Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5893 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is my first post on this forum - I have been having a good look over the last couple of weeks and looks to be doing a great job!

 

Anyway I am after some advice following a visit from a Chandlers bailiff this morning. My wife was just going out to work this lunchtime and was greeted by said chap. I had told her only the other day not to let anybody in the house - I had phoned my council last week to be told I couldn't make a payment plan and that the matter had been handed over to Chandlers. I asked how I could get the council to take the liability back but was told that there was no way they would!

 

 

This bailiff posted a letter through the door. The letter outlined the liability plus their £24.50 charge for making the call. They are being careful at the moment as they are being watched by the council - more about that on another thread.

 

The letter asks that I make payment to the office "by return" or the bailiff shall call back to distrain goods. It also gives the mobile number of the bailiff. So I called the guy for a chat. I said that I wanted to pay in installments of £150pcm but he said he would have to do a WPO and take £100 up front to start such a plan. He also said the fees for this are based on a percentage of the total liability and would be c.£65. I said I wasn't happy to "secure" the liability and asked if there was any way my council might take back the liability and he said no.

 

At this point I told him about a visit from a different bailff (also from Chandlers as well) who visited me at my workshop re. business rates. He demanded c£7/8k saying that there was a lorry coming to empty my workshop unless I paid there and then - this visit was the first contact from Chandlers! I managed to pay using family members and their credit cards! The response to this from the bailiff today is that business rates are handled in a different way. Is this the case?

 

During our phonecall he also mentioned my wife's car - I said, truthfully, that there is outstanding finance on it.

 

The reason for my thread here is to ask what to do to get it taken on by the council again. I think the main problem is that they use a third party company to collect Council Tax and Busines Rates. Suggestions are very welcome as I have told him I shall phone him tomorrow afternoon. I have seen the bailiff's name mentioned on other threads on this forum.

 

the visit re. business rates was over a year ago when they weren't being "watched" by the council.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a few questions about bailiff activity and the collection of Business Rates. I had a visit last year by a very large chap (bigger than me and I'm 6ft4 and 17st!) demanding c£7/8k and that there was a lorry coming to take my machinery from the workshop! On this occasion I managed to pay in full with the help of family. My business had been struggling causing major financial problems.

 

I have contacted my local council as they are looking into the methods and activities of bailiffs following many complaints of "bullying". I have agreed to present the above experience to the scrutiny group as someone on the receiving end. They have already accompanied the bailiffs on their rounds - so unlikey to see any bullying me thinks!

 

The council are conducting this scrutiny group to improve their "code of practice" re. bailiff action. I have requested a copy of the current code from the council but have been fobbed off twice now!

 

The reason for this thread is to ask a couple of questions -

 

 

1. Does the bailiff company have to write in advance of a visit?

 

2. Can a bailiff just turn up (inside my open workshop) and take away my machines on a first visit? This would have meant 3 people would instantly lose their jobs.

 

3. When the bailiff called I was away at an appointment - can the above be done in my absence- I am a sole trader and an emplyee dealt with the matter?

 

Any answers to these questions would be very usefull as I am talking to the group in the middle part of this week.

 

 

Many thanks..

 

Worm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Absolutely,under NO circumstances allow this idiot entry to your property,sorry to state the obvious,but as you have read,these guys are devious.

Someone will be along to give you more detailed advice,but i would say,make your payments direct to the council,and ignore the bailiff,he will give debt back to the council if he gets no joy from you,just make sure all windows and doors are locked at all times,and dont open door to him.

Can i ask which la you are in?,as i know they say they are monitoring in my la,where they employ chandlers and also bristow and sutor

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you, like me, are North Somerset?

 

I have spoken to my friend the tax man today and he owes me a fair bit - this will pay off the C Tax in one go. I have no intention of letting this guy in!

 

Many thanks for your post!

 

Regards

 

Worm

 

(Not my real name!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes,north somerset!!,what a joke,they didnt care less when i was having trouble with the bailiff,i will believe they are making changes when i see it,not that i particularly want to see another bailiff,but if i did at least now i would be better equipt to deal with them!!

And as for the name,i knew someone who went by it for a long time,i was always a bit afraid to ask why!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

North Somerset are looking into the complaints re. bailiffs. Our friend yesterday went by the book. They were accompanied by council staff the other week!

 

As for the name - turned worm - I think it wasthe name of a Two Ronnies sketch many years ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that from the council or the bailiff company. As I understand it the council should have their own code of practice and "rules". My council have capped the % rate for credit card payments to 2.5% - not the 3.8% the bailiff company state!

 

I shall report back when I have more info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason for this thread is to ask a couple of questions -

 

 

1. Does the bailiff company have to write in advance of a visit?

 

On Business rate and Council Tax , i do not think they obliged to write to you. The council have written to you at least twice and then the court issues a liability order against you.

 

2. Can a bailiff just turn up (inside my open workshop) and take away my machines on a first visit? This would have meant 3 people would instantly lose their jobs.

