Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments in orange within your post.
    • no i meant the email from parcel2go which email address did they send it from and who signed it off (whos name is at the bottom)
    • I understand confusion with this thread.  I tried to keep threads separate because there have been so many angles.    But a team member merged them all.  This is why it's hard to keep track. This forum exists to help little people fight injustice - however big or small.  Im here to try get a decent resolution. Not to give in to the ' big boys'. My "matter' became complicated 'matters' simply because a lender refused to sell a property. What can I say?  I'll try in a nutshell to give an overview: There's a long lease property. I originally bought it short lease with a s.146 on it from original freeholder.  I had no concerns. So lender should have been able to sell a well-maintained lovely long lease property.  The property was great. The issue is not the property.  Economy, sdlt increases, elections, brexit, covid, interest hikes etc didn't help.  The issue is simple - the lender wanted to keep it.   House or Flat? Before repo I offered to clear my loan.  I was a bit short and lender refused.  They said (recorded) they thought the property was worth much more and they were happy to keep accruing interest (in their benefit) until it reached a point where they felt they could repo and still easily quickly sell to get their £s back.  This was a mistake.  The market was (and is) tough.   2y later the lender ceo bid the same sum to buy the property for himself. He'd rejected higher offers in the intervening period whilst accruing interest. Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same. I had the property under offer to a fantastic niche buyer but lender rushed to repo and buyer got spooked and walked.  It had taken a long time to find such a lucrative buyer.  A sale which would have resulted in £s and another asset for me. Post repo lender had 1 offer immediately.  But dragged out the process for >1y - allegedly trying to get other offers. But disclosure shows there was only one valid buyer. Again, points as above. Lender appointed receiver (after 4 months) - simply to try acquire the freehold.  He used his powers as receiver to use me, as leaseholder, to serve notice on freeholders.  Legally that failed. Meanwhile lender failed to secure property - and squatters got in (3 times).  And they failed to maintain it.  So freeholders served a dilapidations notice (external) - on me as leaseholder (cc-ed to lender).   (That's how it works legally) Why serve a delapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease. I don't own the freehold.  But I am a trustee and have to do right by the freeholders.  This is where matters got/ get complicated.  And probably lose most caggers.   Lawyers got involved for the freeholders to firstly void the receiver enfranchisement notice. Secondly, to serve the dilapidations notice.  The lack of maintenance was in breach of lease and had to be served to protect fh asset. Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to buy the freehold of the property. It's normal, whether it is a "normal" leaseholder or a repossession with a leasehold house, to claim this right of enfranchisement and sell the property with said rights attached and the purchase price of the freehold included in the final completion price. That's likely what the mortgage provider wished to do. The lender did no repairs. They said a buyer would undertake them. Which was probably correct. If they had sold. After 1y lender finally agreed to sell to the 1st offeror and contracts went with lawyers.  Within 1 month lender reneged.  Lender tried to suggest buyer walked. Evidence shows he/ his lawyers continued trying to exchange (cash) for 4 months.  Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been to renege and for ceo to take control.   I still think that's their plan. Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at? Lender then stupidly chose to pretty much bulldoze the property.  Other stuff was going on in the background. After repo I was in touch by phone and email and lender knew post got to me.   Despite this, after about 10 months (before and then during covid), they deliberately sent SDs and eventually a B petition to an incorrect address and an obscure small court.  They never served me properly.  (In hindsight I understand they hoped to get a backdoor B - so they could keep the property that way.)  Eventually the random court told them to email me by way of service.  At this point their ruse to make me B failed.  I got a lawyer (friend paid). The B petition was struck out. They’d failed to include the property as an asset. They were in breach of insolvency rules. So this is dealt with then. Simultaneously the receiver again appointed lawyers to act on my behalf as leaseholder. This time to serve notice on the freeholders for a lease extension.  