Rossendales, they would have taken their charges first.

 

What is the best course of action, as I am assuming the bailiff is going to be naffed off that I have manouvered around him?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it you live in England? wales fees are slightly less.

 

The Council Tax Administration & Enforcement (Amendment) 1993. Si 773 amended by Si 295 0f 1998, Si 768 of 2003 and Si 3395 of 2006

 

First visit fee: £24.50 This is for a first attendance to levy but where a levy does not takes place. (For example where you are not in)

 

The bailiff can charge a levy fee if they levy but he cannot charge both amounts on the same occasion.

 

Second visit fee: £18.00 Despite any further visits, the bailiff can only charge for a maximum of 2 visits.

 

Levy Fee: Under this heading the bailiff can charge £24.50 for the first £100, and 4% on the next £400 etc.

 

First £100 £24.50

Next £400 @ 4%

Remaining £100 @ 2.5%

 

Walking posession order £12

For other fees see the link below:

 

This is the link to the nationaldebtline website, which shows the complete fees a bailiff can charge whilst collecting council tax are at the bottom of the page.

 

http://www.nationaldebtline.co.u k/england_wales/factsheet.php?page=02_bai liffs_and_council_tax

 

 

You need to give it a few days then double check that the bill is definately paid, as the bailiff fees would normally be deducted first.

 

If I was you I would call the national debtline, my question is that if the bill was returned to the council then the bailiff technically has to start all over again with the process.i.e the previous levy wouldnt stand etc and if you have paid the bill in full before the bailiff has visited then you owe the bailiff nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No bailiffs fees will have been deducted if you paid the council direct on line.

I believe the only way the bailiffs can get there fees now that you have paid the council direct is to take you to the small claims court.

 

if they turn up they will still try to scare you into paying them, just give them a copy of the receipt and tell them to get off your property before you call the police.

Ignore any threats they give you they no longer have any power now you have paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I paid my council tax bill from under the noses of Rossendales last month direct to the council online.

 

The bailiff rang me threatening fire storm petulance and brimstone amongst other things.

 

The very fact that my wife would not be able to deal with these numpties if they turned up

and I wasnt here forced me to pay him £130 towards the charges, when they had actually charged me £205.

I told him that was what I considered to be fair based on the price of van hire locally.

 

I now come home today to find a letter asking for £75 threatening me with a van and removal if I dont pay.

 

two questions

 

i. What colour is the sky on their particular chosen planet?

 

ii. Do any of you great people have a letter that will send them away?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I paid my council tax bill from under the noses of Rossendales last month direct to the council online.

 

The bailiff rang me threatening fire storm petulance and brimstone amongst other things. The very fact that my wife would not be able to deal with these numpties if they turned up and I wasnt here forced me to pay him £130 towards the charges, when they had actually charged me £205. I told him that was what I considered to be fair based on the price of van hire locally.

 

I now come home today to find a letter asking for £75 threatening me with a van and removal if I dont pay.

 

two questions

 

i. What colour is the sky on their particular chosen planet?

 

ii. Do any of you great people have a letter that will send them away?

 

Many thanks

]

 

FIRST QUESTION: Have you ever let them into your home, threby allowing them to 'levy', i.e. make a list of your goods?

 

Second, have you ever signed a Walking Possession Order?

 

If you haven't done either of these, then there's probably nothing they can do, especially if you find out that they have tried to overcharge you, which bailiffs often do -so write to them, and get a breakdown of their charges.and take it from there.

 

For a more detailed answer, you need to tell us whether they have ever set foot in your home and whether you have signed a Walking Possession Order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I signed a walking possession order on my car. This was in July last year. The council took it back on after I contacted them, only for me to fall behind again.

 

He has not been in my property, and I was told by someone who used to be a bailiff that they are not allowed to chase you for their charges, so this came as a bit of a surprise!

 

(I've sold the car by the way-thought it was dead and buried when the council took the debt back)

 

Thank you again

Link to post
Share on other sites

I signed a walking possession order on my car. This was in July last year. The council took it back on after I contacted them

 

Well that means that they had abandoned the goods

 

He has not been in my property

 

That means that they can't come in now.

 

I was told by someone who used to be a bailiff that they are not allowed to chase you for their charges

 

That's absolutely true, but unfortunately it doesn't ever stop them trying -- and that's because they are playing the numbers game -- there will be some people who will pay them exactly what they say they should pay them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no magic letter that will make them go away.

The bailiffs will only leave you alone if they think that further action will gain them nothing, and they will form that opinion based on the kind of contact they have with you.

 

That's why we use template letters, and pick them up on every mistake that they are bound to make.

And that's also why when bailiffs are likely to be about, that we have to behave in a very special way. Parking cars away from the house, keeping doors and windows closed, not opening the door to anyone unless we know who they are, checking who's outside before leaving the house.

