Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

TFL - fare evasion, help plz


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2552 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No. They've asked you to write / e-mail, so write or email.

 

If you call you might get flustered (you mentioned you panicked when questioned).

They might also ask questions they haven't already asked like "have you previously travelled without paying your fare" ; if they haven't asked this in what they've written you don't have to volunteer information they haven't asked for (just in case answering truthfully might be a problem......)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I quite liked the original "gavelling letter"

 

Combination of typoitis and auto-correct?

 

 

I've heard they like letters written on sand paper

frukes their scanners up lovely

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Many thanks for your letter dated [] of Reference [] and offering me the opportunity to reply back to you.

 

On [date], I took a train from West drayton to Shepherd Bush. I did not touch in when I entered the station as I was running very late and I had to give the presentation to the client. It was a new client and I was quite nervous in the morning due to that.

 

When I come out at the Shepherd Bush station, I also used the wrong card and that was because both the Oyster card and tesco card were in the same pocket. Once I was stopped by the revenue inspector, I realized that I used the wrong card. I did show my registered Oyster card to the revenue inspector and it did have enough money to cover the cost of travel. I immediately realized my mistake and apologized to the inspector. I would also like to offer you my sincere apologies for my actions on [date].

 

I spent most of my time on train and tube to prepare for my presentation to the client and I seriously apologize for my absent mindedness on the morning of [date].

 

I am extremely fearful of the potential consequences on my current and future employment as I work in information technology and they take criminal conviction very seriously.

 

I am also extremely worried about the impact of me having a criminal conviction on my record to the extension of my wife's visa as criminal conviction is taken very seriously.

 

This incident made me extremely worried and stressed and I would like to take this opportunity to assure you that I am feeling deeply ashamed and embarrassed with the whole situation. I am so sorry and I am disgusted with my behaviour on this occasion. I certainly learnt from this experience and I again reassure you that I will never ever let that mistake happen again in future.

 

I think of myself as a valuable part of the community and I would like to give back to community by providing my voluntary services to the charity of your choice.

 

I pledge you to allow me to make the necessary compensation to your company, therefore If possible, I would like to remedy this situation and avoid it being escalated further by way of an administrative settlement. I would like to offer payment of the appropriate outstanding fare and to cover any additional administrative costs you have incurred, due to my poor actions.

 

Look forward to hearing from you soon.

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

too much waffle...

 

 

use your nervousness to your advantage.

 

 

it will have no bearing at all on your wifes' visa ..ditch that.

 

 

ditch the charity bit

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

too much waffle...

 

 

use your nervousness to your advantage.

 

 

it will have no bearing at all on your wifes' visa ..ditch that.

 

 

ditch the charity bit

 

 

dx

 

:(

 

home office do perform DBS check on both applicant and sponsor, if my criminal conviction flagged up on either of dbs checks, surely her visa will be rejected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thank you for your letter of [date].

its contents are duly noted and I would very much like to take up your kind offer of allowing me to explain the reasons for the unfortunate situation that I found myself in.

 

on the day of the incident my employment had tasked me to give a very important presentation to one of their most valued clients.

This, in my current role, was a potential leader toward further movement within the company, and if I were to be honest, was still not of a standard I was happy with.

 

I took a train from West drayton to Shepherd Bush.

I did not touch in when I entered the station as I was running very late due to the above.

 

I spent most of my time on train and tube still ruining through this presentation to the client.

 

I arrived at the Shepherd Bush station and mistakenly used my Tesco clubcard at the barrier, that and my Oyster card are kept in the same pocket.

 

Your system correctly alerted to the error and I was approached by the revenue inspector,

 

It was then I realised the card mistake and presented my registered Oyster card to the revenue inspector.

The Card was checked and this confirmed it had enough credit to cover the cost of the travel in question.

 

I would like to offer you my sincere apologies for my actions .

 

I am extremely fearful of the potential consequences on my current and future employment as I work in information technology and they take criminal conviction very seriously.

 

I would like to take this opportunity to assure you that I am feeling deeply ashamed and embarrassed with the whole situation.

 

 

I am so sorry and I am disgusted with my behaviour on this occasion.

 

I have certainly learnt from this experience and I again reassure you that I will never ever let such a mistake happen again in future.

 

I offer to you any reasonable monetary sums equivalent to any related fines and administrative fees you have incurred to allow me to keep my criminal record clear.

 

This would have a very negative effect upon my future employment as my presentation that caused this situation to occur was received very well and impressed my employers, it would be such a shame for this incident to wash that success away.

 

Once again, I apologise for my actions and hope you will take the matter for what it was and allow me to suitably resolve the matter to our mutual satisfaction.

 

yours

etc

 

 

Look forward to hearing from you soon.

Yours faithfully,

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't address the obvious question : how did the OP get from Network Rail to TfL ;the barriers may have been open at West Drayton but what happened at the interchange (Paddington? Ealing Broadway??)

 

Of course, they haven't overtly asked you that so if answering it may be damaging you may decide to skip over that. Did the Revenue staff enquire? (they'll marry up your answer with the report / notes they made).

