Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though.     A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees.   https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
    • China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Tenancy - Succession


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4449 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Asking on behalf of a friend who by no fault of their own has been left to deal with a difficult situation.

 

In a nutshell, he has live in the same council house for over 40 years, his mother is the current tenant.

 

His mother is terminally ill and won't be around for more than a couple of months, she is deteriorating fast. She is in her 80's

 

In the mid 80's his father was the tenant and he passed it over to his wife (the terminally ill mother) via a divorce settlement.

 

When my friend contacted the council they were adamant that it was a succession from his Dad to his Ma and therefore no further successions could take place...as in my friend succeeding the tenancy from his mother.

 

Having no succession rights means that on the death of his mother my friend will be at the mercy of the council, they don't have any obligation to help him single man, no other family and no real priorty for housing. The council over the phone stated 'don't worry, we wont chuck you on the street' yeah right....

 

Armed with my new found confidence due to Cag I saddled up alongside my mate and requested a meeting with the council...

 

Meeting was arranged with the head honcho and during the conversation I requested that he pull the actual file up on my friends property (rather than just quoting from it) and check if it was a succession in the 80's or as I thought and it was actually an assignment......and lo and behold and beneath his furrowed brow he accepted that it was actually an assigment and not a succession...... which roughly translated means that my friend can now succeed the tenancy.....result so far.......the council accept he has full succession rights.....

 

But there is a catch, there is always a catch....succession is one thing, it means my friend has a home with the local authority, however what it doesn't mean is that he has the home he has lived in all his life as his home, the council can and does have the discretion to offer him another small home..something more fitting with his single person status....which ordinarily wouldn't be a problem...but he wants to stay in his own home and the likelihood of him being offered a small flat in a block of flats mainly propgated by younger generation...well it frightens the life out of him...he simply isn't equipped to live in such surrounds....and given he's lived with his mum all his life and she will soon be gone...well you can uinderstand how he must be feeling.....

 

In any case, the head honcho in a further and off the record conversation

told me that it may be better while his mother is alive to get the tenancy assigned to him..and then in the event of he death he will natually keep the property on...no further intervention from the council...he qualifies for the assignment having live in the house 12months prior to the assignment and is related to the current tenant etc etc....

 

This sounds too easy...., does anyone have any knowledge of this situation...and if by accepting an assignment from his mother to him whilse she is still alive gives him automatic right to his property he lives in as opposed to a succession by way of his mothers death and still giving him a home but not neccersarily the one he's living in (and which is what he wants?)

 

I'm not sure if the head honcho was trying to give help (off the record) or was actually in a round about way jeapoardising my friends tenancy even more....

 

Housing Act 1985 is what he is covered by and his mothers tenancy is classed as secured....I've read the literature on it but it's not overly clear where the above situation is concerned. He has sought a solcitors help but as usual they're slow in coming forward.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You probably know this, but it is all I could find:

 

Succeeding to a council tenancy

 

If you live in a council property, the rules are broadly the same for all types of tenancy but there are some differences.

 

If you have a joint tenancy, the surviving tenant will automatically take over the whole tenancy. If you are not a joint tenant, you may be able to take over the tenancy by succession if you are:

  • the tenant's spouse or registered civil partner, as long as you were living together at the time of their death (or, if the tenancy is a demoted tenancy, for at least a year beforehand), or
  • another family member (this includes cohabiting partners, children, parents, siblings and most other close relatives) as long as there is no surviving spouse or civil partner and you were living with the deceased for at least a year before their death.

If you succeed to a council tenancy, you would have the same type of tenancy as the person who died had. So if they had an introductory tenancy or a demoted tenancy, it will remain introductory or demoted until the full trial/demotion period has passed. Remember to stick to the conditions of the tenancy agreement to avoid the risk of eviction.

If you succeed to any type of council tenancy, you also need to be aware that there is a chance that the council may try to evict you on the grounds that the home is now larger than you need. The council cannot do this if you are the spouse or registered civil partner of the person who died, but they can do so if you are related in any other way, including if you were cohabiting. If it does happen, the council must provide a suitable alternative home for you. Get in touch with an adviser immediately to find out whether you can challenge the eviction.

If you are living in temporary accommodation that was provided after you made a homelessness application, you do not have a council tenancy and therefore do not have succession rights. However, it may be possible to ask the council to grant a new agreement in your own name. Contact the council or a local advice centre urgently to discuss your situation.

 

It might be worth you having a look at this site and contacting them if you require more information or help.

 

Shelter England - The housing and homelessness charity

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • 1 year later...

Hi mika99

 

Its best to start your own thread to get the best advice to help you

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...