He had hoped to try and vary the strict lease. Evidence shows the already long length of lease wasn't an issue.  The lender obviously hoped to get round their lack of permission to do works (which they were already doing) by hoping to remove the strict clauses that prevent leaseholder doing alterations.  You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension. You'd need a Deed of Variation for that. This may be done at the same time but the lease has already been extended once and that's all they have a right to. The extension created a new legal angle for me to deal with.  I had to act as trustee for freeholders against me as leaseholder/ the receiver.  Inconsistencies and incompetence by receiver lawyers dragged this out 3y.  It still isn't properly resolved. The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there. Meanwhile - going back to the the works the lender undertook. The works were consciously in breach of lease.  The lender hadn't remedied the breaches listed in the dilapidations notice.  They destroyed the property.  The trustees compiled all evidence.  The freeholders lawyers then served a forfeiture notice. This notice started a different legal battle. I was acting for the freeholders against what the lender had done on my behalf as leaseholder.  This legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease. The simple exit would have been for lender to sell. A simple agreement to remedy the breaches and recompense the freeholders in compensation - and there's have been clean title to sell.  That option was proposed to them.   This happened by way of mediation for all parties 2y ago.  A resolution option was put forward and in principle agreed.  But immediately after the lender lawyers failed to engage.  A hard lesson to learn - mediation cannot be referred to in court. It's considered w/o prejudice. The steps they took have made no difference to their ability to sell the property.  Almost 3y since they finished works they still haven't sold. ** ** I followed up some leads myself.  A qualified cash buyer offered me a substantial sum.  The lender and receiver both refused it.   I found another offer in disclosure.  6 months later someone had apparently offered a substantial sum via an agent.  The receiver again rejected it.  The problem of course was that the agent had inflated the market price to get the business. But no-one was or is ever going to offer their list price.  Yet the receiver wanted/wants to hold out for the list price.  Which means 1y later not only has it not sold - disclosure shows few viewings and zero interest.  It's transparently over-priced.  And tarnished. For those asking why I don't give up - I couldn't/ can't.  Firstly I have fiduciary duties as a trustee. Secondly, legal advice indicates I (as leaseholder) could succeed with a large compensation claim v the lender.  Also - I started a claim v my old lawyer and the firm immediately reimbursed some £s. That was encouraging.  And a sign to continue.  So I'm going for compensation.  I had finance in place (via friend) to do a deal and take the property back off the lender - and that lawyer messed up bad.   He should have done a deal.  Instead further years have been wasted.   Maybe I only get back my lost savings - but that will be a result.   If I can add some kind of complaint/ claim v the receiver's conscious impropriety I will do so.   I have been left with nothing - so fighting for something is worth it. The lender wants to talk re a form of settlement.  Similar to my proposal 2y ago.  I have a pretty clear idea of what that means to me.  This is exactly why I do not give up.  And why I continue to ask for snippets of advice/ pointers on cag.  
    • It was all my own work based on my previous emails to P2G which Bank has seen.
    • I was referring to #415 where you wrote "I was forced to try to sell - and couldn't." . And nearer the start in #79 .. "I couldn't sell.  I had an incredibly valuable asset. Huge equity.  But the interest accrued / the property market suffered and I couldn't find a buyer even at a level just to clear the debt." In #194 you said you'd tried to sell for four years.  The reason for these points is that a lot of the claims against for example your surveyor, solicitor, broker, the lender and now the receiver are mainly founded in a belief that they should have been able to do something but did not. Things that might seem self evident to you but not necessarily to others. Pressing these claims may well need a bit more hard evidence, rather than an appeal to common sense. Can you show evidence of similar properties, with similar freehold issues, selling readily? And solid reasons why the lender should have been able to sell when you couldn't.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Extremely worried - HA applying for warrant of possession - rent arrears.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2026 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