 

It all sounds very difficult, but it's not... after a while it becomes a habit, all that you do is develop habits to keep your stuff safe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rossendales have recently tried to fleece me with unlawful fees.

 

Go over EVERYTHING with a fine toothed comb and work out exactly what fees can be charged. My bailiff 'friend' got backed into a corner when I made it clear he was acting unlawfully and was not going to get away with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Thank you to everyone who helped me fight off GE repossession....one last problem, which I need some clarification on please.

 

My wife and I seperated 18 months ago, and in all the stress and strain, coupled with depression and counselling she is going through,

Council Tax went unpaid. It is in her name alone.

 

Rossendales have their hands on it, and have pushed various letters through the door.

They levied on MY car, which my ex had borrowed for three days to ferry kids around

 

I have an authority with the council to deal with her account, because of her illness.

The council refused to take it back, who have given a deadline of tomorrow to find £1060, which of course is impossible.

They say enforcement will be carried out tomorrow if cash is not received, and gave me a meeting place and time.

 

Here's what I need clear in my mind.

 

i. Is it true that they are not allowed to force entry if they have not been in the property?

ii. Does the levy on my car change the above?

iii. They appear to have added about £500 in fees and charges. Is this correct?

iv. I have read that bailiffs code warns them against approaching vulnerable people.

The definition for vuilnerable people includes single parents and people with illnesses.

Given that my ex is receiving counselling for years of systematic parental abuse and is on anti-depressants, thats about as vulnerable as it gets.

I also know if they turn up when she is there, she will fold like wet cardboard because of her state of mind.

How do I get the relevant people to listen to me?

 

I have tried to raise the money, but it isnt happening. Please help me make sense of this

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

just tell them to Foxtrot Oscar -- ZERO rights of entry.

 

edited Actually they CANNOT legally levy ANYTHING until they've made the requisite two visits so if the car is on your property you don't even have to admit them if they want their clamp back.

 

I HATE these people --but they don't like it "when the Natives start getting restless".

 

NEVER give in to these people -- eventually the council WILL have to take the debt back in any case.

 

NEVER EVER EVER pay bailiff's -- especially Rossendales.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Edited by IdaInFife
post edited
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

Here's what I need clear in my mind.

 

i. Is it true that they are not allowed to force entry if they have not been in the property? They cannot force entry if they have not been into the property.

 

ii. Does the levy on my car change the above? If they have levied your car, it is classed as an unlawful levy and cannot charge a levy fee for this. You need to send proof of ownership to the bailiff company with a letter stating this.

iii. They appear to have added about £500 in fees and charges. Is this correct?

No certainly not correct at all, all they can charge at this time is £42.50 for two visits. Cannot charge for a levy fee as the levy was unlawful.

iv. I have read that bailiffs code warns them against approaching vulnerable people. The definition for vuilnerable people includes single parents and people with illnesses. Given that my ex is receiving counselling for years of systematic parental abuse and is on anti-depressants, thats about as vulnerable as it gets. I also know if they turn up when she is there, she will fold like wet cardboard because of her state of mind. How do I get the relevant people to listen to me?

You need to get straight back on to the council, speak to the 'Manager' at the benefits and revenues department. Under the national standards of enforcement agents your wife is clearly vulnerable. read here http://www.dca.gov.uk/enforcement/agents02.htm#part10

 

I have tried to raise the money, but it isnt happening. Please help me make sense of this

 

Thank you

You can also get in touch with your local councillor who may be able to help you. Your wife does not have to deal with these people at all. she can start making payments to the LO by way of making payments online via their website. Or if your wife is on benefits she can request that they take out payments from her income support/JSA etc. It may also help if you can contact her councillor/doctor to get a letter written on her behalf stating her illness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you, I'm on it as we speak.

 

The bailiff rang me today, and when told there was no way he could have such a large amount of money, he got nasty.

 

I told him my mortgage is on a suspended eviction order and I have no choice but pay it,

 

he said "I have plenty of choices, and am now going to use them against your wife"

 

Lucky I didnt go to meet him,

 

Thank you again for your help, this site is an absolute godsend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because of what he has said I would now write a formal complaint to the Chief Executive of the council with regards to threatening behavour. Please remember if and when he turns up tell your wife NOT to answer the door. Keep all windows and doors locked. She does not have to communicate with them at all !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because of what he has said I would now write a formal complaint to the Chief Executive of the council with regards to threatening behavour. Please remember if and when he turns up tell your wife NOT to answer the door. Keep all windows and doors locked. She does not have to communicate with them at all !!

 

Make also a complaint to Local Govt Ombudsman -- the Local Council will then have to explain WHAT HAPPENED, what control they have in place to ensure their agents behave ACCORDING TO THE LAW and what steps they are taking to ensure this doesn't happen again.

 

This information has to be posted PUBLICLY as well --Councils HATE that more than anything else.

 

You WILL have had to make a complaint to the CEO of the council first so do that and THEN complain to the Local Govt Ombudsman.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...