Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4079 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi bet I'm in wrong place, hope someone will move me to the correct place need some advice.

 

I live in a three story block of flats

 

a new tenant moved in below me around 18 months ago,

 

I recently received a complaint from the housing officer regarding my washing machine being on during the night,

 

its on a timer to start during the cheap rates times economy 7 once a week, it sits in the kitchen on a concrete floor.

 

The tenant claims he can hear said washing machine, the housing officer has told me to stop using the machine and only use it in the day.

 

Ive been using this machine since the tenant moved in as I said 18 months ago and well before that,

 

what I don't understand is why has it only become a problem now I feel there is some aggregating going on regards to the noise level

 

can the housing officer tell me to stop using washing machine with out checking first whether it really is a problem and not just take the tenants word for it that it is.

 

what's next my tumble dryer my fridge. :evil:

Edited by matt v atos
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to be honest, about 10 years ago we lived in a flat and our upstairs neighbours had a washing machine on a concrete floor. I think you'd be surprised how incredibly loud it is in your neighbour's flat - we couldn't hear the TV, or each other speak. I think because the ceiling cavity acted as an amplifier, it was actually much louder in our flat than it was in their own.

 

That being said, they had it on every day not just once a week, and I appreciate that if you're on Economy 7 it is cheaper to use it at night. Is there any way you could place it on something to dampen the noise?

 

In fact, what about something like this?

 

http://www.amazon.co.uk/VIBRATION-DAMPERS-Dampeners-Pack-Dishwasher/dp/B002V7Y8JY

  • Confused 1

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

I'll check which is likely to be the best forum for you. What time/s are you using the machine please?

 

And has the housing office checked the noise level, for example?

 

 

 

My best, HB

 

That info is in my post #1

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to be honest, about 10 years ago we lived in a flat and our upstairs neighbours had a washing machine on a concrete floor. I think you'd be surprised how incredibly loud it is in your neighbour's flat - we couldn't hear the TV, or each other speak. I think because the ceiling cavity acted as an amplifier, it was actually much louder in our flat than it was in their own.

 

That being said, they had it on every day not just once a week, and I appreciate that if you're on Economy 7 it is cheaper to use it at night. Is there any way you could place it on something to dampen the noise?

 

In fact, what about something like this?

 

http://www.amazon.co.uk/VIBRATION-DAMPERS-Dampeners-Pack-Dishwasher/dp/B002V7Y8JY

 

It goes to a fast spin for 3 nins and it don't bounce around it don't make a noise when on wash only on spin

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

I'll check which is likely to be the best forum for you. What time/s are you using the machine please?

 

And has the housing office checked the noise level, for example?

 

My best, HB

 

No the housing officer has checked nothing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but three minutes on a fast spin is enough to wake you up when it sounds like the machine is going to come through your ceiling. :-)

 

Honestly, I can only advise you based on my own experience, and that is that it's probably much louder in their flat than it is in yours. I'll also be honest and say that although I never complained to them or anyone else while we were there, if they'd been using it through the night I probably would have done. Unfortunately, noise issues are an occupational hazard of living in flats, I'm afraid. In my experience, it's better to try to find a compromise rather than let it escalate into a tenant war. Is it coming on at 10pm?

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but three minutes on a fast spin is enough to wake you up when it sounds like the machine is going to come through your ceiling. :-)

 

Honestly, I can only advise you based on my own experience, and that is that it's probably much louder in their flat than it is in yours. I'll also be honest and say that although I never complained to them or anyone else while we were there, if they'd been using it through the night I probably would have done. Unfortunately, noise issues are an occupational hazard of living in flats, I'm afraid. In my experience, it's better to try to find a compromise rather than let it escalate into a tenant war. Is it coming on at 10pm?

 

Yes around that time

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, all I can really say is that it's up to you where you go from here - just bear in mind that he/she has already chosen to go to a housing officer rather than have a polite word with you about it first. These things have a nasty way of escalating into 'us v's them' situations - if it was me, I'd stick a polite note through his door saying that I didn't realise it was so loud, I'd try to find a way to reduce the noise in future but if it's still a problem come and let me know.