My Housing Association has informed me that they are applying for a warrant of possession due to the continuous climbing of my rent arrears.

 

The current arrears is at £3485 (I know it's high).

It got this high because of issues with Housing Benefit (it got stopped).

This was a big hit and I wasn't sure how to deal with this.

I was not immediately aware it was stopped.

 

I'm only now just recovering from that and will be able to make monthly rent payments again to compensate for the lack of Housing Benefit.

 

I'm a full-time student and the University have given me some part-time jobs to do that would aid in me paying the rent (I've told them my situation).

 

My Son and Daughter have also found jobs, so they'll be able to help out as well.

 

Now, I've tried to get my Housing Association to not apply for a warrant by offering them a payment plan.

 

However, they are not going for it and just keep saying how the rent climbed continuously from February 2018 and they cannot wait until I'm able to clear it off in full. They want the full amount now.

 

My plan was to pay what I could now (about £100-150 over the next couple weeks) and get my children to cover some more in a month's time and month's thereafter (when they actually get paid) and in September 2018, use some of my student loan to clear the remaining debt (it's enough to pay for it and leave me with something)

In September, it will drop to 0 due to the large lump sum.

 

Does this sound reasonable?

I don't have the money in full now, but I will eventually.

I'll also be able to prevent further dropping into arrears after clearing it due to a change in circumstances (for the better).

 

All I needed was to find something to replace Housing Benefit which I now have.

Since I can't get the HA to drop the warrant, I've read I'll need to try go through the courts instead.

 

How are they with suspending evictions? Do they favour Housing Associations more than the tenant?

Does my proposed plan sound reasonable enough to convince a judge that I should not be evicted?

 

The reason they are able to apply for a warrant quickly is because I've had issues in the past with them but it got sorted provided I stuck to the agreement back then and paid off the arrears.

 

I paid that off and my account went into credit for some time.

It's only since February that it took a downturn and caused the arrears to climb out of control.

 

I know it took time to act but I'm acting now and I'm able to clear it soon.

 

I do not have the notice yet.

I don't currently know when I have to be out.

 

I'm just panicking and trying to take action now before it's too late.

How long do these notices take to get served and how long do they give you after you get it?

 

I'm just worried sick about losing my home and what hurts me more is knowing I'll have enough money to clear it off soon.

 

Time is pretty much against me right now.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello and welcome to CAG. I'm sorry to hear about your problems, well done for coming up with a plan. Hopefully that will stand you in good stead with the court.

 

People should be along over the course of the say to advise, please bear with us until they're able to get here. :)

 

Best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This link seems most helpful for your situation.

 

https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/eviction/can_housing_association_tenants_stop_the_bailiffs

 

Get advice from Shelter and follow it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason they are able to apply for a warrant quickly is because I've had issues in the past with them but it got sorted provided I stuck to the agreement back then and paid off the arrears. I paid that off and my account went into credit for some time. It's only since February that it took a downturn and caused the arrears to climb out of control. I know it took time to act but I'm acting now and I'm able to clear it soon.

 

 

What notice(s) did they issue, and / or action did they take regarding the previous arrears that you cleared?

Did they get any court order (even a suspended one)?

 

Would you be able to get the arrears down below 8 weeks rent (for weekly rent) / 2 months rent (for monthly rent) by the time of any court hearing?.

 

Was your Housing Benefit stopped on valid grounds (which?), or can you appeal that decision?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just put on £780 towards our rent which has dropped the arrears to £2852.

I am also going to be putting a further £708 at the end of the July and then another for the same amount at the end of August assuming I'm still in the property by then.

 

These payments take some off the arrears but most important stop the climb which led to the arrears hitting 3.4k in the first place.

 

Come September 2018 when Student Finance payment comes through (amounts to around £5.5k),

I will clear the remaining debt and cover any court costs required

(it should be around £2.5k + court costs).

 

I will also be able to continue making monthly payments from then after.

 

I presented this plan to my Housing Association but unfortunately they still are content with letting the eviction go ahead.