 

Yes, i believe the baliff can do this. To prevent this a Walking Possession would be signed to allow you to keep your good on the premises. Are the machines yours to own?

 

3. When the bailiff called I was away at an appointment - can the above be done in my absence- I am a sole trader and an emplyee dealt with the matter?

 

As with my answer above, yes.

 

Worm

 

Hope this help. Who is the baliff company?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that from the council or the bailiff company. As I understand it the council should have their own code of practice and "rules". My council have capped the % rate for credit card payments to 2.5% - not the 3.8% the bailiff company state!

 

I shall report back when I have more info.

 

I got charged 3.5% by Newlyns by paying on a debit card over the phone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope this help. Who is the baliff company?

 

 

The company is Chandlers.

 

No walking possession was offered during the visit.

 

I understood that goods used for business activity couldn't be taken - most of the machnes were owned at the time. The second hand value of them would be £50 - but maybe £12k in a forced sale.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with PizzaMakers comments.

 

For business rates unlike other debts, work equipment, tools etc can be taken. However if they are not owned by you for example on hp or being leased then they cannot be seized.

 

The bailiff cannot force entry but if peaceful entry has been gained, you are not present and a walking possession agreement is required, then this only has to be signed by someone who is in 'apparent authority' over the goods, which is a vague term I appreciate. Therefore, a forman, manager etc could in theory sign the agreement but someone else may have more information regarding this as this is only my interpretation of this point. Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So really it's better to keep your business rates up to date rather than your Council Tax - if circumstances dictate.

 

With the visit in question the tactics used by the bailiff were far higher handed than a bailiff collecting PAYE on another occasion.:mad:

 

Touch wood business is on the up again and the order book is full - this should get my finances sorted over the next 6 months or so! Then its onto the bank charges!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad your business is on the up.

 

I suppose paying business rates before council tax would possibly be the best option if you were forced to choose because if you lose your ability to earn money, losing machinary etc, then you are in a far worse position than just owing money for council tax.

 

Good luck with the bank charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MP's are usually very interested in local councils trying to destroy industry. I have more than once involved my local MP when things have been a bit tough.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose the other thing is to only lease business machinery, vans, etc - not that any business plans to have such major financial problems. Still even easier to move production overseas and cut staff.:(

 

I just find it very surprising that someone can turn up and effectively close the business down. I should also point out that when the bailiff turned up last year - he just wanted the money - no mention of Walking Possession. I asked about paying in 3 installments (weekly) and this was rejected by him. Maybe he was thinking about the charges he could put my way - lorry for machinery, storage and auction costs etc - an extra £3-4k plus I should think!

 

As I said earlier I am seeing the council later today to talk to the scrutiny group about my experiences.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am very worried about the number of posts that there are to say that someone should pay the council direct. For this reason I am posting the advice that I provided a few days ago on another thread.

 

I will answer the query on here later this morning.

 

 

 

PS: I thought North Somerset were using Ross & Roberts Bailiffs ?

................

 

 

 

As a business, we spend all day dealing ONLY with bailiff problems referred to us by either our website or from police forces and advice bureau's around the country. (We have even had referrals from the Office of Fair Trading!!!)

 

By far the main complaints that we receive about bailiffs concern the threats and intimidation and their excessive fees and charges.

 

Putting aside for one moment the above, we have to constantly talk to councils and bailiffs also as the debtor has paid his council tax to bailiff's INSTEAD of paying the bailiff company.

 

Once a Council has been granted a Liability Order, this then enables the council to PASS the debt to a bailiff to enforce. The bailiff is then entitled to charge his fees ON TOP of the debt owed. If however you then decide to pay the council direct......many councils then credit the payment TO THE CURRENT YEAR'S ACCOUNT. There is nothing to stop them doing this.....and we have seen this happens SO MANY TIMES. Therefore if you, or anyone else for that matter recommonds paying the council online INSTEAD of the bailiffs you should insist that they first get the agreement of the council to do this or at least to get a receipt that shows clearly that the payment has been correctly credited to the right year.

 

A way to avoid this is to send the payment instead to the bailiff company with a letter to say that you are enclosing the payment in Full & Final Settlement of the Liability Order and their fees and include with the payment either an amount of £24.50 plus vat for a first visit or an additional amount of £18.00 plus vat if they have visited twice.

 

Enclose with your payment a letter to say why you are paying the sum enclosed and copy it to the council.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The main reason people pay the council direct is because the Bailiffs won't agree to a remotely reasonable payment plan without a WPO. And not many people are in the position to send the full amount to the bailiffs in the timeframe they request it in (by tomorrow)

I tried sending a payment plan to them with an initial chq (800 outstanding ... could pay £200 a month) and they returned it to me saying it wasn't acceptable. Sent it to the council with a letter advising it was for arrears and they cashed it

 

And yes ... it was Chandlers and N Somerset council

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...