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

No barrier at Ealing Broadway interchange.

 

My question to the op is:

you said that you used your Tesco card to exit at shepherd bush. Is this a contactless credit card?

 

Did it work the gate, so you touched and the barrier opened?

 

If so,

you have paid a maximum fare which is your fare for the journey, although more than standard fare.

 

Check your Tesco card statement and if there's a charge for that journey, you have paid.

 

If that's the case you need to send TfL a copy of your statement with the charge highlighted and simply tell them that you mistakenly used your Tesco card instead of the oyster but then produced the oyster card to the revenue inspector.

 

As this card had not been used at the barrier, the inspector reported you.

 

In simple terms,

you did fail to produce a ticket on request, but you had paid with your Tesco card.

 

If all checks out, prosecution would be very unlikely because you have paid for your journey.

 

Let us know if there's a charge on the Tesco card please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I stupidly used my tesco club card to touch out instead of oyster card as both were in the same pocket.

 

My question to the op is: you said that you used your Tesco card to exit at shepherd bush. Is this a contactless credit card?

 

Tesco club card or tesco credit card (or even clubcard credit card .....!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tesco club card or tesco credit card (or even clubcard credit card .....!)

 

No, it was a normal tesco club card and not a credit card.

 

I don't know whether it gave a green light when I touched the card but definitely barriers were still open.

 

 

It was a long queue of people,

so either I managed to come out of barriers because of tailgating

or person behind me touched his card early enough to make the barriers open.

 

If barriers would have remain closed once I touched my card,

that could clearly show me that the card I am using not a oyster card

and could resolve the situation there and then without any involvement from RI.

 

I don't know where the technology is taking us?

Link to post
Share on other sites

a Tesco clubcard has only a magnetic swipe strip not a RF chip

 

I would suggest he saw you tailgate

and then things unfolded from there.

 

quite honestly i'd not bother explaining further.

 

you only need to answer the questions regarding travel for which they are indicating they want the explanation for

whether or not you travelled on another system to get that far and how you paid or didn't is somewhat immaterial.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it was a normal tesco club card and not a credit card.

 

I don't know whether it gave a green light when I touched the card but definitely barriers were still open.

 

 

It was a long queue of people,

so either I managed to come out of barriers because of tailgating

or person behind me touched his card early enough to make the barriers open.

 

If barriers would have remain closed once I touched my card,

that could clearly show me that the card I am using not a oyster card

and could resolve the situation there and then without any involvement from RI.

 

I don't know where the technology is taking us?

 

In this case, grovelling letter as suggested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I offer to you any reasonable monetary sums equivalent to any related fines and administrative fees you have incurred to allow me to keep my criminal record clear.

 

Please advice what should be the reasonable amount I should offer them in my letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please advice what should be the reasonable amount I should offer them in my letter?

 

You see what they say you'll need to cough up.

 

It'll likely be less than you'd be fined, but one disadvantage compared with a fine from a court, you'll need to pay it in one lump sum (no installment option!).

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean likely to be less than 1000£ (Max fine)?

 

Certainly. Have a look at other, similar, threads to see what people have been asked to pay for 'administrative settlements'

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh a lot less

 

 

might even just be a couple £100

theres one here that was simply the fare and £40 admin

another @£240.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

rubbish waste of money

 

 

yes if you'd been doing this for months possibly

but this was an honest mistake

 

 

if you read this forum

then you'll see 99% result is a very small sum to sort the matter.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

rubbish waste of money

 

 

yes if you'd been doing this for months possibly

but this was an honest mistake

 

 

if you read this forum

then you'll see 99% result is a very small sum to sort the matter.

 

 

dx

 

That's what I thought as well and these solicitors are asking at least 600£ to draft a letter. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had spoken to couple of my good friends and they are STRONGLY suggesting me to hire a solicitor instead of me writing to TFL, what do you guys think?

 

Why do they say they suggest this? (& so strongly too!)

 

Have they dealt with this lots before?? (by comparison with the many cases CAG has helped with).

 

Are they suggesting a particular solicitor with special expertise in such cases / railway law?.

 

What extra are you getting for your money (and the risk TfL may react less favourably ......)?

 

 

Ohh, and given it is a Bank Holiday Monday, and you only got the letter Saturday evening ....I'm surprised you've been able to speak to a solicitor about it already for them to quote you £600.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Ohh, and given it is a Bank Holiday Monday, and you only got the letter Saturday evening ....I'm surprised you've been able to speak to a solicitor about it already for them to quote you £600.....

 

This is the first time it happened to me and none of my friends (who suggested for solicitor) even involved with fare evasion. They did not suggest any particular solicitor but advised me to speak to them before I write to TFL.

 

Even I am not in favour to use the solicitor, but I thought I should run the idea on the forum and hence the question.

 

At least 3 solicitors I have spoken to yesterday have 24 hr helpline, I called them, left the message and they returned my call and one of them even sent an email with their T&C.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...