They told me to apply for a "Stay of Eviction" after I received the eviction date and would only agree to a stay if we paid the arrears off in full.

That sucks and is making me more worried now.

 

I am willing to pay off the arrears and it will be cleared in a reasonable amount of time.

They just won't wait now.

 

The possession order was from 2014 or so,

it was many years ago and I can't remember exactly what it said.

 

I haven't been able to even find the document for it.

I do know that I eventually cleared the arrears off in full.

 

All I know is that's allowed them to apply for a warrant.

They aren't going to court for a breach in the suspended order,

they are going because of the continous climb since around February 2018.

 

They are simply able to use that order lingering over me to get a quicker eviction.

I suppose they don't have to reason with me now.

 

Do I have any chance of getting this dropped via the County court (form N244)?

Will a judge see that I'm trying to actually correct the issue and I'm not trying to stall for time,

and actually give me a chance when my Housing Association won't?

 

It's frustrating me knowing that I will be thrown out on the street when I can actually pay it off, just not all in one go right now.

It's not like it's going to take me years to clear either.

 

It's simply only 2 months and I'm still paying current rent to stop it climbing up even higher.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

cant see a judge agreeing with them under those proposals.

 

are the arrears all your doing or are they charging you unlawful arrears fees too.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The arrears were because Housing Benefit got stopped and it took me time to find something to cover that loss.

now have found ways to cover that loss.

 

It just took me a lot of time to get sorted out.

I did inform the Housing Association as well of this and they did wait a bit.

However, I suppose because it was taking too long,

they decided enough was enough and applied for a warrant.

 

I'm not not able to get them to back down even with those proposals.

I paid the £780 2 days ago but I'm now worried that I've essentially wasted that money for nothing.

 

I want to clear it, but I don't want to be thrown out onto the streets.

I'm not sure why they aren't agreeing to wait.

It's far more likely they'd get their money by not evicting me than if they did.

 

They are adamant about getting their money in full.

They are acting like even if I apply for a "stay of eviction",

which was my Income Officer's recommendation,

it won't be granted unless the arrears are paid off in full.

They want it now and refuse to wait.

 

I'm still looking for a solicitor as well.

Not having much luck yet but I have some time seeing how the date hasn't come yet.

 

I'm guessing you can't apply to the courts until you get the eviction date.

 

Still very worried about the outcome.

I felt my proposal is solid and takes care of the problem.

It should be satisfactory.

 

I'm just not sure why they can't see it that way and would rather throw me out.

 

If I can't convince my Housing Association, how will a Judge see it differently?

That's what I'm worried about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the judge will put them in their place.

 

I hope you are not talking on the phone to these muppets???

 

and the every thing is in writing only??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I e-mailed the proposal to my Income Officer. I did originally go in and speak to him. He didn't budge though. He just kept saying management said no and that was that. After that, I then tried pleading with him via E-mail to no avail.

 

He just keeps basically saying the same thing and telling me to wait for an eviction date and then to apply for a "stay of eviction" via the county court. He pointed out that a stay would only be granted if I paid the arrears + court costs off in full. He made it seem like it's their choice whether or not a stay of eviction is granted. I'm not even sure if this is the same thing as getting the warrant suspended.

 

One thing I've read about is that if the possession order was made on a mandatory ground (ground 8), then there's nothing the judge can do. I don't know what grounds the order was made on because it was years ago. Will the eviction letter tell me what grounds are being used? This part is worrying me as well because if it's ground 8, I'm basically done for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the wording from the Act.....

 

Both at the date of the service of the notice under section 8 of this Act relating to the proceedings for possession and at the date of the hearing—

 

(a) if rent is payable weekly or fortnightly, at least eight weeks’ rent is unpaid;

(b) if rent is payable monthly, at least two months’ rent is unpaid;

© if rent is payable quarterly, at least one quarter’s rent is more than three months in arrears; and

(d) if rent is payable yearly, at least three months’ rent is more than three months in arrears;

and for the purpose of this ground “rent” means rent lawfully due from the tenant.