 

EDIT: Sorry, just seen your other post. Just contact the housing officer, tell her that you've apologised and are going to try to dampen the noise in future. To be honest, nothing's going to happen unless he continues to complain and they actually do end up monitoring the noise. Even then, I can't see noise occurring once a week affecting your tenancy. Do you have a tenants handbook? Have a look at what their policies are on handling 'noise nuisance'.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, all I can really say is that it's up to you where you go from here - just bear in mind that he/she has already chosen to go to a housing officer rather than have a polite word with you about it first. These things have a nasty way of escalating into 'us v's them' situations - if it was me, I'd stick a polite note through his door saying that I didn't realise it was so loud, I'd try to find a way to reduce the noise in future but if it's still a problem come and let me know.

 

EDIT: Sorry, just seen your other post. Just contact the housing officer, tell her that you've apologised and are going to try to dampen the noise in future. To be honest, nothing's going to happen unless he continues to complain and they actually do end up monitoring the noise. Even then, I can't see noise occurring once a week affecting your tenancy. Do you have a tenants handbook? Have a look at what their policies are on handling 'noise nuisance'.

 

Thanks for your reply just think the noise level should have been checked first to confirm the tenant was right I would not have a problem with this.:evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ironically, the housing officer was probably trying to stop the situation escalating to where the noise levels need to be checked, by having a quiet word and letting you know that he's getting wound up about it.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

liasing with the neighbour is a very good idea

 

it might also be an idea to ask for how long this had been going on too.

 

it might well be that its got worse or only started in recent weeks.

 

could indicate something is going unbalaced in the machine or its walked a bit or the bearings are on the way out

if its just ac ase of they've had it for 18mts and just decided to mention in fair enough

but if the noise has changed of recent, its worth an investigation

 

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably not a bad idea. At least then you'll have it in writing as to whether you're breaking any rules.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

liasing with the neighbour is a very good idea

 

it might also be an idea to ask for how long this had been going on too.

 

it might well be that its got worse or only started in recent weeks.

 

could indicate something is going unbalaced in the machine or its walked a bit or the bearings are on the way out

if its just ac ase of they've had it for 18mts and just decided to mention in fair enough

but if the noise has changed of recent, its worth an investigation

 

dx

 

This info is in post #1

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go and speak to the neighbour and ask her if you put the washing machine on could you pop in to hear what the problem is during the day.

 

It may be a lot louder to neighbour but even if it doesn't seem that loud to you it clearly does to them at night and probably keeps her awake.

Your neighbour may well be a light sleeper.

Then you could try muffling the sound and see if what you come up with is acceptable.

 

I would guess that perhaps your neighbour was nervous about speaking direct, some people can get aggressive and take offence when spoken to.

It is easier to reach an amicable solution with your neighbour explaining why you use it at night, than going through a third party.

 

Once you have taken steps to reduce ' the noise' to an acceptable level.

Might be interesting what else your neighbour can hear below?

 

I had a friend who lived in a flat and one of the two residents sounded like an elephant thumping across the floor even though clearly it was without shoes.

Also we could hear them quite clearly just talking in a normal voice.

If there is insufficient sound proofing the council might have to do something about it but if it's just the machine then you might be able to solve that yourself.

 

Anyway you might just meet a very nice neighbour grateful for your genuine concern in trying to remedy their problem. It's no fun being kept awake at night.

If you ignore the problem, the council may put recording equipment in the flat below to monitor the noise nuisance and use as evidence for any action they decide to take.

 

So let them know you are in contact with the neighbour in an attempt to find an amicable solution for you both

and then let them know when you've how and when you managed to resolve the problem.

 

It may be useful to them as I'm sure this is likely to be a fairly common complaint in flats. Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do understand your annoyance, Matt. Unfortunately, once they start getting equipment in to check the noise levels, the situation has already escalated and I'm sure that's something that the Housing Association (and you, really) would prefer to avoid.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do understand your annoyance, Matt. Unfortunately, once they start getting equipment in to check the noise levels, the situation has already escalated and I'm sure that's something that the Housing Association (and you, really) would prefer to avoid.

 

If you made a complaint one would not be suprised if your complaint was checked out first in case it was being exaggerated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you made a complaint one would not be suprised if your complaint was checked out first in case it was being exaggerated.

 

Fair enough - as I say, I understand why you're annoyed. Lets see what the HA come up with - you should have a much clearer idea of where you stand when they reply.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...