Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Horizon 2 PCNs at my flat -


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2089 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've just read all the issues that lady had with them...

and i just feel they are harassing me...

 

they control the parking of my own building and I've received two parking charges for being parked...

but not happy with it.

 

what can i do with this people????

i am absolutely fed up with this...

please help!!!!!

Edited by dx100uk
Fine replaced with charge
Link to post
Share on other sites

it is NOT A FINE

read the paperwork carefully

nowhere do they use that word. [fine replaced with charge - dx]

please complete this:

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK lets start with the events where you live.

 

Do you have your own parking space or is it a free for all and you park where you can.

 

Secondly, how were you informed of these demands, was it tickets slapped on your car or was it just letters through the post?

 

When was parking control introduced and who announced it?

To answer that also please tell us who owns the development where you live, Housing association, building developer or whatever.

 

If either of those are applicable do you have managing agent in charge of looking after the common areas and if so who are they. lastly do you rent/own or lease your property. Lastly tell us the DATES on the tickets/letters and the date of the event they refer to.

Both of these are critical.

 

As for the home tickets please tell us the date of the event and how you were notified, was it a ticket slapped on your car and if so what does it say you have done wring so we can match that to their signage for a condition you may have breached (or not)

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

i have my own bay at the parking in my building, and i found a ticket slapped on the windscreen.

i don't know since when these boys are working in here cause I'm a very new resident, i moved 4 months ago(i rent the flat).

 

the date in the ticket is 26th June 2018 and the date on the letter (NTK) is 30th july2018

 

and btw... thank you very much for helping me

Edited by dx100uk
Merge
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK DATES for all of the screen tickets please and when teh NTK's arrive let us know exactly when.

 

If you can post up the NTK as well as the pictures of the signs and supply some of the information asked for about the ownership and management of the development.

 

Different ownerships have different ways of tackling them.

Doesnt matter if you rent from a private landlord, you get the same rights as the flat owner

Link to post
Share on other sites

the date of the pcn at home is 26th june 2018.

i haven't appealed

 

I have received today 2nd August 2018 the NTK for the pcn at home.

The NTK does not mention PoFA 2012 and i haven't appealed to it.

Not photographic evidence.

 

The parking company for the pcn at home is Horizon parking,

 

the pcn at home was in Chelmsford Essex, at my own bay in my parking from the building,

 

this is the answer to post #2 i think... sorry I'm not very good in this kind of things

Edited by dx100uk
Format
Link to post
Share on other sites

we get that but we need to know who owns the land you parked on, is it part of the deeds for the property, allocated in a block parking or what.

Who get these muppets involved so is there a managing agents for the development.

 

We need to know all of this as we want to see if Horizon actually have any chance of even having a contract that allows them to be there in the first place let alone interfering with your vehicle in your parking slot.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

well let me ask in the agency cause there's no one to ask in here at the building... apparently there's a manager of the building but i don't even know him..

 

. i need to wait until monday that I'll be off to go to ask cause the agency is closed all the weekend and i work...

 

i assume the land of the parking is property of the same landlord of the building cause the parking is in the base of it...

thanks

 

im advance about this and all the help are you giving

Link to post
Share on other sites

who owns the flat you live in,

is it you and if so then it will be in your deeds.

 

If you rent from a buy to let landlord then you get the same rights as they do.

What is the name of the development (ie King Court, Romford or whatever).

 

We can then do a bit of homework to see what can be seen from the public highway and possibly have a look at the planning portal of the local council if the buildings are only a few years old to determine who the developer was.

 

Permission to build a lot of stuff and then sell the finished estate on to a land holder for example.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm renting the flat..

. the name of the developer i have no idea is another thing i have to ask on monday at the agency...

 

in the first floor there is a job centre that i assume is an organisation that belongs to the government...

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm renting the flat... the name of the developer i have no idea is another thing i have to ask on monday at the agency... but in the first floor there is a job center that i assume is an organism that belongs to the government... btw how can i upload the pictures... the ticket that most annoy me is the one from job in fact cause i think i could manage the one at home in the agency... but the one at work i was just thinking to put a formal complaint to the hospital because of those two tickets I've received even with the permit parking at sight... what do you think???

 

Hi.

 

Do you have a lease document for this flat that you're renting please? If so we need to see what it says about your parking space.

 

You may need another thread for the work problem so we can keep the two separate. [done -dx]

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread tidied

Ill split the Gemini Broomfield posts out to a sep thread later on

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

post edited

use this thread for the home PCN's

you have an email regarding the new thread I've done for the works pcn.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you post up pictures of the signage there and also a picture of the entrance to the development from the public highway whetehr there are signs there or not.

Tell us the name of the development and we can google noseyneighbour it as well so for example, The Old brewery, Tadcaster or whatever. Postcode will also be helpful

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good news about the ticket(s) at home then, although you'll need to stay on the case to make sure that they do actually get cancelled.

Edited by dx100uk
relevent info copied to other thread - dx

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...