 

Mandatory ground 8

 

The tenant’s right to apply to suspend a warrant effectively only applies when possession has been made on a discretionary ground (Housing Act 1980, s89). Parliament has given landlords of assured tenants, such as registered social landlords (‘RSLs’), a mandatory rent arrears ground: Ground 8 may be used when there are at least eight week’s unpaid rent. If possession is obtained on this mandatory ground then the court’s order should not normally be suspended for more than 14 days. The only flexibility on the court’s power is that enforcement may be suspended for a maximum of six weeks where this is necessary to avoid exceptional hardship. The six week period starts on the day the possession order was made (Housing Act 1980, s89).

 

The use of mandatory Ground 8 in rent arrears cases need cause no unfairness to the tenant because where there are exceptional circumstances for the existence of the rent arrears then the court has the power to adjourn the possession claim (North British HA v Matthews (2005) 1 WLR 3133 - but note the narrow definition given to ‘exceptional circumstances’: the fact that arrears are attributable to maladministration on the part of the housing benefit authority is not an exceptional circumstance (para 32)). Moreover, having obtained the possession order the landlord could opt not to enforce it, for example, if the tenant’s circumstances materially change.

 

Before embarking on a ground 8 claim RSLs should note that Housing Corporation Regulatory Circular 07/04 (para 3.1.4) requires the landlord to have first pursued other alternatives to debt recovery. It also notes that where ground 8 forms part of an arrears and eviction policy, tenants should have been consulted and the governing board should have approved the policy.

 

Some RSL tenancy agreements prohibit the use of ground 8. In these circumstances the tenant may be able to obtain an injunction to prevent breach of contract if ground 8 was used. Any such prohibition should be removed if an RSL wishes to rely on ground 8.

 

Landlords who obtain a ground 8 possession order must also ensure that this fact is stated on the face of the order (Capital Prime Plus plc v Willis (1998) 31 HLR 926, CA).

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will the warrant state what ground was used?

 

Are ground 8 possession orders everlasting? I can't find much information regarding suspended possession orders when it comes to ground 8.

 

It's the part worrying me most as because I have a previous order hovering over me, the HA really don't need to reason with me. This order was years ago, from around 2014.

 

They haven't said I've breached the old order in the emails sent, just that they applied because of the continuous climb of the arrears since February.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let us know when you get the eviction notice and we can help you with the N244 application to court. Given you have a proposal to clear the arrears and have made payments recently to reduce them, it is very unlikely that a judge will allow the eviction to go ahead. By the way, it's not the housing officer's place to say "even if you apply to the court it won't be granted", it's the judge's decision - not his!! and judges don't like taking people's homes away if they have the ability to pay going forward. I take it you are able to cover the rent going forward after the arrears are cleared ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do and yes I can keep it cleared going forward. I just guess I have to hope ground 8 wasn't used back when I first got the suspended order because if ground 8 was used, I'm basically screwed right and can't defend it?

Edited by Gourger20
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Okay, I received an N24 today regarding my eviction. On the 24th July 2018, they were granted permission to issue a warrant for possession of land in this case. It states it was issued without a hearing and if I object, I can apply to have it set aside, varied or revoked providing I do so within 7 days from the date of service of the order.

 

The problem? The letter only just came today and those 7 days have passed.

 

I noticed the letter has a post code error. The last letter is wrong (it's not the post code written on every other letter we've had from other places). Could this be why it took so long to arrive?

 

Is there anything I can do to stop this? I've tried calling the court but can't seem to get through right now. I'm a bit worried as this isn't what I was expecting. I was expecting a date. Please help.

Edited by Gourger20
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes ring the court and advise date of receipt and post code error...you should still be able to act from the date of receipt.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been trying all morning and they don't seem to be answering.

 

There's no way it should have taken this long if it wasn't for the post code error. They got everything else right but the post code is wrong and I checked it on the Royal Mail postcode finder and it's an address for another house near me with the same house number but a different name (it's on the same road as me).

 

Is this the first step for a warrant claim? I was expecting to get a date on which I need to be out but the letter doesn't state any.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The N24 is General Form of Judgement or Order.

 

They were granted permission to issue a warrant for possession.

 

The Court of Appeal has determined that anyone applying for a warrant of possession must first apply to Court for permission to enforce a suspended possession order and can no longer simply issue the form N325 straightaway.

 

In accordance with Civil Procedure Rule 83.2 (1) (d), warrants of possession fall within the category of warrants which may require permission to be issued. The relevant procedure rule states that where an order is suspended on terms, most commonly in respect of payment of rent and a breach of those terms is alleged by the applicant, permission must be sought to enforce the order. This means that the applicant needs to make a separate application to the Court providing evidence of the breach which is being relied upon, before the Court can be satisfied that permission should be given to issue the warrant.

 

Can you not call into your local court ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Furthermore a question was also raised before the Court of Appeal as to whether it was acceptable for a Court to rely on Civil Procedure Rule 3.10 to excuse the failure to get permission before a warrant of possession was applied for, where a tenant or mortgagor had made their own application to suspend the eviction. The Court of Appeal held that at a hearing of an application to suspend the warrant, the Court can rely on rule 3.10 to excuse the failure to seek possession, provided that the defendant (i.e the tenant or mortgagor) has been given the opportunity to put their position forward to the Court.

 

The requirement for permission to be sought before a warrant for possession is issued is seen as a safeguard for the tenant/ mortgagor and is an important stage in the process of getting possession of the property which should not be overlooked.

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part03#3.10

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

We called them and they said the order starts from 31st July, so apparently I actually have more time than I thought.

Weird, because the letter made it sound like it started from the 24th July 2018.

Court reassured me it's not and told me to stop panicking as I have time.

 

They've told me to simply write to the court and state why I want the order stopped stating all the facts and to mention the post code error of the N24 form.

Then I am to wait for the court to respond.

More waiting I suppose.

 

What should I apply for?

Set aside or revoking the order?

What is better to do in my situation (given I can pay the arrears off in full in September)?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

set a side N244.....without hearing initially (£100)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the difference between setting aside and revoking the judgement order?

 

The court simply told me to write to them first (didn't mention any forms or anything) explaining why I disagree with the judgement order and inform them everything I've done and am doing to correct the issue.

 

The court will then decide what the next step is.

I'm just not sure if I should be revoking or setting aside the N24 order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Setting a side is to set a side the order..to suspend it ( temporarily or indefinitely subject the claimants response)

 

To revoke an order is to annul or make void by recalling or taking back; to cancel, rescind, repeal, or reverse.

 

One and the same in theory but used more in amending consent orders.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should be just focusing on setting it aside and not revoking it?

Is that correct?

 

I will be attaching evidence to the letter of my payments made to the Housing Association (made two payments so far and will be making another at end of August and then on 11th September to clear what's left) and proof that I will be receiving a large sum that will tackle the remaining debt at that point. I will also make it clear what went wrong and how it will be prevented in the future.

 

Do my chances look decent?

There's only around 1 month until I can clear my arrears off.

I would like to think the judge would not evict me seeing how I've made two contributions (£780 as mentioned earlier and then £710 at the end of July) and am planning to do another £710 at the end of August before clearing what's left in September with the lump sum I am getting.

 

This defence sounds strong to me and makes me a little optimistic, but at the end of the day it depends on the judge.

I don't know how they are when it comes to evicting Housing Association tenants.

I would think the judge would like to see those two big payments made in effort to tackle my arrears issue

- surely that speaks enough that I am not stalling and will pay it off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you contacted Shelter to help you with liaising with the Housing Association - they are extremely good in these circumstances.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...